Not a good look to go against the point of what I'm tryna say.
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
Fables had an awful final episode Shit I'd say only 1 and 3 were truly good.
Quote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 01:47:53 PMNevermind that Nixon and Carter's healthcare proposals had similarities to the ACA, or that it bears similarities to the GOP plan offered as an alternative to Hillarycare in the 90s. The difference being the Medicaid expansion.Clinton played arm's length on it and was smart for it. He knew it never had a chance in hell of passing. And Nixon's wasn't remotely like Obama's version. Although Nixon did far more to support minorities than Mr. Obamaphone which itself is pretty awesome in my book.
Nevermind that Nixon and Carter's healthcare proposals had similarities to the ACA, or that it bears similarities to the GOP plan offered as an alternative to Hillarycare in the 90s. The difference being the Medicaid expansion.
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 01:50:58 PMQuote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 01:47:53 PMNevermind that Nixon and Carter's healthcare proposals had similarities to the ACA, or that it bears similarities to the GOP plan offered as an alternative to Hillarycare in the 90s. The difference being the Medicaid expansion.Clinton played arm's length on it and was smart for it. He knew it never had a chance in hell of passing. And Nixon's wasn't remotely like Obama's version. Although Nixon did far more to support minorities than Mr. Obamaphone which itself is pretty awesome in my book.You know the "Obamaphone" program was started under George Bush right? Just checking.Breh Nixon's plan included a healthcare bill of rights, subsidies for poorer people who couldn't afford coverage, an expansion of a Medicaid-esque program, and fines for employers who didn't provide healthcare to their employees. Sound familiar?http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2009/september/03/nixon-proposal.aspx
Quote from: nudemacusers on September 16, 2014, 01:42:35 PMQuote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 01:18:18 PMQuote from: nudemacusers on September 16, 2014, 01:17:30 PMgears didn't have a semiotic core of animalic motifs spread throughout the experience, nor did it engage the player-audience in ludonarrative dissonance spoiler (click to show/hide)ebert was right[close]But but the super chicken bro.....the golden chicken in gears of war represents the conflict of man and nature as we head into age of technological singularity. When first encountered by the player avatar, the chicken, in its classical white-feathered representation, is attacked by the player's powerful weapons, yet only bleeds and expressed viscera, but does not die. The stylistically frail appearance of the chicken-entity, juxtaposed against its functional invulnerability, presents a ludonarrative intersection: The player must confront, process and ultimately reject his preconceived assumptions of not only their relationship with the material world, but that of the gameworld as well. The transformation of the chicken symbolizes man's desire to shape the natural world through his actions and interference. It is no coincidence that the chicken is transmuted into a large gold object; throughout history mankind has desired not only gold, but the omnipotence to turn the naturally mundane (chicken) into the profane (precious metal). The player is again confronted not with victory, but an even more difficult opponent, capable of enacting revenge on the player (standing in for humanity at this moment).it is at this chapter in the game 'gears of war' reveals itself to be an environmentally conscious reminder of our tenuous relationship with the natural world, and the act of trapping this message inside what appears on a superficial analysis to be nothing more than a violent distraction is a work of art.I so wish you weren't banned so that you could get banned for making this post a thread. That other thread was good. This is even better.
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 01:18:18 PMQuote from: nudemacusers on September 16, 2014, 01:17:30 PMgears didn't have a semiotic core of animalic motifs spread throughout the experience, nor did it engage the player-audience in ludonarrative dissonance spoiler (click to show/hide)ebert was right[close]But but the super chicken bro.....the golden chicken in gears of war represents the conflict of man and nature as we head into age of technological singularity. When first encountered by the player avatar, the chicken, in its classical white-feathered representation, is attacked by the player's powerful weapons, yet only bleeds and expressed viscera, but does not die. The stylistically frail appearance of the chicken-entity, juxtaposed against its functional invulnerability, presents a ludonarrative intersection: The player must confront, process and ultimately reject his preconceived assumptions of not only their relationship with the material world, but that of the gameworld as well. The transformation of the chicken symbolizes man's desire to shape the natural world through his actions and interference. It is no coincidence that the chicken is transmuted into a large gold object; throughout history mankind has desired not only gold, but the omnipotence to turn the naturally mundane (chicken) into the profane (precious metal). The player is again confronted not with victory, but an even more difficult opponent, capable of enacting revenge on the player (standing in for humanity at this moment).it is at this chapter in the game 'gears of war' reveals itself to be an environmentally conscious reminder of our tenuous relationship with the natural world, and the act of trapping this message inside what appears on a superficial analysis to be nothing more than a violent distraction is a work of art.
Quote from: nudemacusers on September 16, 2014, 01:17:30 PMgears didn't have a semiotic core of animalic motifs spread throughout the experience, nor did it engage the player-audience in ludonarrative dissonance spoiler (click to show/hide)ebert was right[close]But but the super chicken bro.....
gears didn't have a semiotic core of animalic motifs spread throughout the experience, nor did it engage the player-audience in ludonarrative dissonance spoiler (click to show/hide)ebert was right[close]
Quote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 01:58:35 PMQuote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 01:50:58 PMQuote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 01:47:53 PMNevermind that Nixon and Carter's healthcare proposals had similarities to the ACA, or that it bears similarities to the GOP plan offered as an alternative to Hillarycare in the 90s. The difference being the Medicaid expansion.Clinton played arm's length on it and was smart for it. He knew it never had a chance in hell of passing. And Nixon's wasn't remotely like Obama's version. Although Nixon did far more to support minorities than Mr. Obamaphone which itself is pretty awesome in my book.You know the "Obamaphone" program was started under George Bush right? Just checking.Breh Nixon's plan included a healthcare bill of rights, subsidies for poorer people who couldn't afford coverage, an expansion of a Medicaid-esque program, and fines for employers who didn't provide healthcare to their employees. Sound familiar?http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2009/september/03/nixon-proposal.aspxI'm struggling to find where individuals are "fined for not complying" is attached to this document.
Quote from: Totally Not Ronito on September 16, 2014, 01:53:41 PMHonestly the person that came closest to doing Obama are before Obama bob dole. Just sayinNot even remotely similiar in plan or execution. C'mon man you're smarter than this.
Honestly the person that came closest to doing Obama are before Obama bob dole. Just sayin
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 02:00:56 PMQuote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 01:58:35 PMQuote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 01:50:58 PMQuote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 01:47:53 PMNevermind that Nixon and Carter's healthcare proposals had similarities to the ACA, or that it bears similarities to the GOP plan offered as an alternative to Hillarycare in the 90s. The difference being the Medicaid expansion.Clinton played arm's length on it and was smart for it. He knew it never had a chance in hell of passing. And Nixon's wasn't remotely like Obama's version. Although Nixon did far more to support minorities than Mr. Obamaphone which itself is pretty awesome in my book.You know the "Obamaphone" program was started under George Bush right? Just checking.Breh Nixon's plan included a healthcare bill of rights, subsidies for poorer people who couldn't afford coverage, an expansion of a Medicaid-esque program, and fines for employers who didn't provide healthcare to their employees. Sound familiar?http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2009/september/03/nixon-proposal.aspxI'm struggling to find where individuals are "fined for not complying" is attached to this document.but you said Nixon's plan wasn't anything "remotely" like Obama's and I just pointed out multiple areas where it's the same. You can't just point to one area where they differ and declare victory. The individual mandate was a conservative idea from the Heritage Foundation in 1989, and is prominent in Romney's MA healthcare plan.
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 01:54:25 PMQuote from: Totally Not Ronito on September 16, 2014, 01:53:41 PMHonestly the person that came closest to doing Obama are before Obama bob dole. Just sayinNot even remotely similiar in plan or execution. C'mon man you're smarter than this.tYou gonna say Clinton's was closer?
wait what part of this thread's cycle does this current convo fall under. i think we might be out of sync.
Quote from: Broseidon on September 16, 2014, 01:28:41 PMUnironically be a walking caricature of bien-pensant American conservatives, brehs.tell me how obamacare is a centrist policy ...
Unironically be a walking caricature of bien-pensant American conservatives, brehs.
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 01:30:59 PMQuote from: Broseidon on September 16, 2014, 01:28:41 PMUnironically be a walking caricature of bien-pensant American conservatives, brehs.tell me how obamacare is a centrist policy ...A majority of the house and senate passed it and was signed by the president. All of whom are center-right.
Not sure I've ever heard anyone claim Richard Nixon, champion of the Southern Strategy, was good for minorities.
When Am_I_Anonymous starts posting in here...
Quote from: king of the internet on September 16, 2014, 02:16:35 PMWhen Am_I_Anonymous starts posting in here... I only do it once every few weeks and then you can continue to post about how much you being banned on gaf sucks and why PS4 is awesome brah.
Conservatives don't get involved in people's lives if you don't count minorities, women, gays and the impoverished as people.
MEDIOCRE? did you NOT see the new robodinosaur assassin creed skryim game by guerrilla??!??!?!?!?
Quote from: StealthFan on September 16, 2014, 02:04:53 PMbreh...Fables had a terrible ending. I'm not the only one that thinks so. The SA thread was rabid when that shit released.I enjoyed it cause it was fun, you know? Cause it's a game?I don't really care what some guys who take stories in videogames too seriously think. It was voice acted well and the choices were great. Being the Big Bad Wolf fighting Bloody Mary was awesome, who cares if the end was dialog in a game full of dialog. What did you want?
breh...Fables had a terrible ending. I'm not the only one that thinks so. The SA thread was rabid when that shit released.
Quote from: nudemacusers on September 16, 2014, 02:26:30 PMMEDIOCRE? did you NOT see the new robodinosaur assassin creed skryim game by guerrilla??!??!?!?!?What's the multi like though man?
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 02:27:34 PMQuote from: nudemacusers on September 16, 2014, 02:26:30 PMMEDIOCRE? did you NOT see the new robodinosaur assassin creed skryim game by guerrilla??!??!?!?!?What's the multi like though man?killzone 2 post patch
Quote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 02:12:59 PMNot sure I've ever heard anyone claim Richard Nixon, champion of the Southern Strategy, was good for minorities.Then you spend way to much time pandering with the michigan marxist morons to be useful. http://nixonfoundation.org/2013/02/robert-brown-president-nixon-strong-on-civil-rights/
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 02:14:41 PMQuote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 02:12:59 PMNot sure I've ever heard anyone claim Richard Nixon, champion of the Southern Strategy, was good for minorities.Then you spend way to much time pandering with the michigan marxist morons to be useful. http://nixonfoundation.org/2013/02/robert-brown-president-nixon-strong-on-civil-rights/looks like I'll have to do some research after work to find some non-biased sources on this stuff.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=895622How the fuck does OP eat that much and not have his stomach explode?
Practice, I guess. He seems to overeat often enough to have grown some extra capacity.
You should go warn him.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showth8read.php?t=895622How the fuck does OP eat that much and not have his stomach explode?
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 02:45:18 PMhttp://www.neogaf.com/forum/showth8read.php?t=895622How the fuck does OP eat that much and not have his stomach explode?I can eat that much like once a fortnight or so. But daily? Hell no
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 02:45:18 PMhttp://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=895622How the fuck does OP eat that much and not have his stomach explode?op is probably a round person
Quote from: Totally Not Ronito on September 16, 2014, 03:13:00 PMQuote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 02:45:18 PMhttp://www.neogaf.com/forum/showth8read.php?t=895622How the fuck does OP eat that much and not have his stomach explode?I can eat that much like once a fortnight or so. But daily? Hell noI got to think that two frozen pizzas have to be about 1,250% of your daily suggested sodium and calorie intake.
Quote from: nudemacusers on September 16, 2014, 02:26:30 PMMEDIOCRE? did you NOT see the new robodinosaur assassin creed skryim game by guerrilla??!??!?!?!?I thought this was a hyperbolic joke post then I saw the thread. I hope everyone is nowhere near their bandwidth cap, because I foresee 1080p-GIFs. Sony's motherless hyenas has no class and will blow it up.
Quote from: Totally Not Ronito on September 16, 2014, 01:44:58 PMQuote from: nudemacusers on September 16, 2014, 01:42:35 PMQuote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 01:18:18 PMQuote from: nudemacusers on September 16, 2014, 01:17:30 PMgears didn't have a semiotic core of animalic motifs spread throughout the experience, nor did it engage the player-audience in ludonarrative dissonance spoiler (click to show/hide)ebert was right[close]But but the super chicken bro.....the golden chicken in gears of war represents the conflict of man and nature as we head into age of technological singularity. When first encountered by the player avatar, the chicken, in its classical white-feathered representation, is attacked by the player's powerful weapons, yet only bleeds and expressed viscera, but does not die. The stylistically frail appearance of the chicken-entity, juxtaposed against its functional invulnerability, presents a ludonarrative intersection: The player must confront, process and ultimately reject his preconceived assumptions of not only their relationship with the material world, but that of the gameworld as well. The transformation of the chicken symbolizes man's desire to shape the natural world through his actions and interference. It is no coincidence that the chicken is transmuted into a large gold object; throughout history mankind has desired not only gold, but the omnipotence to turn the naturally mundane (chicken) into the profane (precious metal). The player is again confronted not with victory, but an even more difficult opponent, capable of enacting revenge on the player (standing in for humanity at this moment).it is at this chapter in the game 'gears of war' reveals itself to be an environmentally conscious reminder of our tenuous relationship with the natural world, and the act of trapping this message inside what appears on a superficial analysis to be nothing more than a violent distraction is a work of art.I so wish you weren't banned so that you could get banned for making this post a thread. That other thread was good. This is even better.my forum work is public domain, feel free to copy and modify to your satisfaction.
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 03:14:08 PMQuote from: Totally Not Ronito on September 16, 2014, 03:13:00 PMQuote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 02:45:18 PMhttp://www.neogaf.com/forum/showth8read.php?t=895622How the fuck does OP eat that much and not have his stomach explode?I can eat that much like once a fortnight or so. But daily? Hell noI got to think that two frozen pizzas have to be about 1,250% of your daily suggested sodium and calorie intake.red baron fire baked pepperoni(Image removed from quote.)
feminists http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2014/09/16/3568229/chris-browns-new-album-is-as-awful-as-he-is/
Quote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 03:15:44 PMfeminists http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2014/09/16/3568229/chris-browns-new-album-is-as-awful-as-he-is/Wait, I hate Chris Brown so now I'm a feminist? The struggle is real my sisters
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 03:22:07 PMQuote from: Totally Not Ronito on September 16, 2014, 03:20:02 PMQuote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 03:15:44 PMfeminists http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2014/09/16/3568229/chris-browns-new-album-is-as-awful-as-he-is/Wait, I hate Chris Brown so now I'm a feminist? The struggle is real my sistersAgreed, the younger generation promotes some real shitheads. Bieber, this fucktard, Rhianna.....ugh....awe fuck we did the same for R-Kelly......Shitheads are excused cause of their famous work all the time, every generation is guilty of that.
Quote from: Totally Not Ronito on September 16, 2014, 03:20:02 PMQuote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 03:15:44 PMfeminists http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2014/09/16/3568229/chris-browns-new-album-is-as-awful-as-he-is/Wait, I hate Chris Brown so now I'm a feminist? The struggle is real my sistersAgreed, the younger generation promotes some real shitheads. Bieber, this fucktard, Rhianna.....ugh....awe fuck we did the same for R-Kelly......
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 03:28:16 PMQuote from: Death Ghidorah on September 16, 2014, 03:26:43 PMQuote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 03:22:07 PMQuote from: Totally Not Ronito on September 16, 2014, 03:20:02 PMQuote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 03:15:44 PMfeminists http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2014/09/16/3568229/chris-browns-new-album-is-as-awful-as-he-is/Wait, I hate Chris Brown so now I'm a feminist? The struggle is real my sistersAgreed, the younger generation promotes some real shitheads. Bieber, this fucktard, Rhianna.....ugh....awe fuck we did the same for R-Kelly......Shitheads are excused cause of their famous work all the time, every generation is guilty of that. Bieber and famous work do not ever belong in the same book, much less same sentence. At least Rhianna and Brown have some talent. Kid has none.Bieber is awful, yeah. But to act like that baby song isn't instantly recognizable is just being a hater. I think Rihanna and Chris Brown are equally as bad and their songs seem to be as recognizable.Pop acts mostly suck and are for the lowest common denominator, and tends to be the biggest seller. I don't know what we are even debating here. I don't hate any of them as in I don't care to listen to them. Yeah Bieber and Brown are shitbags but in the end who cares? fans will excuse their fuckery while dude's like me continue to ignore them. I also subscribe to the idea of who cares what a person is like irl if you enjoy his work. I watch and love Roman Polanski and Woody Allen movies cause they're great, don't have to be able to get along of them.
Quote from: Death Ghidorah on September 16, 2014, 03:26:43 PMQuote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 03:22:07 PMQuote from: Totally Not Ronito on September 16, 2014, 03:20:02 PMQuote from: Phoenix Dark on September 16, 2014, 03:15:44 PMfeminists http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2014/09/16/3568229/chris-browns-new-album-is-as-awful-as-he-is/Wait, I hate Chris Brown so now I'm a feminist? The struggle is real my sistersAgreed, the younger generation promotes some real shitheads. Bieber, this fucktard, Rhianna.....ugh....awe fuck we did the same for R-Kelly......Shitheads are excused cause of their famous work all the time, every generation is guilty of that. Bieber and famous work do not ever belong in the same book, much less same sentence. At least Rhianna and Brown have some talent. Kid has none.
Wonder which gaffer this is? http://jezebel.com/okcupid-dude-will-not-be-ignored-you-self-involved-pri-1635275077/+Tom_LeyMy bet? Deafmutes
Quote from: Am_I_Anonymous on September 16, 2014, 03:11:32 PMWonder which gaffer this is? http://jezebel.com/okcupid-dude-will-not-be-ignored-you-self-involved-pri-1635275077/+Tom_LeyMy bet? DeafmutesJezebel demonstrates new trend with one random example they found. Oh well, daily rabble-rousing blog posts don't write themselves.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=130307312&postcount=41