Somebody asks what school he's taking his theories from: Keynesian, Chicago, etc. and he says he doesn't see why what University he attends matters but he'll PM if someone really wants to know.
Edit: that one guy pulls the economics major card, and all he's got is a substitute/complement discussion you get in Chapter 3 of Micro-Econ 1? I'm disappointed.
His entire argument seems to rest on the premise that there's no such thing as subjective value and that the $60 MSRP is where the supply/demand meets for everyone everywhere at all times. The idea that a pirate would simply not purchase anything or purchase less than $60 is not allowed, they're still spending the full $60 on gaming in his model no matter what because they likely will spend at least $60 on gaming at some point in their life.
And he just sorta casually dismisses Valve and their partner's experience on messing around with price points in different market conditions.