I'll respond once here because I happened to see your post after I logged out but I have you on block Cindi so most of the time I don't see your posts so I couldn't quote it back to directly respond to. I won't apologize for it. I have issues with you and don't really want to see most of what you post. Not to be rude but for me you did something after the election, that I'll never unblock you for. Not that it matters or that you should care but I'll respond to this for one second since I saw it and made a few posts in this particular thread which I normally don't and it would be a bit rude to ignore in this case.
Disenfranchisement are actual procedural impediments to having people vote. They can be old school like poll taxes. Adding new laws to make it harder to vote. Reducing voting times and hours or locations, etc.
If a group of people aren't excited to vote for somebody that is an issue of engagement or excitement, or not addressing issues relevant to them. That is not disenfranchisement in the way the word is generally used. Kanye West isn't disenfranchising anybody for example. Nobody just cares about what that dumbass has to say. Those are two separate things. The fact that Hillary didn't draw more blacks to the polls isn't because she disenfranchised them. That is a different issue although its fine to discuss that specific issue. And i would argue Joe Biden would have drawn no more himself in 2016 if he had run as I feel people are more motivated to vote now for reasons outside of the candidate this go around but that's just a personal opinion with no factual backing.
With that said, I'm out.