Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 6993747 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15000 on: March 05, 2018, 07:14:08 PM »
Makes you wonder if this is theatrics because this is absolutely coco puffs. Openly disregarding a subpoena, attacking the special prosecution, and Trump. Also making it a partisan issue. Also Sarah's FAT MOUTH
:9

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15001 on: March 05, 2018, 07:15:23 PM »
ALL 👏 THE 👏 BEST 👏 PEOPLE 👏
©@©™

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15002 on: March 05, 2018, 07:17:16 PM »
liberal media eating it up. drunk guy that trump fired making a fool of himself, treat it like important breaking news. GG idiots.


as for why did trump hire people like this? well it worked out, he did win the presidency  :doge
« Last Edit: March 05, 2018, 07:52:33 PM by filler »
*****

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15003 on: March 05, 2018, 07:17:39 PM »
It's the airing of grievances segment

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15004 on: March 05, 2018, 07:22:29 PM »
We are officially living in The Apprentice
:9

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15005 on: March 05, 2018, 07:22:54 PM »
liberal media eating it up. drunk guy that trump fired making a fool of himself, treat it like important breaking news. GG idiots.


as for why did trump hiring people like this? well it worked out, he did win the presidency  :doge
I hate it when filler's right :goty
que

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15006 on: March 05, 2018, 07:27:39 PM »
Erin Burnett is still bae

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15007 on: March 05, 2018, 07:36:18 PM »
Sam Nunberg: These other channels saying it wasn't Russia, it was Russia, clearly, and they colluded with Julian Assange to release the emails.


Clearly Sam hasn't been shown the Kimdotcom tweets and the speediest.com data that proves it was an inside job.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15008 on: March 05, 2018, 07:43:08 PM »
She was a lot hotter pre-baby but she's been turning things around

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15009 on: March 05, 2018, 07:54:09 PM »
Erin: I smell alcohol on your breath, you been drinking   :comeon


Sam:    :shaq2 .... No? Just my meds for depression.


Erin:  :foodcourt

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15010 on: March 05, 2018, 08:00:28 PM »
Yep, she has no chill and is a savage, as the kids say

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15011 on: March 05, 2018, 08:00:43 PM »
holy shit did she really say that

Yeah, that was how they ended the interview.

He fumbled around uncomfortably trying to deny it. Ended the interview with that sort of olive branch liars that are caught try to use where they deny the action but concede to some unrelated lesser crime to deflect attention away. Started talking about his depression medicine.

Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15012 on: March 05, 2018, 08:01:55 PM »
Alcohol is the best depression medicine.

 :lol
野球

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15013 on: March 05, 2018, 08:07:28 PM »
I will say this, since I don't watch much cable news, but they really have down to a science the ability to fill a ton of air time with very little content.



TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15014 on: March 05, 2018, 08:17:52 PM »
the conspiracy theorist in me thinks this is all orchestrated by team trump
püp

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15015 on: March 05, 2018, 08:20:20 PM »
Also Roger Stone being a cheeky asshole
:9

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15016 on: March 05, 2018, 08:28:34 PM »
the conspiracy theorist in me thinks this is all orchestrated by team trump

Trump gets people to torture their dignity for his own ego and narcissism. No way Trump or any of his people sign off on a guy going around the docket calling him a fucking moron and taking credit for low-energy Jeb and the Muslim ban. Throwing bones out there about how Trump is likely exposed in at least one way he is positive about but won't say right now. But that Fox News will feel like idiots and CNN feel smug. Or that he heard from Trump's bodyguard that Agalarov did offer to send woman up to Trump's hotel room on that fateful night.

Trump's too insecure to roll with that sort of subversive tactics. Roger Stone that would go double for given what all happened. And what would be the point???

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15017 on: March 05, 2018, 09:22:51 PM »
« Last Edit: March 05, 2018, 10:39:14 PM by zomgee »
rub

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Benji Memo
« Reply #15018 on: March 05, 2018, 09:53:51 PM »
I mean that's common for a lot of positions. 1988 was the last time Germany had someone who headed the Ministry of Defense with any kind of meaningful military experience. And it shows  :doge

These positions alway go to some cronies to thank them for their loyalty.
Given how damn near everyone's fucked it up, I think it's actually used to retire people prematurely.

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15019 on: March 05, 2018, 10:20:49 PM »
Drunkenly running around every TV network to own the libs. :doge
Hi

seagrams hotsauce

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15020 on: March 05, 2018, 11:07:26 PM »
the conspiracy theorist in me thinks this is all orchestrated by team trump

Trump gets people to torture their dignity for his own ego and narcissism. No way Trump or any of his people sign off on a guy going around the docket calling him a fucking moron and taking credit for low-energy Jeb and the Muslim ban. Throwing bones out there about how Trump is likely exposed in at least one way he is positive about but won't say right now. But that Fox News will feel like idiots and CNN feel smug. Or that he heard from Trump's bodyguard that Agalarov did offer to send woman up to Trump's hotel room on that fateful night.

Trump's too insecure to roll with that sort of subversive tactics. Roger Stone that would go double for given what all happened. And what would be the point???

I don't think Stone is above throwing this guy out there as a meat shield. Maybe this guy is going off reservation, but regardless of the orchestration, it serves Trump and company well to start the week with this guy dominating coverage on all of cable news and pushing coverage of Hope Hicks or WV/OK teacher strikes or gun control or whatever away from the fore

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15021 on: March 06, 2018, 02:47:50 AM »


I don't think Stone is above throwing this guy out there as a meat shield. Maybe this guy is going off reservation, but regardless of the orchestration, it serves Trump and company well to start the week with this guy dominating coverage on all of cable news and pushing coverage of Hope Hicks or WV/OK teacher strikes or gun control or whatever away from the fore

I'm pretty sure thats what the Trump trade wars were for lol, if they had a larger strategic purpose that is. Trump goes off the reservation so much it is hard to tell.

But IMO, this whole saga serves neither Stone's or Trump's self interests in any conceivable fashion. At least with things like Spicer lying about crowd sizes you could see the twisted Trump logic in play. This shit though? I have some thoughts but none lead me to believe this was some sort of strategic set up. Though I guess it can't be ruled out.

Nunberg just made Stone appear guilty as fuck and gave Mueller a treasure trove of riches to squeeze the ever living shit out of him. Trump got called a fucking back stabbing moron that probably is guilty of some illegal shit for 12 hours. And lets just say Trump hasn't exactly shown much of a spine when it comes to deprecating comments at his expense(Alright old Rexxy boy, lets compare IQ tests).
« Last Edit: March 06, 2018, 02:56:13 AM by Nola »

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15022 on: March 06, 2018, 03:06:27 AM »
ok but
(Image removed from quote.)

can you belieeeeeeeeeeeve olbermann was hittin that

of course who could resist a guy with this much sexual charisma

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15023 on: March 06, 2018, 03:12:27 AM »
That's one baggy suit.
Hi

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15024 on: March 06, 2018, 03:23:37 AM »
That looks like a suit from the first couple of years of the NBA dress code in the aughts.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15025 on: March 06, 2018, 09:04:34 AM »
It looks like a Michael Jordan suit

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15026 on: March 06, 2018, 09:40:09 AM »
In my recommended stories this morning...



Now Mueller's even going after the Gorilla Channel.  :-\
©@©™

Kurt Russell

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15027 on: March 06, 2018, 09:53:55 AM »
woke

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15028 on: March 06, 2018, 10:09:18 AM »
the conspiracy theorist in me thinks this is all orchestrated by team trump
Because if we've learned anything it's that Team Trump are geniuses
:dead

This guy isn't even a Trump lackie, he's a Roger Stone lackie. And he is clearly shook.
010

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15029 on: March 06, 2018, 10:20:11 AM »
I think Trump is pretty good at manipulating the news cycle tactically, like on a daily basis, but he does it at the expense of his credibility and the credibility of everyone around him.

Like they’re good at distracting from the current story but the distraction story often turns into the next controversy.

seagrams hotsauce

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15030 on: March 06, 2018, 10:20:23 AM »


I don't think Stone is above throwing this guy out there as a meat shield. Maybe this guy is going off reservation, but regardless of the orchestration, it serves Trump and company well to start the week with this guy dominating coverage on all of cable news and pushing coverage of Hope Hicks or WV/OK teacher strikes or gun control or whatever away from the fore

I'm pretty sure thats what the Trump trade wars were for lol, if they had a larger strategic purpose that is. Trump goes off the reservation so much it is hard to tell.

But IMO, this whole saga serves neither Stone's or Trump's self interests in any conceivable fashion. At least with things like Spicer lying about crowd sizes you could see the twisted Trump logic in play. This shit though? I have some thoughts but none lead me to believe this was some sort of strategic set up. Though I guess it can't be ruled out.

Nunberg just made Stone appear guilty as fuck and gave Mueller a treasure trove of riches to squeeze the ever living shit out of him. Trump got called a fucking back stabbing moron that probably is guilty of some illegal shit for 12 hours. And lets just say Trump hasn't exactly shown much of a spine when it comes to deprecating comments at his expense(Alright old Rexxy boy, lets compare IQ tests).

Eh, yeah, you're right. I can't think of any obvious ulterior motive and trying to figure out any deeper strategy from whatever batshit thing is happening in the proximity of this administration is probably as effective as literally reading tea leaves.

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15031 on: March 06, 2018, 11:30:53 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Roads, bridges, the military, and sports stadiums would beg to differ. Did former Olympian Bruce Jenner compete and travel on him own dime?  :thinking
©ZH

warcock

  • Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15032 on: March 06, 2018, 11:52:55 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Roads, bridges, the military, and sports stadiums would beg to differ. Did former Olympian Bruce Jenner compete and travel on him own dime?  :thinking

You don't have to be so conservative.That monstrosity from apple you call a phone begs to differ.

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15033 on: March 06, 2018, 12:39:02 PM »
My phone that was made in communist China?
©ZH

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15034 on: March 06, 2018, 02:21:33 PM »
Financial deregulation bill passing with more than a dozen Democrats in the Senate voting for it.

This isn't even an issue where you can say the red state Dems were pressured by their electorates, cause there's no actual voting constituency for this issue, just a donor/lobbying one.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15035 on: March 06, 2018, 02:23:01 PM »
To be fair, even Frank (of Dodd-Frank) thinks $50 bil is too low. (Though he also said he wouldn't vote for the current bill, despite the oversight being given to the $100-250 bil range.)

warcock

  • Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15036 on: March 06, 2018, 02:26:24 PM »
I wanted to make a big banks, big fun one-liner, but that wouldn't be accurate since QE has done nothing but make them larger since 2008. :(

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15037 on: March 06, 2018, 02:35:44 PM »
That "oversight" sounds like an open invitation for regulatory capture.

On top of that, those Dems didn't get any concessions in exchange for supporting a bill the GOP really wanted. Just bad politics.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15039 on: March 06, 2018, 02:53:51 PM »
:kobeyuck
©@©™

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15040 on: March 06, 2018, 03:23:16 PM »
Joe's a well known anti-Hillary Russian bot-net, much like thehunter116 and Bernie Sanders.

Optimus

  • Lieutenant colonel, 26th Hate Machine battalion
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15041 on: March 06, 2018, 03:42:02 PM »
she's right you know


No, she really isn't. If Hillary was president the middle class would still be on its death bed, the infrastructure would still be crumbling and on top of that we might have had a nasty proxy war with Russia to deal with that could potentially have grave consequences and as an icing of the cake the TPP to finish off what was left of the middle class. Instead we have an orange clown that makes us look like idiots to the rest of the world, hysterical liberals that admittedly are fucking annoying, daily "controversies" no one really gives a shit about and yeah the moron might start a trade war.

I really don't know what might be the worse, nuclear war or listening to liberals whine every day. But seriously, fuck Hillary Clinton, the warmongering neoliberal psychopath liberal distinguished mentally-challenged fellows still insist "wasn't that bad".


warcock

  • Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15043 on: March 06, 2018, 04:10:17 PM »
she's right you know


No, she really isn't. If Hillary was president the middle class would still be on its death bed, the infrastructure would still be crumbling and on top of that we might have had a nasty proxy war with Russia to deal with that could potentially have grave consequences and as an icing of the cake the TPP to finish off what was left of the middle class. Instead we have an orange clown that makes us look like idiots to the rest of the world, hysterical liberals that admittedly are fucking annoying, daily "controversies" no one really gives a shit about and yeah the moron might start a trade war.

I really don't know what might be the worse, nuclear war or listening to liberals whine every day. But seriously, fuck Hillary Clinton, the warmongering neoliberal psychopath liberal distinguished mentally-challenged fellows still insist "wasn't that bad".

Yo back off, Remington's ass is mine.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15044 on: March 06, 2018, 04:22:25 PM »
We'd be better off with TPP instead of letting China seize the silk road
:yeshrug

A President Hillary would have no legislative victories, be around 45% approval now, and her only "victory" would be a Supreme Court justice. We'd be more heavily involved in Syria and would likely be leading a large sanctions push against Russia. The economy would be the same in terms of low unemployment and a struggling "working" class. On the flip side, republicans would be poised to increase their congressional seat leads.

Long term...I think it's probably a good thing she lost. She'd be underwater right now, beset with multiple scandals (real and imaginary), and all those liberal promises she made during the campaign would be unfulfilled resulting in a lot of "I told you so" shit from Bernie stans. Plus we might be having a recession in a year or too anyway...ehhh. One term president.

Last thing I'd want is complete republican control of WH+congress in 2020, just in time for the Census/gerrymandering.
010

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15045 on: March 06, 2018, 04:24:32 PM »
a Supreme Court justice

Goddamit I forgot about that.

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15046 on: March 06, 2018, 04:28:04 PM »
We'd be better off with TPP instead of letting China seize the silk road
:yeshrug

A President Hillary would have no legislative victories, be around 45% approval now, and her only "victory" would be a Supreme Court justice. We'd be more heavily involved in Syria and would likely be leading a large sanctions push against Russia. The economy would be the same in terms of low unemployment and a struggling "working" class. On the flip side, republicans would be poised to increase their congressional seat leads.

Long term...I think it's probably a good thing she lost. She'd be underwater right now, beset with multiple scandals (real and imaginary), and all those liberal promises she made during the campaign would be unfulfilled resulting in a lot of "I told you so" shit from Bernie stans. Plus we might be having a recession in a year or too anyway...ehhh. One term president.

Last thing I'd want is complete republican control of WH+congress in 2020, just in time for the Census/gerrymandering.

 :rejoice

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15047 on: March 06, 2018, 04:34:12 PM »
Then again, the more I think about it...would you rather have Hillary for one term, under the assumption she got 2 SC justices (Scalia replacement, as well as RBG replacement), or our Current Timeline where it looks like Trump is fucked, republicans are going to lose a lot of seats, etc etc?

Trump replacing RBG is a nightmare.
010

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15048 on: March 06, 2018, 04:35:39 PM »
Today on the day of our lord Tuesday March 6th 2018:

- Dr Phil Scaramucci teaser released (yes, The Mooch and his wife)
- Trump told the Swedish PM he was right about immigration issues there in a joint press conference
- Some special council said Conway did illegal things, congress calls for disciplinary punishment, team Trump said she just communicated an obvious position of Trump and won't do anything #MAGA
- BBC writes an UAE billionaire tried to get Rex Tillerson fired with lobbying over the Qatar thing
- Trump tweeted he welcomes NK's willingness to talk but he will go 'in hard either way'
- Sam Nunberg said he was going to try and cooperate with Mueller anyway after WMD'ing the MSM yesterday
- Trump trolled the Oscars for having the lowest ratings in history

Random quote of the day
https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/971128435383918594
 :dead

I wonder how long Kelly is going to last or if he has just given up at this point.

🤴

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15049 on: March 06, 2018, 04:43:47 PM »
Then again, the more I think about it...would you rather have Hillary for one term, under the assumption she got 2 SC justices (Scalia replacement, as well as RBG replacement), or our Current Timeline where it looks like Trump is fucked, republicans are going to lose a lot of seats, etc etc?

Trump replacing RBG is a nightmare.

Also true. Hillary and the way the Democratic bench sort of just cleared her a path is the root of the problem.

It’s been clear since at least 2008, that Hillary is deeply divisive nationally, and to some extent within her own party. IMO, if the Republican Party was not a complete and utter mess, she really wouldn’t have had much of a chance even in 2016.

If she had one, and Dems made gains in the house/Senate, this would have been sort of like a 4 year rebuilding cycle for tge republicans. Maybe they come out the other side as simply lawful semi-evil instead of chaos demons.

We get two Supreme Court justices and maybe a Republican Party that is somewhat less awful that doesn’t warn people instant side-eye when you find out they voted for them.

Theoretically, that could be preferable to the anti-trump awakening in some ways.

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15050 on: March 06, 2018, 04:49:16 PM »
Why yes, I would prefer an actual human being as president with a liberal supreme court than having the worst example of a politician and man as "babby's first prezident," hurting our political system and our relations abroad.

oh I forgot, hillary is a bitch or something, nevermind I take it all back
püp

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15051 on: March 06, 2018, 04:49:37 PM »
"Maybe if the GOP was out of power for a few years they'd calm down a bit." Given recent history, that's wildly optimistic.

Optimus

  • Lieutenant colonel, 26th Hate Machine battalion
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15052 on: March 06, 2018, 04:55:20 PM »
she's right you know


No, she really isn't. If Hillary was president the middle class would still be on its death bed, the infrastructure would still be crumbling and on top of that we might have had a nasty proxy war with Russia to deal with that could potentially have grave consequences and as an icing of the cake the TPP to finish off what was left of the middle class. Instead we have an orange clown that makes us look like idiots to the rest of the world, hysterical liberals that admittedly are fucking annoying, daily "controversies" no one really gives a shit about and yeah the moron might start a trade war.

I really don't know what might be the worse, nuclear war or listening to liberals whine every day. But seriously, fuck Hillary Clinton, the warmongering neoliberal psychopath liberal distinguished mentally-challenged fellows still insist "wasn't that bad".

it was a joke you pedantic cunt

k.

Thanks for your shitty post anyway, I needed to vent

Skullfuckers Anonymous

  • Will hunt bullies for fruit baskets. PM for details.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15053 on: March 06, 2018, 04:56:50 PM »
I'm curious what the fallout would be if #metoo also happened during a hypothetical Clinton administration.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15054 on: March 06, 2018, 04:59:06 PM »
I'm curious what the fallout would be if #metoo also happened during a hypothetical Clinton administration.

"How can America be a sexist country? We elected a woman president!"

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15055 on: March 06, 2018, 04:59:44 PM »
Bill would be required to resign as First Gentleman. It's in the Constitution and everything.

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15056 on: March 06, 2018, 05:00:51 PM »
I think it depends on the angle you take and the things you prioritize. I think you are right PD in terms of how the likely effect politically would be harmful because it would likely give Republicans power at the very moment they could compound their slow erosion of Democratic pillars like gerrymandering and voting rights. And maybe that cost does override a lot of the good you could list off. But I'll add to that anyways because I'm not sure in total we are better off.

If Hillary were president we would:

+ Have a more liberal Supreme Court Justice and far more favorable appointments downstream. Which would be really important long-term. Trump flooding the courts with shitty judges is a real issue. This alone would be the largest mitigator in a lot of the Republicans state level fuckery with voting rights and gerrymandering. It would potentially be huge in areas like campaign finance and gun control and any number of other things a conservative leaning court could harm. Depending on if another Justice retires before Trump's 2020 election, this is something that could have generational consequences.

+ Still be in the Paris Climate Accords and not be eroding our hegemonic standing on the worlds stage in all manner of areas.

+ Not be bleeding out and scaring off talent for absolutely vital government institutions.

+ She wouldn't be running an often completely fucking nuts foreign policy like embargoing Qatar because they didn't give her son in law a loan and she has been getting millions from Saudi Arabia and the UAE for decades so it is putting this weird chaos into middle east alliances. Getting undercover operatives killed because you blurbed classified info to the Russians.

+ Not be gutting the ACA and likely taken marginal steps to improve it.

+ Retain the regulations, like those the OMB just said are kind of things we shouldn't be getting rid of.

+/- Stayed in the TPP with some notable adjustments, which I think despite flawed was the right decision. We certainly wouldn't be on the precipice of a trade war.

+ Still have Net Neutrality, no crisis for Dreamers/Bush era ICE fuckery, probably at least some minor concern for Puerto Rico, wouldn't have a regressive Justice Department, not likely to have rampant regulatory capture at every level of government set to do untold damage for years to come.




benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15057 on: March 06, 2018, 05:01:28 PM »
Also, Hillary would probably require her Supreme Court Justice nominee to marry her and Huma.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15058 on: March 06, 2018, 05:03:54 PM »
not likely to have rampant regulatory capture at every level of government
sure, jan

warcock

  • Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| The Nunberg Trials
« Reply #15059 on: March 06, 2018, 05:03:56 PM »
I dunno about the Bernie stans i told you so part. Sounds pretty inconsequential at this point. Its not like both sides kissed and made up after the election.