Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 6750390 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
🤴

stufte

  • Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior
  • Senior Member
Trump committing treason, yet this will blow over like everything else. No one will care in a week.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
If Russia is so great why didn't they already have Hillary's e-mails? We already know why the U.S. didn't have them. :thinking

agrajag

  • Senior Member
God damnit, stop playing dumb Stosta. It's not the "damage factor," it's the solicitation of a foreign government's aid by a presidential campaign that's unlawful.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Hopefully if the Democrats gain the House and Senate they'll at least call Obama to testify about his actions during 2016 and into 2017 rather than protecting him like the GOP is out of fear of being called racist or undermining Trump.

No more of this: :whew
« Last Edit: July 16, 2018, 01:52:46 PM by benjipwns »

Nola

  • Senior Member
God damnit, stop playing dumb Stosta. It's not the "damage factor," it's the solicitation of a foreign government's aid by a presidential campaign that's unlawful.

Aside from criminal conspiracy, there are strict foreign campaign finance laws that make this explicitly illegal. Not even really sure what Shosta is trying to argue anymore.

As for the emails not being effective, have some people forgotten etiolate and Optimus that soon? The entire Bernie/Hillary war that people still won’t shut up about? There was nothing individually damning in any of the emails but the collective event absolutely helped exacerbate divisions and fill the air of narratives on both the right and those in the Bernie camp, the Podesta leaks absolutely buffed up the narratives of Hillary being a corrupt/two faced politician.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
If the emails were so harmless, why would Seth Rich sacrifice his life to leak them?

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Excellent point, Nola. Obama refused to disown Bernie's white supremacist dog whistle politics during the primaries and endorse Hillary as the presumptive nominee when she announced in 2015 weeks before Bernie. Yet, he walks free and all anyone wants to talk about is Trump and Russia.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
FACT: Barack Obama appointed James Comey to replace Robert Mueller as FBI Director.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
The dude already said he wasn't using the legal definition of traitor. The word does not only exist in the legal realm. What are you on about, mate?

seagrams hotsauce

  • Senior Member
i'm a little perplexed by this. first you say there's nothing damaging resulting from the leaks, which, sure, i guess, but immediately follow it with 'the American voters are just stupid' which implies you think the leaks adversely affected public opinion. which is it?
It was the event, not the material. All heat and no light. Everyone was so ready for there to be damaging material in (Hillary's) emails that when the (DNC) emails came out, automatic thinking took over. Clueless people listened to Sean Hannity and trusted him on purely fictitious accounts. The emails were damaging to the Clinton ticket the same way superstitions about black cats are damaging to their adoption rate. I defer to Jack Remington's thoughtful and calm analyses on this matter.

i'm not sure why this 'it's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop'-type of distinction matters. the leak had an effect, and the leak was encouraged. saying 'the content doesn't matter' (it did tho, shouts to donna b and cnn) when you're acknowledging that the leak itself was damaging seems a bit like saying "that guy isn't a murder cuz the hitman he hired to strangle his wife startled her into a heart attack instead"

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
i'm a little perplexed by this. first you say there's nothing damaging resulting from the leaks, which, sure, i guess, but immediately follow it with 'the American voters are just stupid' which implies you think the leaks adversely affected public opinion. which is it?
It was the event, not the material. All heat and no light. Everyone was so ready for there to be damaging material in (Hillary's) emails that when the (DNC) emails came out, automatic thinking took over. Clueless people listened to Sean Hannity and trusted him on purely fictitious accounts. The emails were damaging to the Clinton ticket the same way superstitions about black cats are damaging to their adoption rate. I defer to Jack Remington's thoughtful and calm analyses on this matter.

i'm not sure why this 'it's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop'-type of distinction matters. the leak had an effect, and the leak was encouraged. saying 'the content doesn't matter' (it did tho, shouts to donna b and cnn) when you're acknowledging that the leak itself was damaging seems a bit like saying "that guy isn't a murder cuz the hitman he hired to strangle his wife startled her into a heart attack instead"
I'm still convinced the most 'damaging' to Clinton's campaign was her collapse on 9/11 where she was picked up and taken away like a malfunctioning droid.
🤴

agrajag

  • Senior Member
You're the one who's triggered, not me.

Stop triggering me, shitlord.

 :brazilcry

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Obama and Trump enlisting some Russians while they took out Hillary, again, for being a woman and daring to run for President, is a classic Kansas City Shuffle.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
I feel like if you want to learn how to shitpost like benji, you should become his intern or something, Shosta.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
I'm still convinced the most 'damaging' to Clinton's campaign was her collapse on 9/11 where she was picked up and taken away like a malfunctioning droid.
I disagree completely, her death had far less of an effect on her campaign than its internal incompetence.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Good, we've beaten Benji into conformity, you're next mothafucka

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Obama couldn't risk her actually winning so he had her killed, knowing that the neoliberal globalists would be able to control the robot duplicates once in office. That's when Trump double crossed him by winning and they had to turn that 15 minute meeting into a two hour one to figure out how to cover up their obvious ties and bring back their fake feud while nobody else was present.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Narrator: Globalists means Jews

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Though before you get all up in arms at me, I'm sure they spent some of that time discussing their GamerGate orders too. I'm not some kind of mark.

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
What continues to amaze me is how the US press continues to score own goals to embarrass their country on the world stage.

The foreign press knows that Trump hasn't read into everything so they just throw him softball questions:
- Did you call the Japanese PM?
- What did you have for dinner today?
- Do you think today's meeting was a success?

Like the Russian journalists today they're always very polite to the President.

Then the US press storms in: "COLLUSION, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, TRAITOR TRAITOR" and they start throwing questions at Trump that they can already guess the answer on.
Next they complain that Trump 'embarrasses' the US on the World Stage.

The media propped up the host of the Celebrity Apprentice in the first place, what did they think his answer was going to be?
It's just a continuous streak of self goals at this point.
🤴

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Nintex, if you're not polite to the President in Russia your ass gets thrown to jail.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Quote
Another example from the President's current cache of Soviet stories concerns an American who tells a Russian that the United States is so free he can stand in front of the White House and yell, ''To hell with Ronald Reagan.'' The Russian replies: ''That's nothing. I can stand in front of the Kremlin and yell, 'To hell with Ronald Reagan,' too.''

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Way to butcher a classic Radio Yerevan joke. :yuck

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Way to butcher a classic Radio Yerevan joke. :yuck

Nola

  • Senior Member
Don't accuse me of merely playing dumb. Everyone here knows I am, actually, that dumb.

Trace the conversation back. I took issue with yet another this-be-treason spiel. Maybe some people enjoy the fever pitch of politics where every hot topic is the most important one ever and totally unprecedented, but some of us prefer signals that are undistorted. All this talk about damage is to put this in its proper context and scale.

The campaign probably solicited. That was probably illegal. Those people should go to jail. Russia should be considered hostile to the United States. Did I tick all your boxes, yet?

I honestly get where both of you are coming from on this whole treason semantics thing. I get the desire to not throw around highly loaded terms in politics without meeting an equally high bar, for a number of reasons, like diminishing the reputation of the word. Though one thing I’m not really worried about is it being some sort of slippery slope that will get colored and abused when it’s a Democrat, because that sort of thing will happen no matter what the left does. I also get what kingv is saying about the oxford letter of the term and how it probably would fit if this narrative of conspiracy, solicitation and quid pro quo turns out true. Which I am having a harder and harder time buying into any alternative hypothesis that explains all the facts and behavior we are continually seeing.

Though I will say on the fever pitch stuff, I have a totally opposite view. To me it is incredibly disheartening and worrisome the level of false equivocating, downplaying, and tolerance there has become for what is objectively an incredibly significant moment in American political history. There really is not a moment where you potentially had a this for that exchange involving illegal coordination and dissemination between a campaign for president and a hostile foreign nation, that is aiming to undermine our system of government, done in exchange for selling off part of our foreign policy. Where there is hyperbole it bothers me far less than those that frame this as just usual partisan politics.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
There really is not a moment where you potentially had a this for that exchange involving illegal coordination and dissemination between a campaign for president and a hostile foreign nation, that is aiming to undermine our system of government, done in exchange for selling off part of our foreign policy.
True, Anna Chennault was working with an "allied" nation* after all. And the "illegal" qualifier discounts ones like the Obama 2012 campaign because of an unwritten exemption for incumbents.

*whose internal politics we attempted to control for two decades
« Last Edit: July 16, 2018, 03:30:39 PM by benjipwns »

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Can "some of us prefer signals that are undistorted" go in newsfeed?

Nola

  • Senior Member
There really is not a moment where you potentially had a this for that exchange involving illegal coordination and dissemination between a campaign for president and a hostile foreign nation, that is aiming to undermine our system of government, done in exchange for selling off part of our foreign policy.
True, Anna Chennault was working with an "allied" nation* after all.

*whose internal politics we attempted to control for two decades

So we have one partial equivalent....The Nixon administration. I think I’m ok standing by what I said.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
That would be the Nixon campaign, not administration.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Nola annihilated.

Nola

  • Senior Member

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
The funny part is that LBJ knew as it was happening, and told Nixon and Humphrey (in that order) along with the press (who accepted Nixon's denial), but ultimately trusted Nixon to continue the war more than Humphrey so unofficially supported his paranoid brother-in-arms.

Also, I only this year learned that George Wallace received all the intelligence and war updates that the other candidates got. (John Anderson in 1980 and Perot in 1992 (but not 1996) are the other third party candidates to receive any briefings.) Even though he wasn't even intending on winning the Presidency, and wasn't on enough ballots to do so until October.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2018, 03:49:51 PM by benjipwns »

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Quote from: benjipwns
The funny part is that LBJ knew as it was happening

Just like OBUMMER

it's like poetry

 :lucas

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Typical Democrats, you can't trust em, even if you're the party's nominated candidate.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
The first former party nominee to run a third party campaign against said party? Martin Van Buren. A DEMOCRAT.

I rest my case.

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
« Last Edit: July 16, 2018, 04:12:15 PM by Nintex »
🤴

FStop7

  • Senior Member
So they've been using the NRA as a money vector to buy the GOP for years.  So many things fall into place with this knowledge.

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Trump had this woman ask him a question at FreedomFest 2015, such a coincidence.  :doge

🤴

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
So they've been using the NRA as a money vector to buy the GOP for years.  So many things fall into place with this knowledge.

I'm surprised all the revelations along this line haven't gained more traction recently, but I guess given the current climate it shouldn't be all that surprising.
dog

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
"Now THIS will surely make Trump lose his base"

https://twitter.com/JordanUhl/status/1018876214554058755

 :usacry


https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/1018958740504993792

Trump didn't follow the script, wow what a complete surprise that has never happened before.  :doge
🤴

kingv

  • Senior Member
Nola with all this reasonableness.

I expect some serious fucking indictments are coming for leaders in the NRA and GOP soon.

warcock

  • Member
Way to butcher a classic Radio Yerevan joke. :yuck
Do you live in glendale? :noah

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Nola with all this reasonableness.

I expect some serious fucking indictments are coming for leaders in the NRA and GOP soon.
I expect Rudy, Conway and the rest of Arkham will start appearing on TV A LOT again very soon.
Pence has already doubled down in the defense of Trump. 

There's the first one! Rob Goldstone confirms Putin knew Trump was in Moscow even though he said he didn't at the conference today.
https://twitter.com/GoldstoneRob/status/1018904670704726016
« Last Edit: July 16, 2018, 05:10:54 PM by Nintex »
🤴

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
🤴

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Way to butcher a classic Radio Yerevan joke. :yuck
Do you live in glendale? :noah

No, but I do watch the local Armenian telethon on Thanksgiving most years.

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Don't worry, Trump will clear the air tonight

On Hannity

 :dead

https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/1018971104424194049

"Nuclear Warming is our biggest problem by a factor of about 5 million" - PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DONALD J TRUMP


I like how the argument went from: "No collusion, witch hunt, Hillary did it to" to: "ME AND PUTIN CONTROL 90% OF THE NUKES!"


MEANWHILE
https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1018983523984859136
« Last Edit: July 16, 2018, 06:22:52 PM by Nintex »
🤴


Nola

  • Senior Member
He's not wrong....assuming you forget most of the other times Trump has spoken publicly.

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
mcain himself is a disgrace
*****

Nola

  • Senior Member
mcain himself is a disgrace

Not gonna argue you there.

Though like with people like Kristol or Frum, I'm not gonna purity test every single shit conservative that grows to turn against Trump, I still hate them, but hey, if McCain's end-of-life selective consciousness and outspokenness against this president helps turn Arizona blue in 18 and 20, go for it old man!


agrajag

  • Senior Member
McCain and the rest of #resistance republicans in congress are all talk tho

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Yeah, we've heard all this before. Even going back to before the election. Republicans would go on TV and talk about how they were outraged by something that Trump said or did, but they'd always come crawling back to him as soon as the story died down. I don't expect for one second that this will be any different, nor will whatever comes next that they get the vapors over.
dog

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Frum, AFAICT from his production at The Atlantic, has been fairly consistent and always came across as sincere as a Never Trumper. But he's more of an ideologue, policy wonk and an editorialist than a "politician" so I guess this may explain that.

ὕβρις

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
I'm sure Senator Romney will stand up to Trump in defense of the middle class. :american

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
But he's more of an ideologue, policy wonk and an editorialist than a "politician" so I guess this may explain that.
Even worse, he's Canadian.

Nola

  • Senior Member
McCain and the rest of #resistance republicans in congress are all talk tho

For sure, not saying they would do anything substantive policy or governing wise, the tax bill and the refusal to ever hold their own people accountable for obvious obstruction and malfeasance says that plenty, frankly, if they had a working moral compass they probably wouldn't be Republicans. The best you are gonna get is rhetoric. Which isn't nothing(even if it is pretty close), so whatever, i'll take it, not saying I'm excusing the rest of their nonsense.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2018, 08:03:54 PM by Nola »

agrajag

  • Senior Member

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Judicial Watch wants Obama deposed. :rejoice :american :trumps :putin

Mandark

  • Icon
I don't know why anyone's arguing about the Mueller probe which ended back in January.