Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 6928198 times)

0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33060 on: April 30, 2019, 07:55:46 PM »
The New Yorker buying an ad on The Majority Report with Sam Seder is some funny shit.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33061 on: April 30, 2019, 08:33:29 PM »
https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-says-millennials-dont-have-it-tough-780348?fbclid=IwAR0PW6oRRkTiaD78QMvhpC2Rje4QUaNdB-WLdHqd3mv43GZdFpwy5xERrMk

Quote
Millennials who think that times are tough in 2018 have no room to complain, according to former Vice President Joe Biden, who said that he had “no empathy” for young people who compared today to the struggles of the 1960s.

“The younger generation now tells me how tough things are—give me a break,” said Biden, while speaking to Patt Morrison of the Los Angeles Times to promote his new book. “No, no, I have no empathy for it, give me a break.”
IYKYK

Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33062 on: April 30, 2019, 08:39:14 PM »
Quote
Anywhere content flows—which is just to say the whole internet—is infected with lies and inventions meant to make you distrust anything as a possible lie or invention. If that doesn’t scare you, then you’re a fool. But if it does, well, that’s the point.

2deep4me

Who does this author remind me of? :bobby
He could have saved everyone a lot of time and effort and just instead linked to whichever Adam Curtis video clip that inspired his article.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33063 on: April 30, 2019, 08:50:47 PM »
Biden and Bernie are the top second choices of each other's respective supporters.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33064 on: April 30, 2019, 09:03:42 PM »
My worry is that so far biden's making a lot of Hillary Clinton-esque statements that show an apathy to people that come to him. Yet he expects you to vote for him. I said this on Glenn's facebook, but the Democratic Party "I'm chosen" "I have this in the bag and don't have to work for it" "It's guaranteed Biden will get the nom";etc that golden girl/boy thing that did Clinton in 2016 is the last thing we need right now and yet many Biden supporters and Biden himself are falling for it already. This stupid ass "Trump is grass in 2020 and we're going to smoke him" under estimating Trump thing as if anything is guaranteed is precisely why Trump won in 2016. And yet here we are in 2019 with Biden making arrogant statements, his supporters saying he's "guaranteed" to win. It's like they learned nothing from 2016 are still underestimating Trump. Right now Biden should be trying to get as many young people to vote him as possible. Instead, we have him saying the shit in the article I quoted above.

Why do Demorats do this? Why do they think they're guaranteed?



My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball. But tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward; upward, not forward; and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom!
IYKYK

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33065 on: April 30, 2019, 09:09:35 PM »
Biden said that last year before he'd decided to run or hired any advisors who could tell him not to say things like that.

He shouldn't need someone to explain to him that's a dumb thing to say.

Well this is a guy who's run for president twice already and dropped out before New Hampshire both times.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33066 on: April 30, 2019, 09:11:10 PM »
Bernie is the second choice for only a third of Biden supporters.

That would be a bigger chunk than the part of the overall electorate who's picking him first.

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33068 on: April 30, 2019, 10:52:05 PM »
Imo Biden’s biggest problem is that he sucks whenever he opens his mouth.

Everybody knows who he is. He’s basically the Democratic Rick Perry, and imo that gravity will eventually catch up with him and make this a race.

El Babua

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33069 on: April 30, 2019, 11:15:39 PM »
That would be a bigger chunk than the part of the overall electorate who's picking him first.
Lol, just noticed this. Bernie is the girl you'd date but wouldn't marry.

Bernie Sanders is a thot  :drool

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33070 on: April 30, 2019, 11:18:49 PM »
What's so different about Biden in 2020 that won't cause him to fall on his face like he did in 1988 and 2008?

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33071 on: April 30, 2019, 11:26:36 PM »
I'd marry Bernie.   :hmph

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33072 on: April 30, 2019, 11:40:25 PM »
I'll make a bet with someone here that he wins the primary. Mandark gets to set the spread.

Okay. Terms?


Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33074 on: April 30, 2019, 11:55:02 PM »
let's make it interesting

if shosta wins, nintex is permed

if cats3 wins, someone makes eric p come back and post again

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33075 on: April 30, 2019, 11:56:33 PM »
also it's complete and utter horseshit that shosta gets someone to take a wager in under an hour the first time he tries on this forum


Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33077 on: May 01, 2019, 12:04:21 AM »
smh shosta's unwillingness to stand by his posts for more than 30 seconds renders half the replies into non sequiturs

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33078 on: May 01, 2019, 12:09:06 AM »
slut
*****

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33079 on: May 01, 2019, 12:10:00 AM »
Between taking 50:50 odds on Biden when you could get like 3:1 on Predictit and suggesting I save money by moving to Arlington, I'm beginning to suspect you're not the world's greatest money manager.

Tasty

  • Senior Member

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33081 on: May 01, 2019, 12:20:08 AM »




Better put Bernie on the ticket this time.  :doge

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33082 on: May 01, 2019, 12:26:24 AM »


 :thinking




polls are a useful tool for the establishment. according to the polls hilldawg is president right now, won 3 years ago in a landslide  :trumps
*****

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33083 on: May 01, 2019, 12:31:12 AM »
Yeah I thought it was going to be a fun forum bet but do you really want to offer a bet at basically far below the going rate? Cuz idk, might just call you on that

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33084 on: May 01, 2019, 12:35:48 AM »
Filler could you save me a step and just start posting directly on predictit? Thanks

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33085 on: May 01, 2019, 12:50:50 AM »
I'll make a bet with someone here that he wins the primary. Mandark gets to set the spread.

It smells like poliera in here
:O

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33086 on: May 01, 2019, 12:51:16 AM »
at this moment all I can offer are my likes  :pimp
*****

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33087 on: May 01, 2019, 01:12:49 AM »
Maybe Mandark will lock that down with ya

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33088 on: May 01, 2019, 01:24:42 AM »
A Vegas resident desperately trying to make below-odds political bets with posters on a homoerotic splinter forum is the most ass backwards gambling addiction I've ever heard of.

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33089 on: May 01, 2019, 01:41:21 AM »
*****

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33090 on: May 01, 2019, 02:13:18 AM »
*****


BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Margs

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33093 on: May 01, 2019, 02:36:16 AM »
Between taking 50:50 odds on Biden when you could get like 3:1 on Predictit and suggesting I save money by moving to Arlington, I'm beginning to suspect you're not the world's greatest money manager.

He meant Quantico City.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33094 on: May 01, 2019, 02:58:18 AM »
Mama be like "When I'm being lowered into my grave, play Hillary's concession speech so she can let me down one last time."

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33095 on: May 01, 2019, 04:21:38 AM »


It took fifteen years but we finally have JOEMENTUM!!!

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33096 on: May 01, 2019, 04:36:39 AM »
. :gloomy
« Last Edit: May 01, 2019, 04:43:24 AM by KennyLoggins »

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33097 on: May 01, 2019, 08:14:24 AM »
I'd marry Bernie.   :hmph

I hope you think long and hard about his old man balls and constant old man farts and you'll hear "huh" after every sentence you make, you know he'll never listen to anything you're saying and just keep talking over you, likely the type who would put used tea/coffee bags right on the counter despite there being a trash can 5 inches away and ask you to help him with something on the computer then stand behind you and tell you what to do the whole time.

Tell us how you really feel, friend  :doge
Margs

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33098 on: May 01, 2019, 10:04:18 AM »
I love watching greenwald Mate and Tracey just fucking completely melt down.

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33099 on: May 01, 2019, 10:19:28 AM »
barr gun git fukt
©ZH

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
©@©™

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33101 on: May 01, 2019, 10:42:20 AM »
I love watching greenwald Mate and Tracey just fucking completely melt down.

what happened?


benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33103 on: May 01, 2019, 11:31:30 AM »
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/democracy-dollars-gillibrand-s-plan-give-every-voter-600-donate-n1000381
Quote
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., unveiled a plan on Wednesday to give every voter up to $600 in what she calls "Democracy Dollars" that they can donate to federal candidates for office.

In an exclusive interview with NBC News to discuss the roll out of her first major 2020 policy initiative, Gillibrand said her "Clean Elections Plan" would help reduce the influence of big money in politics.

"If you want to accomplish anything that the American people want us to accomplish — whether it's healthcare as a right, better public schools, better economy — you have to take on the greed and corruption that determine everything in Washington," she said.

Under Gillibrand's plan, every eligible voter could register for vouchers to donate up to $100 in a primary election and $100 in a general election each cycle, either all at once or in $10 increments to one or more candidates over time. Each participant would get a separate $200 pool for House, Senate and presidential contests for a total maximum donation of $600 for those federal offices.

There would be strings attached for both donors and candidates. The money could go only to elections in the donor's state, although they could be used for House candidates outside the voter's district.

Politicians would face much tighter limits on donations. To be eligible to receive "Democracy Dollars," a candidate would have to voluntarily agree to forgo any contributions larger than $200 per donor. That’s a big drop from the current maximum of $2,800 per primary cycle and $2,800 for the general election.
:american


agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33105 on: May 01, 2019, 11:45:13 AM »
thanks for the thought Gilli, but I prefer Yang Bucks

 :snob

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33106 on: May 01, 2019, 12:22:48 PM »
That bitch Hillary cost me serious money on Predictit.


Shosta, I will take you up. $10 that Biden is not the winner.

If I win, you give me $20 and get Cream unbanned again.
:O

Broseidon

  • Estado Homo
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33107 on: May 01, 2019, 01:01:56 PM »
I love watching greenwald Mate and Tracey just fucking completely melt down.

what happened?

The Earth completed a rotation on its axis.
bent

Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33108 on: May 01, 2019, 02:02:41 PM »
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/democracy-dollars-gillibrand-s-plan-give-every-voter-600-donate-n1000381
Quote
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., unveiled a plan on Wednesday to give every voter up to $600 in what she calls "Democracy Dollars" that they can donate to federal candidates for office.

In an exclusive interview with NBC News to discuss the roll out of her first major 2020 policy initiative, Gillibrand said her "Clean Elections Plan" would help reduce the influence of big money in politics.

"If you want to accomplish anything that the American people want us to accomplish — whether it's healthcare as a right, better public schools, better economy — you have to take on the greed and corruption that determine everything in Washington," she said.

Under Gillibrand's plan, every eligible voter could register for vouchers to donate up to $100 in a primary election and $100 in a general election each cycle, either all at once or in $10 increments to one or more candidates over time. Each participant would get a separate $200 pool for House, Senate and presidential contests for a total maximum donation of $600 for those federal offices.

There would be strings attached for both donors and candidates. The money could go only to elections in the donor's state, although they could be used for House candidates outside the voter's district.

Politicians would face much tighter limits on donations. To be eligible to receive "Democracy Dollars," a candidate would have to voluntarily agree to forgo any contributions larger than $200 per donor. That’s a big drop from the current maximum of $2,800 per primary cycle and $2,800 for the general election.
:american
Ripping off Yang's policy outright must be a low point for any presidential aspirant's campaign. Hope she comes out with Gillibrand bucks next.


agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33110 on: May 01, 2019, 03:19:26 PM »
So apparently Rachel Maddow ran this segment about female donors to Democratic campaigns using misleading statistics that excluded any donations under $200.

https://twitter.com/ariannaijones/status/1123212438214721536

#thefixisin


agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33112 on: May 01, 2019, 04:33:56 PM »
Are you fucking serious, mate? The tweet above is from a Sanders campaign staffer. With numbers.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33113 on: May 01, 2019, 04:38:21 PM »
Quote
Thursday night on April 11, the Bernie Sanders campaign reached its 1 millionth individual donation! The original goal was to reach this amount during the first quarter, but during the first quarter the over 900,000 mark was reached instead. However, it didn’t take long to hit the 1 million mark after that.

According to Berniebag.com, the Sanders campaign surpassed 1 million donations at 1,000,626 as of April 11, 2019 at 11:01 pm EST.

Out of the $18.2 million raised during the first quarter: $2,039,800 were from people who gave between $200-$2799. $145,600 came from less than 53 people who gave the maximum amount of $2,800.

However, most of it came from small donations, with $16,016,000 coming from people who gave less than $200 total, which adds up multiple contributions a person may have had. Also, Bernie Sanders had around 525,000 different donors.


hOw Do YoU kNoW tHeRe's SoMe BiG sTaTiStIcAl DiFfErEnCe

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33114 on: May 01, 2019, 04:49:23 PM »
How is it strange? There are more poor people than rich people, bro.

And apology assepted, I may have overreacted as well.  :-*

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33115 on: May 01, 2019, 04:54:48 PM »
more rich men than women? I don't know, but them's the numbers. Don't see anyone disputing them. The large donations account for a small percentage of total money raised, so there were probably more male small money donors than female anyway.

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33116 on: May 01, 2019, 05:03:36 PM »
that's the goal of the democratic establishment to push through their guy
*****

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33117 on: May 01, 2019, 05:08:00 PM »
Everyone: "Half of Trump's campaign team is in jail. Democrats can't possibly lose this!"

Sleepy Joe: "Hold my pillow"
🤴

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33118 on: May 01, 2019, 05:08:07 PM »
I don’t blame Trump for getting excited for your primaries.

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| America: A Yum! Brands affiliate
« Reply #33119 on: May 01, 2019, 05:45:51 PM »
Something like 85% of the donations to Bernie's campaign were under 200 dollars.

I don't think it is unreasonable to think there could be a pretty notable difference between the demographic distribution of those donating above and below that threshold.