So uhhh...with his trial tomorrow, I've been thinking about it and I think we were wrong to assume to accused all of the gaf staff for caping for Ami. Just like how it's wrong they label us all as alt right/Nazis because of mere association of the more disgusting posters here, it's probably not good to label all former gaf mods as harboring a defense force for Ami. I admit we said some harsh shit. After the Waypoint article i think understand their mindset more in that process, and I understand that many thought of leaving the staff at that point. At this point is spoiled mil. You know if you went up against Evi, he would have banned them even if they're staff. We've established what happened to countless gaf mods over the years and I understand trying to stick around and convince EviLore how wrong it is to save the community you moderate for free.
I know lots of people got banned here for mentioning the Ami thing after the gag order came so it's not easy, but I'm not convinced at this point that
most of the staff had ill intentions and given that gaf didn't have transparency and we didn't know who banned who - and that we can only guess - it's probably not good to lump all of the former staff into a giant pile. The fact that most of the former gaf staff (sans Besada) have settled nicely post-gaf and are absolutely fine no longer being mods anymore shows they did care about the community.
But, for both our parts, communication has been poor and we've made bad assumptions both ways.

I can admit when I'm wrong.