“Sad little white boy upset he isn’t guaranteed to be at the top of the food chain based purely on said skin color and gender” is what I got out of that. He can get bent.User was warned for arguing in bad faith. spoiler (click to show/hide)
lol jk
I love this post because the person seems to have actually read the memo and realised it isn't as bad as it was made out to be. So what was his take away? Well, it was to twist it into a conspiritorial narrative to make Damore into the exact pure embodiment of evil he desperately wanted him to be, of course. (lol)
https://www.resetera.com/posts/3015231/ People defending the memo. Guys, a shitcake is still a shitcake, even if it’s dressed up with whipped cream. The core is still shit. What I mean is that, James made an attempt to Trojan horse his sexist viewpoint (e.g are biologically not capable of excelling at engineering) with suggestions on Googles hiring practices and having a more open forum for the discussion. The reality is, James knows his viewpoint is not acceptable and discriminatory, but he’s a smart dude, so he thought he bury the core message (the shit in the shitcake) with the dressing (e.g let’s find a way to make googles hiring more effective etc...). Damore's only sin was to suggest that there are differences between men and women. What makes it so 'evil' is that it doesn't square with the modern leftist notion that gender, and pretty much everything else, is entirely a social construct. That is the only thing wrong with the memo. As I said in my previous post, they're completely insincere about it. They have to keep presenting him as this evil person who wrote the memo entirely for nefarious purposes, when really what is going on is that they subscribe to a certain ideological perspective that has made this subject completely off bounds for purely political reasons. That is what is really going on
The irony is anyone defending Damore in any way will be warned about arguing in 'bad faith' and being ''disingenuous', when it is clearly the other way around. It is the people attacking him who are arguing in bad faith, clearly.
There are two Steven Pinker videos I watched recently that speak to this. They are a really interesting watch.
VIDEO This one is 40 minutes long but the relevant part is around 8 minutes in
VIDEO