So the argument the trans woman made is,
A) Trans women are women too. How dare you say trans women are not like real women on Ru-Paul's show.
Rose's response is basically "I fight for all women."
But then the trans women backpedals and her argument changes to.
B) But trans women are not just women, we are different and must not be lumped together with cis women. We need to be specifically mentioned when talking about women's issues.
To which Rose responds by saying "I am not from your planet."
This is a crystal clear example of the Catch 22 when debating trans issues with the more militant wing of the trans movement (the wing which is the most vocal and has all but defined the trans movement in recent years.) When one treats them as a woman they claim they are different, face different challenges and have different needs than cis women (which I think is true) But when one stands up for a cause important to "Women" the transmilitants feel excluded and do not understand why a straight, cis, woman would not become their messenger or advocate.
Thier identity is so convoluted with intersectionalities that either A) they are legitimately beyond confused and cannot see their own identity is riddled with fallacies or B) they are arguing in bad faith.