The Other Forums Thread for Other Forums

[Cream]

I never said white privilege doesn't exist. I said its a weak privilege in comparison to all the other traits a person is born into and the focus on white and male privilege in public discourse betrays a bigotry behind the speakers.

Are you trying to say a black man has more privilege than a white, poor, wheelchair-bound man of lower-than-average intelligence?

Tell that to all the black men that can't get facial recognition to work on their new $900 phone with 100% accuracy.

 This is fucking ridiculous...

WHY do you do this?

Why is it so difficult for people to understand?

All the evidence overwhelmingly supports that racism contributes heavily to massive ubiquitous social inequality!

[shosta]

I dunno how many times people have to tell you but
1) people play it up while you're here
2) you're in the quarantine thread for the worst people. Venture outside and most of us are just normal foot fetishists and anime figurine collectors.

[Nola]

I love that etiolate is pretty much the only poster here who tried to debate Cream in a civilized manner and he was denied because of his "reputation". Remember people, it's not your arguments or behavior that truly matters, it's what side you've chosen.

Inferring a person is a moron, asserting without supporting evidence that a well regarded study is erroneous, and self-proclaiming intellectual superiority is what constitutes civility?

No wonder both of you struggle with basic socialization.

Well, Cream is a moron but etiolate never even implied that.

   There is rarely a post where etiolate isn't trying to imply that. 

How do you know I struggle with basic socialization, Freud?

You honestly both spend more time than almost anyone else I observe around this place trying to tear down and berate the people around here and the broad identity buckets you subjectively place them in.

Often, so oblivious to the antagonistic behavior you engage in you find yourself claiming the victim. Like when you ran out of the the politics thread for months because people finally called you on your shit arguments after showing up every other day post election passive aggressively berating anyone you conjured up as sympathetic to the vague catch-all neoliberal cabal.

[Transhuman]

Why are you all like this

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_Australia#Humour

[etiolate]

I never said white privilege doesn't exist. I said its a weak privilege in comparison to all the other traits a person is born into and the focus on white and male privilege in public discourse betrays a bigotry behind the speakers.

And you’re incredibly wrong about whiteness being a weak privilege.

White privilege is majority privilege in America since the majority of people are white. This is where you get into familiarity bias. However, that can go both ways. For every neophobe there may be a neophile.

Instead of using a term like privilege, let's use a words like advantage and disadvantage because those are imo more relevant to discussions about life experience.

Let's look at a stronger advantage: Physical Attractiveness

Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic performance on 9th graders' ratings of peers' popularity were investigated. Participants were 270 9th graders (152 girls, 118 boys) who read a vignette describing a hypothetical same-sex peer with whom the student had been assigned to complete a project. The partner's attractiveness and academic performance were systematically varied in four conditions: high attractiveness/high grades, high attractiveness/low grades, low attractiveness/high grades, and low attractiveness/low grades. After reading the vignette, the students rated the partner's popularity. As hypothesized, analyses of variance revealed that attractive partners were significantly more popular than unattractive partners, regardless of whether the partner had high or low grades. Contrary to expectation, attractiveness was not more important to girls than to boys. Integration with past research and suggestions for future research are offered.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221329809596155

We report the findings of a meta-analytic review of experimental studies concerned with the biasing effect of physical attractiveness on a variety of job-related outcomes. In support of implicit personality theory, attractive individuals were found to fare better than unattractive individuals in terms of a number of such outcomes. The weighted mean effect size, d, was .37 for all studies. In addition, tests for moderating effects showed that (a) the attractiveness bias did not differ between studies that provided low versus high amounts of job-relevant information about the targets, (b) the same bias was greater for within-subjects research designs than for between-subjects designs, (c) professionals were as susceptible to the bias as were college students, (d) attractiveness was as important for men as for women, and (e) the biasing effect of attractiveness has decreased in recent years. Implications of these findings are considered.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229517285_The_effects_of_physical_attractiveness_on_job-related_outcomes_A_meta-analysis_of_experimental_studies

And this is a rundown of the various ways physical attractiveness benefits people in the workplace:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224540903365414

I can't break down the studies in these because they are behind paywalls, but there are multiple studies on this showing the advantage of being physically attractive. Now that's a pretty strong factor on its own, but what makes it stronger is that it travels.

This field experiment found that Hong Kong human resources management specialists were influenced by the attractiveness bias in evaluating short-listed candidates for an entry-level trainee position. Zero order, stepwise and hierarchical regressions showed that perceived attractiveness of the candidates was more related to their work experience and work-related skills than to grade-point average and public examination results. Women candidates were generally preferred over male candidates. Further research is suggested to determine if the influence of attractiveness extends over a wider range of jobs and to measure more precisely the influence of attractiveness in different cultures and for men and women.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585190110092857

So in Hong Kong, if you're Chinese then you have a majority group advantage, but if you move to America then you become a minority group. However, if you're attractive in Hong Kong then you have the same advantage in America.

Attractiveness continually has positive influence. Whiteness has a huge variance of outcomes because its less important a trait than something like attractiveness. Whiteness doesn't travel. You are no longer the majority when you move to Hong Kong or Mumbai or Tokyo. That's why white skin is a weak advantage. It won't overcome a low IQ and an unattractive form. It won't overcome low conscientiousness and high agreeableness. It won't overcome an addictive personality. It won't overcome very poor physical health.

Stephen Hawking just died. He was white. That's not why he succeeded. He had a debilitating disease. That mattered more than his skin color. So why did he overcome that? Extreme intelligence and a good personality, along with a period of his life with decent health and decent attractiveness. His intelligence and his other personality traits kept him relevant and able to communicate while his body simply could not accomplish these tasks on its own.

[Cream]

I never said white privilege doesn't exist. I said its a weak privilege in comparison to all the other traits a person is born into and the focus on white and male privilege in public discourse betrays a bigotry behind the speakers.

And you’re incredibly wrong about whiteness being a weak privilege.

White privilege is majority privilege in America since the majority of people are white. This is where you get into familiarity bias. However, that can go both ways. For every neophobe there may be a neophile.

Instead of using a term like privilege, let's use a words like advantage and disadvantage because those are imo more relevant to discussions about life experience.

Let's look at a stronger advantage: Physical Attractiveness

Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic performance on 9th graders' ratings of peers' popularity were investigated. Participants were 270 9th graders (152 girls, 118 boys) who read a vignette describing a hypothetical same-sex peer with whom the student had been assigned to complete a project. The partner's attractiveness and academic performance were systematically varied in four conditions: high attractiveness/high grades, high attractiveness/low grades, low attractiveness/high grades, and low attractiveness/low grades. After reading the vignette, the students rated the partner's popularity. As hypothesized, analyses of variance revealed that attractive partners were significantly more popular than unattractive partners, regardless of whether the partner had high or low grades. Contrary to expectation, attractiveness was not more important to girls than to boys. Integration with past research and suggestions for future research are offered.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221329809596155

We report the findings of a meta-analytic review of experimental studies concerned with the biasing effect of physical attractiveness on a variety of job-related outcomes. In support of implicit personality theory, attractive individuals were found to fare better than unattractive individuals in terms of a number of such outcomes. The weighted mean effect size, d, was .37 for all studies. In addition, tests for moderating effects showed that (a) the attractiveness bias did not differ between studies that provided low versus high amounts of job-relevant information about the targets, (b) the same bias was greater for within-subjects research designs than for between-subjects designs, (c) professionals were as susceptible to the bias as were college students, (d) attractiveness was as important for men as for women, and (e) the biasing effect of attractiveness has decreased in recent years. Implications of these findings are considered.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229517285_The_effects_of_physical_attractiveness_on_job-related_outcomes_A_meta-analysis_of_experimental_studies

And this is a rundown of the various ways physical attractiveness benefits people in the workplace:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224540903365414

I can't break down the studies in these because they are behind paywalls, but there are multiple studies on this showing the advantage of being physically attractive. Now that's a pretty strong factor on its own, but what makes it stronger is that it travels.

This field experiment found that Hong Kong human resources management specialists were influenced by the attractiveness bias in evaluating short-listed candidates for an entry-level trainee position. Zero order, stepwise and hierarchical regressions showed that perceived attractiveness of the candidates was more related to their work experience and work-related skills than to grade-point average and public examination results. Women candidates were generally preferred over male candidates. Further research is suggested to determine if the influence of attractiveness extends over a wider range of jobs and to measure more precisely the influence of attractiveness in different cultures and for men and women.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585190110092857

So in Hong Kong, if you're Chinese then you have an majority group advantage, but if you move to America then you become a minority group. However, if you're attractive in Hong Kong then you have the same advantage in America.

Attractiveness continually has positive influence. Whiteness has a huge variance of outcomes because its less important a trait than something like attractiveness. Whiteness doesn't travel. You are no longer the majority when you move to Hong Kong or Mumbai or Tokyo. That's why white skin is a weak advantage. It won't overcome a low IQ and an unattractive form. It won't overcome low conscientiousness and high agreeableness. It won't overcome an addictive personality. It won't overcome very poor physical health.

Stephen Hawking just died. He was white. That's not why he succeeded. He had a debilitating disease. That mattered more than his skin color. So why did he overcome that? Extreme intelligence and a good personality, along with a period of his life with decent health and decent attractiveness. His intelligence and his other personality traits kept him relevant and able to communicate while his body simply could not accomplish these tasks on its own.

Jfc

There really is no amount of proof about racial inequality that will ever change your mind, huh?

[Optimus]

How do you know I struggle with basic socialization, Freud?

You honestly both spend more time than almost anyone else I observe around this place trying to tear down and berate the people around here and the broad identity buckets you subjectively place them in.

Often, so oblivious to the antagonistic behavior you engage in you find yourself claiming the victim. Like when you ran out of the the politics thread for months because people finally called you on your shit arguments after showing up every other day post election passive aggressively berating anyone you conjured up as sympathetic to the vague catch-all neoliberal cabal.

Goddamn, you're fucking delusional. Not only I don't spend time that much time here but often I stop posting for days or weeks. Plus I never play the victim, I shit on Clinton shills like you, I sometimes act like an asshole but I never play the victim. The reason I don't visit that thread often is because it's nothing but annoying Trump drama I'm not interested in. The big picture is more important to me than whining pointlessly about the idiot, it's been more than a year get over it.

[Kurt Russell]

....okay then etoilet, now explain to me how Hawking managed to fuck his nurse, despite only being able to move his cheek.

[shosta]

wormholed his dick

[Hot Slice]

Idk  just heard from a lot of people that you supported Trump.

 If that was true then you saying all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit but you say that it’s not true so forget it.  It’s just what I heard from a bunch of people

1. So hearing stuff makes it true?
2. Even if allegations were true, let’s merely entertain the thought for sake of argument, your claim would still make no sense. The president, last I checked, certainly hasn’t killed citizens based on thier queerness. Did a “bunch of people” say the president was doing this?
3. Again, what does this have to do with anything? With the latter part of “all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit” in your post, it would be valid to make the assumption that you are trying to derail or demonize someone. Not making any claims of that nature of course, but certainly such a claim could be valid.
4. Again, respectfully, what does this have anything to do with my original post?

[Nola]

I never said white privilege doesn't exist. I said its a weak privilege in comparison to all the other traits a person is born into and the focus on white and male privilege in public discourse betrays a bigotry behind the speakers.

And you’re incredibly wrong about whiteness being a weak privilege.

White privilege is majority privilege in America since the majority of people are white. This is where you get into familiarity bias. However, that can go both ways. For every neophobe there may be a neophile.

Instead of using a term like privilege, let's use a words like advantage and disadvantage because those are imo more relevant to discussions about life experience.

Let's look at a stronger advantage: Physical Attractiveness

Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic performance on 9th graders' ratings of peers' popularity were investigated. Participants were 270 9th graders (152 girls, 118 boys) who read a vignette describing a hypothetical same-sex peer with whom the student had been assigned to complete a project. The partner's attractiveness and academic performance were systematically varied in four conditions: high attractiveness/high grades, high attractiveness/low grades, low attractiveness/high grades, and low attractiveness/low grades. After reading the vignette, the students rated the partner's popularity. As hypothesized, analyses of variance revealed that attractive partners were significantly more popular than unattractive partners, regardless of whether the partner had high or low grades. Contrary to expectation, attractiveness was not more important to girls than to boys. Integration with past research and suggestions for future research are offered.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221329809596155

We report the findings of a meta-analytic review of experimental studies concerned with the biasing effect of physical attractiveness on a variety of job-related outcomes. In support of implicit personality theory, attractive individuals were found to fare better than unattractive individuals in terms of a number of such outcomes. The weighted mean effect size, d, was .37 for all studies. In addition, tests for moderating effects showed that (a) the attractiveness bias did not differ between studies that provided low versus high amounts of job-relevant information about the targets, (b) the same bias was greater for within-subjects research designs than for between-subjects designs, (c) professionals were as susceptible to the bias as were college students, (d) attractiveness was as important for men as for women, and (e) the biasing effect of attractiveness has decreased in recent years. Implications of these findings are considered.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229517285_The_effects_of_physical_attractiveness_on_job-related_outcomes_A_meta-analysis_of_experimental_studies

And this is a rundown of the various ways physical attractiveness benefits people in the workplace:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224540903365414

I can't break down the studies in these because they are behind paywalls, but there are multiple studies on this showing the advantage of being physically attractive. Now that's a pretty strong factor on its own, but what makes it stronger is that it travels.

This field experiment found that Hong Kong human resources management specialists were influenced by the attractiveness bias in evaluating short-listed candidates for an entry-level trainee position. Zero order, stepwise and hierarchical regressions showed that perceived attractiveness of the candidates was more related to their work experience and work-related skills than to grade-point average and public examination results. Women candidates were generally preferred over male candidates. Further research is suggested to determine if the influence of attractiveness extends over a wider range of jobs and to measure more precisely the influence of attractiveness in different cultures and for men and women.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585190110092857

So in Hong Kong, if you're Chinese then you have an majority group advantage, but if you move to America then you become a minority group. However, if you're attractive in Hong Kong then you have the same advantage in America.

Attractiveness continually has positive influence. Whiteness has a huge variance of outcomes because its less important a trait than something like attractiveness. Whiteness doesn't travel. You are no longer the majority when you move to Hong Kong or Mumbai or Tokyo. That's why white skin is a weak advantage. It won't overcome a low IQ and an unattractive form. It won't overcome low conscientiousness and high agreeableness. It won't overcome an addictive personality. It won't overcome very poor physical health.

Stephen Hawking just died. He was white. That's not why he succeeded. He had a debilitating disease. That mattered more than his skin color. So why did he overcome that? Extreme intelligence and a good personality, along with a period of his life with decent health and decent attractiveness. His intelligence and his other personality traits kept him relevant and able to communicate while his body simply could not accomplish these tasks on its own.

Nothing in any of that concludes physical attractiveness is somehow a superior advantage to race in terms of social or economic advantages in countries with long histories of structural racial disadvantage. Or that racial advantages in countries such as ours are comparatively weak to all others, as you asserted earlier.

Frankly I am not even sure how one could ever come to a definitive conclusion on a question like that. Or establish a workable framework to definitively measure it?

This is a good example though of how your thinking process is so ridiculous.

[Cream]

Idk  just heard from a lot of people that you supported Trump.

 If that was true then you saying all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit but you say that it’s not true so forget it.  It’s just what I heard from a bunch of people

1. So hearing stuff makes it true?
2. Even if allegations were true, let’s merely entertain the thought for sake of argument, your claim would still make no sense. The president, last I checked, certainly hasn’t killed citizen based on thier queerness. Did a “bunch of people” say the president was doing this?
3. Again, what does this have to do with anything? With the latter part of “all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit” in your post, it would be valid to make the assumption that you are trying to derail or demonize someone. Not making any claims of that nature of course, but certainly such a claim could be valid.
4. Again, respectfully, what does this have anything to do with my original post?

Well Considering Trump is an incredibly racist, homophobic, sexist abusing money-stealing traitor that tried to ban trans people from serving in the military, supporting him and “letting people live” is completely incompatible.

But you said you don’t support Trump.

[shosta]

Trump isn't so bad.

[Cream]

I never said white privilege doesn't exist. I said its a weak privilege in comparison to all the other traits a person is born into and the focus on white and male privilege in public discourse betrays a bigotry behind the speakers.

And you’re incredibly wrong about whiteness being a weak privilege.

White privilege is majority privilege in America since the majority of people are white. This is where you get into familiarity bias. However, that can go both ways. For every neophobe there may be a neophile.

Instead of using a term like privilege, let's use a words like advantage and disadvantage because those are imo more relevant to discussions about life experience.

Let's look at a stronger advantage: Physical Attractiveness

Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic performance on 9th graders' ratings of peers' popularity were investigated. Participants were 270 9th graders (152 girls, 118 boys) who read a vignette describing a hypothetical same-sex peer with whom the student had been assigned to complete a project. The partner's attractiveness and academic performance were systematically varied in four conditions: high attractiveness/high grades, high attractiveness/low grades, low attractiveness/high grades, and low attractiveness/low grades. After reading the vignette, the students rated the partner's popularity. As hypothesized, analyses of variance revealed that attractive partners were significantly more popular than unattractive partners, regardless of whether the partner had high or low grades. Contrary to expectation, attractiveness was not more important to girls than to boys. Integration with past research and suggestions for future research are offered.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221329809596155

We report the findings of a meta-analytic review of experimental studies concerned with the biasing effect of physical attractiveness on a variety of job-related outcomes. In support of implicit personality theory, attractive individuals were found to fare better than unattractive individuals in terms of a number of such outcomes. The weighted mean effect size, d, was .37 for all studies. In addition, tests for moderating effects showed that (a) the attractiveness bias did not differ between studies that provided low versus high amounts of job-relevant information about the targets, (b) the same bias was greater for within-subjects research designs than for between-subjects designs, (c) professionals were as susceptible to the bias as were college students, (d) attractiveness was as important for men as for women, and (e) the biasing effect of attractiveness has decreased in recent years. Implications of these findings are considered.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229517285_The_effects_of_physical_attractiveness_on_job-related_outcomes_A_meta-analysis_of_experimental_studies

And this is a rundown of the various ways physical attractiveness benefits people in the workplace:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224540903365414

I can't break down the studies in these because they are behind paywalls, but there are multiple studies on this showing the advantage of being physically attractive. Now that's a pretty strong factor on its own, but what makes it stronger is that it travels.

This field experiment found that Hong Kong human resources management specialists were influenced by the attractiveness bias in evaluating short-listed candidates for an entry-level trainee position. Zero order, stepwise and hierarchical regressions showed that perceived attractiveness of the candidates was more related to their work experience and work-related skills than to grade-point average and public examination results. Women candidates were generally preferred over male candidates. Further research is suggested to determine if the influence of attractiveness extends over a wider range of jobs and to measure more precisely the influence of attractiveness in different cultures and for men and women.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585190110092857

So in Hong Kong, if you're Chinese then you have an majority group advantage, but if you move to America then you become a minority group. However, if you're attractive in Hong Kong then you have the same advantage in America.

Attractiveness continually has positive influence. Whiteness has a huge variance of outcomes because its less important a trait than something like attractiveness. Whiteness doesn't travel. You are no longer the majority when you move to Hong Kong or Mumbai or Tokyo. That's why white skin is a weak advantage. It won't overcome a low IQ and an unattractive form. It won't overcome low conscientiousness and high agreeableness. It won't overcome an addictive personality. It won't overcome very poor physical health.

Stephen Hawking just died. He was white. That's not why he succeeded. He had a debilitating disease. That mattered more than his skin color. So why did he overcome that? Extreme intelligence and a good personality, along with a period of his life with decent health and decent attractiveness. His intelligence and his other personality traits kept him relevant and able to communicate while his body simply could not accomplish these tasks on its own.

Nothing in any of that concludes physical attractiveness is somehow a superior advantage to race in terms of social or economic advantages in countries with long histories of structural racial disadvantage. Or that racial advantages in countries such as ours are comparatively weak to all others, as you asserted earlier.

Frankly I am not even sure how one could ever come to a definitive conclusion on a question like that. Or establish a workable framework to definitively measure it?

This is a good example though of how your thinking process is so ridiculous.

Thank you! I feel like I’m in fucking crazy town here.

[Nola]

Goddamn, you're fucking delusional. Not only I don't spend time that much time here but often I stop posting for days or weeks. Plus I never play the victim, I shit on Clinton shills like you, I sometimes act like an asshole but I never play the victim. The reason I don't visit that thread often is because it's nothing but annoying Trump drama I'm not interested in. The big picture is more important to me than whining pointlessly about the idiot, it's been more than a year get over it.

You are kind of proving my point.

[etiolate]

cream is arguing in bad faith
 

save me Reset mods!
 

oh wait you were fired nm

[Boredfrom]

Etiolate doesn’t exactly represent the views of most people here, thought.

[HaughtyFrank]

Oh, God Cream is reporting people on the bore, just look at what you have done

[Cream]

cream is arguing in bad faith
 

save me Reset mods!
 

oh wait you were fired nm

Let me make sure I understand you. If someone is attractive in hong Kong then they will have the advantages of that attractiveness in America? I just want to make sure this is what you said.

[Drainage]

I’d rather drag my chiseled body through a coral reef than read this shit.

[Cream]

Oh, God Cream is reporting people on the bore, just look at what you have done

Only person I’ve reported is thisismyusername for calling me it after being told by a mod to stop.

[shosta]

You picked the right person to report. thisismyusername actually hates black people.

[etiolate]

Nola: Physical attractiveness is a reliable advantage. Being hispanic and attractive and intelligent is going to do more for you than being white and lacking those traits.  Because skin color does not travel as an advantage. Skin color can become a disadvantage if you're trying to get into college with AA, for example. It fades as advantage when you travel to another country. It fades when you travel to a different city. However, physical attractiveness tends to not fade when put in different situations.


I'll put it another way: There are many places in the world where it's not good to be the white guy. There are far fewer places int he world where it's not good to be the attractive guy.

Overall, most people are a factor of a multitude of traits that determine their advantages and disadvantages. Some traits can be an advantage and a disadvantage, as there is contextual influence at play.

This is why your dumbass is on ignore.

[Boredfrom]

You should report filler, Cream.

[Raist]

10 pages today. What the fuck is wrong with you cunts.

spoiler (click to show/hide)

What did I miss? 

[close]

[Optimus]

Goddamn, you're fucking delusional. Not only I don't spend time that much time here but often I stop posting for days or weeks. Plus I never play the victim, I shit on Clinton shills like you, I sometimes act like an asshole but I never play the victim. The reason I don't visit that thread often is because it's nothing but annoying Trump drama I'm not interested in. The big picture is more important to me than whining pointlessly about the idiot, it's been more than a year get over it.

You are kind of proving my point.

Proving wrong your absolutely delusional bullshit means... I'm proving your point? What a goddamn moron.

[Cream]

Nola: Physical attractiveness is a reliable advantage. Being hispanic and attractive and intelligent is going to do more for you than being white and lacking those traits.  Because skin color does not travel as an advantage. Skin color can become a disadvantage if you're trying to get into college with AA, for example. It fades as advantage when you travel to another country. It fades when you travel to a different city. However, physical attractiveness tends to not fade when put in different situations.


I'll put it another way: There are many places in the world where it's not good to be the white guy. There are far fewer places int he world where it's not good to be the attractive guy.

Overall, most people are a factor of a multitude of traits that determine their advantages and disadvantages.

This is why your dumbass is on ignore.

Seriously. I want to make sure this is absolute clear to me:

If a man is attractive in hong Kong, he will have the benefit of that attractiveness in America.

Is this exactly what you’re saying?

[etiolate]

Nola: Physical attractiveness is a reliable advantage. Being hispanic and attractive and intelligent is going to do more for you than being white and lacking those traits.  Because skin color does not travel as an advantage. Skin color can become a disadvantage if you're trying to get into college with AA, for example. It fades as advantage when you travel to another country. It fades when you travel to a different city. However, physical attractiveness tends to not fade when put in different situations.


I'll put it another way: There are many places in the world where it's not good to be the white guy. There are far fewer places int he world where it's not good to be the attractive guy.

Overall, most people are a factor of a multitude of traits that determine their advantages and disadvantages.

This is why your dumbass is on ignore.

Seriously. I want to make sure this is absolute clear to me:

If a man is attractive in hong Kong, he will have the benefit of that attractiveness in America.

Is this exactly what you’re saying?

Generally, yes. Attractiveness advantage travels. Majority advantage cannot travel by definition.

I would like to restate that we are a prism of advantages and disadvantages based on traits and life experiences, with some of those traits and experiences being able to serve both negatively and positively toward our lives.

[Boredfrom]

Goddamn, you're fucking delusional. Not only I don't spend time that much time here but often I stop posting for days or weeks. Plus I never play the victim, I shit on Clinton shills like you, I sometimes act like an asshole but I never play the victim. The reason I don't visit that thread often is because it's nothing but annoying Trump drama I'm not interested in. The big picture is more important to me than whining pointlessly about the idiot, it's been more than a year get over it.

You are kind of proving my point.

Proving wrong your absolutely delusional bullshit means... I'm proving your point? What a goddamn moron.

You said some posts ago that you fervently  read the Bore a lot.

[Cream]

Nola: Physical attractiveness is a reliable advantage. Being hispanic and attractive and intelligent is going to do more for you than being white and lacking those traits.  Because skin color does not travel as an advantage. Skin color can become a disadvantage if you're trying to get into college with AA, for example. It fades as advantage when you travel to another country. It fades when you travel to a different city. However, physical attractiveness tends to not fade when put in different situations.


I'll put it another way: There are many places in the world where it's not good to be the white guy. There are far fewer places int he world where it's not good to be the attractive guy.

Overall, most people are a factor of a multitude of traits that determine their advantages and disadvantages.

This is why your dumbass is on ignore.

Seriously. I want to make sure this is absolute clear to me:

If a man is attractive in hong Kong, he will have the benefit of that attractiveness in America.

Is this exactly what you’re saying?

Generally, yes. Attractiveness advantage travels. Majority advantage cannot travel.

Okay. Got it.

So then WHY THE FUCK would the people in America think this man is just as attractive as the people in Hong Kong so if he’s NOT a part of the majority and thus does not follow the traditional beauty standards of that culture?

He would LOSE some of the benefits of his attractiveness because... you guessed it, HES NOT WHITE GENIUS

[Transhuman]

Jfc

There really is no amount of proof about racial inequality that will ever change your mind, huh?

I don't want to put words in etoilate's mouth, but he's not saying the modern world is a post-racial meritocracy. Just that someone born into the good life in America these days seems to make a point to not count their blessings.

[Optimus]

Goddamn, you're fucking delusional. Not only I don't spend time that much time here but often I stop posting for days or weeks. Plus I never play the victim, I shit on Clinton shills like you, I sometimes act like an asshole but I never play the victim. The reason I don't visit that thread often is because it's nothing but annoying Trump drama I'm not interested in. The big picture is more important to me than whining pointlessly about the idiot, it's been more than a year get over it.

You are kind of proving my point.

Proving wrong your absolutely delusional bullshit means... I'm proving your point? What a goddamn moron.

You said some posts ago that you fervently  read the Bore a lot.

No, I said I've been reading thebore for a long time.

[Cream]

Jfc

There really is no amount of proof about racial inequality that will ever change your mind, huh?

I don't want to put words in etoilate's mouth, but he's not saying the modern world is a post-racial meritocracy. Just that someone born into the good life in America these days seems to make a point to not count their blessings.

That can be a completely true statement at the same time as saying there is massive inequality in all areas of American society and black people have it much worse than whites. The evidence, documented by basically by every organization and group possible overwhelmingly supports this.

[Boredfrom]

Goddamn, you're fucking delusional. Not only I don't spend time that much time here but often I stop posting for days or weeks. Plus I never play the victim, I shit on Clinton shills like you, I sometimes act like an asshole but I never play the victim. The reason I don't visit that thread often is because it's nothing but annoying Trump drama I'm not interested in. The big picture is more important to me than whining pointlessly about the idiot, it's been more than a year get over it.

You are kind of proving my point.

Proving wrong your absolutely delusional bullshit means... I'm proving your point? What a goddamn moron.

You said some posts ago that you fervently  read the Bore a lot.

No, I said I've been reading thebore for a long time.

So you did spend a lot of time here...

[etiolate]

Nola: Physical attractiveness is a reliable advantage. Being hispanic and attractive and intelligent is going to do more for you than being white and lacking those traits.  Because skin color does not travel as an advantage. Skin color can become a disadvantage if you're trying to get into college with AA, for example. It fades as advantage when you travel to another country. It fades when you travel to a different city. However, physical attractiveness tends to not fade when put in different situations.


I'll put it another way: There are many places in the world where it's not good to be the white guy. There are far fewer places int he world where it's not good to be the attractive guy.

Overall, most people are a factor of a multitude of traits that determine their advantages and disadvantages.

This is why your dumbass is on ignore.

Seriously. I want to make sure this is absolute clear to me:

If a man is attractive in hong Kong, he will have the benefit of that attractiveness in America.

Is this exactly what you’re saying?

Generally, yes. Attractiveness advantage travels. Majority advantage cannot travel.

Okay. Got it.

So then WHY THE FUCK would the people in America think this man is just as attractive as the people in Hong Kong so if he’s NOT a part of the majority and thus does not follow the traditional beauty standards of that culture?

He would LOSE some of the benefits of his attractiveness because... you guessed it, HES NOT WHITE GENIUS

Well because as long as you're not racist then you fuck what's hot.

[Cream]

Nola: Physical attractiveness is a reliable advantage. Being hispanic and attractive and intelligent is going to do more for you than being white and lacking those traits.  Because skin color does not travel as an advantage. Skin color can become a disadvantage if you're trying to get into college with AA, for example. It fades as advantage when you travel to another country. It fades when you travel to a different city. However, physical attractiveness tends to not fade when put in different situations.


I'll put it another way: There are many places in the world where it's not good to be the white guy. There are far fewer places int he world where it's not good to be the attractive guy.

Overall, most people are a factor of a multitude of traits that determine their advantages and disadvantages.

This is why your dumbass is on ignore.

Seriously. I want to make sure this is absolute clear to me:

If a man is attractive in hong Kong, he will have the benefit of that attractiveness in America.

Is this exactly what you’re saying?

Generally, yes. Attractiveness advantage travels. Majority advantage cannot travel.

Okay. Got it.

So then WHY THE FUCK would the people in America think this man is just as attractive as the people in Hong Kong so if he’s NOT a part of the majority and thus does not follow the traditional beauty standards of that culture?

He would LOSE some of the benefits of his attractiveness because... you guessed it, HES NOT WHITE GENIUS

Well because as long as you're not racist then you fuck what's hot.

1. Who said anything about fucking?  I thought we were talking about how attractiveness is advantage in your life.

2. You are SO close...

[Broseidon]

I’d rather drag my chiseled body through a coral reef than read this shit.

evilore alt spotted

[Jenkem]

Bobby Roberts

[Broseidon]

hey floptimus if you want to prove to Nola that you do more than write invective and get Mad Online and actually have a kickin rad life IRL then stop posting for an extended period of time. In fact if you stop posting forever he will be ultra-owned and you will have won.

[railGUN]

[Transhuman]

Jfc

There really is no amount of proof about racial inequality that will ever change your mind, huh?

I don't want to put words in etoilate's mouth, but he's not saying the modern world is a post-racial meritocracy. Just that someone born into the good life in America these days seems to make a point to not count their blessings.

That can be a completely true statement at the same time as saying there is massive inequality in all areas of American society and black people have it much worse than whites. The evidence, documented by basically by every organization and group possible overwhelmingly supports this.

I don't doubt it. I am trying to explain what etoilate is saying. I have never set foot in America. My only metric with which to judge everyday American racial equality is old episodes of The Daily Show.

[agrajag]

Idk  just heard from a lot of people that you supported Trump.

 If that was true then you saying all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit but you say that it’s not true so forget it.  It’s just what I heard from a bunch of people

1. So hearing stuff makes it true?
2. Even if allegations were true, let’s merely entertain the thought for sake of argument, your claim would still make no sense. The president, last I checked, certainly hasn’t killed citizens based on thier queerness. Did a “bunch of people” say the president was doing this?
3. Again, what does this have to do with anything? With the latter part of “all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit” in your post, it would be valid to make the assumption that you are trying to derail or demonize someone. Not making any claims of that nature of course, but certainly such a claim could be valid.
4. Again, respectfully, what does this have anything to do with my original post?

Tfw Huelen is dismantling you with logic and reason

[shosta]

My only metric with which to judge everyday American racial equality is old episodes of The Daily Show.

newsfeed

[Transhuman]

When Jon Stewart frowns I know it's been a rough week but when he looks exasperated I know t's been a really rough week.

[etiolate]

cream: I said fucking because attractiveness has a sexual element to it

And what is found attractive also travels, which is why attractiveness travels. In men, broad shoulders, small waist, good facial lines and so on. Eye color may be one aspect of attractiveness that changes across borders.

[Optimus]

hey floptimus if you want to prove to Nola that you do more than write invective and get Mad Online and actually have a kickin rad life IRL then stop posting for an extended period of time. In fact if you stop posting forever he will be ultra-owned and you will have won.

But how will I annoy SJWs like you then?

[BisMarckie]

What did I miss? 

[daemon]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/australia-offering-fast-track-visas-for-white-south-african-farmers.29474/

South African white farmers about to be given the genocide treatment given fast visas? Better virtue signal about the implicit racism

[Hot Slice]

Idk  just heard from a lot of people that you supported Trump.

 If that was true then you saying all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit but you say that it’s not true so forget it.  It’s just what I heard from a bunch of people

1. So hearing stuff makes it true?
2. Even if allegations were true, let’s merely entertain the thought for sake of argument, your claim would still make no sense. The president, last I checked, certainly hasn’t killed citizen based on thier queerness. Did a “bunch of people” say the president was doing this?
3. Again, what does this have to do with anything? With the latter part of “all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit” in your post, it would be valid to make the assumption that you are trying to derail or demonize someone. Not making any claims of that nature of course, but certainly such a claim could be valid.
4. Again, respectfully, what does this have anything to do with my original post?

Well Considering Trump is an incredibly racist, homophobic, sexist abusing money-stealing traitor that tried to ban trans people from serving in the military, supporting him and “letting people live” is completely incompatible.

But you said you don’t support Trump.

okay?

Again, you are the one who brought the president up. The president has absolutely nothing to do with what I posted originally. You likely (though I'll make no accusations, I’m better than that) mentioned the president because you assumed I voted for him, possibly to give you leverage in whateve point you were attempting to make against mine for some reason (original post was just that, a post on how one person sees the world).

It’s almost as if you were doing this.

Person 1: I like turtles. I like that they go in and out of thier shells and they are cute. That’s just me though.

Person 2: Didnt you once have a cat?

Person 1: No? What does that have to do with anything?

Person 2: I heard you did. cats give you cat scratch fever. That is bad, but you say you didn’t have a cat.

Person 1: ?

Seriously, what the actual heck is going on? What are you trying to do or get at?

[Broseidon]

hey floptimus if you want to prove to Nola that you do more than write invective and get Mad Online and actually have a kickin rad life IRL then stop posting for an extended period of time. In fact if you stop posting forever he will be ultra-owned and you will have won.

But how will I annoy SJWs like you then?

could spend much more of your time making madposts ITT but that might constitute a self-own on your part

 

[BisMarckie]

Golden Pigeon is basically Lime. One day he claims to be from Uruguay, the next day he is French 

[Optimus]

hey floptimus if you want to prove to Nola that you do more than write invective and get Mad Online and actually have a kickin rad life IRL then stop posting for an extended period of time. In fact if you stop posting forever he will be ultra-owned and you will have won.

But how will I annoy SJWs like you then?

could spend much more of your time making madposts ITT but that might constitute a self-own on your part

 

I think I'm content with my content. The fact that stalkerish SJ Ws like you make desperate posts once in a while only proves to me I'm on the right path. I will never reach the level of annoyance etiolate brings by just debating you but hell, I never wanted to be the best, good is enough for me.

[Broseidon]

[El Babua]

This thread being set on fire in the best possible way

[HaughtyFrank]

Golden Pigeon is basically Lime. One day he claims to be from Uruguay, the next day he is French 

What blows my mind is that he isn't Turkish. Apparently he just really likes the taste of Erdogans dick

[Cream]

Idk  just heard from a lot of people that you supported Trump.

 If that was true then you saying all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit but you say that it’s not true so forget it.  It’s just what I heard from a bunch of people

1. So hearing stuff makes it true?
2. Even if allegations were true, let’s merely entertain the thought for sake of argument, your claim would still make no sense. The president, last I checked, certainly hasn’t killed citizen based on thier queerness. Did a “bunch of people” say the president was doing this?
3. Again, what does this have to do with anything? With the latter part of “all this stuff about letting people live would be bullshit” in your post, it would be valid to make the assumption that you are trying to derail or demonize someone. Not making any claims of that nature of course, but certainly such a claim could be valid.
4. Again, respectfully, what does this have anything to do with my original post?

Well Considering Trump is an incredibly racist, homophobic, sexist abusing money-stealing traitor that tried to ban trans people from serving in the military, supporting him and “letting people live” is completely incompatible.

But you said you don’t support Trump.

okay?

Again, you are the one who brought the president up. The president has absolutely nothing to do with what I posted originally. You likely (though I'll make no accusations, I’m better than that) mentioned the president because you assumed I voted for him, possibly to give you leverage in whateve point you were attempting to make against mine for some reason (original post was just that, a post on how one person sees the world).

It’s almost as if you were doing this.

Person 1: I like turtles. I like that they go in and out of thier shells and they are cute. That’s just me though.

Person 2: Didnt you once have a cat?

Person 1: No? What does that have to do with anything?

Person 2: I heard you did. cats give you cat scratch fever. That is bad, but you say you didn’t have a cat.

Person 1: ?

Seriously, what the actual heck is going on? What are you trying to do or get at?

 I literally just explained it to you.  It is impossible to support Trump and also let people live at the same time.  I was under the impression that you supported Trump yet here you are saying that you let people live.  You have corrected me by telling me that you do not support Trump which I understand now but when you said that you let people live I was under the assumption that you supported Trump which would make that statement a lie.

[Cream]

(Image removed from quote.)

Seriously. Stop responding to It. Let It go back to it's mod safety board.

 You were told to stop calling me it so why do you keep calling me that?

[shosta]

I told you, timu hates black people. It's really crazy. I think he's from Florida.

[nudemacusers]

It? 

[daemon]

(Image removed from quote.)

Seriously. Stop responding to It. Let It go back to it's mod safety board.

 You were told to stop calling me it so why do you keep calling me that?

Don't be like that, he capitalized the i.