Not that anybody did anything wrong, of course, but an article that didn't bother to wait for anyone to reply before getting published, which was based on a single persons mondegreen, and despite being corrected post-publication, confirming there is no news story, has yet to be fully corrected or indeed, retracted, as a non-story, but it wasn't the authors decision to publish without any fact checking. Or tweet and then delete the same unchecked sentiment on their personal Twitter.