So, if someone goes to Wyoming with a Kamala Harris campaign hat, is it not a moot point to say, "He knows what he's doing. He's wearing a political affiliation's clothes when everyone there disagrees with that political affiliation." They're invariably going to not have a taste for it. Isn't this just something that is just obvious on its face about supporting political candidates in a democratic country in general? IE: moot?
I mean, comparing Trumpism and any sane American political party makes for a bad analogy on it's face, but the contentious point is that old man maga wore this hat with the express intention of stirring up shit which is not a moot point because Boredform believes he's just a doddering old racist who supports his president.
A red maga hat can't be compared to a KKK hood as some people want to, but it is absolutely racist symbology.
there are some jews that want to destroy white people, kippas are absolutely racist symbology now
there are some muslims that want to kill non-muslims, hijabs are absolutely racist symbology now
there are some christians that want to kill fegs, the crucifix is absolutely homophobic symbology now
there are some white people that are white supremacists, all non-verbal communications of "OK" using a hand sign is absolutely racist symbology now
there are some indians that want to kill pakistanis, cows are absolutely racist symbology now