Author Topic: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW  (Read 1177597 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

clothedmacuser

  • Defender of Centrist Scum
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4560 on: December 06, 2019, 02:11:35 AM »
Some dork at work would mansplain to me.  I would make a joke such as, "and he was eating squid eyeballs!  It's like the Japanese lost a war or something to eat food like that."

And this ace dude would interject as everyone was having a hearty laugh, "well actually, they did lose a war.  It was known as . . . " 

He just sucked the air out of the room and ruined my hilarity.  I still fantasize about just punching him in the face and everyone ignoring it.
sigh

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4561 on: December 06, 2019, 02:18:22 AM »
He sounds pretty cool

nudemacusers

  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4562 on: December 06, 2019, 02:20:41 AM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/do-you-ask-for-consent-prior-to-sexting.157398/post-27110168
(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)

Quote from: GnarlyGunk
I don’t wanna derail the thread so I’ll just say thank you <3
Quote
Wait what??? This Booki guy is your ex?
Quote
Fam its derailed trust me, and for good reason
Quote from: GnarlyGunk
*no longer responding. If anyone wants to know more in details I can pm*
4,000 posts vs 400. I think we know who to trust.
﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽

NekoFever

  • Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4563 on: December 06, 2019, 02:29:21 AM »
That sexting thread has a yes/no poll that allows multiple choice answers.

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4564 on: December 06, 2019, 02:32:04 AM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/hillary-clinton-visits-the-howard-stern-show-for-her-first-interview.157162/post-27094507
Quote
User banned (2 weeks): condescending mansplaining + previously warned for condescendingly speaking down to marginalised people
Quote from: Morrigan
I don't agree with Brazil's opinion on her at all (though I do wish others would read his follow-up posts instead of jerking their knees here), but there is nothing sexist in what he said. A lot of the so-called criticism of Clinton you see around does come from sexism, but there's also plenty of legitimate reasons to criticize her too. Let's not conflate things here.
Glad the ResetEra mod team is so invested in clarifying what is and isn't sexism.

So you wanna weigh in on this one or what
Quote
She was on Graham Norton last weekend and it had never occurred to me just how much her voice grates. That upwards inflection that she does even multiple times within a fucking sentence is chalkboard and nails to me.
I'll wait

Quote
User banned (3 days): perpetuating stereotypes, thread derail

She was on Graham Norton last weekend and it had never occurred to me just how much her voice grates. That upwards inflection that she does even multiple times within a fucking sentence is chalkboard and nails to me.
I still maintain that Morrigan is the most thin-skinned cunt on the mod team. She gets away with her behaviour because of reasons I am unable to comprehend. Straight up cunt of a human.
Spud

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4565 on: December 06, 2019, 02:33:16 AM »
mansplaining isnt a real thing you absolute pillocks

Like many things, it has a good basis but gets twisted into a unrecognizable form and misused.
A man chiding/correcting whatever, something a woman does or says isn't necessarily mansplaining.

A really straightforward example, hm, what could you use to describe aside from buffoonery say... me trying to correct a woman on something to do with ovulation cycles that somehow became a conversation point?

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4566 on: December 06, 2019, 02:33:37 AM »
I don't use the c-word but she is not a nice lady.

PogiJones

  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4567 on: December 06, 2019, 02:52:14 AM »
mansplaining isnt a real thing you absolute pillocks

Like many things, it has a good basis but gets twisted into a unrecognizable form and misused.
A man chiding/correcting whatever, something a woman does or says isn't necessarily mansplaining.

A really straightforward example, hm, what could you use to describe aside from buffoonery say... me trying to correct a woman on something to do with ovulation cycles that somehow became a conversation point?

I'm sure countless women doctors know more about sperm and prostates than me. Something is either right or wrong, regardless of whose mouth it comes out of.

But I will say that what mansplain was originally meant to convey is a real thing: sexist condescension. If a man tells a woman something in a condescending way because she's a woman, that would fit the original intent. But the term has been poison since the start, and as you said, has only gotten twisted and worse since then.

who is ted danson?

  • ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀✋💎✋🤬
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4568 on: December 06, 2019, 02:55:19 AM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/do-you-ask-for-consent-prior-to-sexting.157398/post-27110168
(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)

Quote from: GnarlyGunk
I don’t wanna derail the thread so I’ll just say thank you <3
Quote
Wait what??? This Booki guy is your ex?
Quote
Fam its derailed trust me, and for good reason
Quote from: GnarlyGunk
*no longer responding. If anyone wants to know more in details I can pm*
Not banned. So much for believe all women. No wonder caravans of women are leaving era in droves. You aint slick cerium.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4569 on: December 06, 2019, 02:57:03 AM »
I mean they didn't say they were a woman so i'm not sure who to believe: yet

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4570 on: December 06, 2019, 03:07:49 AM »
mansplaining isnt a real thing you absolute pillocks

Like many things, it has a good basis but gets twisted into a unrecognizable form and misused.
A man chiding/correcting whatever, something a woman does or says isn't necessarily mansplaining.

A really straightforward example, hm, what could you use to describe aside from buffoonery say... me trying to correct a woman on something to do with ovulation cycles that somehow became a conversation point?

I'm sure countless women doctors know more about sperm and prostates than me. Something is either right or wrong, regardless of whose mouth it comes out of.

But I will say that what mansplain was originally meant to convey is a real thing: sexist condescension. If a man tells a woman something in a condescending way because she's a woman, that would fit the original intent. But the term has been poison since the start, and as you said, has only gotten twisted and worse since then.
There's no way to know if a person is being a condescending asshole due to sexism, unless he says something like 'woman please' or whatever else is cartoonishly stupid. We have a word for condescending people already, to inject your own perception into a routine social interaction is something i'm just going to laugh at.

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4571 on: December 06, 2019, 03:09:53 AM »
I've known plenty of condescending, pushy people who talk over others and think they know everything, and about half were men and half were women.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4572 on: December 06, 2019, 03:11:21 AM »
I've known plenty of condescending, pushy people who talk over others and think they know everything, and about half were men and half were women.
100% were star wars fans

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4573 on: December 06, 2019, 03:12:24 AM »
One of the benefits of being genderfluid is that when accused of "mansplaining" you can FACT CHECK their bigot ass for not understanding that you identified as not male during that moment.

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4574 on: December 06, 2019, 03:13:43 AM »
mansplain to me what mansplaining is then
The perfect way to do that would be to point at a dictionary, I guess.

https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/mansplain

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4575 on: December 06, 2019, 03:16:19 AM »
A really straightforward example, hm, what could you use to describe aside from buffoonery say... me trying to correct a woman on something to do with ovulation cycles that somehow became a conversation point?
That would be a less controversial use, yeah. Though I'd say that yo mama doesn't need to be fat for yo mama jokes to work, either. It's just that people get hung up on being singled out for their identity.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
understandably
[close]

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4576 on: December 06, 2019, 03:17:53 AM »
mansplain to me what mansplaining is then
The perfect way to do that would be to point at a dictionary, I guess.

https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/mansplain

He doesn't want examples of the word used in a sentence, he wants actual examples of mansplaining. Like actual, real world examples.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4577 on: December 06, 2019, 03:23:46 AM »
mansplain to me what mansplaining is then
The perfect way to do that would be to point at a dictionary, I guess.

https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/mansplain
Again, that's just being condescending

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4578 on: December 06, 2019, 03:31:27 AM »
4,000 posts vs 400. I think we know who to trust.
Not to mention someone who was an original Resettler vs. someone who registered in August 2019. Not slick, gator.

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4579 on: December 06, 2019, 03:31:39 AM »
Again, that's just being condescending
Now imagine the man being condescending is doing it based on the presumption that the woman they're talking to doesn't know the thing, specifically because she is a woman (yes, this is also a presumption, no need to point it out).

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4580 on: December 06, 2019, 03:46:46 AM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/just-witnessed-some-casual-racism-wtf.157327/post-27095968
Quote
User Banned (Duration Pending): Racist rhetoric over multiple posts

Quote
I thought the term "negro" was a slur but there were some recent articles posted on resetera that casually use it

https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-root-pete-buttigieg-is-a-lying-mf.155393/
Quote
Quote
This post is a pretty gussied-up way to say "But black people say it, why can't I say it?"
fuck off, you troll. The word appears in the first sentence of an article on a fairly mainstream site and no one in that thread reacts to it. It made me wonder if outside my country it saw use.
Quote
Quote
Wtf, calm down dude.

And no, that word isn't mainstream even if it is in a mainstream site.
Guy managed several leaps of logic from my posting a link to the word being used where people's reactions did not match my own to it meaning I must want to secretly chant the word in public. I've worked on anti-racism campaigns before, I'm not going to put up with some internet troll trying to stir up drama for e-points.

And I didn't say the word was mainstream, I said the site was, i.e. not a fringe source that might sneak an offensive word in there for an agenda. I don't see how you could conclude from that that I'm saying the word is mainstream.
:idont

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4581 on: December 06, 2019, 03:48:51 AM »
Again, that's just being condescending
Now imagine the man being condescending is doing it based on the presumption that the woman they're talking to doesn't know the thing, specifically because she is a woman (yes, this is also a presumption, no need to point it out).
that's like your opinion man  :idont

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4582 on: December 06, 2019, 03:59:18 AM »
Again, that's just being condescending
Now imagine the man being condescending is doing it based on the presumption that the woman they're talking to doesn't know the thing, specifically because she is a woman (yes, this is also a presumption, no need to point it out).
that's like your opinion man  :idont
That's a whole other ball game. Mansplaining is certainly "a thing" though, regardless of whether you think it should exist as a concept. And I'm enough of a condescending bore to feel the need to point it out.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4583 on: December 06, 2019, 04:01:30 AM »
Again, that's just being condescending
Now imagine the man being condescending is doing it based on the presumption that the woman they're talking to doesn't know the thing, specifically because she is a woman (yes, this is also a presumption, no need to point it out).
that's like your opinion man  :idont
That's a whole other ball game. Mansplaining is certainly "a thing" though, regardless of whether you think it should exist as a concept. And I'm enough of a condescending bore to feel the need to point it out.
Disagree, but you do you

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4584 on: December 06, 2019, 04:05:06 AM »
I'm not a condescending bore? :uguu

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4585 on: December 06, 2019, 04:06:53 AM »
lol not that part, but even when you are love ya anyway :heart

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4586 on: December 06, 2019, 04:10:03 AM »
If a man says something to a woman and the woman doesn't like it, it's mansplaining.

It's a meaningless word and it has no longevity as a concept.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4587 on: December 06, 2019, 04:23:07 AM »
another one:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/can-someone-get-your-mans-mayor-pete.157373/post-27101400
Quote
User Banned (Duration Pending): Inflammatory Community Generalizations; Numerous Prior Bans for Hostility and Inflammatory Behavior
Quote
Some people are willing marks.
check out any page of the poliera OT, they worship the ground he walks on

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4588 on: December 06, 2019, 04:25:19 AM »
meanwhile in PoliERA
Quote
Many months ago I saw Pete as a uniquely impressive rising-star Democrat straight out of The West Wing.

It now feels right to hear that Lawrence, one of the shows writers, begs to f***ing differ lmao
:yuck

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4589 on: December 06, 2019, 04:26:26 AM »



:noah

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4590 on: December 06, 2019, 04:27:06 AM »
"Mansplaining" is just a gendered term for "being an arsehole".

Good one feminists, you just played yourself.


Spud

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4591 on: December 06, 2019, 04:28:38 AM »
Quote
Bloomberg should do the entire country and just buy out Fox news... but we all know why he won't.
:lol

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4592 on: December 06, 2019, 04:29:01 AM »
lol not that part, but even when you are love ya anyway :heart
Disarming kindness, my one weakness. :'(

Transhuman wants to play though. Heya. :-*

If a man says something to a woman and the woman doesn't like it, it's mansplaining.

It's a meaningless word and it has no longevity as a concept.
You can't say it's meaningless, then give a (reductive) explanation of its meaning. That's against some kind of rule, I'm sure. >:(

And fuck longevity. It's in use now, that's what matters.

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4593 on: December 06, 2019, 04:31:10 AM »
Tiddies unbanned  :rejoice

https://www.resetera.com/threads/your-daily-dose-of-star-wars-actor-billy-dee-williams-embraces-gender-fluidity-using-him-and-her-pronouns.156117/post-26935615

No luck for this guy though
Quote
User Banned (1 Week): Dismissing Issues around Gender Identity
Mmh, I don't get his comment, to be honest. Did he EVER actually use 'her' pronouns before this interview? Seems like he just came up with this on a whim.

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4594 on: December 06, 2019, 05:10:10 AM »
You can't say it's meaningless, then give a (reductive) explanation of its meaning.

It's okay Rufus, i'm never going to explain anything to women from now on, just to be safe.

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4595 on: December 06, 2019, 05:19:52 AM »
You can't say it's meaningless, then give a (reductive) explanation of its meaning.

It's okay Rufus, i'm never going to explain anything to women from now on, just to be safe.
:lol
I don't care about that (in that way), but it's nice to see you stand your ground. That means you'll stick around.

Welcome to the Bore. :salute

clothedmacuser

  • Defender of Centrist Scum
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4596 on: December 06, 2019, 05:26:35 AM »
I just hope someday we learn what the fucking deal with excelsiorlef is.  Enzom and Labor as well. 


I guess I run in circles that auto-eject such types. 
sigh

SmokyDave

  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4597 on: December 06, 2019, 06:47:05 AM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/boris-johnson-confirms-he-wants-to-control-people-of-colour-coming-to-the-uk.157463/

Time to revisit the N-Word Store.

Edit: cracking up at the cats that can't believe anyone would ever say 'people of talent'. Google is your friend, you reset chumps.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2019, 06:53:15 AM by SmokyDave »

Tiops

  • Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4598 on: December 06, 2019, 06:51:57 AM »
mansplaining isnt a real thing you absolute pillocks

And what about cultural eavesdropping?

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4599 on: December 06, 2019, 07:00:23 AM »
mansplaining isnt a real thing you absolute pillocks

And what about cultural eavesdropping?
Is this like when you overhear a mexican man talking about taco bell then decide to get some yourself? :thinking

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4600 on: December 06, 2019, 07:01:44 AM »
I think that's their way of saying white people shouldn't visit rap shows

Straight Edge

  • Boots & Braces
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4601 on: December 06, 2019, 07:26:28 AM »
I think that's their way of saying white people shouldn't visit rap shows

Strange that Noname has a white drummer and guitarist in her band. Will they be admitted to the show?
Oi Oi

NekoFever

  • Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4602 on: December 06, 2019, 07:38:31 AM »
They're actually mixed ethnicity but very much white-passing.

joeboy101

  • TheBore rulez
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4603 on: December 06, 2019, 07:42:32 AM »
I think that's their way of saying white people shouldn't visit rap shows

Strange that Noname has a white drummer and guitarist in her band. Will they be admitted to the show?

Depends. Are they singing the lyrics as well, or just keeping their heads and privilege down and just playing the music?

Straight Edge

  • Boots & Braces
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4604 on: December 06, 2019, 07:43:58 AM »
And she did a tiny desk concert on NPR which is the whitest audience you could ever reach.
Oi Oi

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4605 on: December 06, 2019, 08:10:48 AM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/sasha-grey-plays-the-witcher-3.157436/page-4#post-27114670

Quote
This thread is locked while we moderate inappropriate responses. The thread maybe reopened pending moderator review.

Benji, I expect a report on my desk this afternoon.
Margs

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4606 on: December 06, 2019, 08:14:16 AM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/boris-johnson-confirms-he-wants-to-control-people-of-colour-coming-to-the-uk.157463/

Time to revisit the N-Word Store.

Edit: cracking up at the cats that can't believe anyone would ever say 'people of talent'. Google is your friend, you reset chumps.

Quote from: Arkestry
He 100% says colour. I've listened to it 10 times trying to hear 'talent' and there's no 't' sound. It's colour.

Narrator: Except Arkestry was 100% wrong.
Spud

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4607 on: December 06, 2019, 08:23:57 AM »
Quote
He clearly says colour (or at the very least definitely not talent) though because as you can seen in the video you posted exactly how the man says the word talent. It's very distinct and phonetic. It's impossible to mix up with with the word colour. The t's are clear (you can hear both of the them in the second but none in the first) and likely how he was brought up to pronounce that word.

Whether it was on purpose, who knows.

Impossible you say? So why have you managed to mix it up you fucking distinguished mentally-challenged fellowed, basement-dwelling, tendies-eating fuckwit?

Quote
i've never heard the phrase "people of talent" before personally
What a surprise! People with no talent have never heard the phrase...

Quote
It basically means 'we should be like Australia where we only let people in if they have skills we need'.
Yes? Is this a problem?
« Last Edit: December 06, 2019, 08:32:04 AM by Potato »
Spud

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4608 on: December 06, 2019, 08:36:53 AM »
https://twitter.com/fatimamanji/status/1202914675924635651

Quote from: Zvonimir Boban
Channel 4 correspondent. It was down to shitty audio

Or perhaps it was down to a shitty racist reporter and shitty racist forum posters?
Spud

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4609 on: December 06, 2019, 08:52:44 AM »
Or perhaps it was down to a shitty racist reporter and shitty racist forum posters?

lol jesus dude, you sure are angry about people mishearing a racist who wasn't actually saying something racist at the time
Have you heard the clip? There is no way anyone could make that mistake unless they were desperate to hear something they wanted to hear.

I don't have skin in the game here and I'm not angry about anything. I just like to point out all the bullshit that forum swallows without any critical thinking whatsoever as long as it follows the "correct" narrative.

Just like with Jussie Smollett et al.
Spud

Hermit

  • Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4610 on: December 06, 2019, 09:05:54 AM »
Your life is a waste when you spend your day arguing about what a politician said during a presser. Sad bunch of people.

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4611 on: December 06, 2019, 09:09:46 AM »
I haven't;  the clips all seem to be deleted.

But the entire "they are the racists because they mis-accused someone else of being a racist!" thing is  :brain

(you realize most of these people are white as fuck right?)
https://mobile.twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1194959130567401475
Spud

jorma

  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4612 on: December 06, 2019, 09:14:38 AM »
I haven't;  the clips all seem to be deleted.

But the entire "they are the racists because they mis-accused someone else of being a racist!" thing is  :brain

(you realize most of these people are white as fuck right?)

That only makes it internalised racism!



Lonewulfeus

  • Former Unofficial Ambassador to ResetEra
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4613 on: December 06, 2019, 09:20:33 AM »
Your life is a waste when you spend your day arguing about what a politician said during a presser. Sad bunch of people.

Do you know where you are? :gurl

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4614 on: December 06, 2019, 09:21:32 AM »
I just hope someday we learn what the fucking deal with excelsiorlef is.  Enzom and Labor as well. 


I guess I run in circles that auto-eject such types.

I'm still trying to figure out Lime.

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4615 on: December 06, 2019, 09:43:34 AM »
Aaron getting banned for attempting to argue with a negro instead of sitting down and listening is some good shit

Hillary bots leaving in droves
:O

Straight Edge

  • Boots & Braces
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4616 on: December 06, 2019, 09:51:42 AM »
No one in that Sasha Grey thread is shaming her, But apparently mentioning that she is a pornstar is misogyny or something. How will the mods spin this?

Quote
some of you have a screw loose. Apparently it is OK for someone to do porn, but God forbid someone say they liked it. If it is fine to do it it should be fair game to discuss after you are done. No one would even know who she is if not for her sex videos(which lead to some mainstream work) so this holier than thou attitude some of you are trying to pull is complete and utter bullshit and rather hypocritical. There is some perspective. You are welcome.

 :salute

Quote
she's clearly more than just a former porn actor (considering that according to her wiki she hasn't appeared in an adult movie in a *decade*) so to just reduce her to that without even bothering to comment on anything else is lazy and stupid at best


 :comeon
« Last Edit: December 06, 2019, 10:01:10 AM by Straight Edge »
Oi Oi

Clockwork5

  • Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4617 on: December 06, 2019, 09:59:46 AM »
Don’t know how, if possible, to embed tweets but seems like the consent bot ain’t too slick.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/do-you-ask-for-consent-prior-to-sexting.157398/page-6#post-27114210
Quote
Why didn't she ask for consent before sending this?
Oh Suzannah!
« Last Edit: December 06, 2019, 10:04:02 AM by Clockwork5 »

Don Rumata

  • Hard To Be A John
  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4618 on: December 06, 2019, 09:59:51 AM »
No one in that Sasha Grey thread is shaming her, But apparently mentioning that she is a pornstar is misogyny or something. How will the mods spin this?

Quote
some of you have a screw loose. Apparently it is OK for someone to do porn, but God forbid someone say they liked it. If it is fine to do it it should be fair game to discuss after you are done. No one would even know who she is if not for her sex videos(which lead to some mainstream work) so this holier than thou attitude some of you are trying to pull is complete and utter bullshit and rather hypocritical. There is some perspective. You are welcome.

 :salute
"Sasha Grey" is her porn name in the first place. :lol

SmokyDave

  • Senior Member
Re: DOJ |OT| SUMMIT NOW SUMMIT NOW
« Reply #4619 on: December 06, 2019, 10:28:02 AM »
Sasha Grey  :rejoice


Oh, sorry, I meant Sasha Grey  :stop