We aren't talking about what YOU said.
Everything you've posted, from your very first post on this topic on
You are moving the goal posts
your entire rationale is a goal post move
are you or aren't you talking about what I said?
I'll tell you: you're talking about what I said because shifting to an argument about goalposts is easier than actually engaging with the point
you want to get into a back and forth of "you moved the goalposts" "no I didn't" "yes you did" because it means you don't have to address links directly from the CDC, or provide any sources that could refute it
regardless, my arguments haven't changed since my first post, it's always been about how quickly updated information is being disseminated, and whether new data has come to light within 24 hours of the governor's comment (it has)
I never said any of his decisions have been good and correct, or that he wasn't a moron
from the beginning I was talking about the interpretation of his comment that new info has surfaced
quote the post where I said he was a good governor
this is the difference between cutting some slack on a particular comment and outright defense of their decisions
Don't you think he should know more than you do?
I do think he should know more than I do, hell the CDC is located in his state
he should have information directly from them
which to this day still says any reports of asymptomatic transmission are unconfirmed and they don't even know what role it might play in infectiousness