It has to be so frustrating that they can't just ban all the survey respondents and call them alt-right trolls acting in bad faith; given the way electoral politics work in the US, a lot of that shit needs to become more widespread accepted and popular before it has a chance in hell of being advanced as policy or becomes common (ie, 'pregnant person' isn't going to be a thing unless you manage to get a lot of people to understand
why it needs to be a thing. Which needs to be explained to people, and not in a lecturing holier-than-thou way, if you want even a fraction of a chance at success.) But since all of the people who so vehemently care about it are far, far too tired and shouldn't be burdened with trying to solve the problem, since it should totally be on the majority that doesn't give a fuck to do it, they'll just dunk on the article and echo-chamber themselves to sleep then be shocked when their pet issues aren't treated with the utmost importance.
Also can't tell if this is going to catch a ban or if I'm reading it wrong, but I'm guessing it leads to ban:
There is a certain extreme flavor of "wokeism" that is anti-intellectual. It's been explained to me before that trying to view complicated issues from multiple viewpoints is called both-sidesing and is a sure sign that someone is a Nazi sympathizer