Since I will never not get triggered over this:
We really do. I don't have a strong take about the details here, but unless you believe that there should be zero limitation on what anyone can post online, someone need to make that calls, someone need to moderate it. And it's waaaaay better to do that through government agencies, that at least in theory we can assert democratic control over than to let the worst companies in the world make those decision.
"it's not censorship is we outsource it to for profit companies" is legit one of the dumbest ideas in American politics.
I don't think you have a perfect solution for those things, it's a difficult problem that I don't think any human society in history perfectly solved, but I absolutely think that if you must regulate speech it's better to do that by the government that to let the worst companies in the world do that, which is what we are doing right now.
And the government get involved in that in the end anyway, we just pretend that we don't so we don't have an honest public discussion about what we're actually doing.
i hate tiktok but absolutely jump with glee everytime a news comes out about how it’s destroying zuck’s shady empire
I think they'll get it banned in the US.
They'll run some stories about kids doing rainbow parties or whatever on tik tok and enough "but won't you think of the children" concerned christian moms will join in for that to pass.
Trump almost got it banned because some kids made fun of him, and he was one of the dumbest, most lazy presidents this country ever had.
When you post something Facebook/Twitter/ResetERA.com/etc. doesn't allow: it gets deleted and/or you get banned. Can continue to publish your speech everywhere else. (And from a practical standpoint you can make a new account on platforms and try publishing it again until they catch you again.)
When you post something the government doesn't allow: you get arrested, imprisoned and/or killed. Cannot publish your speech anywhere.
It's amazing how many people willingly refuse to grasp this because they hate the idea that people can speak in ways they don't want to exist.
Chikor seems to understand this based on the last post I've quoted here, but seems ignorant of it in his other posts in the same thread. Especially considering he's posting on a forum that wants even harsher censorship by private companies than currently and where there's many members who want the state to start enforcing that censorship outside of the platforms. Concepts I don't see him (and increasingly fewer members) ever pushing back against.