can someone ask Era
if a biological male wants to be a woman has the right to be called a woman as a trans woman
but if a biologically white wants to be a black person does not have the right to be a black person as a trans racial person?
isnt it the same energy?
If the response is then that black people should not be overriden by white people as one has been systemically oppressed then shouldnt we also say biological males shouldnt be overriding biologicl women as biological females have also been systematically oppressed to this day?
Being fair, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection are hardwired into virtually every sexual species, including humans. Cultural sexual dimorphism serves the purpose of strengthening sexual selection. In other words, men want to be manly so they can attract a mate, and women want to be womanly for the same reason. How that cultural sexual dimorphism manifests will vary from culture to culture, but the "I want to be perceived as the perfect woman to attract the perfect man" drive (whatever that means culturally) is hardwired into us. So something like gender dysphoria can be explained as a mutation where a male feels the "I want to be perceived as womanly" drive instead of the "I want to be perceived as manly" drive.
None of that is true for race. There is no "I want to be perceived as white/black/asian/latino/etc." embedded in our DNA, and therefore no real way to mutate into having a biologically based drive to be recognized as one of them. It's purely cultural.
So in that sense, their claim that "transgenderism is valid while transracialism isn't valid" is a sound claim. Now, is it true that there is currently a cultural trend where a lot of trans people that don't have gender dysphoria to "validate" their trans-ness with a biological basis, and are instead doing the cultural thing that transracialism would be? Yes. However, there are, in fact, people with gender dysphoria, which is likely biologically driven, and therefore more "valid" than claims of transracialism.
