Excel posts a tweet in the JK thread that basically says JKR is now a Milo-supporter.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/j-k-rowling-and-her-legacy-of-hate-the-uk-gender-critical-movement.643740/page-56#post-102146884https://twitter.com/scottdagostino/status/1631701442577694736
Lmaoooo
The thread reacts about how you'd expect to what seems like the most outright alt-right friendly thing JKR has ever done:
JK is one more podcast appearance away from endorsing Donald Trump.
Quite ironic that Joanne is basically Lady Voldemort these days.
Siding with Milo... Shouldn't be surprised at all.
Of course she does, she wants to be able to say whatever she likes and not suffer any consequence. Right now, even though it's plain to see what she is, she's holding back out of fear. These people are cowards, they'll never go 100% mask off because they know it would ruin them, but they're inching toward the possibility every chance they can get.
Germaine Greer (terf) wrote a pedo book about sexy boys. terfs all over the internet whine about losing access to shapely young boobs. Their reactionary allies are the type to do straight up pedophilia and also make their teen daughters marry them with promise rings and shit. This is who she is.
Obviously it could be that, but it also feels like the sort of thing the people she’s now surrounded herself with might still be worked up enough over that she’d hear about it through them? And then just parrot it as a talking point.
Like her politics before she went mask-off already sucked, but at least publicly it was in a different way than supporting people like him. So starting to care about it to fit in with her alt-right buds would make the most sense to me.
I haven't listened to the podcast. But what I did do was go ahead and click through to the article to see what JKR apparently said, because stanning for Milo would actually be pretty gross. And excel would never, ever mislead people with a tweet, right? Well...
https://www.avclub.com/j-k-rowling-authoritarian-milo-yiannopoulos-podcast-1850183976But surely, the author who wrote a whole series about children fighting allegorical Nazis would at least support the shunning of Nazis? Also no. In the same podcast episode, Rowling says critics should have engaged with alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos rather than running him off college campuses. “I’m watching from across the pond as he tries to speak on various campuses and there are protests, riots, ‘We want him de-platformed, we don’t want him to speak at all,’” she recalls (per The Telegraph). “And I thought it was a terrible strategic error. My feeling was, you are giving this man way more power than he deserves by behaving in this way. It made Milo look sexier and edgier than he deserved to look.”
“I thought it was strategically appalling… get on that platform and eviscerate his ideas, get on that platform and expose him for the charlatan that he is. You push back hard. You’ve given him so much power by refusing to talk,” Rowling continues. “In fact, they were serving his purposes because he was able to walk away from that saying, ‘Look, they don’t dare debate me, this is how dangerous and edgy I am.’ And I don’t think we want to cast the alt-right in that light.”
It's hilarious because JKR going actually pro-Milo would be a pretty good reason for middle-of-the-road people fully turning on her. But for some reason I don't see claiming she supports him based on her saying, basically, people fucked up and gave him more power than he should have had accomplishing that and that giving Milo power was a bad thing paying off. I don't know if this is irony or what but this kind of misrepresentation is just such an epic strategic error that will, ultimately, give her another situation to to claim to be a witch-hunt victim in.