I'm also curious what reputable medical studies are inherently transphobic to the extent that whatever presumably peer reviewed and published findings should be ignored because of your feels.
Almost all of them. If it's falsifiable, it's transphobic. Jack Turban gets around this by fabricating studies, using horrible surveys instead of science and then perjury in his testimony so he's about the only non-transphobic doctor out there.
I'm not joking either. Seriously, try to suggest that you want to see if HRT actually does anything measurable with a double-blind study and get ready for the blood on your hands to permanently stain your reputation.
I mean we know off-label usage of puberty blockers dramatically and permanently harms children in a multitude of ways and nobody can even explain what the benefits are supposed to be, that doesn't even get into surgeries, but look at the reaction that putting any form of gatekeeping in place brings about, let alone actually banning the procedures by law. Look at what doctors, even trans ones, who express concerns about this get accused of. Look at what the New York Times (and others like Kiwi Farms member Jesse Singal) has gotten for reporting on this. You think an "ally" doctor is going to try and study this? That's assuming someone would give them the grant in the first place, especially when everyone knows what the results are obviously going to be.
