ChadGPT what are the potato and cat fighting about
I have a desperate need for all children to be murdered. If even one makes it to their teenage years, I consider it a failure. They absolutely must be protected from james and there's only one way.
You really are a fundamentalist...emphasis on the mental part.
The only hissy fit in this thread is from the guy who took offence at an imaginary slight against his fundamentalist religion politics.
The US has a problem with school shootings. That is a fact. If you don't agree, please present some evidence that there isn't a problem and I'll discuss it with you. Until then, you are just making shit up and deflecting from discussing anything because you have no argument.
So then you agree there's no need for fold-out bulletproof rooms. Good chat.
The invention of a whiteboard that converts into a bullet proof shelter is entirely a demand-driven innovation. If you disagree with that then there is nothing else to discuss. You're a fundamentalist and will not be swayed from your position.
Dude, all I did was dispute that there was a need for this dumb thing, same as Cauliflower and james, and you immediately jumped to accusing me of wanting mass murder. Now you're trying to claim I'm a fundamentalist because I don't think this dumb thing is needed for anyone other than the guy selling it? And you're still trying to baselessly accuse me of things I've already said the opposite of.
You obviously think little of my brain power because you haven't even attempted to try and change my mind about either this stupid thing or the basis of invention other than screaming your head off about my child murder fetish.
Are you seriously suggesting you think these stupid things should be installed everywhere?
STOP. MAKING. SHIT. UP.
You came in the thread and told me to calm down (after a mild joke post) and that people invent stuff everywhere.
I said that this invention is kind of a US-centric thing because it's where school shootings happen (meaning there is demand).
Then you said nobody needs a bullet-proof room in a US school, which I said was debateable (this was sarcasm, just in case you didn't notice).
James made a typically absurdist joke about schools needing no walls at all.
You said teachers could just lock their doors in case of the low probability event of a school shooter.
Cauliflower made a joke about the rooms being blocked by random shit...or bodies...within a week.
Then who the fuck knows what happened because you became convinced I was calling for these stupid things to be installed in every classroom, or the need to eliminate democracy or establishing a police state or something inane like that. You also said something about my proposal needing to be better than democracy...
At no point in this discussion did anyone suggest that these things should be installed anywhere.
If you read my posts (ironic given you're partial to suggesting others don't read yours) instead of having a hissy fit, you would see that the suggestion that the US "get your shit together" did not refer in any way to a need or demand to installing bullet proof shelters in schools.
It was reference to the fact that there are so many school shootings in the US that someone bothered to invent such a thing in the first place.
School shootings are not normal. Building whiteboards that double as bullet proof shelters is not normal. Governments should look for solutions to this problem. Building bullet proof shelters in schools is not a solution.
Is that so hard to comprehend?
