Yeah, my gut feeling is that anything which is an "art" is safe, but things which are fundamentally algorithmic but take a lot of years of training to do competently are vulnerable in the near future. By art I mean something with a significant human interface and a fair amount of subjectivity - your field and most of software probably fits this. Traffic guy, however, spends half of his time staring at satellite photos and then doing formulaic application of domain knowledge. The rest is just make-work in the form of report writing. Law has the opposite problem where the knowledge work isn't automatable but so much of the high skill supporting roles - aggregating relevant cases and the endless paperwork given to paralegals - is the vulnerable part. This isn't me spitballing, these people have looked me straight in the eye and said they have no doubt that their work is fundamentally automatable.