Author Topic: Movie News, Reviews, and Discussion Super-Thread  (Read 5425048 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8580 on: October 28, 2010, 12:19:55 PM »
It was amazing seeing the backlash after the movie hype died down actually.  In my experience at least, so many people are sick of The Dark Knight.  I think it got way too much exposure and the film had way too many mediocre moments to age well.  But I bet most people will forget about that by 2012.  I forget about it every few months when I watch it again  :lol

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8581 on: October 28, 2010, 02:31:17 PM »
The only way RISE will make anything close to TDK is if one of the actors dies of a drug overdose prior to release, that way fanboys will see it 25 times in theaters in a pathetic form of "respect".

Will you kill yourself when Batman 3 makes more money than Tron?
Drunk

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8582 on: October 28, 2010, 02:46:16 PM »
people are spreading rumors now that Tom Hardy would play Harvey Bullock

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8583 on: October 28, 2010, 03:02:01 PM »
people are spreading rumors now that Tom Hardy would play Harvey Bullock

Doesn't really strike me as the Harvey Bullock type.
dog

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8584 on: October 28, 2010, 03:04:59 PM »
The only way RISE will make anything close to TDK is if one of the actors dies of a drug overdose prior to release, that way fanboys will see it 25 times in theaters in a pathetic form of "respect".

Will you kill yourself when Batman 3 makes more money than Tron?

That's not only possible, it's likely. Tron is practically guaranteed to bomb horribly in the box office. I can't think of anything in that film with mainstream appeal.

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8585 on: October 28, 2010, 03:06:44 PM »
wasn't the fat guy from begins bullock?
___

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8586 on: October 28, 2010, 03:14:34 PM »
Christian Bale is such a douchebag and overrated actor. They really cant find anyone else to cast Batman? Two movies is enough for him.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2010, 03:22:45 PM by SantaC »

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8587 on: October 28, 2010, 03:16:41 PM »
wasn't the fat guy from begins bullock?

Nah, that was Flass. He first appeared in Batman: Year One as Gordon's partner.

Bullock is a lot more of a grey character, whereas Flass was pretty much just a corrupt cop.
dog

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Drunk

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8589 on: October 28, 2010, 04:10:17 PM »
Isn't Bullock the guy from TAS who was always like "fuck batman" even when he saved him and shit?

Yeah, that's him. Bullock never really liked Batman, although he does eventually develop a grudging respect for him.
dog

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8590 on: October 28, 2010, 04:20:11 PM »
the WWII get-up looks hot.
nat

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8591 on: October 28, 2010, 07:10:53 PM »
Does HYDRA replace NAZIs or are they just kind of in addition/sideshow to them? Because WWII Cap should be busting some NAZI teeth and perhaps breaking up clandestine occult programs with awesomeness - having it be "HYDRA" instead deflates things like a bad paparazzi picture of that chick, you know the one.
___

Fresh Prince

  • a one-eyed cat peepin' in a seafood store
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8592 on: October 28, 2010, 07:23:58 PM »

(Image removed from quote.)
Can we make his face into an emoticon? It's got that gay, 'you better not say what I think you're going to say bitch' vibe to it.

888

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8593 on: October 28, 2010, 08:56:33 PM »
Male kissy face  :-\
🍆🍆

Enl

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8594 on: October 28, 2010, 09:59:27 PM »
The Loved Ones- Very fun horror and was much more depraved than the trailer made it out to be. In essence the film is The Texas Chainsaw Massacre's dinner sequence expanded for about an hour with a good dose of dark comedy thrown in. Also had a little bit of The People Under the Stairs in there as well. My only complaint is that they could've edited out one of the subplots as it felt like it had no bearing on the overall plot.

[youtube=560,345]Cb5BFm4qIow?fs=1&hl=en_US[/youtube]
mmm

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8595 on: October 28, 2010, 10:40:01 PM »
what year is that movie from?  blockbuster doesn't have anything named that and netflix has one from 2009 that doesn't sound like that movie and isn't available to rent.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8596 on: October 28, 2010, 11:26:03 PM »
what year is that movie from?  blockbuster doesn't have anything named that and netflix has one from 2009 that doesn't sound like that movie and isn't available to rent.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1316536/
dog

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8597 on: October 28, 2010, 11:38:59 PM »
The Loved Ones- Very fun horror and was much more depraved than the trailer made it out to be. In essence the film is The Texas Chainsaw Massacre's dinner sequence expanded for about an hour with a good dose of dark comedy thrown in. Also had a little bit of The People Under the Stairs in there as well. My only complaint is that they could've edited out one of the subplots as it felt like it had no bearing on the overall plot.

[youtube=560,345]Cb5BFm4qIow?fs=1&hl=en_US[/youtube]

Is it just me or do most horror movies seem to publicize really obscure fetishes? I think all my sexual fetishes came from horror films. Most of them seem to be in this film. Will fap.

WrikaWrek

  • Let your soul glow
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8598 on: October 29, 2010, 12:12:31 AM »
Scott Pilgrim

Holy shit, this movie fucking sucks ahaha. I was not expecting it!

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8599 on: October 29, 2010, 12:13:22 AM »
I'm about to go on a western movie binge soon and I need some ideas. I figure the entire Man With No Name trilogy is definitely worth checking out (I've seen TGTBTU already). Definitely gonna peep Lonesome Dove. Any film buffs wanna throw a recommendation my way?

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8600 on: October 29, 2010, 12:36:36 AM »
I'm about to go on a western movie binge soon and I need some ideas. I figure the entire Man With No Name trilogy is definitely worth checking out (I've seen TGTBTU already). Definitely gonna peep Lonesome Dove. Any film buffs wanna throw a recommendation my way?

-Magnificent Seven
-Django
-The Treasure of the Sierra Madre
-Silverado
-Once Upon a Time in the West
-Tombstone
-Unforgiven
dog

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8601 on: October 29, 2010, 01:18:19 AM »
I'm about to go on a western movie binge soon and I need some ideas. I figure the entire Man With No Name trilogy is definitely worth checking out (I've seen TGTBTU already). Definitely gonna peep Lonesome Dove. Any film buffs wanna throw a recommendation my way?

Once Upon a Time in the West is the best Leone wester, Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid is also an excellent wester from that era.

The 90s:
Tombstone
Unforgiven
The Quick and the Dead.
Drunk

Enl

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8602 on: October 29, 2010, 01:27:53 AM »
what year is that movie from?  blockbuster doesn't have anything named that and netflix has one from 2009 that doesn't sound like that movie and isn't available to rent.

It's this year. It's already out on BluRay in the UK but hasn't been released in the USA yet unfortunately.
mmm

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8603 on: October 29, 2010, 01:56:49 AM »
In addition to what's been said: Duck You Sucker!/Fistful of Dynamite, Dead Man, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, High Noon, The Proposition, There Will Be Blood, McCabe and Mrs. Miller, The Ox-Bow Incident.
obo

Enl

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8604 on: October 29, 2010, 02:09:49 AM »
Eastwood's High Plains Drifter is a pretty good tribute to the Man With No Name trilogy.  On the crazier side, the recent Korean film The Good, The Bad, and The Weird is a lot of fun. Also since it hasn't been mentioned yet, Deadwood is epic and one of the greatest modern Westerns made.
mmm

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8605 on: October 29, 2010, 02:28:31 AM »
Thanks for all the tips. I forgot, I saw Butch Cassidy, excellent film.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8606 on: October 29, 2010, 08:47:17 AM »
Quote
WETA is amazing. It's a joke that ILM gets any money at all anymore. WETA owns them at every turn.

Oh, so is that why WETA had to bring in ILM to help them do all those awesome battle sequences? :smug
Whatevs, GR. All I know is that anything which looks strongly, overtly like CG with iffy lighting and shortcut motion curves, it turns out to be from ILM, and everytime I think "wow, holy shit," it turns out to be from WETA. I reserve the right to trot out anectdoctal evidence particularly when I'm just voicing my opinion.

IIRC that was due to time constraints. 

Am I the only one one that thought the horse things in Avatar made the same noises as the raptors in jurassic park 3??  Like exactly the same.
There were a lot of familiar noises. It wouldn't surprise me if they were both referencing the same source animal, whatever that is.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8607 on: October 29, 2010, 10:22:25 AM »
what year is that movie from?  blockbuster doesn't have anything named that and netflix has one from 2009 that doesn't sound like that movie and isn't available to rent.

It's this year. It's already out on BluRay in the UK but hasn't been released in the USA yet unfortunately.
Cool thanks.

The Great Rumbler shot me a link to imdb and it seems that it's the one on netflix but I can only save it in my queue for now.  Sounded interesting enough though so I saved it!

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8608 on: October 29, 2010, 10:28:15 AM »
Quote
WETA is amazing. It's a joke that ILM gets any money at all anymore. WETA owns them at every turn.

Oh, so is that why WETA had to bring in ILM to help them do all those awesome battle sequences? :smug
Whatevs, GR. All I know is that anything which looks strongly, overtly like CG with iffy lighting and shortcut motion curves, it turns out to be from ILM, and everytime I think "wow, holy shit," it turns out to be from WETA. I reserve the right to trot out anectdoctal evidence particularly when I'm just voicing my opinion.

WETA did great [or amazing, or whatever] work on Avatar, and District 9 considering what the budget was for that, but I can't think of anything else they've done [outside of LOTR, which had some good parts and some not so good parts in the special effects category] that's really stood out to me as something that another studio couldn't even come close to.
dog

Cheebs

  • How's my posting? Call 1-866-MAF-BANS to report flame bait.
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8609 on: October 29, 2010, 11:42:28 AM »
How can someone bash ILM yet praise the cgi in Avatar? WETA did all the blue people stuff but a lot of the battle cgi with the ships and explosions and stuff was all ILM. ILM did a ton on Avatar.

Basically it was
WETA = Naviviviviiii motion capture characters
ILM = battle scenes

ILM's stuff was more impressive to me in it anyway.

Weta does amazing character design for pure cgi characters like in lotr, avatar, district 9 but the action stuff ILM did was still damn good.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2010, 11:46:18 AM by Cheebs »

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8610 on: October 29, 2010, 12:00:28 PM »
WETA's work in King Kong :bow WETA :bow2

I think the most impressive part of Avatar was the Naavi shit.  The fact that I forgot I was watching digital characters sometimes is what amazed me. 

Who did Davy Jones? ILM right?  If so, that's the most impressive thing I've seen them do and it was amazing.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8611 on: October 29, 2010, 12:03:02 PM »


Never forget.
dog

bud

  • a smudge of excrement on a tissue surging out to sea with a million tons of raw sewage
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8612 on: October 29, 2010, 12:07:20 PM »
the avatars looked totally real when they had war paint on their faces.
zzz

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8613 on: October 29, 2010, 12:12:08 PM »
I have a strong distaste for WETA's work, and nearly everything they're involved with leaves me more and more disillusioned with the promises of CGI in film.  Hate their in work King Kong, hate most of their work in the LOTR series (save for the first, where it's relatively minimal), hate their work in I Robot, Fantastic Four 2, Narnia, and so on.

Although now that I spell it out like that, it could just be that they so often work on such terrible, terrible films.

Avatar is quite a technical accomplishment for them, but the design of the Navi is fucking repugnant, spoiling the entire effort for me.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2010, 12:17:50 PM by Robo »
obo

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8614 on: October 29, 2010, 12:16:59 PM »
yeah, they work on a lot of shitty films.  but I thought the CGI of King Kong (not in because the dinosaurs and shit were fucking terrible) was fucking amazing.  I'm still of the belief that the CGI in LOTR has aged terribly.  Ugh.  District 9 looks amazing IMO.  The best thing they do is practical effects IMO.  sets, weapons, props, costumes.  They've always been amazing at that IMO.

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8615 on: October 29, 2010, 12:35:24 PM »
Oh, I'm talking exclusively about their CGI.  Their animation is mostly what I have a problem with -- the figures tend to look excellent from a technical perspective, but the animation is often exaggerated and overdone.  They seem to have a lot of difficulty recreating realism when it's most called for.
obo

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8616 on: October 29, 2010, 12:49:00 PM »
I hate that they always look like gumby when in action.  like legolas when he's on... ANYTHING.  ugh.  the elephant and scenes specifically.

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8617 on: October 29, 2010, 12:53:52 PM »
That's exactly what I'm talking about.  I saw a lot of that in Avatar too and did not care for it.
obo

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8618 on: October 29, 2010, 08:32:17 PM »
Katie Holmes wasn't in TDK, so you didn't get what I was saying.

Uh...no, I did get what you were saying. I was asking if you thought Katie Holmes acting was better than anything in TDK.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
It's not, by the way. Katie Holmes acting was terrible.
[close]

Yet somehow, Maggie Gyllenhaal managed to be worse.
🍆🍆

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8619 on: October 29, 2010, 08:38:15 PM »
Katie Holmes wasn't in TDK, so you didn't get what I was saying.

Uh...no, I did get what you were saying. I was asking if you thought Katie Holmes acting was better than anything in TDK.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
It's not, by the way. Katie Holmes acting was terrible.
[close]

Yet somehow, Maggie Gyllenhaal managed to be worse.

She wasn't good, at all, but I'd still take her performance over Katie Holmes.
dog

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8620 on: October 29, 2010, 09:16:24 PM »
Katie Holmes wasn't in TDK, so you didn't get what I was saying.

Uh...no, I did get what you were saying. I was asking if you thought Katie Holmes acting was better than anything in TDK.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
It's not, by the way. Katie Holmes acting was terrible.
[close]

Yet somehow, Maggie Gyllenhaal managed to be worse.

She wasn't good, at all, but I'd still take her performance over Katie Holmes.

I wouldn't :yuck

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8621 on: October 29, 2010, 09:31:06 PM »
Did you guys read the Deadpool script? this movie could be an action/comedy classic is another studio were handle it.

The opening credits are :lol
Drunk

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8622 on: October 29, 2010, 09:38:31 PM »
How can someone bash ILM yet praise the cgi in Avatar? WETA did all the blue people stuff but a lot of the battle cgi with the ships and explosions and stuff was all ILM. ILM did a ton on Avatar.

Basically it was
WETA = Naviviviviiii motion capture characters
ILM = battle scenes

ILM's stuff was more impressive to me in it anyway.

Weta does amazing character design for pure cgi characters like in lotr, avatar, district 9 but the action stuff ILM did was still damn good.

ILM helped with the battle scenes, weta did most of the work.
Drunk

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8623 on: October 30, 2010, 11:44:03 PM »
How can someone bash ILM yet praise the cgi in Avatar? WETA did all the blue people stuff but a lot of the battle cgi with the ships and explosions and stuff was all ILM. ILM did a ton on Avatar.

Basically it was
WETA = Naviviviviiii motion capture characters
ILM = battle scenes

ILM's stuff was more impressive to me in it anyway.

Weta does amazing character design for pure cgi characters like in lotr, avatar, district 9 but the action stuff ILM did was still damn good.
This conversation started because I didn't know that ILM did anything on Avatar, and GR stated that they had done a lot of work. The subsequent discussion has revealed that it was due to time constraints, and the stuff ILM did in the movie was mainly the big battle sequences.

My problem with ILM in general is that, anymore, they are more of a marketing point to put in large print the lobby poster than an innovative bunch of geniuses. They are not /bad/ they are just badly overrated.

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8624 on: November 01, 2010, 04:49:31 AM »
The Loved Ones- Very fun horror and was much more depraved than the trailer made it out to be. In essence the film is The Texas Chainsaw Massacre's dinner sequence expanded for about an hour with a good dose of dark comedy thrown in. Also had a little bit of The People Under the Stairs in there as well. My only complaint is that they could've edited out one of the subplots as it felt like it had no bearing on the overall plot.

[youtube=560,345]Cb5BFm4qIow?fs=1&hl=en_US[/youtube]

Watched this for my yearly Halloween horror movie.  Overall it was good and quite enjoyable.  I felt like the movie had good tension and comedy and was nicely shot, but that at around 3/4ths through when
spoiler (click to show/hide)
the main guy escapes and kills the dad and kills the people underneath, the movie kind of loses all sense of tension and just becomes totally non-threatening lolz ridiculous and is therefore less entertaining than the first 3/4ths.
[close]

If by subplot you're talking about the other kid whose going to prom, I thought it was a great subplot because A) it juxtaposes a more realistic version of a "fucked up prom night" with the fantastical horror version that's going on with the other guy and B) it provides a light comedy element that balances the dark elements and keeps the film "fun" rather than "torture porn."


Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8625 on: November 01, 2010, 10:07:49 AM »
United 93
Hadn't seen this in a long while (since it came out).  While it's obviously an emotionally manipulative film, I love how this movie doesn't try to sidestep it.  It actually makes it enjoyable.  The terrorists are clear bad guys, there are no main characters (hell, there are barely any names mentioned) and there is no bullshit story to get you "more emotionally involved".  It's bad guys on a plane with normal people.  As soon as the movie starts, the tension starts.  I always thought that was great.  Think what you will about the subject matter, but I always thought this movie handled it pretty well.


Letters to Juliet
:lol :lol :lol This shit was terrible.  So very terrible.  It wasn't even a fun romantic comedy.  Just so bad.  Especially when the characters start recreating a scene from Romeo and Juliet and it wasn't ironic. :'(

Cheebs

  • How's my posting? Call 1-866-MAF-BANS to report flame bait.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8626 on: November 01, 2010, 10:08:15 AM »
First shots of the Steven Spielberg directed TinTin are out. I uh...am unsure what to think. Despite stuff like Indiana Jones 2 & 4, Hook, & The Lost World I still give the guy the benefit of the doubt when he directs a movie. I'll check it out.




Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8627 on: November 01, 2010, 10:14:13 AM »
Looking good, is it 3d?
Drunk

ManaByte

  • I must hurry back to my comic book store, where I dispense the insults rather than absorb them.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8628 on: November 01, 2010, 10:46:26 AM »
Yes 3D and likely the only Spielberg movie to be ever shot digitally.
CBG

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8629 on: November 01, 2010, 10:55:32 AM »
Cool with watch it in the cinema then.
Drunk

Cheebs

  • How's my posting? Call 1-866-MAF-BANS to report flame bait.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8630 on: November 01, 2010, 11:06:28 AM »
I wonder what will happen if it makes enough money to warrant a sequel. Because the original plan was Spielberg would direct the first film, Jackson would direct the second, and they would co-direct the third. Jackson is now going to be pretty busy for the next 4 years or so. I guess Spielberg will just direct the sequels himself now?

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8631 on: November 01, 2010, 11:55:29 AM »
meh
010

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8632 on: November 01, 2010, 12:05:02 PM »
I hate the term "emotionally manipulative." Sounds like a pretentious way of saying you're ashamed to have emotions. The film is about people on a plane trying to stop a terrorist attack, knowing they're going to die. How else is it going to be, given what happened in real life?  ::)
010

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8633 on: November 01, 2010, 12:18:40 PM »
You're the one taking offense to the term.  I don't think there's anything wrong with liking emotionally manipulative films, but that's what they are.  There's a difference between having an emotional scene and pulling obvious strings to evoke (nearly) universal human emotion.  They do it in a way that's not creative or unique and provides no real insight into the content.  We'll take something else for example.  Grey's Anatomy.  That show is emotionally manipulative.  Its entire purpose to play off your emotions of death that EVERYONE has.  The scenes and writing provide no insight into actually dealing with grief and loss.  It's a series of photo set to somber audio of people dying.  That's emotionally manipulative.

Edit: And for comparison sake, Six Feet Under is a show that actually discusses and focuses on grief and loss instead of showing me sad images to tell me "death=bad".
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 12:27:15 PM by Mupepe »

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8634 on: November 01, 2010, 12:53:31 PM »
i cry therefore i am

Forrest Gump :bow
I Am Sam :bow

010

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8635 on: November 01, 2010, 01:07:31 PM »
I love those movies :heartbeat

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8636 on: November 01, 2010, 01:10:56 PM »
I get what Mups is saying though. There's no problem with pulling at peoples heart strings, but a lot of times, its overly done and its just ridiculous. I go by the way of If I notice its what you're trying to do, you're doing it wrong.

Saving Private Ryan.
dog

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8637 on: November 01, 2010, 01:29:18 PM »
The Pacific was pretty bad about it.  But i only got like 4 episodes in (need to buy the blu rays).  I was scared Band of Brothers would be the same but it was much better at getting the emotion across without making you so depressed that you don't really want to keep watching.  Band of Brothers did exactly like its name sounds.  It set up emotional investments in the characters and their relationships that kept me watching.  Emotional investment in the subject matter and not actually the movie will only keep you watching while it's convenient.  I missed one episode of The Pacific and I didn't go back to watching the next week.  I just didn't care.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8638 on: November 01, 2010, 01:39:55 PM »
As an example of doing it right or wrong?

Saving Private Ryan is KIND of an example, but I really only had a problem with The Pacific.

Not the whole movie, but there is at least one scene that springs instantly to mind.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
When Upham sees one of the other American soldiers about to be stabbed by a German soldier and he just wusses out. That whole scene is pretty much straight up emotional manipulation.
[close]
dog

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8639 on: November 01, 2010, 01:46:53 PM »
Pretty much every James Cameron movie has emotional manipulation.