Author Topic: Movie News, Reviews, and Discussion Super-Thread  (Read 5424645 times)

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8640 on: November 01, 2010, 01:51:41 PM »
i cry therefore i am

Forrest Gump :bow
I Am Sam :bow
Harry Potter :bow


You forgot one PD.
Drunk

Cheebs

  • How's my posting? Call 1-866-MAF-BANS to report flame bait.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8641 on: November 01, 2010, 01:56:10 PM »
Yes 3D and likely the only Spielberg movie to be ever shot digitally.
Well other than the sequels if they happen lol

The fact it's a screenplay from Edgar Wright and Steven Moffat is pretty exciting. Though Wright said Simon Pegg did uncredited rewrites on it while filming.

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8642 on: November 01, 2010, 02:05:41 PM »
Yeah the movie will rock, I haven't watch anything by Moffat that I didn't like.
Drunk

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8643 on: November 01, 2010, 02:31:21 PM »
Scott Pilgrim

1/3rd great, 1/3rd good, 1/3rd bad. Overall I liked it!

It started off spotty and it got great right around the first fight.  Then after everything with Todd and Envy it became a total bore.  The Katanagi Twins weren't interesting in the comic, but they really just made it much less interesting and it didn't have a cool fight or anything.  Roxy was just stupid.  It actually makes me realize that the scenes I saw from before it was in theaters that made me think it would suck involved Roxy.  Then the final fights and all that were boring.  The only real payoff at the end lasts about twenty seconds.  The ending was...well, I heard there was an alternate ending on the dvd/bluray and hopefully it is good.

The casting is really good (sans Cera) and Wallace especially was hilarious.  A lot of characters are subplots are overlooked for time reasons, but I didn't really mind.  And Cera wasn't that bad. 

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8644 on: November 01, 2010, 03:08:45 PM »
creepy old man roles

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8645 on: November 01, 2010, 03:21:25 PM »
I can see him in some type of "aging hipster's favorite musician dies, goes on 2000 mile road trip to attend funeral and gets in adventures along the way" flick
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 03:42:49 PM by Phoenix Dark »
010

Herr Mafflard

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8646 on: November 01, 2010, 03:35:00 PM »
rewatched Alien on blu ray, then straight after I rewatched it again with the commentary track. :rock 

still a great movie and the blu ray transfer is omg fuckawesome.

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/screenshot.php?movieid=5090&position=10
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/screenshot.php?movieid=5090&position=1
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/screenshot.php?movieid=5090&position=8

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8647 on: November 01, 2010, 03:45:58 PM »
rewatched Alien on blu ray, then straight after I rewatched it again with the commentary track. :rock 

still a great movie and the blu ray transfer is omg fuckawesome.

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/screenshot.php?movieid=5090&position=10
Dem titties  :yuck

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8648 on: November 01, 2010, 04:03:18 PM »
rewatched Alien on blu ray, then straight after I rewatched it again with the commentary track. :rock 

still a great movie and the blu ray transfer is omg fuckawesome.

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/screenshot.php?movieid=5090&position=10
Dem titties  :yuck

smh

:drool

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8649 on: November 01, 2010, 04:09:02 PM »
definition of chesticles :yuck

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8650 on: November 01, 2010, 04:10:18 PM »
mmm, wanna gargle them in my mouth :drool

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8651 on: November 01, 2010, 04:14:58 PM »
 :lol :lol

tiesto

  • ルカルカ★ナイトフィーバー
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8652 on: November 01, 2010, 04:23:34 PM »
Hereafter, and didn't like it... felt the movie dragged waaaay too much, and it came to a pretty uninteresting conclusion.
^_^

ManaByte

  • I must hurry back to my comic book store, where I dispense the insults rather than absorb them.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8653 on: November 01, 2010, 07:03:56 PM »
http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2010/10/animated-progress.html
Quote
Over at Progress City, they've got a really big rumor...

We all know that after "Winnie the Pooh" next year, there is a hole in the schedule and then there is a mystery as to what will come out in 2013/2014. The site is reporting a rumor that Ron Clements and John Musker's next film will be an adaptation of Terry Pratchett's book "Mort." Blue Sky reported that the next hand drawn film from the Mouse would again be by the duo back earlier this year. At the time we knew it was a fantasy. I was told, but didn't reveal that it was based on a book by a famous fantasy author that was published in the 80's. This book fits the period when the book came out and the type of author that would provide this source material.

But is it true?

Yes, kinda. I will say that the film does take place in the Discworld series which is where the Mort book (fourth in the line of books, btw) takes place, but remember that this is an adaptation that won't necessarily be literal (no film adaptation really is). I got confirmation from the Bothans of this. The hero of the book shows that this is an entirely different kind of story than Walt Disney Animation Studio has told before, but it does have a princess in it. Remember that this is early in the process and things can change. It's at least three years before it will come out and the animation process is a long, bumpy and slow road. This project as well as "Reboot Ralph" and another to be announced "untitled project" give you a sense as to how the course will change in the Mouse's animation direction after that one year break. Interesting, no?

So now you know what the next hand drawn is, but you still don't know how different it really is...

:omg :hyper
CBG

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8654 on: November 01, 2010, 07:13:03 PM »
From what I understand Tin-tin is going to be some sort of live-action CGI hybrid - to say it's Senor Speilbergo "shooting a film digitally" seems a little misleading.
___

ManaByte

  • I must hurry back to my comic book store, where I dispense the insults rather than absorb them.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8655 on: November 01, 2010, 07:16:45 PM »
It's entirely CG. Performance capture, Zemeckis/Cameron style.
CBG

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8656 on: November 01, 2010, 07:27:00 PM »
http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2010/10/animated-progress.html
Quote
Over at Progress City, they've got a really big rumor...

We all know that after "Winnie the Pooh" next year, there is a hole in the schedule and then there is a mystery as to what will come out in 2013/2014. The site is reporting a rumor that Ron Clements and John Musker's next film will be an adaptation of Terry Pratchett's book "Mort." Blue Sky reported that the next hand drawn film from the Mouse would again be by the duo back earlier this year. At the time we knew it was a fantasy. I was told, but didn't reveal that it was based on a book by a famous fantasy author that was published in the 80's. This book fits the period when the book came out and the type of author that would provide this source material.

But is it true?

Yes, kinda. I will say that the film does take place in the Discworld series which is where the Mort book (fourth in the line of books, btw) takes place, but remember that this is an adaptation that won't necessarily be literal (no film adaptation really is). I got confirmation from the Bothans of this. The hero of the book shows that this is an entirely different kind of story than Walt Disney Animation Studio has told before, but it does have a princess in it. Remember that this is early in the process and things can change. It's at least three years before it will come out and the animation process is a long, bumpy and slow road. This project as well as "Reboot Ralph" and another to be announced "untitled project" give you a sense as to how the course will change in the Mouse's animation direction after that one year break. Interesting, no?

So now you know what the next hand drawn is, but you still don't know how different it really is...

:omg :hyper


:omg

Somebody pinch me!
dog

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8657 on: November 02, 2010, 12:01:43 AM »
Watched Inception this evening which I hadn't seen before.

I enjoyed it. I feel like I need to watch it again though because early on I was sort of conceptually lost about the early plot and a rewatch would clear up a few things for me. I sort of like that they went balls out with the concept. I've seen a lot of "trip" movies that either never find a cohesive plot to settle around on or they abandon the interesting premise really quickly and go back to being a very generic movie. Like the film or not I thought they went balls deep on the concept which is the sort of film making I always prefer.   

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8658 on: November 02, 2010, 12:52:45 AM »
Superman/Batman: Apocalypse

"The Supergirl from Krypton" in animated form. It's decent enough, with some well-animated parts and brisk pace. The main problem is that, like other such comic book animated movies, it tends to slice out expository scenes in favor of having longer action scenes, which makes the pacing feel really weird. A fine way to pass an hour and fifteen minutes, but it's not nearly as good as Batman: Beneath the Red Hood.
dog

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8659 on: November 02, 2010, 01:30:12 AM »
I liked it because the story was just a means to show cool fights, and the fights were cool. 

The stories in these movies are generally butchered amalgamations of various comics, or in the case of The New Frontier, they outright drop some stuff.  In most cases, I think they compliment the stories and characters you enjoy from comics or other shows.  Though, yeah, Red Hood was totally solid and better than the comic story in a lot of ways.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8660 on: November 02, 2010, 01:42:20 AM »
Watched Inception this evening which I hadn't seen before.

I enjoyed it. I feel like I need to watch it again though because early on I was sort of conceptually lost about the early plot and a rewatch would clear up a few things for me. I sort of like that they went balls out with the concept. I've seen a lot of "trip" movies that either never find a cohesive plot to settle around on or they abandon the interesting premise really quickly and go back to being a very generic movie. Like the film or not I thought they went balls deep on the concept which is the sort of film making I always prefer.   

welcome to the cool club  :pimp
010

Cheebs

  • How's my posting? Call 1-866-MAF-BANS to report flame bait.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8661 on: November 02, 2010, 08:36:13 AM »
Production Weekly, not one of those endless movie fan sites but the source of when movies officially enter production has stated that Ghostbusters III is entering production and will start filming in May 2011. Looks like they finally wrote a good enough screenplay for Bill Murray paid Bill Murray a shitload of money.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8662 on: November 02, 2010, 10:23:45 AM »
I liked it because the story was just a means to show cool fights, and the fights were cool. 

The stories in these movies are generally butchered amalgamations of various comics, or in the case of The New Frontier, they outright drop some stuff.  In most cases, I think they compliment the stories and characters you enjoy from comics or other shows.  Though, yeah, Red Hood was totally solid and better than the comic story in a lot of ways.

Yeah, that's pretty much how they are. It's got a thin story that's just enough to keep going until the end where they can bust out a big fight scene. I certainly didn't hate, but I just felt it was a really minor work that lacked a lot in the substance department, fun to watch but not something that I would think too much about later or ever really feel the need to return to.
dog

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8663 on: November 02, 2010, 10:26:52 AM »
Pretty much every James Cameron movie has emotional manipulation.

Yeah that's the terminator and true lies in a nutshell.

Jamie Lee Curtis is all, "ahhhh! help! help!" and Arnold is all, "THE BRIDGE IS OUUUTTTT!"  To not shed a tear is to not be human.
obo

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8664 on: November 02, 2010, 10:43:00 AM »
Beetlejuice
Man, this is the definition of a charming movie IMO. Ugly in so many ways but the humor and art is great and makes up for the outdated effects.  I hadn't seen this since high school super stoned and before that I was like 8.  Really great movie.

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8665 on: November 02, 2010, 10:44:07 AM »
The thumbs up at the end of T2 :'( :'( :'( :'(
Drunk

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8666 on: November 02, 2010, 10:46:31 AM »
Jamie Lee Curtis striptease in True Lies is pure emotional manipulation, no question.
dog

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8667 on: November 02, 2010, 11:14:17 AM »
More like penis manipulation :drool

Loved The Social Network, awesome awesome script, great direction and great performances, my favorite scene is when Spidey start ranting at Micheal Cera after he fuck him over because I have "friends" that are exactly like Zuckerberg is portrayed in this film(except not as smart or rich) and I have ranted at them like that many times before, drunk most of the time.

"sorry my prada is in the cleaners along with my hoodie and my flip flops you pretentious douche bag!" :bow2
Drunk

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8668 on: November 02, 2010, 09:00:48 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)
Doomed.

Just, freakin' doomed before it ever hits the screen. There is nothing in that cover that makes anyone want to see the movie who isn't already a fan.

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8669 on: November 02, 2010, 09:04:03 PM »
You are just saying that because you are a terrorist loving anti american.
Drunk

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8670 on: November 02, 2010, 09:10:57 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)
Doomed.

Just, freakin' doomed before it ever hits the screen. There is nothing in that cover that makes anyone want to see the movie who isn't already a fan.

How about inside the cover:

___

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8671 on: November 02, 2010, 09:16:48 PM »
That scientist is totally checking Cap's Johnson.
Drunk

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8672 on: November 03, 2010, 12:05:55 AM »
From the past couple of months:

Horror of Dracula: Something about Christopher Lee locking Hutchins in the basement cracks me up every time.

Curse of Frankenstein: Is this the original Lee/Hutchins duo? I think so. All the hammer films are obsessed with boys tinkering in their garage

Revenge of Frankenstein: Different sort of monster makes for a different feel, but the garage tinkering remains.

Dead of Night: You should be seeing the trend here by now.

Inglorious Bastards: Easily the most enjoyable Tarantino flick for me. It lacks his movie-geek ego and is... mature? Loved the Cat People sequence.

Girl who Played with Fire: Not as good as the first film. It tries to explore the girl's character while still brining along the male character, but then just flames out towards the end. Her Jesus moment was pretty lame.

Secret of Kells: Neat movie, best parts in the middle. Felt like it may have worked better as a series?

Peeping Tom: This movie and another I watched brought back memories of Punch Drunk Love, which I know is kind of weird, but the awkward romance seems to unsettle people. Tons of documentary commentary in the movie.

Repulsion: I can totally see Polanski raping little kids now. Makes total sense after seeing this movie.

Carnival of Souls: If I am comparing this and Repulsion, as two films about isolating women with a distaste for men and perhaps lesbianism running on behind the scenes, then I rather preferred Carnival's way of doing it. Repulsion beats you over the head with symbols everywhere, is rather blunt about everything and yet I am not sure those symbols really go anywhere in the end. They are just visual cues. Carnival felt like an Edward Hopping painting and keys in on the isolation of being an American. While Brits have their own isolation, Carol's character was just such an extremity that it didn't really reflect anything but "crazy".

Also, this was the other movie to remind em of Punch Drunk Love. The opening with an organ and I think PDL actually references some of the shots from this film.

ManaByte

  • I must hurry back to my comic book store, where I dispense the insults rather than absorb them.
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8673 on: November 03, 2010, 02:46:38 AM »
How to Train Your Dragon: meh.

Invictus: Awesome.

CBG

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8674 on: November 03, 2010, 03:00:35 AM »
How to Train Your Dragon: meh.

Somehow I'm not surprised.
dog

Yeti

  • Hail Hydra
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8675 on: November 03, 2010, 09:04:10 AM »
I thought back in the day men didn't shave their chests?
WDW

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8676 on: November 03, 2010, 10:14:43 AM »
The Crazies
Watched the new version.  Definitely better than your standard horror.  It had some REALLY intense sense that were well shot and paced.  My favorite part was the car wash scene.  That was fucking awesome.  As a whole, the movie had some pacing issues when I wanted them to stfu already but it was all in all a really good horror movie.

Enl

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8677 on: November 03, 2010, 06:09:09 PM »
The Crazies
Watched the new version.  Definitely better than your standard horror.  It had some REALLY intense sense that were well shot and paced.  My favorite part was the car wash scene.  That was fucking awesome.  As a whole, the movie had some pacing issues when I wanted them to stfu already but it was all in all a really good horror movie.

I was actually pretty surprised by this one too. The original was a decent horror flick but I felt was hampered by too much focus on the political/military aspect rather than the characters trying to escape from the quarantine. It's an interesting film to say the least but not one I can rewatch over and over. The remake kinda feels a bit more Romero than the Romero version by actually focusing on a handful of characters trying to survive their unfortunate predicament.
mmm

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8678 on: November 03, 2010, 07:55:57 PM »
agreed on all points. i don't think i can rewatch because of the pacing issues but i think I'm still gonna buy it. and yeah, the original seemed like romero restraining himself. but the remake had all his tendencies: small group escaping, military, rednecks and slight social commentary.

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8679 on: November 03, 2010, 10:07:04 PM »
The Killer Inside Me.  horrible final minutes, absolutely wonderful everything else
Tonya

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8680 on: November 04, 2010, 01:44:41 PM »
Anyone surprised that Megamind has turned out to be another mediocre Dreamworks movie? Anyone?

spoiler (click to show/hide)


[close]
dog

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8681 on: November 04, 2010, 01:48:53 PM »
afaik, no one expected anything more

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8682 on: November 04, 2010, 01:58:16 PM »
What's Megamind?

Dreamworks superhero movie with Will Farrell doing Will Farrell stuff.

afaik, no one expected anything more

How to Train Your Dragon was a big step up for Dreamworks and Kung Fu Panda was pretty good [although both suffered from painfully predictable plots], so I thought maybe Dreamworks was finally picking up their game a little bit. Seems not.
dog

Powerslave

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8683 on: November 04, 2010, 01:58:44 PM »
Tin-tin more like Shit-bin

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8684 on: November 04, 2010, 02:00:59 PM »
megamind looks fun; don't hate

kung fu panda > up
IYKYK

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8685 on: November 04, 2010, 02:07:20 PM »
megamind looks fun; don't hate

kung fu panda > up

Up at least had an interesting story. Kung Fu Panda was a fun movie, I won't contest that, but the story is same old, same old.

Loser has a special talents that no one is impressed with.
Everyone is threatened by someone/something.
Loser uses special talents to defeat that someone/something.
Loser is now the hero.

They did the same thing with How to Train Your Dragon and that hurt it. I'd probably have put it just tick below Toy Story 3 if not for the story.
dog

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8686 on: November 04, 2010, 02:14:30 PM »
you're trying to tell me that up wasn't a generic pixar movie?
IYKYK

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8687 on: November 04, 2010, 02:38:37 PM »
you're trying to tell me that up wasn't a generic pixar movie?

Up is about an old man travelling to South America to fulfill a promise he made to his late wife and, along the way, realizes that his childhood hero is nothing but an egotistical fraud and that if he continues to cling to the memories of his wife he will never be happy. In the end, he becomes a father-figure to a boy whose own parents are distant and seemingly uncaring.

So, no, I wouldn't put Kung Fu Panda above it.
dog

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8688 on: November 04, 2010, 06:28:11 PM »
:lol :lol

Pixar movies feel cheesy or predictable in how the plot will end (like knowing the old man is going to be a father figure to the fat kid), but they're nowhere near the shittastic stories of Dreamworks movies.  Was Despicable Me Dreamworks?  If not, then the last one I saw was Monsters vs Aliens and I snuck into it.  The last one I paid for was Kung Fu Panda.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8689 on: November 04, 2010, 06:42:09 PM »
:lol :lol

Pixar movies feel cheesy or predictable in how the plot will end (like knowing the old man is going to be a father figure to the fat kid), but they're nowhere near the shittastic stories of Dreamworks movies.  Was Despicable Me Dreamworks?  If not, then the last one I saw was Monsters vs Aliens and I snuck into it.  The last one I paid for was Kung Fu Panda.

Despicable Me was a co-production between Illumination Entertainment, Universal, and Mac Guff.

And I'm not saying that Pixar's movies are some of the greatest movies ever and have storylines that among the best ever written, although some of them ARE very good, but we're talking about whether a decent Pixar movies is better than a pretty good Dreamworks movies and the answer is "yes".
dog

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8690 on: November 04, 2010, 06:43:53 PM »
Despicable Me was the shit.  I'd love to see more from the creators.  I really expected to hate it and I absolutely loved it.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8691 on: November 04, 2010, 06:53:21 PM »
Up>Citizen Kane
010

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8692 on: November 04, 2010, 08:53:32 PM »
Despicable Me was the shit.  I'd love to see more from the creators.  I really expected to hate it and I absolutely loved it.

I'll have to check it out when it hits DVD.

And the two guys that directed haven't really done anything else, the two writers also wrote Horton Hears a Who.

Up>Citizen Kane

:bow
dog

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8693 on: November 04, 2010, 11:18:45 PM »
Anybody know how the availability thing works on Netflix? 

Like, the first disc of Twin Peaks says, "Very long wait"... does that mean if I put it at the top of my queue, I'll be waiting three months until one is available before I get anything else, or will it just skip to the next in line until they're able to send it to me?
obo

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8694 on: November 04, 2010, 11:20:38 PM »
it'll skip to the next in line although i believe in series it will skip disc 2 of twin peaks until it can send you disc 1.  by the way, i've had twin peaks at the top for like 6 months so yeah, they do mean long wait haha

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8695 on: November 04, 2010, 11:21:10 PM »
Chloe

HOLY FUCK MOVIE OF THE FOREVER

JULIANNE MOORE FUCKING A YOUNGER GIRL

:drool
:lol :lol

Yes.  I watched it just for that.  But man the rest of the movie is so distinguished mentally-challenged that it's bad.

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8696 on: November 04, 2010, 11:36:27 PM »
it'll skip to the next in line although i believe in series it will skip disc 2 of twin peaks until it can send you disc 1.  by the way, i've had twin peaks at the top for like 6 months so yeah, they do mean long wait haha

Wow, 6 months?  The only thing on the first disc is the 90 minute pilot, so maybe it's better to just pirate the damn thing and move on to disc two.
obo

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #8697 on: November 04, 2010, 11:39:28 PM »
I should probably do that but fuck I'm lazy and then I'll end up pirating the whole thing because I'm lazy and think why the hell not? and then I'll feel bad about it.  yeah, I feel bad when I pirate stuff sometimes.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8698 on: November 04, 2010, 11:55:23 PM »
Up was good but like, I felt it was completely off tangent, like it didn't know what it wanted to be: classy cartoon film for adults or cutesy harmless comedy for children? The parts in the jungle didn't really resonate with me and I felt the sidekicks made it feel like a generic movie. It has a lot of great ideas, such as the story of the old man coming to terms with his childhood dream, but the bulk of the film felt uninspired -- from the villain, to the sidekicks, to the plot. Up is entirely front loaded and back ended to be enjoyable on subsequent viewings. Really good movie, just not one of Pixar's greatest and I *love* Pixar. I almost put Up on par with A Bug's Life.

I enjoyed Kung Fu Panda far more.

Megamind looks fun too and I honestly don't understand how anyone can describe Megamind as a typical Dreamworks picture. The premise alone is unique for an animated feature film for kids in a time when talking animals or talking _____ is de facto standard. Everyone has wondered at one point in time "what would happen if the villian actually WON?" and Megamind panders to that line of thinking; the premise is pretty inventive, not even just as a Dreamworks movie, but as an animated film as well. That said, that's all from media and trailers, the movie itself could prove me wrong, though.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2010, 11:59:40 PM by Stringer Bell »
IYKYK

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #8699 on: November 04, 2010, 11:59:12 PM »
The premise alone is unique for an animated feature film movie for kids.

Go watch Despicable Me instead.

Quote
I honestly don't understand how anyone can describe Megamind as a typical Dreamworks picture.

I think this review blurb sums it up nicely:

Quote
This is the kind of movie where "Bad to the Bone" is considered a clever musical cue because, you know, Megamind is bad. To the bone.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 12:00:55 AM by Great Rumbler »
dog