Author Topic: Movie News, Reviews, and Discussion Super-Thread (Read 5394659 times)

Mandark · « **Reply #15420 on:** December 01, 2012, 07:27:19 PM »

http://www.indiewire.com/article/strange-and-norrell-and-jason-byrne-among-bbc-orders-for-2013-series

Okay, it's a TV miniseries and not a movie. We don't have a miniseries news thread. Whatevs.

Robo · « **Reply #15421 on:** December 01, 2012, 07:30:35 PM »

Chronicle - I actually got a nosebleed while watching this, but it was because I was picking my nose. I enjoyed it a lot more than I thought I would.

Yeti · « **Reply #15422 on:** December 01, 2012, 09:12:12 PM »

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #15423 on:** December 01, 2012, 09:29:25 PM »

Well, there's no reason to watch the movie now, we've already seen all the jokes.

Also, the fact that this was actually shot back during the middle of 2010 and then shelved until January 2013 is not a good sign.

Barry Egan · « **Reply #15424 on:** December 01, 2012, 10:01:49 PM »

I dont get it

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #15425 on:** December 01, 2012, 10:36:09 PM »

what the fuck happened to Halle Berry's career $:-\$

Diunx · « **Reply #15426 on:** December 02, 2012, 01:35:33 AM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on December 01, 2012, 10:36:09 PM

what the fuck happened to Halle Berry's career $:-\$

She only has four good movies.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #15427 on:** December 02, 2012, 02:48:21 AM »

Quote from: Diunx on December 02, 2012, 01:35:33 AM

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on December 01, 2012, 10:36:09 PM
what the fuck happened to Halle Berry's career $:-\$

She only has four good movies.

Jungle Fever and The Flintstones better be on this list

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #15428 on:** December 02, 2012, 02:50:48 AM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on December 02, 2012, 02:48:21 AM

Quote from: Diunx on December 02, 2012, 01:35:33 AM
Quote from: Phoenix Dark on December 01, 2012, 10:36:09 PM
what the fuck happened to Halle Berry's career $:-\$

She only has four good movies.

Jungle Fever and The Flintstones better be on this list

The only other two I can think of are The Last Boyscout and X2, so that seems right.

G The Resurrected · « **Reply #15429 on:** December 02, 2012, 04:38:38 AM »

Hells yeah the boys are back in town!

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #15430 on:** December 02, 2012, 08:37:12 AM »

Quote from: Joe Molotov on December 02, 2012, 02:50:48 AM

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on December 02, 2012, 02:48:21 AM
Quote from: Diunx on December 02, 2012, 01:35:33 AM
Quote from: Phoenix Dark on December 01, 2012, 10:36:09 PM
what the fuck happened to Halle Berry's career $:-\$

She only has four good movies.

Jungle Fever and The Flintstones better be on this list

The only other two I can think of are The Last Boyscout and X2, so that seems right.

Swordfish

Momo · « **Reply #15431 on:** December 02, 2012, 09:24:46 AM »

Quote from: fistfulofmetal on December 02, 2012, 08:37:12 AM

Swordfish

Let's see you crack my bore password while PD gives you a blowjob

Eric P · « **Reply #15432 on:** December 02, 2012, 08:15:17 PM »

Premium Rush Honestly it was really good. Fun chase story with a really dumb ending.
Black Christmas eh.

drew · « **Reply #15433 on:** December 03, 2012, 05:12:17 AM »

The Bourne Legacy pretty bad, an equal mix of eye roll worthy Federal Agency porn and high octane action sequences with an unfulfilling ending that is abrupt and comes out of nowhere. in the previous movies Bourne was running around with a purpose in the back of his mind of sticking it to the people behind the program, in this one the new guy is running around just to run. that's it. the ending is like a Brosnan Bond movie where we're led to assume that he is left to tenderly fuck the chick he's been through the whole ordeal with as the sun sets, but without the implied sex. terrible. waste of time. avoid.

edit: and while Jason was likable (a major reason the movies worked) this new guy is not

chronovore · « **Reply #15434 on:** December 03, 2012, 09:13:25 AM »

Yeah, I just don't buy Renner as an action star.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #15435 on:** December 03, 2012, 10:49:14 AM »

Diunx · « **Reply #15436 on:** December 03, 2012, 10:57:55 AM »

Yeah that's definitely Star Trek.

Eric P · « **Reply #15437 on:** December 03, 2012, 11:28:35 AM »

stars, treks
i'm sold

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #15438 on:** December 03, 2012, 11:32:44 AM »

Can't wait to see The Hobbit just to see this trailer. I'm interested how it is tonally.

Dickie Dee · « **Reply #15439 on:** December 03, 2012, 12:12:13 PM »

Has any earth city beside SF been shown before?

Momo · « **Reply #15440 on:** December 03, 2012, 12:23:36 PM »

THE FUCK at that star trek. Fuck this gay earth

Howard Alan Treesong · « **Reply #15441 on:** December 03, 2012, 12:48:22 PM »

apparently ME3 made post-apoc London de rigueur for your SF sequel

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #15442 on:** December 03, 2012, 01:43:55 PM »

Quote from: BlueTsunami on December 03, 2012, 11:32:44 AM

Can't wait to see The Hobbit just to see this trailer. I'm interested how it is tonally.

I'm more interested in the Pacific Rim trailer.

cool breeze · « **Reply #15443 on:** December 03, 2012, 01:44:32 PM »

I like that the title is "Star Trek Into Darkness" instead of "Star Trek: Into Darkness"

Diunx · « **Reply #15444 on:** December 03, 2012, 02:33:57 PM »

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #15445 on:** December 03, 2012, 02:45:37 PM »

"And in other news today, famed super-hero Superman was arrested on allegations of stalking made by the mother of his child..."

cool breeze · « **Reply #15446 on:** December 03, 2012, 03:23:42 PM »

Is that really an official poster? I'm not being sarcastic or nothing. It looks like one of those fake deviantart dark knight rises posters that get posted in the gaf threads for a laugh.

Himu · « **Reply #15447 on:** December 03, 2012, 03:42:35 PM »

They couldn't do something like this?

drew · « **Reply #15448 on:** December 03, 2012, 10:31:20 PM »

really? i thought he was fine, it wasn't his fault the script was a piece of shit.

Steve Contra · « **Reply #15449 on:** December 05, 2012, 02:29:12 PM »

Quote from: Diunx on December 03, 2012, 02:33:57 PM

(Image removed from quote.)

Did JJ Abrams direct this poster?

And WTF at that Star Trek poster. Why does everything need to be DARK AND SERIOUS these days.

Robo · « **Reply #15450 on:** December 05, 2012, 08:33:50 PM »

I watched Election this evening—never seen it before. The one with Matthew Broderick, not that shitty Chinese crime movie. I laughed a whole bunch.

Cormacaroni · « **Reply #15451 on:** December 05, 2012, 08:54:33 PM »

Quote from: chronovore on December 03, 2012, 09:13:25 AM

Yeah, I just don't buy Renner as an action star.

his only good role so far has been playing a psycho. Not sure why we're all supposed to be in love with the guy

Eric P · « **Reply #15452 on:** December 05, 2012, 09:53:44 PM »

Quote from: Robo on December 05, 2012, 08:33:50 PM

I watched Election this evening—never seen it before. The one with Matthew Broderick, not that shitty Chinese crime movie. I laughed a whole bunch.

fuck you, trick

Eric P · « **Reply #15453 on:** December 05, 2012, 09:54:01 PM »

i'm sorry that was rather strong.

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #15454 on:** December 06, 2012, 01:35:15 AM »

Quote from: Eric P on December 05, 2012, 09:54:01 PM

i'm sorry that was rather strong.

No, it's fine.

Mandark · « **Reply #15455 on:** December 06, 2012, 02:18:45 AM »

Quote from: Cormacaroni on December 05, 2012, 08:54:33 PM

Quote from: chronovore on December 03, 2012, 09:13:25 AM
Yeah, I just don't buy Renner as an action star.

his only good role so far has been playing a psycho. Not sure why we're all supposed to be in love with the guy

http://www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=38792.0

The Sceneman · « **Reply #15456 on:** December 06, 2012, 05:57:32 AM »

just watched Cabin in the Woods. Hurr hurr pretty funny I guess. Storyline was definitely innovative on some level

Groogrux · « **Reply #15457 on:** December 06, 2012, 09:12:50 AM »

While the poster may be a gimmick, the movie itself looks fucking amazing. Benedict Cumberbatch is a phenomenal actor and he will make a great Khan.

Steve Contra · « **Reply #15458 on:** December 06, 2012, 11:57:46 AM »

Nah, looks pretty bad. All I saw was explosions and way too serious dialogue. You could have put any title on the trailer and it wouldn't have made a difference.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #15459 on:** December 06, 2012, 12:34:17 PM »

Quote from: Groogrux on December 06, 2012, 09:12:50 AM

While the poster may be a gimmick, the movie itself looks fucking amazing. Benedict Cumberbatch is a phenomenal actor and he will make a great Khan.

Except people think he won't be playing Khan, but this guy instead:

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Gary_Mitchell

Quote from: The Wrath Of Drugula on December 05, 2012, 10:00:53 PM

Quote from: Steve Contra on December 05, 2012, 02:29:12 PM
And WTF at that Star Trek poster. Why does everything need to be DARK AND SERIOUS these days.

It's the new trend. Remember the early '00s when every sad pathetic manchild wanted everything to be darker and more serious while calling anything not so kiddy and too corny? Well they got what they wanted with Batman Begins and Casino Royale, and the success of those two reboots gave hollywood another money boner so that's what they cater to now. And now every sad nerdlinger is screaming for steampunk, which I doubt will ever happen.

See also: Iron Man 3.

I blame 9/11.

Groogrux · « **Reply #15460 on:** December 06, 2012, 01:16:00 PM »

Steve Contra · « **Reply #15461 on:** December 06, 2012, 01:38:05 PM »

Fuck, someone needs to take that generic voiceover and put it over a Batman trailer. And then a James Bond trailer. And then a Transformers trailer.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #15462 on:** December 06, 2012, 01:55:18 PM »

My response: meh? Am I supposed to care about a villain I have connection to. I don't even know who it is. Khan? Was he in the first movie..?

Himu · « **Reply #15463 on:** December 06, 2012, 01:57:04 PM »

khan wasn't in star trek reboot. it starred romulans as the villains.

Groogrux · « **Reply #15464 on:** December 06, 2012, 03:45:12 PM »

Quote from: Steve Contra on December 06, 2012, 01:38:05 PM

Fuck, someone needs to take that generic voiceover and put it over a Batman trailer. And then a James Bond trailer. And then a Transformers trailer.

This is totally a case of the Little Tortilla Boy. The same voiceover can be used for any contempory movie preview of its time.

Watch this and you'll see what I mean:

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

Steve Contra · « **Reply #15465 on:** December 06, 2012, 04:19:07 PM »

I agree, this Star Trek does look like generic crap that deserves a generic voiceover. Glad you agree.

cool breeze · « **Reply #15466 on:** December 06, 2012, 04:58:38 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on December 06, 2012, 01:55:18 PM

My response: meh? Am I supposed to care about a villain I have connection to. I don't even know who it is. Khan? Was he in the first movie..?

They're intentionally being coy about the villain's identity. But the Japanese trailer runs longer and has strong hints towards who he is.

I think the running hypotheses are

spoiler (click to show/hide)

Gary Mitchell or another telling of Khan because of alternate universe business.

[close]

Himu · « **Reply #15467 on:** December 07, 2012, 12:29:33 AM »

Quote from: The Wrath Of Drugula on December 07, 2012, 12:25:11 AM

Also that trailer is the most I've ever seen of Star Trek, I might have to rectify that.

Compare that trailer to this:

Groogrux · « **Reply #15468 on:** December 07, 2012, 01:36:59 AM »

Quote from: The Wrath Of Drugula on December 07, 2012, 12:25:11 AM

I'm just not a fan of JJ Abrams, and while I enjoyed Cloverfield(Sort of a disappointment though) and loved Super 8, those fit certain niches that I'm a fan of and I thought they were good in spite of his involvement.

Also that trailer is the most I've ever seen of Star Trek, I might have to rectify that.

JJ Abrams makes pretty decent stuff across the board. You should give the reboot Star Trek a shot. While I'm not a huge Trek fan, I've enjoyed most of TNG, Enterprise, the reboot, Generations, and few other projects they've done.

Momo · « **Reply #15469 on:** December 07, 2012, 01:39:30 AM »

Quote from: Groogrux on December 06, 2012, 01:16:00 PM

This movie having the name star trek can fuck off

Groogrux · « **Reply #15470 on:** December 07, 2012, 01:41:06 AM »

I take it you're not a reboot story-line fan?

Momo · « **Reply #15471 on:** December 07, 2012, 01:45:47 AM »

Nah, I want the classic continuity to be put in film/tv

They could easily have called this SpaceBattleShip Abrams and still did as well as they are. The existence of this line makes it less and less likely that I will get classic continuity stuff, at least delaying anything potentially for a long time.

Rahxephon91 · « **Reply #15472 on:** December 07, 2012, 01:48:00 AM »

ST looks cool and fun, which is what I'm looking for in the new series.

Momo · « **Reply #15473 on:** December 07, 2012, 01:50:29 AM »

They should reboot StarGate as a military/g.i. joe type movie to complete my misery

Groogrux · « **Reply #15474 on:** December 07, 2012, 01:56:16 AM »

The only bad thing about the original continuity is that (1) TOS did not age well at all, and younger audiences have a hard time connecting with it, (2) TNG was really great, but I think they've squeezed everything out of it that they could, (3) DSN and Voyager didn't do very well and are often less remembered, (4) Enterprise was fun, but was kindof gimmicky, and hardcore fans don't accept it into the lore.

All that being said, they didn't have much room to build on anything in the original continuity and make any actual money off of it.

Momo · « **Reply #15475 on:** December 07, 2012, 02:02:09 AM »

There are tons of new things Voyager only touched on that can be put into film/series.

Just NONE of the Voyager writers nor actors may return. They should send out a new ship to explore/map the Delta quadrant further.

Groogrux · « **Reply #15476 on:** December 07, 2012, 02:07:01 AM »

I would love to see a new series. Considering we've not had one since Firefly was still be aired live...

Momo · « **Reply #15477 on:** December 07, 2012, 02:30:11 AM »

Yeah, the Enterprise stink has worn off now, but they went in this new film direction sadly.

Groogrux · « **Reply #15478 on:** December 07, 2012, 03:27:21 AM »

I would say that if they do a new series, it would be based off of the new continuity, however that doesn't mean that it would be bad. The timeline could still be set an X number of years after the events of the reboot storyline and most of the outcomes would be close to the same as they would in the original universe.

CajoleJuice · « **Reply #15479 on:** December 07, 2012, 06:04:27 PM »

I want to see the new Star Trek because Cumbernatch. Thought the reboot was mediocre. Abrams for me probably goes Cloverfield > Star Trek > Super 8

oh wait he didn't direct Cloverfield, oops

News:

Author Topic: Movie News, Reviews, and Discussion Super-Thread (Read 5394659 times)