i like her too. great value with Vizier. pretty fragile early, can't protect herself consistently on an empty board especially if you're playing on three. pretty solid mid game and incredible late game. really well designed x cost. i would bet on her dropping a bit from this pre-order price.
rhonas though a.k.a lambholt pacifist on crack
legendary Creature - GodDeathtouch, indestructible Rhonas, the Indomitable can't attack or block unless you control another creature with power 4 or greater.
2G: Another target creature you control gains +2/0 and trample until end of turn.
I think i was being a little overly liberal with my use of
jank re Gifts Storm - it's feelings vs. facts

, i have no data to back up my opinion. It seems a solid deck, to elaborate i see it as being a little slower and more fragile than ad nauseum. as far as league results, i've never really taken them as much of an indication of what is actually good. popular though? sure. i would describe my hatebears as pretty jank and barely tiered atm, but always fairly popular because of guys like Craig Wescoe who get it in the spotlight by constantly forcing it and being amazing players, and looking at recent leagues it still puts up a lot of results.
Similarly Storm seems like it will always be popular, because Storm is cool, cheap (and good for loners). unless ad naus becomes
the spike deck, but i believe it's underrated primarily because its lines are esoteric, the cards are weird, historically it hasn't been great, and at the moment its competitive edge is only really anecdotal and up for debate. so, really, i can't speak on a deck i have only sat across the table from and im not all that results or data focussed with mtg, it is too difficult to get solid numbers. generally i just trust my gut and experience when it comes to what i think is better. mtgtop8 seems almost meaningless aside from describing how popular a list is, or identifying what the big decks are, as you really need to understand how many ppl are entering the leagues with such lists vs how many are actually placing to understand the efficacy in win %. e.g. looking at the page for lists like bant retreat, it looks great,
http://mtgtop8.com/archetype?a=222&meta=51&f=MO, has been showing up in top 8's at GPs for a while and seems to place fine in leagues. although i really have little idea just by looking at those numbers. still, consistently top 8'ing gps with upwards of 600 players indicates a fair bit more than some league numbers, yet i think most people who play modern would either just be unfamiliar with the deck, or describe it as jank because it's not a traditionally popular archetype.