Author Topic: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread (Read 5050997 times)

Pringo · « **Reply #600 on:** February 12, 2011, 08:19:12 PM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=421580

Anyone here know this guy? I recognize the avatar but I can't say I really remember his posts much. A search seems to show he's been active for quite a few years on GAF.

etiolate · « **Reply #601 on:** February 12, 2011, 08:25:44 PM »

I was reading some older thread with a post from him in it the other day. It may have been the PA thread? I am not sure.

He didn't post a lot but I recognize his name and avatar. Did he have some wacky thread once?

editL here

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=109714

Dickie Dee · « **Reply #602 on:** February 12, 2011, 08:29:39 PM »

That sucks - I know depression-GAF probably seems like a pity-party whinefest to outsiders but I bet it helps a few just a little bit. Too bad he went past the point of being able to reach out.

Quote from: etiolate on February 12, 2011, 08:25:44 PM

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=109714

That is one genuine drunk thread - fuck these "I just had some Kahlua and not I just don't know

"

MyNameIsMethodis · « **Reply #603 on:** February 12, 2011, 10:35:15 PM »

I guess he couldnt handle the strong current that depression brings. RIP.

Mupepe · « **Reply #604 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:21:37 PM »

Wow. I don't mind depression GAF honestly. Make fun of them sometimes on here, sure. But if you have problems, there's nothing wrong with trying to reach out.

Himu · « **Reply #605 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:27:02 PM »

I recognize the name and avatar of Snaildog. Damn, that's horrible. Depression sucks. Get help.

EmCeeGrammar · « **Reply #606 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:31:54 AM »

what the fuck drohne

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=421445

The Sceneman · « **Reply #607 on:** February 13, 2011, 04:31:07 AM »

Quote from: Stringer Bell on February 12, 2011, 11:27:02 PM

I recognize the name and avatar of Snaildog. Damn, that's horrible. Depression sucks. Get help.

Yep depression does suck. I've been feeling on top of the world lately, thankfully.

pilonv1 · « **Reply #608 on:** February 13, 2011, 05:49:37 AM »

someone help drohne out. send him some cock pics or something

Oblivion · « **Reply #609 on:** February 13, 2011, 06:18:35 AM »

Quote from: pilonv1 on February 13, 2011, 05:49:37 AM

someone help drohne out. send him some cock pics or something

Way ahead of you.

Olivia Wilde Homo · « **Reply #610 on:** February 13, 2011, 07:36:15 AM »

RIP Snaildog, even though I don't remember who he is.

I don't have a problem with depression age. Not everyone can afford therapy and sometimes it does feel good to unload yourself onto the internet. I think the only time people turn on depression age people are if they make no attempt to change their situation. I think that is why people give CrushDance so much shit: he's been whining about the same problems for years but makes no attempt to change things.

Quote from: Stringer Bell on February 12, 2011, 02:48:27 PM

It also helps that my job is literally BEING ON A COMPUTER.

So EB is always a alt + tab or multi-touch finger gesture away.

I'm just kidding around.

Diunx · « **Reply #611 on:** February 13, 2011, 09:39:59 AM »

Don't remember him but RIP.

Chinner · « **Reply #612 on:** February 13, 2011, 11:45:15 AM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=25920412&postcount=81

is that evillore?

MyNameIsMethodis · « **Reply #613 on:** February 13, 2011, 11:56:23 AM »

lmao how is that guy not banned

Himu · « **Reply #614 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:50:42 PM »

yes that's evilore chinner

Pringo · « **Reply #615 on:** February 13, 2011, 01:18:42 PM »

Quote from: Stringer Bell on February 13, 2011, 12:50:42 PM

yes that's evilore chinner

Although obviously a bit shopped. You can tell that the author of the gif shrank his ear size down a bit for the image.

The Sceneman · « **Reply #616 on:** February 13, 2011, 11:09:38 PM »

^

Grade A zinger

tiesto · « **Reply #617 on:** February 14, 2011, 09:03:37 AM »

That guy Snaildog was cool, it's a shame. :'(

brob · « **Reply #618 on:** February 16, 2011, 08:54:17 PM »

God damn it. Why doesn't gaf have a function that tells me if someone is banned for a week, or forever? Before I could search and try to deduce how hard the hammer fell, but now that's all fucked. Especially if they kicked upwards in Evilore's G4 thread or something and had all their oversteps deleted.

/serious gaf drama for serious internet whining

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #619 on:** February 16, 2011, 08:57:54 PM »

GAF's Google search thing is completely useless.

MyNameIsMethodis · « **Reply #620 on:** February 16, 2011, 08:58:56 PM »

it's entirely there to make evilore money are u dat surprised

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #621 on:** February 16, 2011, 09:01:27 PM »

Where did I say I was surprised? The only thing it's good for [aside from lining Evilore's pocket] is finding threads that are 3-4 years old.

Pringo · « **Reply #622 on:** February 16, 2011, 09:23:20 PM »

Quote from: Great Rumbler on February 16, 2011, 09:01:27 PM

Where did I say I was surprised? The only thing it's good for [aside from lining Evilore's pocket] is finding threads that are 3-4 years old.

One of the more bizarre things about the GAF Google search I've found is that it actually misses threads that a "site:neogaf.com" search on Google will pick up. Like you can look up the exact same search term and get different results between the two. No idea why that happens.

Don Flamenco · « **Reply #623 on:** February 17, 2011, 11:22:19 AM »

I wonder if new people have been getting approved at neogaf. I've had an account waiting for a few months now.

i'm totally perma-banned from cag. I'm locked out of an account that's supposed to be my "real" account and maybe one of the mods has it out for me, because I keep making new accounts and having them banned quickly for being duplicates. Can mods see IP addresses of posters? I'm not even a trouble poster there (usually) :'(

Mupepe · « **Reply #624 on:** February 17, 2011, 11:52:35 AM »

They approved a bunch of juniors at GAF about a month ago. Evilore did one of those "welcome new members" threads. I had been pending approval for like a month before that and didn't get in. Still waiting.

Shaka Khan · « **Reply #625 on:** February 17, 2011, 12:02:56 PM »

PM me your usernames, I can get you approved.

Mupepe · « **Reply #626 on:** February 17, 2011, 12:09:20 PM »

don't toy with my emotions. I really want to post in like 2 threads dammit and troll the rest

Mupepe · « **Reply #627 on:** February 17, 2011, 12:13:02 PM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=421993

i want to troll the fuck out of this thread. Sensitive fucking hippies. Jesus.

Mupepe · « **Reply #628 on:** February 17, 2011, 12:50:02 PM »

Yeah, i'm sorry. I'll be respectful, not make fun but if you've got a dick and look like a dude, I'm going to call you sir by instinct. Get over it.

Robo · « **Reply #629 on:** February 17, 2011, 12:53:20 PM »

[redacted] I refuse to make a Susan Boyle joke.

MyNameIsMethodis · « **Reply #630 on:** February 17, 2011, 01:03:11 PM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=422011

this looks so bad

Shaka Khan · « **Reply #631 on:** February 17, 2011, 01:12:54 PM »

I commend their dedication, but that is a perfect example of running what was once a ~~good~~ joke into the ground. It stopped being interesting a long, long time ago and they should have stopped at the mock-up art stage. I hope they find a crowd big and courteous enough to support them. $:-\$

Sman · « **Reply #632 on:** February 17, 2011, 01:21:33 PM »

Quote from: Mupepe on February 17, 2011, 12:13:02 PM

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=421993

i want to troll the fuck out of this thread. Sensitive fucking hippies. Jesus.

Someone, just find me a photo of Gaborn (Jaydubya and Solidsnake would be nice too) and I'd gladly troll them in doodle form, Koshiba-style.

Shaka Khan · « **Reply #633 on:** February 17, 2011, 01:22:39 PM »

Haha, that would be epic, but I don't recall the three of them posting pics.

Mupepe · « **Reply #634 on:** February 17, 2011, 02:04:31 PM »

Yeah, I doubt someone as self loathing as Gaborn would ever post a picture of himself.

Mupepe · « **Reply #635 on:** February 17, 2011, 03:03:42 PM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=25994001&postcount=41

one of the few actually scary moments described in that thread.

Mupepe · « **Reply #636 on:** February 17, 2011, 03:58:37 PM »

shyamalamadingdongtweest.jpg

25% of that thread is people drowning, 20% is people being raped at a young age and 50% is homeboys getting shot at. The other 5% is made up of sleep paralysis, wild animals and health issues.

Boogie · « **Reply #637 on:** February 17, 2011, 05:49:39 PM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=422059

ITT, GAF members reveal their continued stupidity and misogynistic tendencies.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #638 on:** February 17, 2011, 05:56:43 PM »

If you don't want to get blown up by a terrorist, then you shouldn't dress like a pampered, middle-class American! It's just COMMON SENSE!

etiolate · « **Reply #639 on:** February 17, 2011, 06:25:16 PM »

Boogie:

There is an issue with rape prevention and the way its headed, and the "rape culture" PA stuff goes into this. So much has gone into making it feel safe for a women to come forward that the many important parts of the greater issue are being overlooked. The issue with the cop is his phrasing, but his inclusion of the idea probably offends people as well and that being offending is a big problem.

The definition of rape has been played with to the point that they've included gray areas into legal boundaries. There are ethical problems there. They are teaching a fear of male sexuality that is harmful to the issue. When you are extending rape to the point that includes a girl who decides to get drunk at a party and then a guy ends up sleeping with her without her specifically saying "yes I want this", then how that girl is dressed does comes into play. To think we are not sending messages by how we appear and that people do not receive these messages is silly.

I would say that overall the problem with rape prevention is that its extended itself into dating, and gender and sexual interaction. These are places that involve many more issues. You can't step into that realm of life and avoid the complexity, but rape prevention is trying to do that and it's not a good idea, even if its reasoning is noble.

Boogie · « **Reply #640 on:** February 17, 2011, 06:25:27 PM »

"My position is right and true. Common sense agrees with me." Mind = blown.

Boogie · « **Reply #641 on:** February 17, 2011, 06:35:40 PM »

Quote from: etiolate on February 17, 2011, 06:25:16 PM

The definition of rape has been played with to the point that they've included gray areas into legal boundaries. There are ethical problems there. They are teaching a fear of male sexuality that is harmful to the issue. When you are extending rape to the point that includes a girl who decides to get drunk at a party and then a guy ends up sleeping with her without her specifically saying "yes I want this", then how that girl is dressed does comes into play. To think we are not sending messages by how we appear and that people do not receive these messages is silly.

Of course "we send messages by how we appear."

But that is a far cry from saying "to protect yourself from sexual assault, dress less slutty" as valid advice to protect women.

etiolate · « **Reply #642 on:** February 17, 2011, 06:36:58 PM »

Nobody is saying that and only that will protect you. The only real protection is the ability to disable a sexual attacker. People are saying that dress can influence the situation.

Boogie · « **Reply #643 on:** February 17, 2011, 07:14:25 PM »

Quote from: etiolate on February 17, 2011, 06:36:58 PM

People are saying that dress can influence the situation.

Well, so far in 11 pages, the only study that says so is from 1996 and also says that "Investigators have suggested that a woman may be at
increased risk for sexual victimization in a dating situation if she initiates the date, allows her
partner to pay dating expenses, goes to his apartment, and wears revealing clothing."

So I guess we should tell women not to ask out men, in order to protect themselves from sexual assault too, huh?

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #644 on:** February 17, 2011, 07:20:32 PM »

Quote from: etiolate on February 17, 2011, 06:36:58 PM

Nobody is saying that and only that will protect you. The only real protection is the ability to disable a sexual attacker. People are saying that dress can influence the situation.

You have to be rape-proof, which means you are willing and able to stop anybody from raping you.

Boogie · « **Reply #645 on:** February 17, 2011, 07:21:57 PM »

Quote from: Joe Molotov® EDGE™ on February 17, 2011, 07:20:32 PM

Quote from: etiolate on February 17, 2011, 06:36:58 PM
Nobody is saying that and only that will protect you. The only real protection is the ability to disable a sexual attacker. People are saying that dress can influence the situation.

You have to be rape-proof, which means you are willing and able to stop anybody from raping you.

damn. You win.

The Sceneman · « **Reply #646 on:** February 17, 2011, 07:27:35 PM »

"I used to think rape was funny, until I got raped!"

Boogie · « **Reply #647 on:** February 17, 2011, 09:58:17 PM »

Quote from: Billy Rygar on February 17, 2011, 09:56:39 PM

Quote from: etiolate on February 17, 2011, 06:25:16 PM

I would say that overall the problem with rape prevention is that its extended itself into dating, and gender and sexual interaction. These are places that involve many more issues. You can't step into that realm of life and avoid the complexity, but rape prevention is trying to do that and it's not a good idea, even if its reasoning is noble.
What are you trying to say here?

The sexual equivalent of "white guilt shithole"

etiolate · « **Reply #648 on:** February 17, 2011, 11:38:49 PM »

Quote from: Billy Rygar on February 17, 2011, 09:56:39 PM

Quote from: etiolate on February 17, 2011, 06:25:16 PM

I would say that overall the problem with rape prevention is that its extended itself into dating, and gender and sexual interaction. These are places that involve many more issues. You can't step into that realm of life and avoid the complexity, but rape prevention is trying to do that and it's not a good idea, even if its reasoning is noble.
What are you trying to say here?

What it says.

Oblivion · « **Reply #649 on:** February 18, 2011, 06:43:43 AM »

Quote from: The Worst Poster Ever on February 17, 2011, 01:03:11 PM

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=422011

this looks so bad

Shit, they actually went ahead and made it? Definitely gotta give em credit for that much.

magus · « **Reply #650 on:** February 18, 2011, 09:35:53 AM »

what about sega fans?

Olivia Wilde Homo · « **Reply #651 on:** February 18, 2011, 04:22:25 PM »

Quote from: Oscar the Grouch on February 18, 2011, 07:25:26 AM

Quote from: Billy Rygar on February 17, 2011, 10:08:12 PM
Anyhow that whole thread reads like a thesis on the sad, confused state of internet masculinity. All that repressed rage towards female sexuality and "oh god I just want a submissive wife who will cook for me and love me why did feminists have to ruin it for me why I can't I get laid" is coming off of the whole thing. I bet the lot of them are Nintendo fans.

Actually, doing a quick scan of a few pages, most of the people defending the cop's statement are Sony fans, some of them highly notable Sonytards. Nintards tend more toward white knighting and treating women like incompetent delicate flowers. MS fans sigh and honk their wife's boobs.

Makes sense. Most Sfags think of themselves as gangstas and ballas. Chad Wardenn encapsulated Sfaggotry very well.

The Sceneman · « **Reply #652 on:** February 18, 2011, 11:34:08 PM »

[youtube=560,345]A-F5lrPksJY[/youtube]

this makes me laugh every time

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #653 on:** February 18, 2011, 11:49:58 PM »

Stoney Mason · « **Reply #654 on:** February 18, 2011, 11:55:20 PM »

Quote from: Oblivion on February 18, 2011, 06:43:43 AM

Quote from: The Worst Poster Ever on February 17, 2011, 01:03:11 PM
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=422011

this looks so bad

Shit, they actually went ahead and made it? Definitely gotta give em credit for that much.

Whole thing seems like a joke that's been taken too far and isn't funny anymore and was barely funny originally. But good luck to them I guess.

Diunx · « **Reply #655 on:** February 19, 2011, 08:42:39 AM »

Is the game gonna be free?

Positive Touch · « **Reply #656 on:** February 19, 2011, 09:25:53 AM »

Quote from: etiolate on February 17, 2011, 11:38:49 PM

Quote from: Billy Rygar on February 17, 2011, 09:56:39 PM
Quote from: etiolate on February 17, 2011, 06:25:16 PM

I would say that overall the problem with rape prevention is that its extended itself into dating, and gender and sexual interaction. These are places that involve many more issues. You can't step into that realm of life and avoid the complexity, but rape prevention is trying to do that and it's not a good idea, even if its reasoning is noble.
What are you trying to say here?

What it says.

that it's not a good idea to discuss date rape or gender roles effects on sexual violence because we should instead focus only on violent, "random" rapes?

Olivia Wilde Homo · « **Reply #657 on:** February 19, 2011, 09:45:40 AM »

Quote from: Stoney Mason on February 18, 2011, 11:55:20 PM

Quote from: Oblivion on February 18, 2011, 06:43:43 AM
Quote from: The Worst Poster Ever on February 17, 2011, 01:03:11 PM
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=422011

this looks so bad

Shit, they actually went ahead and made it? Definitely gotta give em credit for that much.

Whole thing seems like a joke that's been taken too far and isn't funny anymore and was barely funny originally. But good luck to them I guess.

I don't think it was ever funny and was always a passive aggressive stance towards COD and games that aren't Mario and Zelda and <insert whimsical nostalgia laden game here> that are selling these days. It allowed people who play games only for their whimsical factor (and character-icon factor) to make a flaccid poke at games that sell these days.

I wouldn't mind playing it though if turns out to be pretty decent.

Shaka Khan · « **Reply #658 on:** February 19, 2011, 11:17:31 AM »

How many people are working on this project anyways?

Smooth Groove · « **Reply #659 on:** February 19, 2011, 02:36:08 PM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=421694

How much do people get paid for a project like this?

News:

Author Topic: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread (Read 5050997 times)