Author Topic: GTAV - first person mode in pc/ps4/xb1 :o  (Read 217827 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Damian79

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #900 on: September 18, 2013, 03:41:13 AM »
especially since the gta guys seem to waffle between this being "satire" and "where do we sign up for our oscar for our amazingly brilliant story-telling"

You cant have good satire based story telling?  It is very clear the game is satire, not realistic in the slightest.

Damian79

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #901 on: September 18, 2013, 04:02:52 AM »
True.  However it is impossible to please SOME women.  Like when the new tomb raider is seen as female death porn when it has been done to men for decades.  But when you write reviews as a reviewer you are supposed to put away those shackles of gender and judge the game for what it is.  I am sure if there was a woman main character in this game this particular reviewer would cry death porn aswell.

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #902 on: September 18, 2013, 04:32:26 AM »
So far this is awesome.  It's actually fun to dick around in the world (!!).

I had a moment where the game was giving me instructions on how to rob an armored van.  I ignored them and instead punched out the driver waiting outside, took the van to a parking garage, and then realized I had no idea how to get it open.  So, I started by ramming cars into it, shooting at it and stuff.  Luckily driving it off a bridge did the trick.  My last resort would've been parking it in-front of a train.  Franklin went from a couple hundred to 5k and I felt better about splurging on that stringer bell goatee.

also, it's a bit bittersweet seeing as how the performance and image quality are butt.  I'm glad I bought it to play it now, but this deserves PC and next gen versions.  There's way too much detail that's muddied by these sagging consoles.

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #903 on: September 18, 2013, 04:41:09 AM »
I think the IQ is and framerate are really good compared to GTA4

Damian79

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #904 on: September 18, 2013, 05:14:24 AM »
I am making an assumption based on what she wrote.  I know that it was Anita Sarkeesian that complained about the "death porn" thing.

I believe that it is the same group of people that complain about violence versus women in games.  It is a damned if you do and damned if you dont scenario.  So why not cater to mainly men and women who just dont care?

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #905 on: September 18, 2013, 05:20:35 AM »
Oscar, adding female character for the sake of adding female character is a symptom of what is wrong with media nowadays, even suggesting it is. Everything is fucking focus group tested and by the numbers and pandering to the mood du jour.

Someone has a vision for a game, movie or book you don't go changing that only because "i'm not sure how adding a proper female character now and then is going upset things."

It may not upset things, but it's not part of the vision, so no point in shoehorning that shit in to please some people.

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #906 on: September 18, 2013, 05:23:05 AM »
What would you rather have at the GTA6 briefing for the writers:

1. Guys write some wacky stuff
2. Guys write some wacky stuff, but make sure to feauture a strong female lead, a coloured man thats well educated and breaks the stereotype, and a Polack that doesn't drink

Re: GTAV
« Reply #907 on: September 18, 2013, 05:58:04 AM »
I like some of the humour and wackiness, but they put such love into making these games high quality movie-like productions that whether they intend me to or not - I start to look at it as such, and feel like they maybe take the story too seriously. Like they have a high opinion of what they're doing. I see the jabs at Facebook and both the political left and right and I think to myself, it's nice that they're trying satire, but I also think its a bit reductive and simple. Its pandering to people who hold reductive and simple opinions. I've seen interviews with the houser bros recently where they actually downplay the 'social commentary' and stuff, so maybe its more the media (Sessler and co) making me feel like that by bigging them up so much for it...

Some of the writing DOES seem fun, but I found myself thinking 'fucking shut up' during the bombardment of FUCK YOU, MOTHERFUCKERS during the intro flashback sequence. The gangster / crime movies (and TV shows) that GTA riffs off are plenty loose with swearing themselves, but there's just enough restraint in the good ones among them that you aren't listening to a load of shite-talking all the way through. It seems to have toned down since then though. Stuff like the strip club (which I haven't done yet), and the torture thing just sound embarrassing to me. The latter makes me feel like the game is trying too hard to be edgy... like its targetted at 15 year olds. Maybe to some degree it is, and I shouldn't scrutinise / worry about it too much.

What I do like so far is how the game mechanics themselves feel and the animation. The animation quality makes the game feel next gen IMO, and visually its way more gorgeous than GTA IV. Even before the game released you could tell that every character would animate beautifully and ever vehicle / set piece would look and control better than ever.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 05:59:47 AM by radioheadrule83 »

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #908 on: September 18, 2013, 06:05:49 AM »
My favorite part of the AI in GTA IV was the cars on the bridge getting out of the way of the train, on the level beneath them.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #909 on: September 18, 2013, 06:39:31 AM »
Oscar, adding female character for the sake of adding female character is a symptom of what is wrong with media nowadays, even suggesting it is. Everything is fucking focus group tested and by the numbers and pandering to the mood du jour.

Someone has a vision for a game, movie or book you don't go changing that only because "i'm not sure how adding a proper female character now and then is going upset things."

It may not upset things, but it's not part of the vision, so no point in shoehorning that shit in to please some people.

Spot on.

I can play as a girl in gtao anyways. Don't care.
IYKYK

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #910 on: September 18, 2013, 06:43:18 AM »
Oscar: I know it's happening already, its a 200 million project.

I don't think you can use GTAV as an example why the market as a whole is in trouble with tablets etc, this is exactly the type of game why people buy consoles.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #911 on: September 18, 2013, 06:53:08 AM »
True.  However it is impossible to please SOME women.  Like when the new tomb raider is seen as female death porn when it has been done to men for decades.  But when you write reviews as a reviewer you are supposed to put away those shackles of gender and judge the game for what it is.  I am sure if there was a woman main character in this game this particular reviewer would cry death porn aswell.

right, but unless that's actually the same woman who said both of those things (hint: it's not), you're just making the kind of generalizations that feed into the problem.

i mean, i think it *is* pretty sad that, parody, satire, or whatever, that there hasn't been much in the way of decent female characters in the series.  they've included interesting male characters while still managing to parody and satire what they want, i'm not sure how adding a proper female character now and then is going upset things.

and no, when you write reviews as a reviewer, you are supposed to give your opinion of the game, nothing more or less.  if a game can have its score increased due to story/character reasons (and they do), then you have to allow the opposite as well.  i'd rather hear the reviewer's honest feelings, even if it differs from what everyone else is saying.  actually, *especially* if it differs from what everyone else is saying.

she did break a certain rule here in that she criticized the game and gave it a lower score than Rockstar usually wants.  i'm sure that's going to have tremendous blowback on her beyond the already shameful usual display gamers have put on, so don't worry, she'll shut up the next time and just give the publisher-requested score.

They've actually done a good job with female characters now and then in Catalina (:heartbeat) and Elizabeta. In the case of Catalina, she's gtaIII's main antagonist even. GTA Chinatown had a cool female partner, and GTA TLAD features a struggling druggie chick and her awful, awful life in a very sympathetic light.

Honestly, I've never had an issue with how gta treats women. In this case, the game clearly full on satire in this matter and is a reflection of the world design. The emphasis on violence, the obsession with sex, are all reflections of America. If anything, the way women are treated in GTA are also reflections. If you're talking about a game where almost every npc has a smartphone out, there's a gun company that is treated almost like Wal Mart, do people really think they're going to write women in a good light when - in the real world - they still make less money than men on average and women are seen as vapid?

Characters like aforementioned Elizabeta and Catalina even slightly comment on this with their gungho attitudes.

It is like they [reviewer at gs] are purposely missing the point of what they're [rock star] saying. Which admittedly is often flawed, juvenile, and crass still manages to say a good point every now and then. Rock star are excellent at writing good female characters when they're actually on screen. So the misogyny line falls on deaf ears. The developers aren't misogynstic, we know this from their actual female characters - they are merely saying we live in a misogynistic world.

I agree with your core argument, but in the context of GTA I find you're arguing up the wrong tree.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 07:18:51 AM by Formerly Known As Himuro »
IYKYK

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #912 on: September 18, 2013, 07:26:29 AM »
gtfo with that bullshit. the women in gta are shallow in a way that the men are not - no matter what woman it is (tho elisabeta's character is the sole exception i can think of) they are always stereotyped solely by their sex. they are ALWAYS whiny or sex-hungry or "hysterical." its hilarious you mention catalina because she's a perfect example of this - she's an oversexed latina who's "crazy" because she never knows what she wants and is ruled by her emotions. just cuz you make jokes out of it doesnt mean its satire or not offensive. most of the jokes are extremely derogatory or violent, so its no surprise that a woman doesn't feel welcome when she's playing in a virtual world that keeps calling her a bitch and showing other women die as a punchline.

what gets me more then all the extremely blatant mysoginy in videogames is why dipshit gamers are so desperate to argue that 1) its not real and 2) it doesnt matter. obviously it does matter to plenty of people; thats why it gets called out so much. why are yall so set on protecting it? dumbfucks
pcp

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #913 on: September 18, 2013, 07:27:51 AM »
panties rustled

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #914 on: September 18, 2013, 07:29:11 AM »
Catalina rules. :what Oversexed latina? That girl feminizes men. Ride that ho, Catalina! :rejoice

Shallow in a way the men aren't? I don't even know what he's talking about. A lot of the female characters are some of my favorite characters in the games. Like that chick Michelle in IV. Fuck her! :punch

Positives scrawl reads hilariously.

« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 07:31:59 AM by Formerly Known As Himuro »
IYKYK

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #915 on: September 18, 2013, 07:30:10 AM »
panties rustled
could you stop wearing your seatbelt when you drive irl? thanks
pcp

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #916 on: September 18, 2013, 07:30:40 AM »
Catalina rules. :what Oversexed latina? That girl feminizes men. Ride that ho, Catalina! :rejoice

and yet she's still a total stereotype. amazing how that works
pcp

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #917 on: September 18, 2013, 07:31:31 AM »
You mad homeboy?

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #918 on: September 18, 2013, 07:33:22 AM »
what? no. just offering up some helpful life tips
pcp

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #919 on: September 18, 2013, 07:33:29 AM »
How in the world is Catalina a stereotype? Where'd you get that back scratcher? You're reaching.
IYKYK

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #920 on: September 18, 2013, 07:35:52 AM »
Positive probably thinks Bonnie from rdr is a stereotype too, guys.

Pretty cute coming from iirc another bore member who has shat on feminity on this board. But I lose track of that. I'll make note of it the next time goes in a rant about how men should be and what is manly and why such and such is faggety.
IYKYK

Eel O'Brian

  • Southern Permasexual
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #921 on: September 18, 2013, 07:36:06 AM »
The problem with their satire is that it's the exact same satire they've been doing for over a decade. It's like a Rodney Dangerfield routine. Sure, it's kind of funny the first time you hear it, but when you see him doing the same jokes again and again ten years later on Letterman you just kind of roll your eyes.

Also, for a game with "Auto" right there in the title, they have never managed to get a grasp on making the driving worth a fuck.
sup

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #922 on: September 18, 2013, 07:36:57 AM »
How in the world is Catalina a stereotype? Where'd you get that back scratcher? You're reaching.
a woman who acts "hysterical" in that she always mad, always changing her mind, never in control of her emotions, and never knows what she wants is a pretty basic female stereotype.


Positive probably thinks Bonnie from rdr is a stereotype too, guys.

Pretty cute coming from iirc another bore member who has shat on feminity on this board. But I lose track of that. I'll make note of it the next time goes in a rant about how men should be and what is manly and why such and such is faggety.
??? ??? ??? yeah youre definitely confusing me with someone else there
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 07:39:33 AM by Positive Touch »
pcp

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #923 on: September 18, 2013, 07:38:23 AM »
Why arent you upset Michaels therapist is a golddigging jew? Are you an antisemite?

OH WAIT ITS SATIRE

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #924 on: September 18, 2013, 07:39:02 AM »
I completely agree Eel. This is why I prefer Saints Row methodology of everyone let's hold hands thing a lot better.

How in the world is Catalina a stereotype? Where'd you get that back scratcher? You're reaching.
a woman who acts "hysterical" in that she always mad, always changing her mind, never in control of her emotions, and never knows what she wants is a pretty basic female stereotype.

Again, you're reaching. So because she's female she can't have mental issues?
IYKYK

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #925 on: September 18, 2013, 07:40:38 AM »
 :snoop the stupid is overwhelming
pcp

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #926 on: September 18, 2013, 07:41:22 AM »
Positive Touch, how about you go be upset about some things more serious. Like Kate Perry for example, a role model for young girls that runs around naked. It's not even satire.

That's a real issue.

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #927 on: September 18, 2013, 07:42:34 AM »
thank you for once again justifying all our insulting pollack jokes
pcp

Eel O'Brian

  • Southern Permasexual
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #928 on: September 18, 2013, 07:45:08 AM »
You still kind of lurch around like you're drunk when walking/running, but it's closer to the whiskey-drunk of RDR than the rubbing-alcohol-drunk of GTA IV. 
sup

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #929 on: September 18, 2013, 07:52:01 AM »
:snoop the stupid is overwhelming

You keep going on about stereotypes in a game trilogy that is all about tropes, cliches, and stereotypes dude.

Catalina is my fave btw. Fuck off. :maf bet you're just mad they didn't show her fucking Carl with a dildo. Can't blame you.
IYKYK

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #930 on: September 18, 2013, 07:54:16 AM »
thank you for once again justifying all our insulting pollack jokes

Do lace panties rustle worse then others?

Eel O'Brian

  • Southern Permasexual
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #931 on: September 18, 2013, 07:54:44 AM »
The world itself is pretty awesome, I don't think they can be beat as far as making you feel like you're in a real city. But so far (and I'm only into it an hour or so), I'm in this really pretty world doing the same GTA mission shit again. I'm waiting until I can get to the point of breaking out on my own and exploring. A better approach, instead of just throwing you right into that same old mission stuff at the beginning, might have been letting you loose to explore for an hour or so beforehand - say, Lamar telling you "We got a couple hours to kill before we have to be at ____." That way you could dick around a bit, get a feel for the streets, get used to the controls and such on your own.
sup

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: GTAV
« Reply #932 on: September 18, 2013, 07:56:42 AM »
Well you don't have to do the missions straight away. You can just dick around.

Also one of the early missions is already a big nice twist IMHO

spoiler (click to show/hide)
When Micheal holds you at gunpoint when you repo the car and then bam you ARE micheal, didnt see that coming!
[close]

Eel O'Brian

  • Southern Permasexual
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #933 on: September 18, 2013, 07:59:31 AM »
They throw you right into the first Franklin mission. I'd rather have just walked around his neighborhood and made my way to the repo spot on my own and gotten a feel for things that way.
sup

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: GTAV
« Reply #934 on: September 18, 2013, 08:17:18 AM »
You know what open-world game has an awesome female lead?

:bow Saints Row 4 :bow2 :smug
dog

magus

  • LIKES FF7
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #935 on: September 18, 2013, 08:25:29 AM »
i don't know why you guys are getting all your wires bundled together when we all know the only open world game worth playing is just cause 2 :smug
<----

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: GTAV
« Reply #936 on: September 18, 2013, 08:52:00 AM »
I'm really enjoying the game, though. The Gold medal shit is making me OCD.

Thankfully you only need 70 out of the 90 or so (Story + Freaks)
fat

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: GTAV
« Reply #937 on: September 18, 2013, 10:24:48 AM »
Game is fun as fuck.  About 10 hours in or so and so far it seems like it's totally worth the 60 bucks.  Even the mini games are actually FUN.  Can't hate. 

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #938 on: September 18, 2013, 11:12:15 AM »
Game is pretty great so far.  But of fucking course, leave it to me to be the guy who has only done tow truck missions  :lol
püp

Sho Nuff

  • o/~ TOUCH ME AND I'LL BREAK YOUR FACE o/~
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #939 on: September 18, 2013, 11:37:52 AM »
Holy shit I can't stop playing this game, it's just so much fun. As far as I'm concerned, this is San Andreas 2

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: GTAV
« Reply #940 on: September 18, 2013, 11:44:44 AM »
Holy shit I can't stop playing this game, it's just so much fun. As far as I'm concerned, this is San Andreas 2

I'm sold. :bow2
©@©™

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #941 on: September 18, 2013, 11:49:04 AM »
Oscar's posts in this thread :lawd
Oscar, adding female character for the sake of adding female character is a symptom of what is wrong with media nowadays, even suggesting it is. Everything is fucking focus group tested and by the numbers and pandering to the mood du jour.
What are you talking about? Focus tests tend to skew towards putting male protagonists in games. I'm really not sure how you can defend against this. It's inarguable that the ratio of male:female player characters in games is pitiful, what's wrong with wanting that to change?

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #942 on: September 18, 2013, 12:06:51 PM »
I was hoping that the game would treat females better in the scope of the game, and I was seeing some good things in the early bits of the game....

then Michael had to race a batshit crazy jogger, Franklin had to take some paparazzi pics of a starlet getting it in the butthole thus leading to a high speed chase that she initiated, and michael's wife is a cheating spouse.

All hope diminished, but meh, c'est la vie in GTA-world.
püp

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #943 on: September 18, 2013, 12:13:58 PM »
I've got this, diablo 3, and saints row 4 at the top of my game queue, hopefully the shit bags at gamefly send me one of them.

I know this is, like, rilly rilly obvious, but damn I think every game I want to play right now is a sequel of a sequel or more. Gaming sure is stagnant. 

Sho Nuff

  • o/~ TOUCH ME AND I'LL BREAK YOUR FACE o/~
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #944 on: September 18, 2013, 12:18:17 PM »
I think this game nails the atmosphere in the exact same way that RDR did. I did a complete circuit around the map last night, and wound up driving back into town from the desert as the sun was setting. Just the weather effects combined with the atmospherics and colors were spot on perfect. And dat music

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: GTAV
« Reply #945 on: September 18, 2013, 12:19:28 PM »
I've got this, diablo 3, and saints row 4 at the top of my game queue, hopefully the shit bags at gamefly send me one of them.

I know this is, like, rilly rilly obvious, but damn I think every game I want to play right now is a sequel of a sequel or more. Gaming sure is stagnant.

There's plenty of new games out this year. GameFly sent me Remember Me -- bet you don't Remember that new IP, huh
fat

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #946 on: September 18, 2013, 12:21:40 PM »
To be fair, I basically stopped following gaming for a few years there. I'm sure there are some great things I've missed. So, no lol.

Should probably load up a bunch of kinect dance games, my wife at least would enjoy that haha
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 12:23:59 PM by Spencer »

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: GTAV
« Reply #947 on: September 18, 2013, 12:22:55 PM »
I know this is, like, rilly rilly obvious, but damn I think every game I want to play right now is a sequel of a sequel or more. Gaming sure is stagnant. 

To be fair, I basically stopped following gaming for a few years there. I'm sure there are some great things I've missed. So, no lol.

:beli
dog

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #948 on: September 18, 2013, 12:26:23 PM »
Batman was pretty sweet.  :larry

Damian79

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #949 on: September 18, 2013, 12:37:33 PM »
What are you talking about? Focus tests tend to skew towards putting male protagonists in games. I'm really not sure how you can defend against this. It's inarguable that the ratio of male:female player characters in games is pitiful, what's wrong with wanting that to change?

Because it is the male gamers that drive the industry.  A male in the uk spends 150 pounds more than women on entertainment that is among all men even non gamers.  I mean look at ME3, they put out a start that 18% of gamers played the female lead and i guarantee you that half of that is played by men "who like to look at something nice when they play".  Perhaps that will change in the future but as it stands atm, it is a hard sell to sell a 60 dollar game to females in general.  It is much easier to make female oriented games among the mobile market and get it to sell.   And in general girls dont like to watch senseless violence(this is just an observation).  I mean my neices like their mario karts but would never go for a game like GTAV.  But i guess they arent old enough for that except for the one who is studying to become a doctor but i think she quit gaming a while back.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #950 on: September 18, 2013, 01:13:41 PM »
how are the foot contols in V? we both agreed that IV's foot controls were flawed and sluggish. Are they better in V?

Himuro I'll just answer your question here and through in a couple of broad general observations.

The foot controls are serviceable. They aren't the ideal I think they should/could be but they are better than what have been in any prior game. There is still room to go in the future in the balance they go for in having the animations look nice and having them always functional and responsive.  That's the best I can really say on the subject. They get the job done but I still see room for improvement. They should also just go full bore in the next one and add max payne style slow mo and diving and dodging.

As far as the general broad observations, the three character thing is great. It really helps to differentiate the characters and playstyle and just distinguish the characters. Its fun to bounce around them when you get tired of one character. It's like a multi-rpg feeling in a weird sense. I'll go so far as to say I can't imagine them going back to a solo character game anymore in this specific franchise. It would feel limiting.

Man the driving is so good. I think its by far the best its ever been in the franchise and arguably the best I've played in an open world world game that isn't a dedicated racing game. The soft focus lock on and the slow down Franklin special ability are just great and make the driving so much less frustrating than its ever been. And the world building job they've done is terrific. Each area feels different. Just driving around the world and listening to music is fun. Its amazing how many open world games can never get that right.

So that's it. Just some broad stuff.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 01:18:34 PM by Stoney Mason »

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: GTAV
« Reply #951 on: September 18, 2013, 01:17:33 PM »
I agree on each area being distinct.  I was surprised how quickly I started learning the different neighborhoods.  The design in this game is top notch

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #952 on: September 18, 2013, 01:20:35 PM »
I agree on each area being distinct.  I was surprised how quickly I started learning the different neighborhoods.  The design in this game is top notch

Yep. Very much reminds me of San Andreas in that regard. I can instantly feel where I am in the city without having the necessarily consult the radar. That is really rare for me in an open world game where everything tends to feel copy and paste and I can't really get a big picture image of where I am at, at any given moment.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 01:28:03 PM by Stoney Mason »

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: GTAV
« Reply #953 on: September 18, 2013, 01:23:41 PM »
Same here.  I've played an ungodly amount of Crackdown but I can't ever figure out where I am without the radar/map.  Not to mention with everything going on in this game I tend to not get tunnel vision so much on the road and map.  But I find myself looking at what's going on in the neighborhood so it's easier to remember landmarks and buildings.  Hell a few times I found myself waiting at a light because I was actually just cruising the neighborhood.  After a few seconds of waiting at the light behind other cars I thought "Wait, what the hell am I doing?" and rammed the cars out of my way.

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #954 on: September 18, 2013, 01:24:05 PM »
Man there was two pages about the "satire" in GTA over the past two pages.  I feel dumb just reading it.
vin

brob

  • 8 diagram pole rider
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #955 on: September 18, 2013, 01:26:32 PM »
Man there was two pages about the "satire" in GTA over the past two pagesI feel dumb just reading it.

Clearly.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #956 on: September 18, 2013, 01:38:04 PM »
I agree on each area being distinct.  I was surprised how quickly I started learning the different neighborhoods.  The design in this game is top notch

Yep. Very much reminds me of San Andreas in that regard. I can instantly feel where I am in the city without having the necessarily consult the radar. That is really rare for me in an open world game where everything tends to feel copy and paste and I can't really get a big picture image of where I am at, at any given moment.

Great news, this is incredibly tough in IV. I have played about 120 hours of IV between the main game  and expansions in the past five years and I still don't understand the layout of the city beyond how to get to get on highways and to different Burroughs. It just isn't fun to explore or drive though, which is half the fun of a GTA game.
IYKYK

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #957 on: September 18, 2013, 01:39:03 PM »
Any of you niccas streaming your game?
©ZH

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #958 on: September 18, 2013, 01:40:15 PM »
Any of you niccas streaming your game?

No but when I get a new system a friend and I will be streaming GTA Online.
IYKYK

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: GTAV
« Reply #959 on: September 18, 2013, 01:41:54 PM »
whoever made the riverside underpasses and nondescript onramps in 4 can die in poverty. I still have trouble getting around that fucking map.
pcp