If parents (especially Texan parents) stormed in to the school with guns blazing, I imagine the friendly fire casualty list would have been much worse than what the shooter did.
While this storming the school is a bad idea, maybe you should consider that they were not thinking straight given that their children were getting killed and the police appear (to them) not doing anything.
Also, I dunno, they are probably not going to shoot the children like the shooter, dude. Calm you conservative side for once, Jesus.
Of course they weren't thinking straight, which is exactly why the police needed to prevent them from going in to the school.
The last thing anyone needed was more guns in there.
Not sure what calming my "conservative side" would do here, but it's certainly not US conservatives who are arguing that armed parents shouldn't be entering the school to have a gunfight with a teenager while kids are hiding in classrooms.
Untrained people having gunfights WILL result in innocent bystanders getting shot.
Is just tasteless to essentially they were going to kill more children than the child murderer.
It's not tasteless, it's the truth. Sending armed, untrained, highly emotional people into that sort of high stress situation is going to end in disaster. If you don't think that, you're being naive at best.
