Author Topic: VOAT Containment Megathread of Trash People for Trash People  (Read 3651979 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13500 on: March 30, 2017, 02:19:05 AM »
Quote
Can the Queen just hide him in a secret basement in her castle and then McCain and some random Democrat travel to London and talk to him?

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=232980631&postcount=8939

Quote
Steele would probably set up a dead man's switch with all of his intel behind it.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=232982189&postcount=8948

 :beavis
ὕβρις

FatalT

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13501 on: March 30, 2017, 02:21:57 AM »
Quote
I don't understand how they could screw up this, all they had to do was remake the GitS movie in live action and they couldn't even do that.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=232966039&postcount=140

:derp

Reading what people in that thread are writing, they didn't even see the movie. The Puppet Master plays a HUGE role in the movie. This ruins the whole movie's plot and fuck the boring ass anime. I appreciated the origin story.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
You learn that Hanka raided a little temple where young children were living in poverty to escape from technology and stole them away to perform experiments on them, torturing them and removing their brains to implant into shells to create a perfect soldier. The Puppet Master was a failed experiment and is out for revenge against Hanka, hacking and murdering everyone involved in his capture/experimentation. You later at the end of the movie find out that The Puppet Master and Motoko were lovers, stolen away from each other. The Puppet Master is killed at the end beside Mira/Motoko but tells her he will always be a part of her Ghost, so I'm assuming he assimilated into her when she deep dived the hacked geisha you see in the trailers so it still somewhat follows the anime where the Puppet Master combines with Motoko after the robot spider attack, which is also when he is killed in the new movie and this scene takes place.
[close]

Once again GAF not actually seeing something but wanting to have an opinion on it, even when it's blatantly false. I THINK The Puppet Master's name was Kuze but I forget now.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 02:26:56 AM by FatalT »

Rahxephon91

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13502 on: March 30, 2017, 02:43:10 AM »
I mean but that fucks over two characters in one.

The Puppet Master is'nt some failed experiment or even a person. It's a thing born from the internet who's only motivation is to basically keep evolving. It went rogue and out of control, but it doesn't have this amazing revenge plan or anything. The Major is only intersted in it because gee it's a thing that is maybe alive regardless of it not being human which is something she wants to know about.

Kuse is an entirely other fantastic character in a story that has nothing to do with the first movie who leads a refugee "uprising".

Maybe the movie is good but my problem is it seems to be a lame adaptation that just takes images and names from the entire franchisee and merges them together with little substance.

I mean to me it looks like the only use Kuse because well in SAC they have some backstory. Lets use it. But wait the Puppet Master is the villain in the thing we are adapting. Lets use it!

Geisha's attacked people in the begining of SAC and had there heads go crazy in Innocence where Batou also shot up people at an Asian Restaurant. Lets use it.

She wears a red uniform in Arise. Lets use it!

It just seems hacky and not something thats doing anything interesting with the property. Why even use Kuse? Save him for another movie.

FatalT

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13503 on: March 30, 2017, 02:52:23 AM »
I mean but that fucks over two characters in one.

The Puppet Master is'nt some failed experiment or even a person. It's a thing born from the internet who's only motivation is to basically keep evolving. It went rogue and out of control, but it doesn't have this amazing revenge plan or anything. The Major is only intersted in it because gee it's a thing that is maybe alive regardless of it not being human which is something she wants to know about.

Kuse is an entirely other fantastic character in a story that has nothing to do with the first movie who leads a refugee "uprising".

Maybe the movie is good but my problem is it seems to be a lame adaptation that just takes images and names from the entire franchisee and merges them together with little substance.

I mean to me it looks like the only use Kuse because well in SAC they have some backstory. Lets use it. But wait the Puppet Master is the villain in the thing we are adapting. Lets use it!

Geisha's attacked people in the begining of SAC and had there heads go crazy in Innocence where Batou also shot up people at an Asian Restaurant. Lets use it.

She wears a red uniform in Arise. Lets use it!

It just seems hacky and not something thats doing anything interesting with the property. Why even use Kuse? Save him for another movie.

With all this outrage I doubt there will be another movie. Not being familiar with anything other than the 1995 Ghost in the Shelll anime, I enjoyed it, although I'm probably the target audience for this film.

Coax

  • Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13504 on: March 30, 2017, 04:45:23 AM »
Stumbled upon this gem the other day.

We should get BobbyRoberts and some more black gaffers.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:ohyou
[close]

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13505 on: March 30, 2017, 05:00:42 AM »
please do not question Bobby Roberts' pop culture expertise

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13506 on: March 30, 2017, 07:28:40 AM »
With all this outrage I doubt there will be another movie. Not being familiar with anything other than the 1995 Ghost in the Shelll anime, I enjoyed it, although I'm probably the target audience for this film.

Who cares about faux-outrage?  If the film makes money, there will be a sequel. 

The target audience is people who want to see Scar Jo:P
ど助平

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13507 on: March 30, 2017, 08:06:38 AM »
Have you ever bought a game because a hot girl/guy was in it

Quote from: Zambayoshi;233015618
I'm a habitual offender...

Bravely Default on 3DS - bought because of that damned sexy fairy...

(Image removed from quote.)

 :oreilly

Quote from: poodaddy;233034557
No, if anything it has the opposite effect.  Sex is great and all but when devs try to appeal to my baser instincts with their character designs it just has the opposite of the intended effect in that it turns me away from the game.
Quote from: psychowave;233031343
Nope, and overly sexualized characters (especially female) have kept me from buying a game I was initially interested in more than once.


Quote from: Aokage;233031851
Does buying Musou Stars solely for its hot furry characters count?

Nick...Rox?  Why are you saying this, Nick Rox?  No.  PLS NO
:stahp
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 08:22:20 AM by Dosukebe »
ど助平

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13508 on: March 30, 2017, 09:09:52 AM »
Sex is great and all but when devs try to appeal to my baser instincts with their character designs it just has the opposite of the intended effect in that it turns me away from the game.
             /
             /
 :snob

Mr. Nobody

  • Groovy.
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13509 on: March 30, 2017, 09:30:39 AM »
Bayonetta was hot and the gameplay was even hotter

That's bae  :rejoice

FunSlower

  • Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13510 on: March 30, 2017, 09:31:23 AM »
Stro, I think you and Babby Raberts need to review movies together in podcast form.

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13511 on: March 30, 2017, 09:54:41 AM »
Quote from: Aokage;233031851
Does buying Musou Stars solely for its hot furry characters count?

Nick...Rox?  Why are you saying this, Nick Rox?  No.  PLS NO
:stahp
He revealed years ago on Shidoshi's podcast (the really long one, forget the name) that he's a furry. His fursona is a lion if I remember correctly.

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13512 on: March 30, 2017, 10:07:41 AM »
It was Warning A Huge Podcast.

A shame that podcast went away.  I really enjoyed it.
🍆🍆

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13513 on: March 30, 2017, 10:10:00 AM »
Yes! Thank you. 

I really appreciated it when I had a long commute, but I would have culled it by now.

archnemesis

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13514 on: March 30, 2017, 10:56:45 AM »
It was a fox. Nick Fox.

I also miss the podcast. It was great.

FStop7

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13515 on: March 30, 2017, 11:17:23 AM »
I cannot blame them that much given how the Persona 5 QL, while excellent because Jeff and Vinny commentary, feel more like it was the first episode of the  P4 ER than something that actually informed us about the game mechanics.

I do agree about the P5 QL.  It reminded me of the old days.  It shows how far Giant Bomb has fallen off in both quality and quantity of output.

Klelk

  • Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13516 on: March 30, 2017, 11:35:27 AM »
I cannot blame them that much given how the Persona 5 QL, while excellent because Jeff and Vinny commentary, feel more like it was the first episode of the  P4 ER than something that actually informed us about the game mechanics.

I do agree about the P5 QL.  It reminded me of the old days.  It shows how far Giant Bomb has fallen off in both quality and quantity of output.

Reminder that Brad would be fired by now if he worked for anyone other than Jeff  :doge

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member

Raist

  • Winner of the Baited Award 2018
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13518 on: March 30, 2017, 01:53:30 PM »
There was a thread about that new IT trailer, and Bobby Roberts ruined at least the first 3 pages of it with one post.

Fuck Bobby Roberts.

The thing is, no one needed to be reminded that IT was dogshit outside of Tim Curry. Absolutely no one has nostalgia of It being some high quality production. Rob's post was some preemptive bullshit thinking he was being cutting edge. But even if it WAS a good show to begin with, the idea that you'd need to make sure to tell people to cut out all of their nostalgia on a remake production is so god damn stupid to begin with.

To be fair other than the green mile and the shining movies derived from king's work are dogshit. Well just like the books anyway.

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13519 on: March 30, 2017, 02:04:34 PM »
There was a thread about that new IT trailer, and Bobby Roberts ruined at least the first 3 pages of it with one post.

Fuck Bobby Roberts.

The thing is, no one needed to be reminded that IT was dogshit outside of Tim Curry. Absolutely no one has nostalgia of It being some high quality production. Rob's post was some preemptive bullshit thinking he was being cutting edge. But even if it WAS a good show to begin with, the idea that you'd need to make sure to tell people to cut out all of their nostalgia on a remake production is so god damn stupid to begin with.

To be fair other than the green mile and the shining movies derived from king's work are dogshit. Well just like the books anyway.

 :trigger :trigger :trigger :trigger :trigger
rub

stufte

  • Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13520 on: March 30, 2017, 02:33:13 PM »
There was a thread about that new IT trailer, and Bobby Roberts ruined at least the first 3 pages of it with one post.

Fuck Bobby Roberts.

The thing is, no one needed to be reminded that IT was dogshit outside of Tim Curry. Absolutely no one has nostalgia of It being some high quality production. Rob's post was some preemptive bullshit thinking he was being cutting edge. But even if it WAS a good show to begin with, the idea that you'd need to make sure to tell people to cut out all of their nostalgia on a remake production is so god damn stupid to begin with.

To be fair other than the green mile and the shining movies derived from king's work are dogshit. Well just like the books anyway.

 :iface

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13521 on: March 30, 2017, 02:55:09 PM »
Stro, I think you and Babby Raberts need to review movies together in podcast form.

how is babby formed

Low light and Photoshop filters.
rub

FStop7

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13522 on: March 30, 2017, 03:12:03 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=233049379&postcount=186

If you're in a relationship I don't see why you would want to be spending leisure time alone with a person of the opposite gender.
 :quark

Peak NeoGAF has been achieved.  Shut that shit down.  It's over.

Raist

  • Winner of the Baited Award 2018
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13523 on: March 30, 2017, 04:12:50 PM »

Raist

  • Winner of the Baited Award 2018
  • Senior Member

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13525 on: March 30, 2017, 04:23:36 PM »
Quote
Good. I can think about supporting Oculus again.
Quote
Is it safe to buy a Rift now?

samfish

  • Cereal mispeller
  • Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13526 on: March 30, 2017, 04:24:51 PM »
Can someone please remind me why NeoGAF hates Palmer Lucky again? It's so hard to keep up with all the names on their Shit List at this point.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13527 on: March 30, 2017, 04:26:15 PM »
Because he wears sandals all the time.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Quote
In 2016, it was reported that Luckey had donated $10,000 to Nimble America, a pro-Trump group that ran a billboard campaign displaying 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton with the caption "Too Big To Jail".
Quote
In September 2016, Luckey stated he is a libertarian who supported Libertarian Party politicians like Ron Paul and Gary Johnson in the past.
[close]

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13528 on: March 30, 2017, 04:28:20 PM »
I legit never saw or read anything GITS related until like 2 weeks ago when I watched the 1995 anime and it's sequel. The idea that it's some untouchable sacred cow is ridiculous, since the first movie is like 60% mindless cool action for the sake of it and 40% naval gazing. And the sequel is like 80% navel gazing, 20% cool action.

The Hollywood version seems to be 80% cool action and 20% naval gazing, which seems pretty dope to me.

Yeah, but you are target demographic for that one, so people are right to be pissed off if they were fans of the original. It was not a sacred cow but it was not a popcorn film for many people. I think that is also dope to have so now or then.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13529 on: March 30, 2017, 04:32:20 PM »
Can someone please remind me why NeoGAF hates Palmer Lucky again? It's so hard to keep up with all the names on their Shit List at this point.

He donated some money to a meme basedProTrump organization in the internet and his politics are libertarian.

So he is the devil and needed to be purged from Facebook.

Meanwhile Peter Thiel...

Pence's logic isn't that weird. It's probably not that he's worried he or the woman won't be able to contain themselves and more that you can't be accused of something if you don't put yourself in that position to begin with. It's not like having a female staff member in the room for a male-female interaction is some super rare thing. Happens at churches, schools, sometimes doctor offices.

People acting like it's some horrible crime or means he obviously hates women are clearly people that never have to worry about a woman saying they touched her.

The guy is infamous for being super religious and still believes in stuff like conversion therapy, so is kind of dificult to believe that he is scared of being accused of something like that unless his religious beliefs are more deeper or delusional than anyone thought.   

« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 04:36:39 PM by Boredfrom »

clothedmacuser

  • Defender of Centrist Scum
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13530 on: March 30, 2017, 04:34:20 PM »
Wayne Gretzky also had that rule.  But he was a millionaire jock and didn't ever want to be falsely accused of sexual assault.  I'm not sure why Pence thinks he's so damn special.
sigh

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13531 on: March 30, 2017, 04:37:00 PM »
It's the anti-Hillary stuff even more than the pro-Trump even more than the libertarianism.

Carmack gets a pass, probably more because nobody remembers all his .plan's and everything else that have been filled with stuff that make Ayn Rand look warm and emotional.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13532 on: March 30, 2017, 04:48:00 PM »
Wayne Gretzky also had that rule.  But he was a millionaire jock and didn't ever want to be falsely accused of sexual assault.  I'm not sure why Pence thinks he's so damn special.

 :yeshrug

Maybe it's a Mid Western thing, because "married men don't do things alone with women that aren't their wife/family" is pretty common around here. Of all the things to shit on him for, this seems petty as fuck.

Is common in a lot of places, but also is weird as fuck for many people and the kind of stuff it gets mocked with old characters from sitcoms. Is also generally not a expected policy from the Vice President whose current boss was caught saying on camera "grab them by the pussy".

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13533 on: March 30, 2017, 04:55:16 PM »
Wayne Gretzky also had that rule.  But he was a millionaire jock and didn't ever want to be falsely accused of sexual assault.  I'm not sure why Pence thinks he's so damn special.

 :yeshrug

Maybe it's a Mid Western thing, because "married men don't do things alone with women that aren't their wife/family" is pretty common around here. Of all the things to shit on him for, this seems petty as fuck.

Nah, it's a stupid dipshit thing.


Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13535 on: March 30, 2017, 06:17:16 PM »
Quote
Who are you?

Oh, your the asshole that got kicked out of video games, lost all your friends, and has to rely on other asshole's money to make a living. I hear Luckey could use a friend.

Not salty at all about the Patreon money. But I suppose that Gaf mocking a person for losing their job and their friends because a shitty joke sure will teach him about empathy.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13536 on: March 30, 2017, 06:22:27 PM »
that wasn't even a clever slight of hand changing the meaning of those posts to what he wanted them to say rather than what they did

and that guy regularly calls me a joke poster?

Purple Filth

  • This cosmic dance of bursting decadence and withheld permissions twists all our arms collectively, but if sweetness can win—and it can—then I'll still be here tomorrow to high-five you yesterday, my friend. Peace
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13537 on: March 30, 2017, 06:43:44 PM »
The Persona weirdness is all up in the Giant Bomb thread, too.  Those guys have been saying for years that they're not inclined to do an Endurance Run of P5 and that the more people ask for it the less chance there is of them changing their minds.  The regulars in that thread know this full well yet there's still endless low/mid key begging and whining.

I cannot blame them that much given how the Persona 5 QL, while excellent because Jeff and Vinny commentary, feel more like it was the first episode of the  P4 ER than something that actually informed us about the game mechanics.


Yep.

For better or worse that Quick Look gave its contribution.

Hopefully they will talk about it during GOTY at least.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13538 on: March 30, 2017, 07:01:19 PM »
Don't care about GAF, but what people bitch about with GAF exists outside of GAF and has a whole strain behind it running from college, to academia, and to the blogger press, and within the state on a lobbying level while also trying to reach its way into government at an official status.That bugs me more than GAF's two minute hate of Palmer Luckey.


Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13539 on: March 30, 2017, 07:12:20 PM »
I legit never saw or read anything GITS related until like 2 weeks ago when I watched the 1995 anime and it's sequel. The idea that it's some untouchable sacred cow is ridiculous, since the first movie is like 60% mindless cool action for the sake of it and 40% naval gazing. And the sequel is like 80% navel gazing, 20% cool action.

The Hollywood version seems to be 80% cool action and 20% naval gazing, which seems pretty dope to me.

Yeah, but you are target demographic for that one, so people are right to be pissed off if they were fans of the original. It was not a sacred cow but it was not a popcorn film for many people. I think that is also dope to have so now or then.

If they aren't the target demo, being mad makes even less sense. Be mad at something not even marketed to you, brehs.

So people should have been not mad about Ghostbusters Remake? Or how the shitty the film look compared with the original? because they target demo were way different that the original one.

I understand that the film was not made for fans of the original but that doesnt make it inmune to be compared with that or expressing how disappointing it is the whitewashing and being a more shallow version.   
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 07:16:31 PM by Boredfrom »

Shuri

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13540 on: March 30, 2017, 07:23:02 PM »
Pages worth of "fuck you palmer" is going to make a huge difference in the struggle

zepblackstar

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13541 on: March 30, 2017, 07:35:52 PM »
Pages worth of "fuck you palmer" is going to make a huge difference in the struggle

it worked with Notch...wait...

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13542 on: March 30, 2017, 07:37:09 PM »
I legit never saw or read anything GITS related until like 2 weeks ago when I watched the 1995 anime and it's sequel. The idea that it's some untouchable sacred cow is ridiculous, since the first movie is like 60% mindless cool action for the sake of it and 40% naval gazing. And the sequel is like 80% navel gazing, 20% cool action.

The Hollywood version seems to be 80% cool action and 20% naval gazing, which seems pretty dope to me.

Yeah, but you are target demographic for that one, so people are right to be pissed off if they were fans of the original. It was not a sacred cow but it was not a popcorn film for many people. I think that is also dope to have so now or then.

If they aren't the target demo, being mad makes even less sense. Be mad at something not even marketed to you, brehs.

So people should have been not mad about Ghostbusters Remake? Or how the shitty the film look compared with the original? because they target demo were way different that the original one.

I understand that the film was not made for fans of the original but that doesnt make it inmune to be compared with that or expressing how disappointing it is the whitewashing and being a more shallow version.   

No. No one should have been mad about the Ghostbusters remake except for it not being good. No one should be mad at any remakes. If there is something you like that is getting remade and your reaction is, "UGH WHY", then it's not for you. You don't have to see it. And that's okay. It's meant for other people. There is no reason to be upset. Good vibes and good times, brehs.

People twisting themselves up in knots to be mad about something so stupid as an adaptation of something you like not being exactly like the original (and from what I've read the 1995 movie is a pretty large departure from the source material at times as well) when it's made for a different and broader audience is silly shit. Just watch your cartoons and don't go see the movie. Problem solved.

I think being dismissive and disingenuous is as bad. Like I said, I dont mind the film, and I can respect people saying that want to see it because ScarJo or because is just dumb fun, but pretending to not know why people will care about a remake film being a disservice to the original feels like bad as the people thinking that fighting this film is a form of activism.

Dont be as petty as people you complain. Problem solved.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13543 on: March 30, 2017, 08:38:19 PM »
There's a pretty big difference being not pleased/interested when something you like is being remade (normal) and hoping it bombs/arguing with people who are pleased/interested(not normal). MUH CHILDHOOD people are fuckbois. Just watch the version you like and stop getting mad about versions you don't. GITS live action movie in 2017 won't ruin or erase the 1995 movie. Ghostbusters 2016 didn't ruin or erase Ghostbusters 1984. The Point Break remake did not ruin or erase the original. Such a stupid ass thing to get pantaloons in a wad over.

I didn't say I don't understand why people would get upset. But I sure am dismissive of them because you're a fucking baby if you can't handle something getting remade and it not being exactly how you want it. And you're a shithead if you get into arguments with people who do like it. Just watch your older version and stop being a baby.

You were the one that bringed out how you didnt understand and wondered why people disliked how the film was being made and promoted. At worst you have acted like people are just being weeabos.

I agree with your point that is not worth fighting for "my childhood is being destroyed" or shit, but neither going to defend a shitty hollywood remake because Gaf doesnt like it. I mean, one thing is waiting to enjoy the film in peace while other is "Why GITS nerds care about that boring ass film from 1995? They should thank this film, weeabos..."
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 08:45:11 PM by Boredfrom »

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13544 on: March 30, 2017, 09:01:03 PM »
I'm not even defending the movie. I haven't seen it. I have no idea if it's good or bad, and that's not the point I'm making at all. My point is people that get pissy at remakes should be laughed at and treated with 'scust.

So edgy.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13545 on: March 30, 2017, 09:09:54 PM »
I'm not even defending the movie. I haven't seen it. I have no idea if it's good or bad, and that's not the point I'm making at all. My point is people that get pissy at remakes should be laughed at and treated with 'scust.

So edgy.


 :badass

Saying to watch what you like  with good times and good vibes instead of getting mad over something not meant for you is definitely an edgy statement.


I saw the post before you wrote the other sentence in the edit. But in any case, I somehow doubt that is a good vibe calling people babies or nerds that should thank a film. 

zepblackstar

  • Senior Member
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 10:37:05 PM by Ripclawe »

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13547 on: March 30, 2017, 10:18:55 PM »
I am... unfamiliar with that particular text passage.
rub

Averon

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13548 on: March 30, 2017, 11:06:54 PM »
Quote
Who are you?

Oh, your the asshole that got kicked out of video games, lost all your friends, and has to rely on other asshole's money to make a living. I hear Luckey could use a friend.

Not salty at all about the Patreon money. But I suppose that Gaf mocking a person for losing their job and their friends because a shitty joke sure will teach him about empathy.

Get kicked out of dead end career covering video games
or
Make $40K a month

Not really that hard a choice to make.


nudemacusers

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13550 on: March 30, 2017, 11:27:30 PM »
There are some highly problematic posts in that thread
﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽

Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13551 on: March 30, 2017, 11:56:21 PM »
Can someone please remind me why NeoGAF hates Palmer Lucky again? It's so hard to keep up with all the names on their Shit List at this point.

He donated some money to a meme basedProTrump organization in the internet and his politics are libertarian.

So he is the devil and needed to be purged from Facebook.

Palmer Luckey is a worthless cumsock.  The fact that a worthless cumsock would be a libertarian is an entirely unsurprising detail.  It's exactly what you'd expect a flabby, pasty, socially crippled, shoeless, hawaiian-shirt-wearing VR entrepreneur to be.

Actual quote from Palmer Luckey: "Nimble America can do things the Trump campaign cannot. I want to help it succeed. There is no cuckoldry in pooling resources."
ǚ

clothedmacuser

  • Defender of Centrist Scum
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13552 on: March 31, 2017, 12:18:04 AM »
A perfect GAF thread

Representation/diversity in film is a beautiful thing

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1356795


But thank God I clicked it because I finally found some Gamers who don't Gate.



Imagine if we were all so open to diversity?!  Imagine Peace.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2017, 12:28:56 AM by clothedmacuser »
sigh

zepblackstar

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13553 on: March 31, 2017, 12:35:42 AM »
Penny Arcade: Dick Wolves to awww red hair

 :flabbypd


Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13554 on: March 31, 2017, 12:44:58 AM »
Woke up, saw Palmer Luckey news in my feeds, closed tab, went on with my day. Aint nobody have time for that. 

stufte

  • Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13555 on: March 31, 2017, 12:46:06 AM »
Can someone please remind me why NeoGAF hates Palmer Lucky again? It's so hard to keep up with all the names on their Shit List at this point.

He donated some money to a meme basedProTrump organization in the internet and his politics are libertarian.

So he is the devil and needed to be purged from Facebook.

Palmer Luckey is a worthless cumsock.  The fact that a worthless cumsock would be a libertarian is an entirely unsurprising detail.  It's exactly what you'd expect a flabby, pasty, socially crippled, shoeless, hawaiian-shirt-wearing VR entrepreneur to be.

Actual quote from Palmer Luckey: "Nimble America can do things the Trump campaign cannot. I want to help it succeed. There is no cuckoldry in pooling resources."

 :umad

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13556 on: March 31, 2017, 01:09:22 AM »

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member

Purple Filth

  • This cosmic dance of bursting decadence and withheld permissions twists all our arms collectively, but if sweetness can win—and it can—then I'll still be here tomorrow to high-five you yesterday, my friend. Peace
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13558 on: March 31, 2017, 01:29:01 AM »

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #13559 on: March 31, 2017, 01:46:56 AM »
That's his daughter...
dog