Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 6815469 times)

0 Members and 31 Guests are viewing this topic.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25441 on: October 29, 2018, 07:20:32 PM »
🤴

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25442 on: October 29, 2018, 07:23:37 PM »
Shep Smith may as well be on a different channel entirely given how wildly different the rest of the Fox is from him.
dog

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25443 on: October 29, 2018, 07:31:16 PM »


Get ready for 2016 part 2 bois.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:preach
[close]
🤴

stufte

  • Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25444 on: October 29, 2018, 07:32:29 PM »
michaelscottNOOOOOOOOO.gif

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25445 on: October 29, 2018, 07:40:02 PM »
Don't worry. She won't be political correct this time.
https://twitter.com/MarkDice/status/1057049949513252864
🤴

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25446 on: October 29, 2018, 08:52:07 PM »
:violin
©ZH

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25447 on: October 29, 2018, 10:02:09 PM »
What she actually said is she doesn't want to run again but would still like to be president because obviously. So if she could be president without running...

Great so she is planning a coup.

No way she could win again, imo. Tainted meat.

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25448 on: October 30, 2018, 01:33:18 AM »
Mike Pence got a rabbi who is really a Christian to pray for synagogue dead.

On Monday, Vice President Mike Pence led a campaign event in Grand Rapids, Michigan where prayers were said by Rabbi Loren Jacobs, who is affiliated with the Messianic synagogue Shema Yisrael. “God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, God and Father of my Lord and Savior Yeshua, Jesus the Messiah, and my God and Father too,” Rabbi Jacobs intoned. During the prayer, he also condemned the “hate-inspired shooting in synagogue in Pittsburgh.”

A rabbi referring to Jesus as the Messiah is, of course, an unusual event but Jacobs is no ordinary rabbi. He is, in fact, a Christian. Shema Yisrael is a synagogue devoted to Messianic Judaism, which is to say, towards a faith that mixes Jewish cultural practices with a variation of Christian theology.

:quark FAKE JEWS! :quark
___

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25449 on: October 30, 2018, 05:38:50 AM »
https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1057004782311927808
Of all the diseases available you still fall back on leprosy, smallpox and tuberculosis? Those were the things you had to fear from immigrants like a century ago, not today when most of our population is borderline invincible against them.

I saw a segment earlier where the host asked them what the potential ENDGAME of the KARAVAN is, and the expert said "that's the thing that frightens our national security community, we don't know." :lol

Shep Smith may as well be on a different channel entirely given how wildly different the rest of the Fox is from him.
Shep's deal gives him the freedom of a Hannity or Chris Wallace, except unlike Hannity, he tends to use it for good. Shep prefers doing lots of news stories quickly on his shows rather than just being a pundit fest so it offers up some diversity to the programming.

I think Bret Baier kinda leans like Chris Wallace into the old format of the news program where you do news, then you have a panel, but Bret's also taken over Shep's position on their long coverages of stuff so the panels are often there for him to just toss to in order to fill time.

There was an interesting article back when Ailes got kicked out about how he actually envisioned Fox as providing all these different types of shows, even if they all leaned conservative generally, and that the main reason Tucker/Hannity/the late O'Reilly/etc. were in primetime was simply because of their ratings. People liked the Shep and Bret more news focus at the times when people grew up when network news was on, and that a good chunk of the audience leaves to go watch regular TV shows, while a new group comes in to watch the Hannity Bloc and watches the whole thing even as it covers the same two stories over and over and over for three or four hours.

Back when Red Eye was in its prime, they openly talked on the internet about lots of the ways Fox measures all their ratings and stuff, and they can do metrics down to the individual segment. (That was partly why Red Eye slowly lost guests like GWAR or interviews or comedic bits and many "unknown" comedians in order to bring on more talking heads or worse people like Steven Crowder...and then started to shift into more of a slightly more laid back version of The Five and their "liberal" devils advocate was fired.)

Lots of people talk about Trump watching Fox endlessly, but you can tell from what he says or tweets that he doesn't truly engage with it and it's background noise for most of his day*. His focus is Fox and Friends in the morning which starts off his tweetstorms, and then Lou Dobbs/Hannity in the evening before he goes to bed.

*This has actually been part of standard White House policy since the first Bush Administration, they were increasingly learning things about international events quicker from CNN than actual officials, etc. So there was a policy implemented to have CNN on, often muted, just to see if they missed anything. I imagine that as CNN alternatives arose they might have allowed for Fox in the W. Admin or al Jazeera in the Obama Admin. Trump infamously ordered Fox to be on instead of CNN on Air Force One, but for most purposes like breaking news during the daytime all three channels are generally the same. Personally I would have ordered RT along with Info Wars to be on to get unbiased facts.

An equivalent today would probably be putting a few people to just have a twitter feed up to see if anything starts trending like during the Arab Spring or etc.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25450 on: October 30, 2018, 05:43:56 AM »
There was an interesting article back when Ailes got kicked out about how he actually envisioned Fox as providing all these different types of shows, even if they all leaned conservative generally, and that the main reason Tucker/Hannity/the late O'Reilly/etc. were in primetime was simply because of their ratings.

That sounds like one of those Javanka stories from the first half of 2017.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25451 on: October 30, 2018, 06:02:24 AM »
It was just a few paragraphs in a larger piece how in recently he had increasingly shifted to being obsessed with ratings uber alles as MSNBC had started to win some of those showdowns. Especially Maddow. Megyn Kelly's out of nowhere push into the 9PM slot was part of that. And that he wanted to create more diversity in terms of the type of show/person he could move around the schedule. He wasn't satisfied with the inherent stagnancy around the O'Reilly/Hannity/Greta bloc that had ruled for so long.

I'll try a bit harder to find it, but most of these pieces I'm pulling up are hitting that "he was king of the world, then it came crashing down" trope narrative.

I've always felt one of the understated stories in these Fox growth pieces the last few decades have been how both Murdoch and Ailes were pretty savage in terms of the business side. Murdoch totally overhauled Sky when he saw just copying Fox wasn't going to work.

MSNBC has been savage along those lines in a kind of incoherent nonsensical way until they finally settled on the Morning Joe/Maddow axis. Remember when their big promotion for a primetime bloc that was like Sharpton/Ed Schulz/Olbermann. And they just tore it apart and cast the first two off to weekends until their contracts ran out.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25452 on: October 30, 2018, 06:05:16 AM »
i loved these goofy ads




edit: and i had forgot he had died :-\

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25453 on: October 30, 2018, 06:11:04 AM »
 :rejoice MSNBC's Greatest Moments :rejoice

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25454 on: October 30, 2018, 06:34:15 AM »
If his different "vision for Fox News" came that late in its lifespan, then it feels even more like one of those Javanka stories.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25455 on: October 30, 2018, 06:57:17 AM »
Oh, that's my mistake, it wasn't that he changed really, he still wanted the conservative view, but as his "stars" aged and MSNBC started winning some of the matchups, he was paying closer and closer attention to the ratings and quicker to pull the plug. He had always used a system similar to minor leagues, where the daytime was where people would get test runs, then promoted up or relegated down, etc. And then the other times were focused on trying commentators or potential hosts and so on.

The Five, I think is a pretty good example of at least this minor priority shift. When Beck left rather than try to plug in another big name, he instead created a roundtable show where Fox could try out a variety of personalities, many of whom wound up doing guest hosting stints, etc. Since it was at 5PM, it wasn't a period for his big ratings, but it also let him try them out not as conservatives posing as news reporters but actual commentators. They then created Outnumbered as another version of this.

I've digressed, but it's not that it was a different or new vision, it was more of one that had been around for a while, but some of the emphasis had shifted more towards the ratings. When Fox was winning every time slot as it did for years and years and they had these long term institutions like O'Reilly there was less incentive to rock the boat. But when things started to become more competitive, he had to start looking at the ratings more to find candidates. I think since he's left Fox has been overall much more sensitive to ratings and the business side. Like realizing Megyn Kelly wasn't worth what NBC was offering her and also that her loss wasn't a huge deal.

Even so, the main point of what I had read is that Ailes himself was feeling more pressure to course correct on those types of things instead of giving them time, that was the main change to his "vision" compared to the years or decades prior when he was the invincible god-king of the network. I didn't intend and don't think his "vision" of how the network should be changed much other than perhaps around the edges while considering ratings. Fox has really increasingly hustled after the Trump segment of its viewership since he took office, whereas back in 2015 there was more skepticism as long as alternatives like Cruz/Rubio/Jeb! existed and even that one debate where they were kinda rough on him. Ailes probably would have made that same exact shift looking more at the metrics (based on my understanding of what his "focus change" was), even if he wasn't a big Trump fan.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25456 on: October 30, 2018, 07:06:45 AM »
Probably anyone would make that shift. There's no market for anti-Trump conservatism.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25457 on: October 30, 2018, 07:12:02 AM »
You're going to look awfully foolish when Bill Kristol takes the New Hampshire primaries in 15 months.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25458 on: October 30, 2018, 07:30:04 AM »
Aaaaaand the news today is that Trump wants to do away with birthright citizenship by executive order.

Which is nonsense on stilts but I'm not completely sure the Supreme Court would knock it down. "The 14th amendment was meant to apply to former slaves, it was never meant to establish birthright citizenship" is already a meme on the right and I could see the FedSoc commissioning a white paper to give it a legal sheen if they haven't already.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25459 on: October 30, 2018, 07:44:02 AM »
-Bill Kristol nearly defeats Trump in the New Hampshire Primaries
-Trump tweets that he will not accept the nomination or another term as President
-Pence and Jeb! enter the race
-Jeb! is assassinated after winning the California primary
-Ted Cruz and Kanye West launch a third party bid with the goal of sending the election into the House
-At a contentious convention, the Republicans reluctantly nominate Pence
-The NEW Hillary narrowly wins a comeback election based on her "Southern Strategy" and vague promise to end the Karavan War

/nintex

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25460 on: October 30, 2018, 07:55:00 AM »
https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/birthright-citizenship-two-perspectives

look who's arguing in favor of birthright citizenship lol

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25461 on: October 30, 2018, 07:57:54 AM »
from a casual glance, most of the groups prior to this have done a straddle, from Heritage:
Quote
In 1898, the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark declared that the Fourteenth Amendment adopted the common-law definition of birthright citizenship. Chief Justice Melville W. Fuller's dissenting opinion, however, argued that birthright citizenship had been repealed by the principles of the American Revolution and rejected by the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment. Nonetheless, the decision conferred birthright citizenship on a child of legal residents of the United States. Although the language of the majority opinion in Wong Kim Ark is certainly broad enough to include the children born in the United States of illegal as well as legal immigrants, there is no case in which the Supreme Court has explicitly held that this is the unambiguous command of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25462 on: October 30, 2018, 07:58:16 AM »
The ol' testicle-crusher himself.

This is like when Ken Starr was arguing in favor of DC getting Congressional representation.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25463 on: October 30, 2018, 08:08:43 AM »
from a casual glance, most of the groups prior to this have done a straddle, from Heritage:
Quote
In 1898, the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark declared that the Fourteenth Amendment adopted the common-law definition of birthright citizenship. Chief Justice Melville W. Fuller's dissenting opinion, however, argued that birthright citizenship had been repealed by the principles of the American Revolution and rejected by the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment. Nonetheless, the decision conferred birthright citizenship on a child of legal residents of the United States. Although the language of the majority opinion in Wong Kim Ark is certainly broad enough to include the children born in the United States of illegal as well as legal immigrants, there is no case in which the Supreme Court has explicitly held that this is the unambiguous command of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Ah, so the Revolution did away with a traditional British understanding of citizenship and replaced it with a new, uniquely American understanding of the concept that is... much less favorable to the children of immigrants.

It's too early in the morning for this.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25464 on: October 30, 2018, 08:26:36 AM »
Even for a late 19th Century Supreme Court, Fuller was well known for opposing civil rights for blacks and asians more than normal. And this was the Court that went 8-1 for Plessy.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25465 on: October 30, 2018, 08:51:45 AM »

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25466 on: October 30, 2018, 08:56:42 AM »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25467 on: October 30, 2018, 09:00:13 AM »
I did like the part where he says "VIOLENCE OFFENDS ME" followed by a montage of annihilating fools.

Optimus

  • Lieutenant colonel, 26th Hate Machine battalion
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25468 on: October 30, 2018, 09:19:02 AM »
Republicans are now directly using SJWs as a useful advertising tool for their campaigns.

"Bububububut we're not negatively impacting elections or get Trump elected"

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25469 on: October 30, 2018, 09:21:28 AM »
yeah it's p dispositive

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25470 on: October 30, 2018, 09:32:06 AM »
"Bububububut we're not negatively impacting elections or get Trump elected"
She's more or less tied in a state Trump won by 19 points. And that Hillary had the lowest % for a candidate since George McGovern.

Although she did just suggest she's not a "crazy Democrat" like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. And has been playing up how she votes with Trump half the time.

So I'm not too sure the social studies warrior factor will be a major reason she loses if she does.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25471 on: October 30, 2018, 09:38:34 AM »
Lots of Republicans have been attacking their Dem opponents on Medicare for all (including several races where the Dem doesn't actually support it).

More broadly, shying away from anything a Republican might put in an attack ad sounds a lot like timid centrism.

Optimus

  • Lieutenant colonel, 26th Hate Machine battalion
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25472 on: October 30, 2018, 10:48:25 AM »
"Bububububut we're not negatively impacting elections or get Trump elected"
She's more or less tied in a state Trump won by 19 points. And that Hillary had the lowest % for a candidate since George McGovern.

Although she did just suggest she's not a "crazy Democrat" like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. And has been playing up how she votes with Trump half the time.

So I'm not too sure the social studies warrior factor will be a major reason she loses if she does.


That wasn't my point, her political views don't matter at all imo, republicans are using the SJW strawman unilaterally now to smear all their opponents whether they support this bullshit or not and this is only the beginning of the backlash. When the working class eventually goes on a full get fucked mode against SJWs and political correctness you can bet your ass that republicans will fully exploit the situation to destroy anyone they disagree with even it has nothing to do with "social justice" issues.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25473 on: October 30, 2018, 10:59:03 AM »
I don't think that's true.

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25474 on: October 30, 2018, 11:04:38 AM »
"Bububububut we're not negatively impacting elections or get Trump elected"
She's more or less tied in a state Trump won by 19 points. And that Hillary had the lowest % for a candidate since George McGovern.

Although she did just suggest she's not a "crazy Democrat" like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. And has been playing up how she votes with Trump half the time.

So I'm not too sure the social studies warrior factor will be a major reason she loses if she does.


That wasn't my point, her political views don't matter at all imo, republicans are using the SJW strawman unilaterally now to smear all their opponents whether they support this bullshit or not and this is only the beginning of the backlash. When the working class eventually goes on a full get fucked mode against SJWs and political correctness you can bet your ass that republicans will fully exploit the situation to destroy anyone they disagree with even it has nothing to do with "social justice" issues.

Outside of social media and video game forums, where does one see SJWs? When you go to the grocery store, how many SJWs do you pass by?
Republicans loooooooooooove political correctness, but only when it's applied to them.
©ZH

Optimus

  • Lieutenant colonel, 26th Hate Machine battalion
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25475 on: October 30, 2018, 11:14:06 AM »
"Bububububut we're not negatively impacting elections or get Trump elected"
She's more or less tied in a state Trump won by 19 points. And that Hillary had the lowest % for a candidate since George McGovern.

Although she did just suggest she's not a "crazy Democrat" like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. And has been playing up how she votes with Trump half the time.

So I'm not too sure the social studies warrior factor will be a major reason she loses if she does.


That wasn't my point, her political views don't matter at all imo, republicans are using the SJW strawman unilaterally now to smear all their opponents whether they support this bullshit or not and this is only the beginning of the backlash. When the working class eventually goes on a full get fucked mode against SJWs and political correctness you can bet your ass that republicans will fully exploit the situation to destroy anyone they disagree with even it has nothing to do with "social justice" issues.

Outside of social media and video game forums, where does one see SJWs? When you go to the grocery store, how many SJWs do you pass by?
Republicans loooooooooooove political correctness, but only when it's applied to them.


I see them in Hollywood, I see them in "journalism", I see them affecting policies of the biggest public discourse medium on the planet aka the internet. They're loud, influential and stupid enough to piss off a huge number of voters.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25476 on: October 30, 2018, 11:15:56 AM »
Just because a thing bothers you personally doesn't make it electorally relevant.

Optimus

  • Lieutenant colonel, 26th Hate Machine battalion
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25477 on: October 30, 2018, 11:23:21 AM »
Just because a thing bothers you personally doesn't make it electorally relevant.


You keep saying that despite more and more evidence pointing to the opposite. It's as if you ignore reality that doesn't fit your worldview or something.

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25478 on: October 30, 2018, 11:25:47 AM »
You consider things as evidence where you're assuming that backlash was a factor, i.e. you're assuming that it is a factor.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25479 on: October 30, 2018, 11:38:06 AM »
When the working class eventually goes on a full get fucked mode against SJWs and political correctness
is this the dialectic?

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25480 on: October 30, 2018, 11:48:05 AM »
every fucking day, it just gets worse and worse
püp

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25481 on: October 30, 2018, 11:49:14 AM »
You keep saying that despite more and more evidence pointing to the opposite.

Citation Needed

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25482 on: October 30, 2018, 11:52:21 AM »
Optimus, grow up you fuck.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25483 on: October 30, 2018, 11:55:27 AM »
-Bill Kristol nearly defeats Trump in the New Hampshire Primaries
Isn't New Hampshire supposed to vote for straight talking wackos? So instead of Bill Kristol, maybe Bristol Palin.
Kristol was not only a big supporter of McCain's in 2000, he promoted Palin as a VP choice for months:
The most ardent promoter, however, was Kristol, and his enthusiasm became the talk of Alaska’s political circles. According to Simpson, Senator Stevens told her that “Kristol was really pushing Palin” in Washington before McCain picked her. Indeed, as early as June 29th, two months before McCain chose her, Kristol predicted on “Fox News Sunday” that “McCain’s going to put Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska, on the ticket.” He described her as “fantastic,” saying that she could go one-on-one against Obama in basketball, and possibly siphon off Hillary Clinton’s supporters. He pointed out that she was a “mother of five” and a reformer. “Go for the gold here with Sarah Palin,” he said. The moderator, Chris Wallace, finally had to ask Kristol, “Can we please get off Sarah Palin?”

The next day, however, Kristol was still talking about Palin on Fox. “She could be both an effective Vice-Presidential candidate and an effective President,” he said. “She’s young, energetic.” On a subsequent “Fox News Sunday,” Kristol again pushed Palin when asked whom McCain should pick: “Sarah Palin, whom I’ve only met once but I was awfully impressed by—a genuine reformer, defeated the establishment up there. It would be pretty wild to pick a young female Alaska governor, and I think, you know, McCain might as well go for it.” On July 22nd, again on Fox, Kristol referred to Palin as “my heartthrob.” He declared, “I don’t know if I can make it through the next three months without her on the ticket.”

But I just don't see 2020 as the year for the Meghan McCain/Bristol Palin Dream Ticket. For one thing, Bristol's only 28.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25485 on: October 30, 2018, 12:39:12 PM »
yeah, these banker and financial types are supposed to be so smart yet they give out loans despite there being only a little over a decade left of the planet existing, it's like, you can't take it with you ya dingus

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25486 on: October 30, 2018, 12:42:26 PM »
dude I know a guy who said he couldn't support cap and trade cause it would mean invading small African countries

shit's wild

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25487 on: October 30, 2018, 12:50:46 PM »
If you've had complications after having transvaginal mesh surgery the time to act is now.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25488 on: October 30, 2018, 12:51:13 PM »
"No, not CAPTURE and trade"

spoiler (click to show/hide)
it was benji :shh
[close]

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25489 on: October 30, 2018, 01:00:16 PM »
"No, not CAPTURE and trade"

spoiler (click to show/hide)
it was benji :shh
[close]
someone tell me what mandark hid in that cowardly spoiler :maf

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25490 on: October 30, 2018, 01:22:36 PM »


"I have no use for knights; I need revolutionaries."

Maiden Voyage

  • Junior
  • Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25491 on: October 30, 2018, 01:23:23 PM »
Seeing the difference in ads between MSNBC and Fox News is pretty wild.

MSNBC is full of superfluous techy bullshit, depression meds, and this repeating ad for guys who get curved dicks from sex injuries

Fox News is full of gold, reverse mortgages, and shit like Abilify.

They started playing MSNBC in the breakroom at the office and I stopped taking breaks entirely.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25492 on: October 30, 2018, 01:25:07 PM »
Seeing the difference in ads between MSNBC and Fox News is pretty wild.

MSNBC is full of superfluous techy bullshit, depression meds, and this repeating ad for guys who get curved dicks from sex injuries

Fox News is full of gold, reverse mortgages, and shit like Abilify.

They started playing MSNBC in the breakroom at the office and I stopped taking breaks entirely.

Capitalism :rejoice
©@©™

Maiden Voyage

  • Junior
  • Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25493 on: October 30, 2018, 01:33:40 PM »
Eating at my desk to own the libs.


agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25495 on: October 30, 2018, 02:03:00 PM »
They need to get Olbermann back on. He was an obnoxious blowhard, but I liked his enthusiasm.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25496 on: October 30, 2018, 02:06:48 PM »
He wanted away from politics that's why he went back to ESPN again and stopped tweeting about Trump or anything again. IIRC, his last episode for that GQ series he was doing he explained it.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25497 on: October 30, 2018, 02:09:30 PM »
Quote
On November 27, 2017, Olbermann announced his retirement from political commentary after episode 147 had aired, citing his belief that "this . . . presidency of Donald John Trump will end prematurely and end soon, and I am thus also confident that this is the correct moment to end this series of commentaries".
See, no need for him to continue commenting.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25498 on: October 30, 2018, 02:19:36 PM »
Did you not watch his YouTube series that went for a year?

Yeah but it wasn't the same without the Worst Person In The World segment (90% of the time the worst person being Bill O'Reily).

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Everything is awful
« Reply #25499 on: October 30, 2018, 02:33:12 PM »
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/10/12-young-people-on-why-they-probably-wont-vote.html

 :american
The boomers will carry the GOP to victory that and folks that have benefitted (or think) they benefitted from their economic policies.
🤴