Author Topic: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread  (Read 136450 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #360 on: January 25, 2017, 11:51:32 PM »
Trump has already built a wall in the minds of his followers

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #361 on: January 26, 2017, 03:02:59 AM »
Large public works are only good for /r/abandonedporn




 

naff

  • someday you feed on a tree frog
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #362 on: January 26, 2017, 05:26:42 AM »
FF9 is average and if you like it, you're a furry sissy
◕‿◕

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #363 on: January 26, 2017, 12:15:46 PM »
Large public works are only good for /r/abandonedporn

 

I don't think you know what public works are if you think this. 

Beezy

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #364 on: January 26, 2017, 07:34:28 PM »
For the good of mankind we must shut down facebook. It was a mistake. let's pretend it never happened.
fixed

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #365 on: January 26, 2017, 07:38:52 PM »
I don't want the wall to be built, but I don't think it's going to hurt anything. Large public works projects used to be something the left supported.

 :trumps


I'd love to see an increase of public works projects; fix roads, fix water pipes, fix bridges. Infrastructure stuff. This wall is Trump's version of a 200-foot gold statue of himself, a testament, worshipping his own hubris.

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #366 on: January 26, 2017, 09:25:57 PM »
I don't want the wall to be built, but I don't think it's going to hurt anything. Large public works projects used to be something the left supported.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

People already die trying to cross the border, I imagine more walls and border patrol agents will increase that number.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #367 on: January 26, 2017, 09:42:37 PM »
yeah, there's no need for a wall. nature is the wall. it's stupid hot out there during the day, cold at night, full of dangerous plants and animals, and any part with a water crossing can easily kill someone. hundreds die trying to cross the border every year, the wall is redundant.

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #368 on: January 26, 2017, 10:02:04 PM »
IF you were serious about stopping illegal immigration rather than just plain racism, anyone with half a brain would know that applying that money to enforcement and more importantly prosecuting employers of illegal immigrants (yes, I'm looking at you Texan Soccer Moms) would get you MUCH MUCH farther in curbing illegal immigration than a dumb wall.
que

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #369 on: January 26, 2017, 10:13:49 PM »
folks are literally dying out there to earn the privilege of mowing my lawn

nudemacusers

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #370 on: January 26, 2017, 10:15:35 PM »
the people who will build the wall will be contractors who I'm sure happen to work for companies that his buddies own.
that's pretty much all gov contracting tho
﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #371 on: January 26, 2017, 11:13:15 PM »
folks are literally dying out there to earn the privilege of mowing my lawn

I use gladiatorial combat to weed out all my helpers too. 

Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #372 on: January 27, 2017, 08:38:05 AM »
I don't want the wall to be built, but I don't think it's going to hurt anything. Large public works projects used to be something the left supported.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

People already die trying to cross the border, I imagine more walls and border patrol agents will increase that number.

You imagine that, but CBP says that after they put up a 18 foot wall on parts of the border there were immediately dozens of 19 foot ladders everywhere. They were collecting so many at their stations that they were eventually told them to just leave them.

Also, how many people die crossing the border? I believe it happens but I doubt it's very often. Lots of immigrants take a bus to the border town and then walk a short distance to the nearest CBP agent to seek asylum. Last week's This American Life had a good segment on this.

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #373 on: January 27, 2017, 06:24:55 PM »
I don't want the wall to be built, but I don't think it's going to hurt anything. Large public works projects used to be something the left supported.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

People already die trying to cross the border, I imagine more walls and border patrol agents will increase that number.


You imagine that, but CBP says that after they put up a 18 foot wall on parts of the border there were immediately dozens of 19 foot ladders everywhere. They were collecting so many at their stations that they were eventually told them to just leave them.

Also, how many people die crossing the border? I believe it happens but I doubt it's very often. Lots of immigrants take a bus to the border town and then walk a short distance to the nearest CBP agent to seek asylum. Last week's This American Life had a good segment on this.

Yes but that only applies to those seeking asylum. If you're trying to get into the US to work you're going through one of the remote areas to avoid capture. This article talks about it and the border patrol strategy of forcing migrants into the more dangerous routes: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/04/us-mexico-border-patrol-trump-beautiful-wall

Quote
Unfortunately, direct violence, including killings by the border patrol and on the Mexican side, as cartels work to solidify control over profitable smuggling routes, does not even scratch the surface of the violence that surrounds the US–Mexico border. The border patrol has recovered more than 6,000 bodies there since the 1990s, deaths attributable to the construction of the border wall and the massive border patrol presence. Migrants are funnelled to more dangerous and remote locations, just like migrants at the edges of the EU. Instead of crossing in a city, migrants are making the arduous journey through the deserts of Arizona, hiking 50 or more kilometres through arid and desolate terrain. According to the first National Border Patrol Strategy document, released in 1994, that was the goal: “The prediction is that with traditional entry and smuggling routes disrupted, illegal traffic will be deterred, or forced over more hostile terrain, less suited for crossing and more suited for enforcement.” Put another way, the official border patrol strategy was to create conditions that would cause more migrants to die in hostile terrain, in order to deter other migrants from making the trip.
An agent scans the US-Mexico border at Sunland Park, New Mexico ... many thousands of migrants have perished in hostile terrain.

With the increased enforcement, crossings and migrant deaths in California declined, while those in Arizona surged. The Tucson, Arizona coroner’s office has seen a twentyfold increase in the number of migrant bodies found each year since the 1990s. Migrants do not bring enough food and water, often because smugglers, who do not want to be slowed down by the extra weight, tell them the trip is not very far. The harrowing result is documented in books such as The Devil’s Highway by Luís Alberto Urrea, which tells the story of 26 migrants who attempted to enter the US through the Arizona desert in May 2001. Only 12 survived. Leanne Weber and Sharon Pickering of the Monash University criminal justice programme estimate that there are two additional deaths for every recovered body, since remains are quickly obscured by shifting sands.

So 6,000 bodies recovered since the mid 90s, with presumably many more undiscovered.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #374 on: January 27, 2017, 06:46:26 PM »
I'd agree with curly here. It's debatable if securing one's border means you share some of the responsability for what may happen to people being phisically kept out, but I'd certainly expect more casualties on the whole.

Also the Wall (which is the terminology used by Trump, regardless of what will be built) is a terrible symbolic image. It's clearly meaning Mexico is viewed as hostile.

Do it the European way, you call that stuff a weird technocratic name (Frontex) and you keep the communications about what it does low-key. Sometimes a drown kid will float ashore, the Pope will visit refugees or the coast guard saves people but otherwise the boats sink at sea without troubling our peace of mind.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2017, 06:54:26 PM by VomKriege »
ὕβρις

Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #375 on: January 28, 2017, 03:21:44 AM »
I'm glad you brought up Europe. Thousands of dead migrants is very depressing and the general outcry over those dead migrants is that the European coast guards should be doing more to save them.

If we aren't going to relax our immigration laws, then maybe more CBP agents and better physical security would bring down that number of migrant border deaths because more will be intercepted before they die of exposure/thirst, right?

What's the least bad scenario?

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #376 on: January 28, 2017, 01:40:14 PM »
I'm tired of hearing about Donald Trump in general but feel like I want to punch people in the throat when they bring him up irl while never having said a single word about Jacob Zuma, as if our own issues aren't glamorous enough.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #377 on: January 28, 2017, 01:41:46 PM »
Also in general something people from the USA probably cant relate to, I hate how pervasive the american media machine is.

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #378 on: February 07, 2017, 02:06:56 PM »
- The US would be better off as 3-5 separate countries
- There's a fair chance we'll see some sort of attempted genocide on Muslims in the next 5 years
- Marilyn Monroe was murdered
- Business is just a bunch of companies lying to each other about what they can do
que

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #379 on: February 07, 2017, 02:12:02 PM »
- The US would be better off as 50 separate countries

Now you are Libertarian.


Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #380 on: February 07, 2017, 04:50:08 PM »
- Marilyn Monroe was murdered

What's the evidence? I never followed it that closely.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #381 on: February 07, 2017, 05:10:03 PM »
Public works projects are only good if you're building something useful. Otherwise it's applied Broken Window economics. It would be more efficient to just give people money.

The Tennessee Valley Authority was a handout to InfoWars.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #382 on: February 07, 2017, 05:54:13 PM »
Andrew Lloyd Webber is not a great composer.

dog

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #383 on: February 07, 2017, 07:50:47 PM »

- Business is just a bunch of companies lying to each other about what they can do

:lol yes

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #384 on: February 07, 2017, 07:53:14 PM »
Also who wants to invest in my AI start up.  You upload a photo of some one and it will will search for pornstars which look like the person in the photo.  It will also do sentiment analysis on twitter and targeted ads.


I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #386 on: February 07, 2017, 08:13:25 PM »
Andrew Lloyd Webber is not a great composer.
I've posted several popular opinions in this thread, but I think this goes beyond "popular opinion" territory and into "truth" territory
que

Valkyrie

  • Good Christian
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #387 on: February 07, 2017, 11:06:03 PM »
Posting here since no one else seems to have mentioned it yet AFAIK, but who scared Queen away?

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #388 on: February 08, 2017, 12:00:05 AM »
Posting here since no one else seems to have mentioned it yet AFAIK, but who scared Queen away?


Last posts look like she was in the Switch thread, but not reeling or anything. Probably just having a break.

Syph

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #389 on: February 08, 2017, 12:04:49 AM »
Also who wants to invest in my AI start up.  You upload a photo of some one and it will will search for pornstars which look like the person in the photo.  It will also do sentiment analysis on twitter and targeted ads.
Real-talk I've had this idea before too and was pretty far-along in thinking how it would work
The real thing I was wondering about was legality
XO

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #390 on: February 08, 2017, 12:36:24 AM »
The scary thing is I'm pretty sure I could have this working in a week if I tried / had the data. 

Valkyrie

  • Good Christian
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #391 on: February 08, 2017, 12:44:00 AM »
Posting here since no one else seems to have mentioned it yet AFAIK, but who scared Queen away?


Last posts look like she was in the Switch thread, but not reeling or anything. Probably just having a break.
Checked her last posts and it could be why she left/took a break. I hope she comes back. She hasn't posted on Gaf either since the 18th. :(

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #392 on: February 08, 2017, 01:18:54 AM »
Posting here since no one else seems to have mentioned it yet AFAIK, but who scared Queen away?


Last posts look like she was in the Switch thread, but not reeling or anything. Probably just having a break.
Checked her last posts and it could be why she left/took a break. I hope she comes back. She hasn't posted on Gaf either since the 18th. :(


She's on FB and the twitters. Avoiding GAF is just common sense. I can't stand that site.

Syph

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #393 on: February 08, 2017, 01:19:35 AM »
The scary thing is I'm pretty sure I could have this working in a week if I tried / had the data.
Suppose I were to front you the money
XO

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #394 on: February 08, 2017, 01:24:03 AM »
The scary thing is I'm pretty sure I could have this working in a week if I tried / had the data.
If only there was some way for get a lot of pictures of porn stars. Alas! :comeon
que

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #395 on: February 08, 2017, 02:18:41 AM »
I don't think I know any smart person whose main career goal is to make more money. They may be hardworking, dedicated, loyal, etc but I don't know anyone that just wants money in life but could also be a good teacher. Probably why I could never fully trust capitalism.

The scary thing is I'm pretty sure I could have this working in a week if I tried / had the data.
If only there was some way for get a lot of pictures of porn stars. Alas! :comeon

It depends on if he's going by a search of the attributes of the image or the attributes of the face that are most similar. The latter would be more challenging since you need some statistical data on what features are most responsible for making the human face look unique but it would be less prone to false positives due to lighting/angle/etc.

Purrp Skirrp

  • Mr. Paté
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #396 on: February 08, 2017, 07:40:22 AM »
- Marilyn Monroe was murdered

What's the evidence? I never followed it that closely.



« Last Edit: February 08, 2017, 07:47:56 AM by JAY OWEN »


I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #398 on: February 08, 2017, 04:06:56 PM »
Unpopular opinions thread bro  :trumps
que

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #399 on: February 08, 2017, 04:54:19 PM »
The scary thing is I'm pretty sure I could have this working in a week if I tried / had the data.

The scary thing is it exists already


Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #400 on: February 08, 2017, 05:00:22 PM »
Ya but for cam girls.  I ain't going to pay for porn.  Now someone give me 100 mil for my start up. 

StealthFan

  • Swings Both Ways
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #401 on: February 08, 2017, 06:23:27 PM »
Legend Of Dragoon is utter trash. The graphics and FMV blinded fanboys. All JRPG's from the PSX era have fanbases, no matter how bad the game is.
reckt

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #402 on: February 08, 2017, 06:32:52 PM »
Shadow Madness > Legend of Dragoon
dog

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #403 on: February 08, 2017, 08:19:06 PM »
I've been posting about it here for a while but STEM is pretty much saturated.  Lots of friends and friends of friends who claim that their friends and family are having a hard time finding a job despite having strong GPAs, extracurriculars, etc.  I've been saying for a while now that STEM is no longer the land of milk and honey.  The reason why I post about it again is that I'm going to hire some interns and in less than a week 60 people have applied.  Most of them with great qualifications too.  When I had a full time position posted last fall, I got a lot of people going up to me and asking me to consider their daughter/son/niece/nephew/whatever for the job.  All I can surmise is that we've hit a saturation point.

I don't really see it getting better either and it will get to the point where people are just going to offer less and less for starting salaries.  Last year my company no longer offered any relocation money but yet there was still a long line of people who applied.  While I'm glad your friend's cousin's dog groomer's son got a $90k job somewhere in software engineering straight out of school, I think these days are just about over.
🍆🍆

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #404 on: February 08, 2017, 08:37:58 PM »
That just depends on the job.  What I do now, if you have a masters of Ph.D you can easily expect > $100k

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #405 on: February 08, 2017, 08:38:05 PM »
Not only that but there's SO much a focus on STEM that people really haven't learned to "think". There's no creativity. Constantly with my employees and working with clients' employees I keep finding people that know the technical ins and outs but for the life of them can't figure their way out of even the most basic problems.

Of course, having been trained as a musician I say that the issue is that is the lack of any real arts/philosophy education and the over emphasis on STEM. I noticed this at the beginning of my career when I worked with employees from another country it was obvious that they were highly skilled in the "how" of things but never in the "why" of things and lacked creativity. Now I'm noticing it with younger US employees, this lack of creative know-how. I really think it's because we've shifted from an education that taught you to think to an education that teaches you a job skill.
que

tiesto

  • ルカルカ★ナイトフィーバー
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #406 on: February 08, 2017, 09:11:18 PM »
Legend Of Dragoon is utter trash. The graphics and FMV blinded fanboys. All JRPG's from the PSX era have fanbases, no matter how bad the game is.

Except Guardian's Crusade, it seems. It's a solid and super-charming game that rarely goes mentioned.
^_^

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #407 on: February 08, 2017, 09:30:44 PM »
Not only that but there's SO much a focus on STEM that people really haven't learned to "think". There's no creativity. Constantly with my employees and working with clients' employees I keep finding people that know the technical ins and outs but for the life of them can't figure their way out of even the most basic problems.

Of course, having been trained as a musician I say that the issue is that is the lack of any real arts/philosophy education and the over emphasis on STEM. I noticed this at the beginning of my career when I worked with employees from another country it was obvious that they were highly skilled in the "how" of things but never in the "why" of things and lacked creativity. Now I'm noticing it with younger US employees, this lack of creative know-how. I really think it's because we've shifted from an education that taught you to think to an education that teaches you a job skill.

Seeing friends and my girlfriend go through the STEM path, I definitely think the lack of emphasis placed on developing critical thinking/creative thinking skills that you tend to find in certain parts of the higher-ed social sciences is a real misstep in curriculum.

I don't think you are alone in this sentiment either. I have definitely read a few articles about tech companies taking a less  :donot with liberal arts degrees recently. Citing the sort of day to day critical thinking and reasoning/logic skills you can learn from certain liberal arts paths.

...Still wouldn't encourage my future kids to chase a Philosophy degree.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #408 on: February 08, 2017, 09:47:36 PM »
The estate tax is not a tax on wealth but a tax on income that had been deferred until an involuntary conversion (death) caused it to be received.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #409 on: February 09, 2017, 12:58:14 AM »
The estate tax is not a tax on wealth but a tax on income that had been deferred until an involuntary conversion (death) caused it to be received.
One reason some orthodox economists talk about it as a wealth tax (besides ideology/partisanship, obv) is that treating inter-generational income/spending/saving/etc. as decisions made by a single, immortal agent is actually a pretty common simplifying technique.

So I guess my unpopular opinion is: rationality probably isn't closest to the goofiest assumption economists make when smoothing down their models.


edit: on second thought, the way the models are completely reliant on stylized rationality is also p. dumb.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2017, 01:07:51 AM by Mandark »

Rahxephon91

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #410 on: February 09, 2017, 04:31:59 AM »
I kind of feel whitewashing is an overblown issue and it's usually white people complaining about it. I guess it's my background as a colored but white "passing" that I never feel like I can't relate or see myself in movies.

Related, but the Scar Jo whitewashing complaints were annoying. Japan appropriates everything and honestly Scar Jo would be the perfect choice for the Movie Major. She is good at playing cold, detached, and moody females. Which is what movie Major is. Too bad I'm not sure the live action movie will be doing that. I don't think a big Hollywood action movie could have a character so detached. Yeah I guess the problem is that Hollywood hasn't given many chances to Asian females and so there arent any to be considered, but as it stands Scar Jo really is a good choice.

Beezy

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #411 on: February 09, 2017, 09:19:14 AM »
I kind of feel whitewashing is an overblown issue and it's usually white people complaining about it. I guess it's my background as a colored but white "passing" that I never feel like I can't relate or see myself in movies.

Related, but the Scar Jo whitewashing complaints were annoying. Japan appropriates everything and honestly Scar Jo would be the perfect choice for the Movie Major. She is good at playing cold, detached, and moody females. Which is what movie Major is. Too bad I'm not sure the live action movie will be doing that. I don't think a big Hollywood action movie could have a character so detached. Yeah I guess the problem is that Hollywood hasn't given many chances to Asian females and so there arent any to be considered, but as it stands Scar Jo really is a good choice.

 :cac

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #412 on: February 09, 2017, 11:53:20 AM »
I largely view as the whitewashing thing a matter of marketing (though while Tilda Swinton did a great job there was really no reason for her character to be white). I mean I think of how the movie gets funded. You have a group of investors and they want to get the product out there to as many people to watch it. So they know star power so they're not going to be like "Hrm....the major is supposed to be somewhat Japanese." They're thinking "You got Scarlett Johanson?! OK, I'll invest." People that will go see GitS because they know the material is a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of the market. The people that will say, "Hey, an action movie with Scarlett Johanson? I'll go see that."

I JJ Abrams had it right in saying that casts should reflect population. But let's be honest, JJ Abrams can coast on the brands of the movies he's making and his name. In essence, asking for no whitewashing is a bit of a circular problem. White Celebrities are put on as movie sellers because they've proven themselves in other movies. But they got the roles in those movies because they were white, etc, etc. Like I said, I think some production companies are moving in the right direction. But the cynical part of me views the problem not as a monolithic effort by people to push white culture. It's just lazy business.
que

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #413 on: February 09, 2017, 02:36:13 PM »
Donnie is the greatest thing to happen to this country in a long time. We so blessed, fam  :rejoice
*****

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #414 on: February 09, 2017, 02:48:21 PM »
They're thinking "You got Scarlett Johanson?! OK, I'll invest." People that will go see GitS because they know the material is a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of the market. The people that will say, "Hey, an action movie with Scarlett Johanson? I'll go see that."

That's pretty much exactly what the director of GitS said about it. Without ScarJo, or another big name, there's no movie. Period. But with ScarJo on board, and funding secured, they were able to fill out the rest of cast with Asian actors like Takeshi Kitano, Chin Han, Kaori Momoi, and Yutaka Izumihara.
dog

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #415 on: February 09, 2017, 02:49:05 PM »
Junior bacon cheeseburger > double stack

Atramental

  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #416 on: February 09, 2017, 05:51:32 PM »
Donnie is the greatest thing to happen to this country in a long time. We so blessed, fam  :rejoice


spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

 :whew

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #417 on: February 10, 2017, 04:10:15 AM »
One reason some orthodox economists talk about it as a wealth tax (besides ideology/partisanship, obv) is that treating inter-generational income/spending/saving/etc. as decisions made by a single, immortal agent is actually a pretty common simplifying technique.

So I guess my unpopular opinion is: rationality probably isn't closest to the goofiest assumption economists make when smoothing down their models.


edit: on second thought, the way the models are completely reliant on stylized rationality is also p. dumb.

A lot of mainline writing about the estate tax in accountancy (which admittedly is more and more dated as it becomes less and less of an issue) takes it as an uncontroversial fact that it's a tax on wealth despite this position being fundamentally inconsistent with other accounting identities.

There's a strong textualist bent in the field (which, if I had to guess, arises from the chasms that form between statute and regulation in tax), so I largely ascribe this situation to that since the stated goal of the estate tax is something other than taxing income.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #418 on: February 10, 2017, 04:14:12 AM »
Accounting identity tangent that's on-topic: There's a Soviet comedic novel that I love wherein one of the characters describes someone's assets and their liabilities, but not their equity, which when you think about it makes a lot of sense in a society where private ownership is considered a moral failing.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: 2017: Unpopular opinions thread
« Reply #419 on: February 11, 2017, 12:59:16 AM »
anime is the richest form of av entertainment