now i didn't read the details as the video was bad and the explanation on ERA was even worse in actually explaining why this is even a thing...look, death threats aren't cool, but public figures getting them is normal throughout human history, it's just the cost of sending them has dropped as has the cost of what it takes to become a public figure, which also drops the probability of them actually meaning anything, and usually these "death threats" are like comments on their videos or twitter or shit which i have a hard time taking seriously as an old man who received death threats many times online over a decade ago back when people actually e-mailed them even if their name and school or whatever was in the e-mail address
and for people who live online, ERA is irrationally paranoid about "doxxing", "online harassment" and "death threats" to where it's all DEFCON 1 immediately, even when the person makes themselves a total public figure online that probably would have used to assume this is what they'll get by default
they think a bot scraping the forum is stalkers targeting people for sinister motives, when the forum already provides the same function for users posts and it's not even protected as well as on NeoGAF.com
i guess my point is only people posting in favor of littering should be actioned and it should be severe, they should receive a PMed death threat and if they're an eraclear member it should replace the ads with one
