There is just an awesome bunch of garbage that has come out of the social sciences in Russian academia in the post-Soviet period. History especially is full of it, I assume because for 80 years or so it was so controlled and set down by the state that basically you didn't have to learn actual historiographical practices just repeating the "Marxist-Leninist" truth as laid down by higher ups and you'd advance to prestigious positions.
Then when the Soviet system collapsed (and it lingered a bit longer in social science academia out of inertia), it freed them all up to publish their TRUE LIFE'S WORK finally. Like you can see on the Wiki page,
The New Chronology is like this box set of giant 800 page historical tomes full of charts and diagrams and maps, not some single 300 page crank book or wild revisionist theory like would be more standard in the West. And it's taken seriously by all kinds of "certified" people in high positions, they get great reviews, etc. We obviously have own our issues in academia but the Eastern European social sciences can be seriously wild because in some ways they're like a century or more behind in figuring out methodology. A lot of their stuff looks more like what we were publishing in the late 19th century. Like the guy who wrote that geopolitics book in the late 90s (along with a bunch of other fantastic stuff) that popular media in the West discovered last year finally, and it got a bunch of play from the 100 part message Twitter people as PUTINS SECRET PLAN WITH TRUMP and whatever.
So it can be just totally awesome. Real problem is more getting it translated, because it's not really going to get translated for publication here, so you're relying on the true believers.
