The first part is amazing too if you read the conversation : we have to accept that false accusations will be more plentiful in raw numbers because people are allowed to speak up (ok, I can accept that) all the while saying that you'll basically never truly accept that someone has been cleared.

There are
so many dubious claims being made in that thread; what actually is the end goal that they think they want?
Anyone accused of anything by anyone should become a pariah by default unless they can prove their innocence? And even
then have people but-her-emails!ing their exoneration?
The burden of proof should be on someone proving a negative (which they literally concede is impossible to do) and not being able to do so should be treated as a criminal? (In fact,
worse than a criminal, because actual criminal acts (which this is
not) have fixed term sentences and at the end you are considered - in theory anyway - to have paid for your crime)
Create additional legislation on what is and is not acceptable behaviour for adult sexual relationships, so things like inappropriate commentary become classified as actual
assault? Does anyone really want to open
that can of worms? The government telling you what is and is not legally accepted sexual conduct?