Author Topic: YANG GANG 2024  (Read 42758 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #240 on: April 18, 2019, 10:29:38 PM »
but only white autistic babies, because remember, he is a crypto fascist/white nationalist

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #241 on: April 18, 2019, 10:30:04 PM »
lol, that word filter Dog, not a good look

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #242 on: April 18, 2019, 11:46:43 PM »
it's kind of weird how mad yang makes trent dole
Nazis suck :yeshrug
Hi

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #243 on: April 18, 2019, 11:54:01 PM »
lol, that word filter Dog, not a good look

Ugh what’s the filter

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #244 on: April 19, 2019, 12:13:38 AM »
is the altered phrase sjw? hmm what could it beee
Hi

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #245 on: April 19, 2019, 02:23:35 AM »
a u t i s t i c

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #246 on: April 19, 2019, 06:08:44 AM »
damn you guys are thick

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #247 on: April 19, 2019, 08:49:54 AM »
Just autistic

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #248 on: April 19, 2019, 12:58:07 PM »
püp

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #249 on: April 20, 2019, 01:25:38 PM »
*****

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #250 on: April 20, 2019, 11:47:15 PM »
https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/1119697373607940097

much crypto fascist such white supremacist  :doge

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #251 on: April 21, 2019, 08:19:25 PM »
he's not thinking about how much his hand is going to hurt :doge

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #252 on: April 26, 2019, 01:34:19 AM »
每天生气

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #253 on: April 26, 2019, 04:08:27 AM »


Tucker Carlson going full yang gang.

ah... uh... maybe trent dole was right

spoiler (click to show/hide)
but I don't care! all aboard  :hump
[close]
每天生气

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #254 on: April 28, 2019, 01:55:45 PM »
*****

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #255 on: April 29, 2019, 09:32:03 AM »
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/end-relocation-bidding/

Quote
The recent circus surrounding Amazon’s HQ2 project should highlight how damaging the practice of allowing localities to ‘bid’ for investment from corporations can be to our country, and how important it is for us to find a solution to this problem.

You can’t blame the corporation for trying to save money, and you can’t blame the localities for trying to attract investment and new jobs. Because no one has an incentive to stop this practice, it continues unabated.

However, it amounts to up to $90b a year of tax breaks and cash grants. Since states and other localities can’t run a deficit or print money, these subsidies amount to money that could otherwise go to school, road repair, and other important functions. These incentives are meant to steal jobs and investment from other states, not from offshoring or to entice businesses to expand when they otherwise wouldn’t.

There’s also evidence that corporations start with an idea of where they want to move, and then use a public bidding war to get tax breaks from those locations. Considering Amazon’s business, DC and NY were likely locations for HQ2 even before they received 238 proposals from cities across the country.

This form of corporate welfare needs to stop, and only the federal government has an incentive to do so. We must end it by considering any financial benefit provided to a company to entice local investment, or relocation, to be special income that is taxed at 100%. General investment by a locality to be more business-friendly is fine, but no more bribing companies to do something they were already planning to do. The only ones who win are the companies.

agrajag

  • Senior Member

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #257 on: May 04, 2019, 11:52:51 AM »

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #258 on: May 05, 2019, 01:12:59 PM »


shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #260 on: May 16, 2019, 03:18:05 PM »
每天生气

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #261 on: May 16, 2019, 03:21:18 PM »
post y'all SAT scores, I'm tryna see something

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #262 on: May 16, 2019, 03:28:02 PM »
I only got a 2060 :(
每天生气

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #263 on: May 16, 2019, 03:29:58 PM »
I got 1300 out of 1600, mainly because I was bad at high school math.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #264 on: May 16, 2019, 03:31:10 PM »
so going into [redacted] was an act of career retribution
每天生气

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #265 on: May 16, 2019, 03:36:02 PM »
I met a girl that I ended up dating during my SAT exams, so, not altogether a bad memory.
每天生气

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #266 on: May 16, 2019, 03:38:55 PM »
so going into [redacted] was an act of career retribution

 :lol Something like that.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
When I got into less algebraic mathematics in later high school and college it was always a reminder how dumb I was to not try hard in foundational high school math classes.
[close]

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #267 on: May 16, 2019, 03:55:28 PM »
Never took it, only ACT. :hmph

spoiler (click to show/hide)
33 or 34 I think? I don't remember exactly, was pretty high end, max then was 36. I think they've since changed it like the SAT?

For some reason lots of the people I knew had problems with it and were mad* I seemingly dunked on it. They all honors/AP/4.0 kids who took stuff seriously. One dude who I like and think of as smart had to take it like three times to get a 28. So I remember thinking it was seeming too easy so I must have done bad type of test. But didn't so, whatevs I guess.

*I assume because it wasn't history/social studies/etc. stuff which they were used to benji totally annihilating the curve on at that point. :doge

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Also, I had to take it at some weird suburban high school that was built out in the middle of a nearby forest, yet was apparently the type of school where all the bathroom stalls are only half height. Every window you looked out from inside was just trees. Plus like nobody there for the test was from around there so during the breaks we're like wandering around this dark, strange, high school miles from civilization.
[close]
[close]

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #268 on: May 16, 2019, 04:03:59 PM »
Guess ACT is still at 36, average is only 20. A 29 puts you in the 90+% percentile, huh, didn't realize that it had such a sharp curve to it at all.

Also Texas is RUN BY LIEBERALS clearly (otherwise lol at how close this map is to the EC "average" this century):


Back when I took it, they told us that ACT was if you didn't plan on leaving the state as in-state schools would know your high school's WARP equivalent in stuff so then less broad (and cheaper) ACT was fine, SAT was for if you planned on leaving the state or just wanted all options open. But according to Wikipedia now they're considered equal almost everywhere and since 2011 more people take the ACT than SAT.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2019, 04:10:42 PM by benjipwns »

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #269 on: May 16, 2019, 04:07:04 PM »
post your asvab scores  :-[
*****

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #270 on: May 16, 2019, 04:11:43 PM »
post your asvab scores  :-[
I accidentally submitted a practice test blank and it says I've qualified for a five year tour.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #271 on: May 16, 2019, 04:54:03 PM »
post your asvab scores  :-[

I took that... can't remember my score though.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
I even took it after high school. :shaq2
[close]

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #272 on: May 16, 2019, 05:18:13 PM »
Standardized tests :nope

Humanistic education. :snob

That‘s why we have Eurovision. :smug

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #273 on: May 17, 2019, 12:54:45 AM »
10/10 on the apgar, bitches

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #274 on: May 17, 2019, 01:28:48 AM »
I probably did not score as highly as I was a preemie. :fbm

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #275 on: May 17, 2019, 02:52:46 AM »
I...don't remember. I did well anyway. :-[
Hi

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #276 on: May 19, 2019, 04:55:13 PM »

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #277 on: May 20, 2019, 01:01:34 AM »

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #278 on: May 23, 2019, 02:03:39 PM »

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #279 on: May 24, 2019, 03:52:34 PM »
https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/1131901042759819265

Can we get some guerilla marketing up in this shit?!
每天生气

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #280 on: May 24, 2019, 03:53:46 PM »
https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/1131901042759819265

Can we get some guerilla marketing up in this shit?!

there should be a viral campaign like they did with the clowns for the It movie, but with Yang face masks.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #281 on: May 24, 2019, 03:56:32 PM »
face masks of an asian person could get a little racist.
每天生气

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #282 on: May 24, 2019, 04:06:15 PM »
just tell them you're filipino, you get a pass

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #283 on: May 24, 2019, 04:06:55 PM »
well, if you don't like masks, I guess people could paint their faces instead

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #284 on: May 30, 2019, 09:25:38 AM »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #285 on: June 08, 2019, 02:21:42 AM »
r.i.p. in pieces YANG GANG (2019-2019)


Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #286 on: June 08, 2019, 08:00:17 AM »
Yikes
🤴

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #288 on: June 12, 2019, 06:02:14 PM »
isn't that illegal
每天生气

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #289 on: June 12, 2019, 06:17:19 PM »
it's two separate events, the person is receiving $1000 a month, and the person can choose to vote for Andrew Yang or not

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:doge
[close]

naff

  • someday you feed on a tree frog
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #290 on: June 12, 2019, 06:51:12 PM »
 :doge
◕‿◕

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #291 on: June 12, 2019, 07:07:12 PM »
isn't that illegal
It's all very cool, all very legal. Who's going to sue him?

Yang is willing to use the Trump administration dubious relationship with election ethics against them.
Which is why he is the best candidate to take on Trump. If he collects enough donations and money for the general election he can just outright buy the votes he needs to secure his margins in the swing states.
Had Clinton not spend $2 billion on ads and campaigning but simply spend it on buying 2 million votes she probably would've won.
🤴

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #292 on: June 12, 2019, 07:08:05 PM »
It's all very cool, all very legal. Who's going to sue him?
The FEC could prosecute?
每天生气

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #293 on: June 12, 2019, 07:10:16 PM »
It's all very cool, all very legal. Who's going to sue him?
The FEC could prosecute?
The FEC going after the first asian american presidential candidate?

Yikes, not a good look.

Besides is that part of the government even staffed by the Acting Trump Organimadnistration?
🤴

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #294 on: June 12, 2019, 07:10:39 PM »
Nintex, you don't always have to post.
每天生气

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #295 on: June 13, 2019, 03:34:45 AM »
Andrew "Beto" Yang


agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #296 on: June 14, 2019, 06:17:49 PM »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #297 on: June 20, 2019, 08:48:46 AM »
https://www.isidewith.com/elections/2020-presidential-quiz

WOOOO YANG GANG; FUCK MARIANNE, TRAITOR

Quote
Candidates
Here are the candidates ranked from most to least similar to your beliefs.

65%    Andrew Yang

63%    Beto O’Rourke

58%    Cory Booker

58%    Julian Castro

54%    Kirsten Gillibrand

53%    John Delaney

52%    Tulsi Gabbard

49%    Bernie Sanders

49%    Pete Buttigieg

47%    Amy Klobuchar

46%    Elizabeth Warren

46%    Kamala Harris

42%    Donald Trump

40%    Joe Biden

39%    Marianne Williamson
I only answered Yes or No rather than the more specific answers, in 2016 doing that that boosted Bernie up to like 55-60% with Gary Johnson around 80%

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #298 on: June 20, 2019, 09:35:29 AM »
so your views are very close to Beto and Big Pharma Corey Booker.  :teehee

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: YANG GANG 2020
« Reply #299 on: June 20, 2019, 09:39:02 AM »
"I'm Spartacus" he said climbing up on furniture