What makes me uncomfortable about threads like that is the insinuation that doxxing is justified even if someone was saying the n word. Like yeah, let the stadium investigate and ban the guy if it's against their policy, but that's it. Of course I'm pretty absolutist when it comes to being anti-internet vigilantism in general outside of verifiable instances of animal abuse and even then, that should mostly be the law's job instead of a bunch of trolls that want to feel important.
I've been thinking about this a lot recently
I'm not sure whether I feel like doxing is wrong
the wrong thing is
acting on the knowledge of the dox in any way, harassment has always been the issue, whether it's antagonizing them at their house or as minor as signing up their email address for spam
but dox? I mean, people constantly dox themselves, at what point have you simply recorded info they themselves made available one way or another? if you dig to make connections for hours there's something wrong with you, but can it really be called wrong if all you did was google a username?
the world is full of dox already, publicly searchable records as required by law, like lawsuits, how could it be wrong to simply view that info? should digital directories be outlawed?
you can argue that the fear people have that something MIGHT happen when they are doxed is an issue, but that's still a level removed from the actual harassment
what if someone just says "I will dox you," then they make me fear that I might be doxed which if happened would make me fear harassment? how many layers removed is still legitimate fear before anything even happens
I will say in this case, doxing this man does show an unhealthy level of investment beyond well-adjusted humans...it's dumb, but still not harassment in and of itself