wait, why don't they just openly talk about these things?
It's because what you and the rest of the normie posters might see the problem as being;
- mods do not treat all posters equally, or enforce the rules non-selectively
- rules are not clear and agreed to as TOS, and you get things like a mod dropping into a thread and saying "MY OPINION IS THE CORRECT ONE, SO IM ACTIONING ALL CONTRARY VIEWS" than going through the thread banning people
retroactively, or reverting peoples fucking edited posts if they feel they went too far and self-censored just to drop a ban on them
- bans are arbitrary in frequency, length, and severity, and can be clearly and visibly seen to not be based on a particular posters actual prior infractions, despite the attempts to keep this secret.
- despite claims that moderator decisions are final, they're
fucking not and mods can and will eat a big bucket of shit if you can brigade the forums successfully for long enough, whereas doing what 'you're supposed to' over an egregious ban gets you fuck all except maybe upgrading your ban for 'abusing the report system' or 'hostile private messages'.
era mods - WHO ARE FUCKING LAUGHABLY SHIT AT THEIR ONE JOB - think the problem is;
- not enough bans
- not enough 'personalities' (names they recognise who always hold the same opinion as them) want to become mods
- not enough secret rules not listed anywhere to justify bans, and not enough secret histories and interent detective powers to justify bans
- all these alt right bad faith secret nazi badthink troll accounts playing the long game just to make a moderator look like a petty asshole, like Chris1964 did, when clearly mods didnt do nothing
Watch and fucking see their 'solution' is going to be
less moderator transparency,
more stasi-like 'trusted informants' whose reports will be auto-actioned without oversight or even reading the fucking thread, and more bans for longer with even more opaque reasoning