or if you say "climate change is real and is leading us all to doom" that could easily and obviously lead someone to commit violence
but it's true, so I guess we don't censor that?
but then who determines what is true enough not to censor?
Forget saying that climate change will "literally burn" the planet and leave it unhospitable to all life. What about an entire mass culture that cultivates the idea that anyone who says something you don't like is ontologically evil, that no action against them is wrong, that they're too stupid or morally broken to deserve rights or protection from violence, that their inherent
sin moral depravity means they
deserve random acts of chaos against them in retaliation for their crimes, that they're all part of a giant conspiracy led by a wealthy cabal out to murder people, that they're currently carrying out an ongoing genocide, that their one lone obsessive goal and their every act is seeking to murder
you personally, that we're in a constant state of universal war against these people with existential and immediate consequences in every area of life and every potential subject, etc.
We have historical examples of exactly that type of speech leading to actual literal violence and mass murders, surely the powerful conspiracy that sits in power should want to suppress and punish
that kind of speech. Yet wooooosh, right over the heads of these totalitarian idiots. (Who I, of course, believe should maintain their free speech rights.)