it's complicated
0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.
Sorry if I missed it... but what this a house cat that has just got a taste of freedom?If so this might be a real challenge...
"Killed"
um...doesn't this have to contend with Black Panther 2? Sorry sweetie. We all know which will be better.
Does Avatar 2 star an anti-vaxxer transphobe also tho?
Quoteum...doesn't this have to contend with Black Panther 2? Sorry sweetie. We all know which will be better.QuoteDoes Avatar 2 star an anti-vaxxer transphobe also tho?https://www.resetera.com/threads/amc-ceo-has-watched-footage-from-avatar-2-its-mindblowing.512196/#post-76734330
User Banned (2 Weeks): Trolling and Making Fun of People's Identity; History of Trolling
Quote from: MechaJackieAnd that's why NFT game stans sound like actual children, because they don't even start to think about any single step of this whole process. I'm actually convinced now this is just astroturfing, because holy fuck y'all aren't even trying.For the record, Stan is not the preferred nomenclature. Fomosexual is what I like to be called.
And that's why NFT game stans sound like actual children, because they don't even start to think about any single step of this whole process. I'm actually convinced now this is just astroturfing, because holy fuck y'all aren't even trying.
QuoteSo the precedent will be that if someone shoots and kills someone in a crowd and the crowd reacts by trying to stop the shooter, the shooter can then theoretically murder everyone in the crowd and be defending themselves? Even the “good guys with guns”? This is so stupid.A judgement here doesn't set a precedent really.Though, this has been the case for white people since forever.
So the precedent will be that if someone shoots and kills someone in a crowd and the crowd reacts by trying to stop the shooter, the shooter can then theoretically murder everyone in the crowd and be defending themselves? Even the “good guys with guns”? This is so stupid.
User Warned: Dismissive CommentaryI wish all people into crypto a very bankruptcy.
Could moderation make it any more obvious that some of them have crypto investments at stake by warning posts like this?I'll repost what I posted in the feedback channel that's buried in a dark corner of the site:QuoteI'm seeing some of the warnings in the Discord NTF and other crypto threads and it is shockingly obvious that some mods and/or admins are bought in.Absolute conflict of interest and abuse of their powers.Chilling criticism or mockery of obvious pump and dump schemes is a way of protecting the investments of anyone in moderation with stake.
I'm seeing some of the warnings in the Discord NTF and other crypto threads and it is shockingly obvious that some mods and/or admins are bought in.Absolute conflict of interest and abuse of their powers.Chilling criticism or mockery of obvious pump and dump schemes is a way of protecting the investments of anyone in moderation with stake.
Tell me exactly what I mean by this if you think it's so dang offensive.When I talk about real cost of scrapping the BBC, I mean the impact goes beyond the scope of this discussion - none of which would be given any consideration in the sort of burn it to ground reactionary take some folks want to push. Like it or not, the BBC impacts the lives, health, jobs, education and more, of millions of people on an ongoing, constant basis. Instead of repairing any of the harm their actions have caused, simply getting rid of the BBC would do more harm to more people. And the folks responsible would just hop over to the next high paying gig and not be affected.What is so borderline insulting about taking this position exactly? If you thought I was using the term "real cost" to imply the current damage is not real, that is not what I'm saying or implying.The solution, whatever it is, needs to be as effective in scope, results and scale - if not more so, than the people that have intentionally caused the situation in the first place.I am completely certain that the BBC's decade plus long course needs to be corrected. The damage it does specifically to the trans community needs to stop immediately. I believe or at least I am not yet convinced however, that the BBC doesn't need to be deleted to accomplish it. It's quite literally been the lifelong goal of the sorts of people that have brought about the situation about and why would anyone want to give such folks even an inch, knowing full well, if they bring the BBC down, regardless of the damage it would cause, they would seek out more targets, cause more shit, emboldened by their victory.
Every single one of these crypto threads has mad The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints energy
I ran after the little fucker for like 10 minutes, around the pine tree in the yard. That little shit. He went on the porch, and I thought I had him but there was a break in the screen, and he made a break for it.
Been training our cat since he was a kitten to go outside w/ an escort and he doesn't run / freak out.
Cats dont need outside. Cats are better off inside.
Stop trying to be "Republican Lite" and move further left.
Fritzl still can't lure his cat back into the cellar -Quote I ran after the little fucker for like 10 minutes, around the pine tree in the yard. That little shit. He went on the porch, and I thought I had him but there was a break in the screen, and he made a break for it.His thread has lured other Fritzls though -QuoteBeen training our cat since he was a kitten to go outside w/ an escort and he doesn't run / freak out.An escort? Is he one of those wankers that walk their cat on a lead?QuoteCats dont need outside. Cats are better off inside.
Yeah. He was in indoor cat for 3 years. This is his big break.
Quote from: https://www.resetera.com/threads/discord-ceo-appears-to-suggest-some-sort-of-ethereum-nft-integration-in-discord-is-coming.511824/post-76709730 User Warned: Dismissive CommentaryI wish all people into crypto a very bankruptcy.Quote from: https://www.resetera.com/threads/discord-ceo-appears-to-suggest-some-sort-of-ethereum-nft-integration-in-discord-is-coming.511824/post-76739982Could moderation make it any more obvious that some of them have crypto investments at stake by warning posts like this?I'll repost what I posted in the feedback channel that's buried in a dark corner of the site:QuoteI'm seeing some of the warnings in the Discord NTF and other crypto threads and it is shockingly obvious that some mods and/or admins are bought in.Absolute conflict of interest and abuse of their powers.Chilling criticism or mockery of obvious pump and dump schemes is a way of protecting the investments of anyone in moderation with stake.
Man, y'all have lost the plot. Wishing bankruptcy on other members is textbook hostility and clearly against the rules.
Constructive thread has been going back and forth about crypto all day, but the above situation and accusations of staff being obviously pro-crypto got the emeritus hostility expert to weigh in:Quote from: MorriganMan, y'all have lost the plot. Wishing bankruptcy on other members is textbook hostility and clearly against the rules.
Quote from: benjipwns on November 09, 2021, 07:53:38 PMQuote from: https://www.resetera.com/threads/discord-ceo-appears-to-suggest-some-sort-of-ethereum-nft-integration-in-discord-is-coming.511824/post-76709730 User Warned: Dismissive CommentaryI wish all people into crypto a very bankruptcy.Quote from: https://www.resetera.com/threads/discord-ceo-appears-to-suggest-some-sort-of-ethereum-nft-integration-in-discord-is-coming.511824/post-76739982Could moderation make it any more obvious that some of them have crypto investments at stake by warning posts like this?I'll repost what I posted in the feedback channel that's buried in a dark corner of the site:QuoteI'm seeing some of the warnings in the Discord NTF and other crypto threads and it is shockingly obvious that some mods and/or admins are bought in.Absolute conflict of interest and abuse of their powers.Chilling criticism or mockery of obvious pump and dump schemes is a way of protecting the investments of anyone in moderation with stake. Constructive thread has been going back and forth about crypto all day, but the above situation and accusations of staff being obviously pro-crypto got the emeritus hostility expert to weigh in:Quote from: MorriganMan, y'all have lost the plot. Wishing bankruptcy on other members is textbook hostility and clearly against the rules.
Quote from: nobody of note on November 09, 2021, 11:55:43 PMConstructive thread has been going back and forth about crypto all day, but the above situation and accusations of staff being obviously pro-crypto got the emeritus hostility expert to weigh in:Quote from: MorriganMan, y'all have lost the plot. Wishing bankruptcy on other members is textbook hostility and clearly against the rules.ok but what if the other member said they liked asmongold or ninja or travis scott or contrapoints on alternating sundays
stumbled across this articlehttps://gamerant.com/resident-evil-4-vr-design-flaw-female-gamer-discomfort/short summary: the new RE4 VR places your inventory close at chest height, and it's constantly causing female players to punch themselves in the boob and bruise their titties in a moment of panic(Image removed from quote.)here is an actual, honest to god video game which is discriminatory toward women, and also ableist, a genuine case where everyone should agree that this ought to be changed to improve everyone's comfortand not one of the vocal "always online" types fucking cares at allit is not mentioned once in era's 10 page thread breathlessly praising the gameif you want to whip yourself into a righteous fury, this is an easy slam dunk! not to mention that to laugh about it is nasty boys' club rhetoric, so you get to condemn them too while you're at it!I swear they need to hire me to find these opportunities
Quote from: https://www.resetera.com/threads/kyle-rittenhouse-judge-rules-link-to-proud-boys-would-be-poison-at-trial.488062/post-76738074QuoteSo the precedent will be that if someone shoots and kills someone in a crowd and the crowd reacts by trying to stop the shooter, the shooter can then theoretically murder everyone in the crowd and be defending themselves? Even the “good guys with guns”? This is so stupid.A judgement here doesn't set a precedent really.Though, this has been the case for white people since forever.White People: Able to get away with premeditated mass murder since forever.
Quote from: Uncle on November 10, 2021, 12:23:26 AMstumbled across this articlehttps://gamerant.com/resident-evil-4-vr-design-flaw-female-gamer-discomfort/short summary: the new RE4 VR places your inventory close at chest height, and it's constantly causing female players to punch themselves in the boob and bruise their titties in a moment of panic(Image removed from quote.)here is an actual, honest to god video game which is discriminatory toward women, and also ableist, a genuine case where everyone should agree that this ought to be changed to improve everyone's comfortand not one of the vocal "always online" types fucking cares at allit is not mentioned once in era's 10 page thread breathlessly praising the gameif you want to whip yourself into a righteous fury, this is an easy slam dunk! not to mention that to laugh about it is nasty boys' club rhetoric, so you get to condemn them too while you're at it!I swear they need to hire me to find these opportunities Is there no calibration in that game?You'd think at least two people who tried the game were of different statures and would notice this in testing the routine.
Unless the warning got edited, it's not even for hostility. "Hostility against other members" is its own citation. The warning was for being dismissive of... NFT's? Bankruptcy? People who bought into NFT and went bankrupt?
What am I missing here, the post was warned for dismissive commentary, not hostility.
I just checked again and it says "drive-by posting". It's obviously a rude post though. I don't even know why this warning is some big debate or used as evidence that the staff is "bought in". That's absurd levels of paranoia.
The reasoning has been changed. It was originally dismissive commentary.
Quote from: SketchsanchezBig "being toxic is fine as long as it's against something I don't like" energy in these posts tbh.Era in a nutshell :\Quote from: GradonThe reasoning has been changed. It was originally dismissive commentary.Okay. Sometimes the banners are a bit sloppy or are hastily written and later get corrected, it's not a big deal, and still isn't evidence that "mods are bought in!".
Big "being toxic is fine as long as it's against something I don't like" energy in these posts tbh.
This thread has run its course and isn’t producing any meaningful discussion. In the future be mindful that threads do not need to be made every time something is playable via emulation.
I'm not condoning theft, but you won't catch me side-eyeing people for stealing from companies that generate billions in revenue every year -- especially those that use slave labor. The developers of this title will be just fine as the game goes on to break every single sales record SMT mainline has ever had.
Smt v is pretty fucking good but its not as atmospheric as smt iv so far but we'll see
MM explain your crimes.
QuoteYeah it's really incredible how some people actually educate themselves on the case and how the fucking law works in order to have an informed opinion.No it's just incredible to watch so many people line up to argue on behalf of a murderer regardless of whether or not they are "legally" right or wrong.Rittenhouse was clearly in the wrong here legally or not.
Yeah it's really incredible how some people actually educate themselves on the case and how the fucking law works in order to have an informed opinion.
Didn't know if this deserved its own thread but I can't be the only one to think trying to capitalize on renaming Mcree to Cassidy feels just a bit sleazy and makes the whole move feel insincere (and incredibly disrespectful to those who were abused by the real Jesse McCree? Given that I've seen it not discussed on Era and gaming press just seem to be promoting the event, I think I must be, but this feels utterly wrong to me.
Yes, but at this point, who is actually surprised at this. Fuck Blizzard.
QuoteThis event was in the works before they decided to rename the character. When they announced renaming the character they mentioned postponing content about McCree specifically so they could incorporate it with his new name.Which is entirely in line with their strategy of not acknowledging the lawsuit exists, so as to not tip off the players that don't know.
This event was in the works before they decided to rename the character. When they announced renaming the character they mentioned postponing content about McCree specifically so they could incorporate it with his new name.
QuoteQuoteYeah it's really incredible how some people actually educate themselves on the case and how the fucking law works in order to have an informed opinion.No it's just incredible to watch so many people line up to argue on behalf of a murderer regardless of whether or not they are "legally" right or wrong.Rittenhouse was clearly in the wrong here legally or not.https://www.resetera.com/threads/kyle-rittenhouse-judge-rules-link-to-proud-boys-would-be-poison-at-trial.488062/page-14#post-76785462Get mad that people discuss whether someone is legally guilty or not in a legal trial
Welltall Zero going complete douchebag in that thread as he bitches about a company not acknowledging lawsuits against it in its own PR for barely related announcements and events.
Channel 4 have also recently withdrawn from this programme, as have OFCOM and many others.
Quote from: HaughtyFrank on November 10, 2021, 01:26:44 PMQuoteQuoteYeah it's really incredible how some people actually educate themselves on the case and how the fucking law works in order to have an informed opinion.No it's just incredible to watch so many people line up to argue on behalf of a murderer regardless of whether or not they are "legally" right or wrong.Rittenhouse was clearly in the wrong here legally or not.https://www.resetera.com/threads/kyle-rittenhouse-judge-rules-link-to-proud-boys-would-be-poison-at-trial.488062/page-14#post-76785462Get mad that people discuss whether someone is legally guilty or not in a legal trialthat person is probably eligible for jury service
What is the difference between Rosenbaum lunging at Rittenhouse and the weapon and Arbery lunging at young hick and his weapon? The answer, Arbery actually connected. If you think Rosenbaum was more of a threat than Arbery you're completely wrong. With that said, both weren't threats but Rosenbaum even more....he never made contact!!!!!!! The cases are very similar.
https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1458478044507774981
You could argue that the people who are rooting for him to be convicted wouldn’t be if he was black too
actively shut the fuck up
Wooooow.
Rayon Mcintosh: ForGeorge Zimmerman: AgainstDerek Dhauvin: (I thought it should have been manslaughter not third-degree murder)Breonna Taylor's killers: AgainstMohamed Noor: AgainstJussie Smollett: AgainstTrump: AgainstSaddam Hussein: Against
I don't get it. It seems pretty obvious that a subset doesn't care about any of the laws here. For them it's just about whose side the shooter was on.
Quote from: https://www.resetera.com/threads/bbc-confirm-withdrawal-from-stonewall-programmes-uk-lgbtq-organisation.512397/post-76771599Channel 4 have also recently withdrawn from this programme, as have OFCOM and many others.weird how this comment is completely overlooked and the very public reasoning behind why so many companies are pulling out is never mentioned in this topic
Any chance to see a bald Bayonetta?
https://www.resetera.com/threads/youtube-is-making-dislike-private-for-everyone-will-be-visible-for-creators.512499/A move clearly meant to protect the corporations they claim to hate so much but is cheered on because disliking a video is an "alt-right move" to them. If someone convince them breathing air is an alt-right tactic, half of those morons would willingly suffocate.
Not sure why you’re taking issue with me conceding I was wrong tbh. I misremembered, which is why you see me admitting to it.
It's taken you six back-and-forth posts full of deflections and justifications, after being confronted with the evidence, to admit being wrong. That was my issue with it. Moving on...