Author Topic: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.  (Read 221602 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1321 on: December 17, 2019, 03:34:37 PM »
But Scientology tho, that's the good stuff. :lawd
©@©™

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1322 on: December 17, 2019, 04:12:34 PM »
demsocs ain't slick

https://twitter.com/kirstiealley/status/1207028067849396224

Where did all these roads, bridges, farm subsidies, middle east nation building, and world police come from?  :thinking
You might not want to call is socialism, but it's still redistribution of wealth.
©ZH


curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1324 on: December 17, 2019, 07:23:39 PM »
Will doubling down on BERNIE OR BARBARISM in this week's free Chapo. :existential

I did nearly drive off the road when Matt described Melenchon as "anti-NATO, genuinely antisemitic" though. :lol

Interesting how the only hopes for humankind are white succdems from the imperial core :hitler


benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1326 on: December 18, 2019, 02:48:48 AM »
okay I quite liked this line: https://thecritic.co.uk/issues/december-2019/block-boris/
Quote
Everyone mocked Anna Soubry when she tweeted that Brexit is “the most important decision facing our country since WW3”, but I have no doubt whatsoever that Brexit could lead to a fourth world war. They won’t be laughing then.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1327 on: December 18, 2019, 03:33:19 AM »
Titania McGrath is a Spiked employee's joke alt.

This post brought to you by the Lunch Pail Doxer Gang.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1328 on: December 18, 2019, 04:27:18 AM »
Titania McGrath is a Spiked employee's joke alt.
Why would you go on the internet and tell lies like this, Kara? I really thought better of you.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1329 on: December 18, 2019, 02:19:45 PM »
Titania McGrath is a Spiked employee's joke alt.
Why would you go on the internet and tell lies like this, Kara? I really thought better of you.

It's OK I assume you don't read the "Funded by Koch" Slack channel you're in.

Speaking of, imagine going from being a Trot rag to this.

https://twitter.com/SayeedaWarsi/status/1207024669880135686

Is this Militant 2.0?

 :isthis


curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1331 on: December 19, 2019, 02:13:25 PM »
that account  :-\

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1332 on: December 19, 2019, 03:05:58 PM »
Sam Kriss rose from the grave of canceldom to write about Corbynism and while it's 90% barely readable shit there are a few good nuggets hidden within:

Quote
The failure of Corbynism was a failure on the level of theory. It’s important to contextualise the decline of the Labour party. This wasn’t an isolated incident; the traditional centre-left is dying across Europe and across the world. Social-democratic politics are (mostly) a mass politics, and the last forty years have conspired to shatter all masses. Neoliberalism and deindustrialisation and the assault on the unions have disrupted collective subjects and collective solidarity – but new technologies do the same thing. Marxism was the ideological expression of the printed word, and we’re all illiterates now.

https://samkriss.com/2019/12/19/the-case-for-giving-up/

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1333 on: December 19, 2019, 03:26:47 PM »
It's all masturbatory with him. He was in the pits over the Brexit vote as well.

Pissy F Benny

  • Is down with the sickness
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1334 on: December 19, 2019, 03:56:57 PM »
I'm sure he was wiping his tears away with £50 notes in his dads million quid house  :mynicca
(ice)

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1335 on: December 19, 2019, 04:15:52 PM »
One of my nü Labour mutuals mentioned him out of the blue the other day before the election so I went to his Twitter to see if he was back to posting and it was all Liberal Democrat retweets for the most part.

Then I went to his blog and read his post about antisemitism in the United KKKingdom and had a similar reaction to curly with the Corbyn post.

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1336 on: December 19, 2019, 04:17:06 PM »
That twitter's not him

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1337 on: December 19, 2019, 04:18:08 PM »
 >:( owned

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1338 on: December 19, 2019, 04:23:48 PM »
google gave me this as the closest meme




Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1339 on: December 20, 2019, 02:26:09 AM »
http://www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=46734.msg2751319#msg2751319

CW: the shite thread

benji, my version of this story involves convincing my lovable but clueless friend to run for school president in our senior year.

I wrote a pretty funny speech for him (even after it was censored by the mods school administrators--the speeches had to be preapproved :usacry) that was the product of paying a nontrivial amount of attention during the prior 3 elections (nerd). I also had him deliver the speech in a particular manner to "heighten the comedy" (it didn't and it sucks that I asked him to do that).

He beat a cheerleader and some nerd and became president. The mods administrators passed a rule after the election that required klanidates give their speeches in their normal manner of speaking because of our campaign that I assume is still on the books.

One of my friend's new duties was to give morning announcements on our school's television channel. (Each of the other elected officials also had to do this on different days.) One week we had Wednesday and Friday off but not Thursday. That Thursday was of course going to be senior ditch day. He gave announcements on Monday or Tuesday with a girl in a different year. At the end of their broadcast she said, "Enjoy your 3 day weekend everyone!" and my friend deadass said, "And to you seniors, enjoy your 5 day weekend." She looked absolutely mortified as the feed cut to credits.

He of course got in hot water, became the object of much contempt by the senior class, and only the most foolish seniors didn't show up to school on Thursday.

There's probably a historical metaphor to make here but 99% of historical analogies are bullshit except for the ones that are developed by Friedrich Engels and Matt Karp.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1340 on: December 20, 2019, 10:40:54 PM »
everybody probably already seen this but it's new to me

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1341 on: December 20, 2019, 11:41:14 PM »
everybody probably already seen this but it's new to me




spoiler (click to show/hide)
Quote
Slavs or western spies?

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Quote
Corn in the video so they are clearly revisionists
[close]
[close]
« Last Edit: December 20, 2019, 11:46:02 PM by Great Rumbler »
dog



Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member

Crash Dummy

  • teleiophile
  • Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1345 on: December 25, 2019, 05:26:54 AM »

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1346 on: December 25, 2019, 02:14:41 PM »
article sourced from
https://www.tsln.com/news/stangle-impossible-burgers-are-made-of-what/

Quote
By Dr. James Stangle, DVM
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol


team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1348 on: December 25, 2019, 05:58:02 PM »
;)
*****





Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1353 on: December 27, 2019, 10:06:55 PM »
https://twitter.com/feggnews/status/1210609694835953665

You can't abort a fetus, but you can put a child in a closet and let it starve to death.
dog


shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
每天生气

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1356 on: December 29, 2019, 01:34:29 PM »
Don Hughes should be elevated to Wank Dad status.



shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1359 on: December 30, 2019, 06:53:34 PM »
:dead
每天生气

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1361 on: December 30, 2019, 08:28:23 PM »
 :nsfw
spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1362 on: January 01, 2020, 03:33:21 PM »
spent some time listening to conservative voting relatives veer into discussing how the rich avoid taxes over the holidays  :lol

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1363 on: January 01, 2020, 07:48:36 PM »
conservative relatives feeln dat bern  :pimp
*****

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1364 on: January 01, 2020, 09:55:43 PM »
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2020/01/what-libertarianism-has-become-and-will-become-state-capacity-libertarianism.html
Quote
Having tracked the libertarian “movement” for much of my life, I believe it is now pretty much hollowed out, at least in terms of flow.  One branch split off into Ron Paul-ism and less savory alt right directions, and another, more establishment branch remains out there in force but not really commanding new adherents.  For one thing, it doesn’t seem that old-style libertarianism can solve or even very well address a number of major problems, most significantly climate change.  For another, smart people are on the internet, and the internet seems to encourage synthetic and eclectic views, at least among the smart and curious.  Unlike the mass culture of the 1970s, it does not tend to breed “capital L Libertarianism.”  On top of all that, the out-migration from narrowly libertarian views has been severe, most of all from educated women.

There is also the word “classical liberal,” but what is “classical” supposed to mean that is not question-begging?  The classical liberalism of its time focused on 19th century problems — appropriate for the 19th century of course — but from WWII onwards it has been a very different ballgame.

Along the way, I believe the smart classical liberals and libertarians have, as if guided by an invisible hand, evolved into a view that I dub with the entirely non-sticky name of State Capacity Libertarianism.  I define State Capacity Libertarianism in terms of a number of propositions:

1. Markets and capitalism are very powerful, give them their due.

2. Earlier in history, a strong state was necessary to back the formation of capitalism and also to protect individual rights (do read Koyama and Johnson on state capacity).  Strong states remain necessary to maintain and extend capitalism and markets.  This includes keeping China at bay abroad and keeping elections free from foreign interference, as well as developing effective laws and regulations for intangible capital, intellectual property, and the new world of the internet.  (If you’ve read my other works, you will know this is not a call for massive regulation of Big Tech.)

3. A strong state is distinct from a very large or tyrannical state.  A good strong state should see the maintenance and extension of capitalism as one of its primary duties, in many cases its #1 duty.

4. Rapid increases in state capacity can be very dangerous (earlier Japan, Germany), but high levels of state capacity are not inherently tyrannical.  Denmark should in fact have a smaller government, but it is still one of the freer and more secure places in the world, at least for Danish citizens albeit not for everybody.

5. Many of the failures of today’s America are failures of excess regulation, but many others are failures of state capacity.  Our governments cannot address climate change, much improve K-12 education, fix traffic congestion, or improve the quality of their discretionary spending.  Much of our physical infrastructure is stagnant or declining in quality.  I favor much more immigration, nonetheless I think our government needs clear standards for who cannot get in, who will be forced to leave, and a workable court system to back all that up and today we do not have that either.

Those problems require state capacity — albeit to boost markets — in a way that classical libertarianism is poorly suited to deal with.  Furthermore, libertarianism is parasitic upon State Capacity Libertarianism to some degree.  For instance, even if you favor education privatization, in the shorter run we still need to make the current system much better.  That would even make privatization easier, if that is your goal.

6. I will cite again the philosophical framework of my book Stubborn Attachments: A Vision for a Society of Free, Prosperous, and Responsible Individuals.

7. The fundamental growth experience of recent decades has been the rise of capitalism, markets, and high living standards in East Asia, and State Capacity Libertarianism has no problem or embarrassment in endorsing those developments.  It remains the case that such progress (or better) could have been made with more markets and less government.  Still, state capacity had to grow in those countries and indeed it did.  Public health improvements are another major success story of our time, and those have relied heavily on state capacity — let’s just admit it.

8. The major problem areas of our time have been Africa and South Asia.  They are both lacking in markets and also in state capacity.

9. State Capacity Libertarians are more likely to have positive views of infrastructure, science subsidies, nuclear power (requires state support!), and space programs than are mainstream libertarians or modern Democrats.  Modern Democrats often claim to favor those items, and sincerely in my view, but de facto they are very willing to sacrifice them for redistribution, egalitarian and fairness concerns, mood affiliation, and serving traditional Democratic interest groups.  For instance, modern Democrats have run New York for some time now, and they’ve done a terrible job building and fixing things.  Nor are Democrats doing much to boost nuclear power as a partial solution to climate change, if anything the contrary.

10. State Capacity Libertarianism has no problem endorsing higher quality government and governance, whereas traditional libertarianism is more likely to embrace or at least be wishy-washy toward small, corrupt regimes, due to some of the residual liberties they leave behind.

11. State Capacity Libertarianism is not non-interventionist in foreign policy, as it believes in strong alliances with other relatively free nations, when feasible.  That said, the usual libertarian “problems of intervention because government makes a lot of mistakes” bar still should be applied to specific military actions.  But the alliances can be hugely beneficial, as illustrated by much of 20th century foreign policy and today much of Asia — which still relies on Pax Americana.

It is interesting to contrast State Capacity Libertarianism to liberaltarianism, another offshoot of libertarianism.  On most substantive issues, the liberaltarians might be very close to State Capacity Libertarians.  But emphasis and focus really matter, and I would offer this (partial) list of differences:

a. The liberaltarian starts by assuring “the left” that they favor lots of government transfer programs.  The State Capacity Libertarian recognizes that demands of mercy are never ending, that economic growth can benefit people more than transfers, and, within the governmental sphere, it is willing to emphasize an analytical, “cold-hearted” comparison between government discretionary spending and transfer spending.  Discretionary spending might well win out at many margins.

b. The “polarizing Left” is explicitly opposed to a lot of capitalism, and de facto standing in opposition to state capacity, due to the polarization, which tends to thwart problem-solving.  The polarizing Left is thus a bigger villain for State Capacity Libertarianism than it is for liberaltarianism.  For the liberaltarians, temporary alliances with the polarizing Left are possible because both oppose Trump and other bad elements of the right wing.  It is easy — maybe too easy — to market liberaltarianism to the Left as a critique and revision of libertarians and conservatives.

c. Liberaltarian Will Wilkinson made the mistake of expressing enthusiasm for Elizabeth Warren.  It is hard to imagine a State Capacity Libertarian making this same mistake, since so much of Warren’s energy is directed toward tearing down American business.  Ban fracking? Really?  Send money to Russia, Saudi Arabia, lose American jobs, and make climate change worse, all at the same time?  Nope.

d. State Capacity Libertarianism is more likely to make a mistake of say endorsing high-speed rail from LA to Sf (if indeed that is a mistake), and decrying the ability of U.S. governments to get such a thing done.  “Which mistakes they are most likely to commit” is an underrated way of assessing political philosophies.

You will note the influence of Peter Thiel on State Capacity Libertarianism, though I have never heard him frame the issues in this way.

Furthermore, “which ideas survive well in internet debate” has been an important filter on the evolution of the doctrine.  That point is under-discussed, for all sorts of issues, and it may get a blog post of its own.
F

 :paul

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Quote
Daniel Klein
January 1, 2020 at 5:44 am
Here, on January 1, 2020, you diss "classical liberalism" as a "question-begging" expression, ill-suited to modern times.

Yesterday, December 31, 2019, in your Modi post, you identified, without qualification, as classical liberal.

Pedagogical esotericism? Does Homer nod? Other?



God of Thunder
January 1, 2020 at 11:25 am
What a difference a year makes!
[close]

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1365 on: January 01, 2020, 09:58:07 PM »
For one thing, it doesn’t seem that old-style libertarianism can solve or even very well address a number of major problems, most significantly climate change.

this is true

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1366 on: January 01, 2020, 10:10:22 PM »
why solve a problem when you can profit handsomely from said problem


shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1367 on: January 02, 2020, 01:01:22 AM »
Same way I don't think of you as a Soviet composer anymore. Well I might by the time this forum is over  :doge


:salute
每天生气

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1368 on: January 02, 2020, 10:02:38 PM »
your kind is a blight, benji
https://twitter.com/YALiberty

if I had the misfortune of seeing this, you will too


lmao
« Last Edit: January 03, 2020, 06:48:16 PM by OnlyRegret »

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1369 on: January 02, 2020, 10:05:00 PM »
rand paul
ron paul
my gunzzz
b-but the founding principles
"welfare is killing the american dream"

 :stahp

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1370 on: January 03, 2020, 01:22:37 AM »
We're still maybe a decade or two out from this being true, but if Chavismo can withstand this much AmeriKKKan aggression and persist it will probably become as (comparatively) unimpeachable as Castroism on the left.
Quote
Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro Thursday announced that the Venezuelan Great Housing Mission (GMVV) achieved its 2019 goal by completing the delivery of 3 million dwellings to the Bolivarian people as planned.

“Despite the Imperialist economic, trade and financial blockade, which robbed us of so many resources in 2019, the construction industry did not stop,” Maduro said at an event in the state of La Guaira where he handed over the keys of the dwelling number 3 million to a local family.

The housing program, which seeks to deliver at least 500,000 new dwellings in 2020, has a new goal to achieve: to deliver 5 million dwellings by 2025.
didn't even have to wait a decade
每天生气



Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1373 on: January 03, 2020, 08:25:19 PM »
Weird to read a post of mine written 5 days before my life drastically changed.

Anyway, reposting this dank meme from the Unofficial LF Bore Biden 2020 PAC Slack.


benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1374 on: January 03, 2020, 08:34:49 PM »
https://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/ejhb55/just_a_quick_shoutout_to_all_the_libertarians/
Quote
Quote
Let's get real: Who voted for Gary Johnson? I did, but the like-minded "libertarian" people I've talked to almost all voted for Trump. WTF?
Allow me to explain...first off, Gary Johnson is exactly the kind of candidate that makes everyone thing the LP is a joke. He never seemed to be prepared for appearances. When you add in the possibility of Hillary Clinton -- who was more of a danger to liberty than any of the other candidates -- winning office, a lot of people would've have voted for the devil himself because any alternative was better than Clinton.
:hmm

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1375 on: January 03, 2020, 08:37:13 PM »
The guys who subscribe to Lew Rockwell's newsletter definitely voted for Trump as part of some noble rearguard action. :american


Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1378 on: January 04, 2020, 03:14:43 PM »
https://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/bookstore/vgames/index.html

READ DO NOT PLAY SETTLERS.

Quote
In MIM's political economy, settlers play an important role, especially in the question of nationalism. The reason that settlers have been important in the united $tates, I$rael, Au$tralia etc. as well as within the exploited nations is not handled here. With all the wrong political messages, "Settlers" the game should be skipped.
ὕβρις

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Laissez-faire Politics Thread - Praxis? I didn't play Deus Ex, sorry.
« Reply #1379 on: January 06, 2020, 01:48:02 AM »
FINALLY they're sending troops to The Hague. :preach

https://twitter.com/LockheedMartin/status/1213551929378443267