man was the WSJ always like this or have they just gone coco for coocoo puffs since murdoch happened?
They've always had conservative columnists, but its only been lately they've had brazenly stupid conservative columnists.
Because, you know, there certainly won't be an unemployment benefits rush this year. And really, everyone knows that food stamp enrollment and medicaid serve no purpose in what looks to be a giant recession, right? Right?
So the WSJ is pissed off that the bill is preparing for inevitable things? Republicans would rather have unemployment flopza first and then have the government move incredibly slowly for a month to fix it, maybe?
I'm convinced that there's a core Republican belief that its okay to let people starve to death as long as they're poor.
Also starve may be substituted for...
-freeze from living in the street
-get blown up by IED's
-drown in natural disasters
-suffer mortal infections from back-alley-abortions
-get shot by automatic weapons
-get food poisoning from deregulated and poorly inspected food
-killed by Dick Cheney for sport
-die due to negligence on part of shitty health care system
there's more but I'm running late for class.