Author Topic: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread  (Read 6013683 times)

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2100 on: April 25, 2011, 07:37:37 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=428389

that's a nice idea for a thread but on gaf it becomes "tell me what's your favourite game by finding sarcastic faults in it"

heck i mean i love FFX and it's not like the game has a moronic "match the enemy to the character" battle system


He complains that Morrowind was a huge world filled with nothing. LOL. Go play some Daggerfall, nub.  :lol
dog

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2101 on: April 25, 2011, 09:26:32 PM »
More Mercury Fred insufferability

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=27394722&postcount=4926

A series isn't capturing his interest but if there's dude on dude action then hes so in
:9

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2102 on: April 25, 2011, 09:30:33 PM »
good lord, he just needs to become a gay porn star to stuff his mouth full of cock.  it would shut him the fuck up
püp

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2103 on: April 25, 2011, 09:46:28 PM »
:lol

Maybe one should fight fire with fire...

Promises, promises doo doo do do do

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=27395463&postcount=4941
:9

lennedsay

  • Senior MILF
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2104 on: April 25, 2011, 10:13:27 PM »
He's masturbating furiously and DVRing it as we speak.
(|)

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2105 on: April 25, 2011, 10:24:58 PM »
:lol

Maybe one should fight fire with fire...

Promises, promises doo doo do do do

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=27395463&postcount=4941

BlueTsunami
there is joy in sucking dick
(Today, 08:41 PM)
Reply | Quote
©@©™

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2106 on: April 25, 2011, 10:29:46 PM »
So meaty :(
:9

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2107 on: April 25, 2011, 10:32:26 PM »
Someone give me the rundown on this Fred Mercury dude.
Unzip

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2108 on: April 25, 2011, 10:34:13 PM »
Obnoxiously gay, very confrontational, doesn't argue a point but yells via text, apparently can only enjoy media that features openly gay couples
:9

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2109 on: April 26, 2011, 01:29:23 AM »
Wow, yet another insufferable member mirepresenting Gays at GAF. I guess when you lump gay issues on top of the problems your regular thinly-skinned OT campers suffer from, you'll end up with quality posters like him, Gaborn and Krypt0nian.

At times like these, even joke characters like Greatness Gone are sorely missed.
Unzip

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Unzip

magus

  • LIKES FF7
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2111 on: April 26, 2011, 07:10:58 AM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=428486

:drudge
    Weeabo alert

i'm pretty sure i played this game called tales of vesperia that had cellshading so kickass that i think it actualy looked better than certain anime but okay......
<----

pilonv1

  • I love you just the way I am
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2112 on: April 26, 2011, 08:13:36 AM »
Eternal Sonata

oh wait you meant a good game? :teehee



itm

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2113 on: April 26, 2011, 04:37:28 PM »
Someone give me the rundown on this Fred Mercury dude.

A thin skinned bully prone to histrionics who would have been long since banned if he didn't admit to liking cock.
🍆🍆

Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2114 on: April 26, 2011, 09:56:33 PM »
That creepy Pony thread got locked. :rock
野球

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2115 on: April 26, 2011, 09:59:33 PM »
Are you serious?! best belated birthday gift ever!
Unzip

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2116 on: April 26, 2011, 10:03:34 PM »
Aaaaand it's open again :-\

Evilore should treat it as the Rock Band thread, since it's treading the same path of "way off topic; turning into a sub-forum."
Unzip

Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2117 on: April 26, 2011, 10:07:04 PM »
Someone should say that, unless it's a bannable comment.
野球

Arbys Roast Beef Sandwich

  • •••
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2118 on: April 26, 2011, 11:52:42 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=428571

libertatians spreading FUD: shocker
うぐう

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2119 on: April 27, 2011, 12:47:36 AM »
Well he got roasted pretty hard, so no harm no foul?
Unzip

pilonv1

  • I love you just the way I am
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2120 on: April 27, 2011, 05:43:02 AM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=428571

Sounds like a conversation over dinner with demi

...

not that I'd know

...

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:hump
[close]
itm

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2121 on: April 27, 2011, 04:45:27 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=428593

"professional game journalists"  :teehee

Oh GAF, you silly-willies.
©@©™

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2122 on: April 27, 2011, 06:14:26 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=428593

"professional game journalists"  :teehee

Oh GAF, you silly-willies.

Remember that :tophat game journalist symposium a couple of years ago?  Boy that turned out to be a raging success!
🍆🍆

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2123 on: April 27, 2011, 06:17:03 PM »
APF can be an annoying ahole sometimes but he essentially ends the thread here imo

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=27444334&postcount=181

Game "journalism" is shit because the people who cover it aren't well trained or very knowledgable when it comes to actual journalism for the most part. So just take it for what it is.

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2124 on: April 27, 2011, 06:24:38 PM »
No serious journalist would shackle himself/herself into games journalism.  Anyone with a modicum of talent would move onto better and more prestigious things if they were at least semi-serious about journalism.  I've always interpreted games journalists as fanboys writing for other fanboys or people writing as a side hobby.  Which is fine to me.
🍆🍆

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2125 on: April 27, 2011, 06:33:19 PM »
Everytime I hear about gaming "journalism" I remember IGN getting to see 300 early at a private showing, and giving it a 5/5 afterward. Obviously that was a film review instead of gaming, but the point remains: these are nerds whose reviews are influenced by how many private parties they're invited to, and how fast they get to see cool stuff.
010

Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2126 on: April 27, 2011, 06:46:05 PM »
Everytime I hear about gaming "journalism" I remember IGN getting to see 300 early at a private showing, and giving it a 5/5 afterward. Obviously that was a film review instead of gaming, but the point remains: these are nerds whose reviews are influenced by how many private parties they're invited to, and how fast they get to see cool stuff.

See: Harry Knowles.
野球

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2127 on: April 27, 2011, 06:47:48 PM »
I don't even think the issue with stuff like that is journalists getting bribed per se. I think the real issue is that they tend to have a very narrow range of interests so they are already predisposed to love the stuff they are covering anyway. They don't have to be bribed. They already are in the bag due to their lifestyle and interests.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2128 on: April 27, 2011, 07:07:34 PM »
I don't think it's about bribes as much as the prestige and privilege they receive from this treatment. Give them a front row seat and something that doesn't offend their child nostalgia and you're going to get what you paid for: a glowing review from a nerd gatekeeper.

They have narrow interests and are incapable of giving impartial reviews because everything is driven by an inner nostalgia. They may attempt to pretend otherwise (e.g: Morgan Webb badmouthing Mario Galaxy) but when you peel the flashy, socially acceptable dudebro shit away you just discover a nerd.
010

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2129 on: April 27, 2011, 07:07:48 PM »
^ And on that note, there is no reason to improve the quality if their audience doesn't require any standard but to be narrow obsessed fans like the audience themselves are.

So as silly as it sounds to talk about pro game journalism, you gotta talk about it if you want more than PR regurgitation.

And if you complain about game companies ignoring you as a consumer, you want your respective press to not be PR regurgitation.

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2130 on: April 28, 2011, 02:10:57 AM »
One poster seemed actually extremely distraught that a Class Action suite was being placed against Sony
:9

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2131 on: April 28, 2011, 09:14:24 AM »
The hacked-PSN thread is really dreadful, now I'm not gonna parrot the same thing over and over, but I'm more convinced that there is absolutely no fumble that can deter them from washing Sony's balls. I pray to Lucifer that most of them are on the payroll.
Unzip

The Sceneman

  • Did my wife send you?
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2132 on: April 28, 2011, 09:30:05 AM »
I just called out the bullshit in that thread. I wonder what the fuckers are going to say
#1

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2133 on: April 28, 2011, 09:43:49 AM »
Don't get me wrong, I don't think the people going bat-shit insane, grabbing their pitchforks and torches and calling for Sony's head, while making genocidal analogies, are any better. But my problem is that these ballwashers don't believe that Sony should be held accountable for anything, because, well, "things gets hacked", it was "only inevitable", and "Sony being targeted first is a matter of luck."

Okaaaay.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2011, 09:50:57 AM by Shah Rukh Khan »
Unzip

Chinner

  • Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2134 on: April 28, 2011, 10:35:42 AM »
apparnatly evillore can read our pms on gaf, is this true?

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2135 on: April 28, 2011, 01:50:57 PM »
apparnatly evillore can read our pms on gaf, is this true?

I can read all your PMs here. Does that help?
fat

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2136 on: April 28, 2011, 02:28:10 PM »
I approve of the new guidelines for posting "etiquette" that was posted today, especially the ones regarding OTs and garbage threads: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=428779

That's the second time in the last 4 weeks that they update/post, it will probably (most definitely) get ignored by everyone including posters and mods, but it's nice to see some semblance of transparency and acknowledgement of what was recently considered unspoken and hidden rules/TOS.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2011, 02:30:48 PM by Shah Rukh Khan »
Unzip

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2137 on: April 28, 2011, 02:39:29 PM »
The site is shitty because of poor moderation, often bizzare nonsensical censorship, and the inconsistent enforcement of the rules. None of that will change despite how many sticky threads they toss up.

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2138 on: April 28, 2011, 03:01:54 PM »
I still have faith in Stump, all of these updates sound very much like what he would suggest.

But yeah: Nobody in their right mind would think that mere guidelines would push the site to take a 180 in quality (no, that will need a major site restructure, and evilore's retirement) but it can make it more tolerable. They have been pushing some of those rules aggressively (and consistently) recently, I can at least vouch for stump, charlequin and Kev.
Unzip

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2139 on: April 28, 2011, 03:05:17 PM »
Perhaps I'm jaded but I still occasionally check out threads over there and I see the same shit I've always seen. I don't know. When Evilore is the owner of the site and mods like Amirox are there the individual actions of a few good mods are never enough to reverse the culture there. They've always had a few good mods. But if the big boss is still a hypocritical dickhead that gets reflected on the entire site. I still see the dumbest portions of the community or the most fanboyish driving conversation and direction of threads.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2011, 03:13:15 PM by Stoney Mason »

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2140 on: April 28, 2011, 05:39:29 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=27467283&postcount=106

I've never seen a photo of REIROM before, I finally get the Diunx reference :lol
Unzip

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2141 on: April 28, 2011, 05:47:33 PM »
The obsession with OT and spoilers is a sign of whats wrong.

An internet community is like a bar. Be it a forum or a chatroom. A bar can self regulate and a good bar normally self regulates. Gaf is like an old bar that had long standing traditions and members, then suddenly a change in management started changing traditions and discouraging or kicking out long time patrons. Some of this was probably warranted and needed, but then the management put up a LIVE NUDE GIRLS neon sign outside the bar, because it needed patrons to replace the people that are no longer there, and the bar and its identity went to shit.

Of course, when you put up a sign like that, you're going to get some uncouth cretinous masses of the man brotherhood. The new patrons come in, hoot and holler, and get shitfaced, and start retelling the same joke and doing all sorts of nonsense that is irking the workers and whoever is left from before. So management ought to turn off the LIVE NUDE GIRLS sign. Instead, they let the idiots come in and then inform them that its illegal to hoot and holler, and not to pass along jokes, and generally telling the new cretinous patrons to not do the only things they know how to do. So it gets awkward.

And that's GAF, with their change in moderation practice acting like that LIVE NUDE GIRLS sign, but they don't want to stop this self-important news source image of themselves because it brings in people, even if its sycophants and idiots. They just tell them they can't use memes, and how to spoiler, and try to reeducate shitty posters from posting the only way they know how.

If you stop attracting PR spewing sycophants then you don't have to write a law book on OT threads.
If you stop attracting over-reactive hyperbolic children you don't need to have an intricate spoiler policy.
But when your mods act like PR spewing twats and hyperbolic children, you attract their minions.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2011, 05:50:26 PM by etiolate »

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2142 on: April 28, 2011, 06:00:58 PM »
You got a problem with live nude girls?
©@©™

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2143 on: April 28, 2011, 06:06:35 PM »
The obsession with OT and spoilers is a sign of whats wrong.

An internet community is like a bar. Be it a forum or a chatroom. A bar can self regulate and a good bar normally self regulates. Gaf is like an old bar that had long standing traditions and members, then suddenly a change in management started changing traditions and discouraging or kicking out long time patrons. Some of this was probably warranted and needed, but then the management put up a LIVE NUDE GIRLS neon sign outside the bar, because it needed patrons to replace the people that are no longer there, and the bar and its identity went to shit.

Of course, when you put up a sign like that, you're going to get some uncouth cretinous masses of the man brotherhood. The new patrons come in, hoot and holler, and get shitfaced, and start retelling the same joke and doing all sorts of nonsense that is irking the workers and whoever is left from before. So management ought to turn off the LIVE NUDE GIRLS sign. Instead, they let the idiots come in and then inform them that its illegal to hoot and holler, and not to pass along jokes, and generally telling the new cretinous patrons to not do the only things they know how to do. So it gets awkward.

And that's GAF, with their change in moderation practice acting like that LIVE NUDE GIRLS sign, but they don't want to stop this self-important news source image of themselves because it brings in people, even if its sycophants and idiots. They just tell them they can't use memes, and how to spoiler, and try to reeducate shitty posters from posting the only way they know how.

If you stop attracting PR spewing sycophants then you don't have to write a law book on OT threads.
If you stop attracting over-reactive hyperbolic children you don't need to have an intricate spoiler policy.
But when your mods act like PR spewing twats and hyperbolic children, you attract their minions.

I get what you're trying to say, and I agree for the most part. But that bar analogy? it started out fine then you really lost me halfway through lol.

You got a problem with live nude girls?

Sounds like it. Someone needs to break this news to CG.

Unless...
Unzip

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2144 on: April 28, 2011, 06:11:44 PM »
The GAF moderation quality has improved by leaps and bounds.  With Dragona, sp0rsk, and Vennt demodded, there was a considerable improvement in the amount of irrational bans and thread locks.  Most of that etiquette will be tramped by the eternally asshurt PC-gaf (politically correct, not personal computer) who think that their holier than thou trigger finger outrage is worth shitcanning the rules for.  It's a nice dream but people will push the limits of it and if they're on the protected list, they won't get banned.

Nice thought though.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=27467283&postcount=106

I've never seen a photo of REIROM before, I finally get the Diunx reference :lol

:bow midas netal :bow2
🍆🍆

Boogie

  • The Smooth Canadian
  • Icon
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2145 on: April 28, 2011, 06:29:25 PM »
I still have faith in Stump, all of these updates sound very much like what he would suggest.

But yeah: Nobody in their right mind would think that mere guidelines would push the site to take a 180 in quality (no, that will need a major site restructure, and evilore's retirement) but it can make it more tolerable. They have been pushing some of those rules aggressively (and consistently) recently, I can at least vouch for stump, charlequin and Kev.

"Search before posting."

lol

edit:  Vennt's been de-modded?  Thank Christ.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2011, 06:31:28 PM by Boogie »
MMA

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2146 on: April 28, 2011, 06:40:45 PM »
The real kicker is that if you go to google.com and search using "site:neogaf.com" you'd still get better results than what GAF's google custom search yields lol.
Unzip

pilonv1

  • I love you just the way I am
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2147 on: April 28, 2011, 07:50:20 PM »
the inconsistent enforcement of the rules. None of that will change despite how many sticky threads they toss up.

100% truth
itm

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2148 on: April 28, 2011, 08:15:24 PM »
The site is shitty because of poor moderation, often bizzare nonsensical censorship, and the inconsistent enforcement of the rules. None of that will change despite how many sticky threads they toss up.
I honestly don't notice as much because I rarely read after the first page of Gaming topics.  GAF is really too big for discussion, which is why the splinter groups, which Evilore is not too keen on fostering, are so important.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2149 on: April 28, 2011, 11:30:28 PM »
You got a problem with live nude girls?

No, just their fans.

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2150 on: April 29, 2011, 02:03:38 AM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=27467283&postcount=106

I've never seen a photo of REIROM before, I finally get the Diunx reference :lol

That guy looks nothing like me! demi is not only a cripple but is fucking blind as well.
Drunk

Shaka Khan

  • Leather Jihadist
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2151 on: April 29, 2011, 02:29:38 AM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=27467283&postcount=106

I've never seen a photo of REIROM before, I finally get the Diunx reference :lol

That guy looks nothing like me!

I beg to differ:

Unzip

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
010

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2153 on: April 29, 2011, 09:20:25 AM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=27485925&postcount=59

UGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

No, minorities need pride because we grow up drawing white superheroes, thinking that there are virtually zero non-white role models in existence (that are alive that is). Piecing together an identity is important, especially at an early age, and having pride and love for one's heritage more so.

Jesus Christ on a stick what an ass clown

« Last Edit: April 29, 2011, 09:30:41 AM by Stringer Bell »
IYKYK

Herr Mafflard

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2154 on: April 29, 2011, 11:18:19 AM »
didn't read any of that thread apart from the post you linked, but with a dumbass thread title like that,  is it any wonder that you get dumbass responses like that...

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2155 on: April 29, 2011, 11:19:44 AM »
haha racism

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2156 on: April 29, 2011, 03:22:00 PM »
obo

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2157 on: April 29, 2011, 03:33:57 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=428875

Sony could do no wrong.  What a surprise.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2011, 05:37:06 PM by Rman »

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2158 on: April 29, 2011, 04:04:39 PM »
can't we just blame the people that post on gaf?

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH BITCH about GAF thread
« Reply #2159 on: April 29, 2011, 04:49:13 PM »
my favorite superhero was blue =x