I keep trying to convince her to start doing Hentai and Furry commissions to make some dough, but she refuses.
0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: FStop7 on April 26, 2017, 10:52:06 AMIt's because Ivanka looked at Trudeau the way Donald wishes she'd look at him.
It's because Ivanka looked at Trudeau the way Donald wishes she'd look at him.
https://twitter.com/peatreebojangle/status/857236653395587073Well!
Happily for Canada, the cancellation of NAFTA would resurrect the pre-existing free-trade agreement (FTA) between Canada and the United States. Yes, in this case, Mr. Trump is correct: The Americans were outnegotiated. Our side was clever enough to foresee that NAFTA, with Mexico added into the mix, might be problematic and ultimately fail. By an exchange of notes between Canada and the United States at the time NAFTA was negotiated, it was formally agreed that in the event of NAFTA's demise, the FTA would revive. Mr. Trump's target is Mexico and his need for leverage to force Mexico to pay for that damn wall. He can accomplish that by abrogating NAFTA and leaving Canada-U.S. trade relations intact.Don't breathe a sigh of relief just yet, though. The FTA had many detractors in the United States, and Canada could indeed come into focus. Some Americans argued that the FTA facilitated the movement of manufacturing jobs to Canada. Funny, this is the same argument that Canadian critics of NAFTA have been making, but in reverse. Liberalized trade may not be a zero-sum game after all. It is just possible that technological change, tax incentives, currency fluctuation and, yes, health-care costs, have everything to do with jobs shifting one way or the other.
Yeah but he did kidnap kids
Quote from: Steve Contra on April 26, 2017, 09:50:47 PMYeah but he did kidnap kids But heaps of things were happening in 1994! NAFTA was signed.
In a White House interview, Trump brushed aside the idea after Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen told Reuters on Thursday she would not rule out talking directly again to the U.S. president, an act certain to incense China. The status of self-ruled Taiwan is possibly the most sensitive issue between Washington and Beijing.“Look, my problem is I have established a very good personal relationship with President Xi. I really feel that he is doing everything in his power to help us with a big situation,” Trump told Reuters, referring to signs that China may be working to head off any new missile or nuclear test by Pyongyang, Beijing’s neighbor and ally.“So I wouldn’t want to be causing difficulty right now for him,” Trump added. “I think he’s doing an amazing job as a leader and I wouldn’t want to do anything that comes in the way of that. So I would certainly want to speak to him first.”
This is the sum total of what Trump has done so far: signed a few executive orders [the most meaningful of which got blocked almost immediately by the judiciary], released a laughably short tax "plan", picked a Supreme Court justice out of a hat, failed spectacularly on healthcare reform, immediately retreated on NAFTA, immediately collapsed on getting tough with China, caved on funding a border wall, and many rounds of golf. That's it.
Trump, asked if he considered North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to be rational..."He's 27 years old. His father dies, took over a regime. So say what you want but that is not easy, especially at that age."I'm not giving him credit or not giving him credit, I'm just saying that's a very hard thing to do. As to whether or not he's rational, I have no opinion on it. I hope he's rational," he said.
You know who else was willing to confront the great anxiety of his people?
Essentially Don's a fucking distinguished mentally-challenged fellow who has no idea what he's saying or doing about anything.
I don't get it.
Drumpf was making the rounds recently saying that coverage for pre-existing conditions would be preserved in the repeal bill, which is hilarious because that would definitely kill the bill. Again.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/05/08/how-trump-could-get-fired?currentPage=allso you're saying there's a chance
Media is Trump’s “drug of choice,” Sam Nunberg, an adviser on his campaign, told me recently. “He doesn’t drink. He doesn’t do drugs. His drug is himself.”
Quote from: benjipwns on May 01, 2017, 09:36:12 AMhttp://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/05/08/how-trump-could-get-fired?currentPage=allso you're saying there's a chanceHearing some rumblings on Twitter about some BIG info that is going to drop this week. He'll be out before the first Republican debate, second Republican debate, the third Republican debate, the fourth Republican debate , the end of 2015, Super Tuesday, the Republican Convention, The Debates, the Election, Inauguration, the First 100 days Memorial Day for sure.
A sizable chunk of Obama-Trump voters — 30 percent — said their vote for Trump was more a vote against Clinton than a vote for Trump. Remember, these voters backed Obama four years earlier.42 percent of Obama-Trump voters said congressional Democrats’ economic policies will favor the wealthy, vs. only 21 percent of them who said the same about Trump.
Skepticism about the Democratic Party was echoed rather forcefully in the focus groups that I watched. In one, Obama-Trump voters were asked what Democrats stand for today and gave answers such as these:“The one percent.”“The status quo.”“They’re for the party. Themselves and the party.”One woman, asked whether the Democratic Party is for people like her, flatly declared: “Nope.”
But new information shows that Clinton had a much bigger problem with voters who had supported President Barack Obama in 2012 but backed Trump four years later.Those Obama-Trump voters, in fact, effectively accounted for more than two-thirds of the reason Clinton lost, according to Matt Canter, a senior vice president of the Democratic political firm Global Strategy Group. ...“We have to make sure we learn the right lesson from 2016, that we don’t just draw the lesson that makes us feel good at night, make us sleep well at night,” Canter said.His firm’s conclusion is shared broadly by other Democrats who have examined the data, including senior members of Clinton’s campaign and officials at the Democratic data and analytics firm Catalist. (The New York Times, doing its own analysis, reached a similar conclusion.)
Democrats are quick to acknowledge that even if voters switching allegiance had been Clinton’s biggest problem, in such a close election she still could have defeated Trump with better turnout. She could have won, for instance, if African-American turnout in Michigan and Florida matched 2012 levels.
Belief that turnout was the main reason Clinton lost, however, remains a prominent theory among Democrats.“There’s an active conversation within the party about whether persuasion was the problem or turnout,” said Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, vice president for social policy and politics at Third Way, a center-left Democratic think tank.That debate is complicated, she added, because some Democrats think winning over voters is already a lost cause.“There’s still a real concern that persuasion is harder and costs more than mobilization, so let’s just triple down on getting out the people who already agree with us,” she said. “And I think there’s a lot of worry that we don’t actually know how to persuade anymore, and so maybe we should just go talk to the people we agree with.”
MANCHESTER, N.H. — A vast array of Democratic leaders, divided by generations but uniformly emboldened by President Trump’s perceived vulnerability, have begun taking palpable steps toward seeking the White House in an election that is still three and a half years away.
People don't realize, you know, magnets, if you think about it, why?
Trump is not getting impeached, the fact that he was elected in the first place seem to signify that.
