"Actually the meeting was only about adoption policy"
"There was no collusion"
"Who would turn down the opportunity to get info on an opponent during an election? The point is to win!"
"There was no collusion, and collusion isn't a crime"
"I think my son might have accidentally broken the law"
That article seems to be printing bullshit straight from the horse's mouth (WH sources). In one paragraph it notes Trump believes collusion isn't a crime based on his lawyer's arguments, and in the very next paragraph he's concerned his son may have broken the law by meeting Russians? If collusion isn't a crime, Jr didn't break the law and has nothing to worry about.
Sounds more like, you know, Trump is guilty and is realizing more people will be indicted, including his son. He kind of throws him under the bus, too. But of course, Jr is so stupid he called a blocked number before/after the meeting so...I'm pretty sure he called his dad. Do these people think that Mueller can't just get phone records from the NSA? They probably want to talk to Trump under oath because they have the evidence that he lied, but want him to lie during the interview before springing the trap.