i'm building my own console with a 12 core zen 3 and an rtx 3080 called the asschewer 40k because it chews the ass off of soyny greystations and micropenis pissboxes.stay drooling nerds. i've got pussy to wade in.
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
The early 2000s start with a real masterpiece. The greatest series nobody ever watches no matter how hard I pimp it: Manhattan, AZ
Jay Mohr alleged that his estranged wife, Nikki Cox, battles mental health issues and is requesting sole physical custody of their 5-year-old son, Meredith, according to new court documents.In the documents — filed on Friday, March 10, and obtained by People — Mohr requests sole physical custody and joint legal custody with Cox, 38, having “reasonable visitation with Meredith, which shall be professionally monitored.”The Ghost Whisperer actor, who filed for divorce from Cox for the second time in December after nearly 10 years of marriage, also claims that the actress/comedy writer has refused “to attend her mental health issues.”Mohr, who has been living with Cox and their son in the same home since their split, went on to say that he and Meredith have had to move due to the Unhappily Ever After star’s “abuse of drugs, and her failure to respect boundaries. … I had no choice but to obtain alternate housing for me and our son.”The Saturday Night Live alum cited several alleged incidents in which he believes Cox put Meredith in danger. He claims that she left ovens on while she and her son were asleep; she left backdoors open at night for their dogs to walk in and out of; and once gave Meredith too much medicine, causing him to throw up. “Nikki’s mental health issues continue to go untreated. … she continues to demonstrate that she is incapable of caring for Meredith,” he states in the docs.
According to court documents obtained by TMZ, he is alleging the Las Vegas star has a drug problem and it is putting their son at risk.The 46-year-old Ghost Whisper star said in the court documents that Nikki's drug issues are causing their five-year-old son to regress but did not specify how.He did, however, claim that the actress has put son Meredith's safety at risk a number of times.TMZ reports that Nikki allegedly gave the boy 'a double dose of flu medicine that caused the boy to vomit in his sleep'.The star also alleges, TMZ reports, that his estrange wife 'doesn't set boundaries' and their child is allowed to watch television and eat candy till 2am.This is not the first time the comedian has accused his ex of having drug issues.The first time he filed for divorce in July he wanted full custody of their child, as he claimed the Las Vegas actress suffers from depression and that her self-medication has led to a 'serious' drug problem that puts their boy at risk. In his latest filing Jay said, according to TMZ, that his wife has tried to take her life twice.The 38-year-old also told her estranged husband that she was pregnant in January, the website reports, but Jay dismissed the claim as he is azoospermic - which means his semen contains no sperm rendering him infertile.
According to the documents, he claims that Meredith “has been urinating and defecating in his pants” and “routinely yells and screams” at his mother.“Nikki’s poor parenting decisions affect Meredith’s well-being. Her refusal to discipline Meredith has made me the parent who enforces the rules in our house,” the docs read. “When I have checked on Meredith in the middle of the night, I have walked into the master bedroom to see Meredith and Nikki awake at 2:00 a.m, watching cartoons and eating candy.”The actor also alleges that his estranged wife “will often come to the guest bedroom in the middle of the night and attempt to seduce me” and recently told him that she believed she was expecting another child: “In January (2017), Nikki told me that she thought she was pregnant. I am azoospermic so this news meant either a miracle had happened, another man had impregnated Nikki, or she was lying. She assured me it was mine.”He also claims that on “2 separate occasions” during their almost decade-long marriage, she asked him to “drive her to the Universal Hilton so that she could commit suicide. She almost never sleeps. She has isolated herself and no one ever comes to the house to visit her.”“While I acknowledge that I still love Nikki, I also acknowledge that we can no longer be married to each other, and I cannot continue to raise our son in a toxic environment,” the docs read.
one thing I've always wondered is: how did bobcat not ruin his vocal chords?
Quote from: agrajag on November 22, 2017, 03:22:24 AMLook, I used to watch all those shows. I feel a certain amount of nostalgia towards them too. They just don't hold up. Bitch, I watch Blossom ALMOST EVERY DAY.
Look, I used to watch all those shows. I feel a certain amount of nostalgia towards them too. They just don't hold up.
Tbh, Piven deserves to be strung up, beaten and shot for this heinous stunt. The dudes truly a psychopath. No joke, this dude is fucking insane. Even Weinstein didn't have the balls to take some bogus polygraph test.Because like any psychopath he has no shame. They feign these emotions but don't truly have them. This is what has allowed Piven to do such a brazen thing even though he is guilty. Straight up a lunatic.
QuoteAre you going to attempt to defend your statement that "everything you've read" suggests they're 50/50 at best, when the very source your quoted - from leading critics no less - contradicts that?Also, correct, that 90% comes from a potentially biased source which is why I'm happy to meet you on your side of the middle. Literally not one single person in this thread is claiming that a polygraph is completely accurate.I've read the 50/50 stat previously. I'm not a fucking polygraph academic and this is an internet forum, I don't have to defend shit."That 90% stat is likely made up, so I'll meet you half way." lol ok
Are you going to attempt to defend your statement that "everything you've read" suggests they're 50/50 at best, when the very source your quoted - from leading critics no less - contradicts that?Also, correct, that 90% comes from a potentially biased source which is why I'm happy to meet you on your side of the middle. Literally not one single person in this thread is claiming that a polygraph is completely accurate.
lmao at that cherry picking.First of all, throw that 50/50 garbage out because this ain't a false positive scenario.So according to your own source, the leading critics of polygraphs still concede they're at least 65% accurate.But sure "everything I've read suggests they're 50/50 at best".Leading proponents claim up to 90% so let's split the difference, throw a few points back your way and call it about 75%. Hardly meaningless.
Now I know how etiolate always gets away with his alt right lies
If you lie loud enough and have enough people repeat it then who is going to spend the time to fact check during their workday?
Quote from: etiolate on November 21, 2017, 09:42:01 PMJoan Rivers and Rosanne Barr. Not sure who else I genuinely like. Not a stand-up comic, but I think Julia Louis-Dreyfus is one of the funniest people on earth.
Joan Rivers and Rosanne Barr. Not sure who else I genuinely like.
how could I ever forget, the mastapiece of all times
Quote from: TranshumanYou know, that might happen, and it's horrible that that might happen, but at the same time if the university is censoring debate that exists in the real world and it's impossible to extricate that from the backlash some individuals might face, the information still has to be released.The same with the Brett Winstein scandal, releasing the email he sent regardless of the consequences to his life (and there were consequences) had to be weighed against the newsworthiness of the content.Arguing that the recording shouldn't have been released because some people might get backlash is a disingenuous complaint, and I doubt you would care if someone you disagreed with was the focus on the animus.You are falling into the trap set up by the far right thinking that this is a question of freedom of speech and that we somehow have to 'tolerate' and actively invite and encourage the inclusion of far-right opinions and arguments in order to 'defeat them'. Freedom of speech has nothing to do with a university course and how to teach.University courses have curricula. They have hiring practices. They have regulations stating that what topics and areas to teach. All the time teachers and professors decide on what literature and authors to include and exclude when teaching. All the time they decide what to say and how to balance teaching, course requirements, hand-ins, exams, etc. When they choose not to include everything, would you call this censorship as well? Obviously not. We constantly make value judgments on what fits best with the limited time in a course and not having the time to pick up on some far-right academic's views on gender pronouns and his ties to nazis is not a case of censorship - it's just saying that it's not worth the time of day.Freedom of speech is just the societal equivalent to "ethics in games journalism". It's just a smokescreen to entice unaffected and unknowing people to listen to and recognize bigoted arguments as legitimate political positions. It has nothing to do with this specific case of university teaching.
You know, that might happen, and it's horrible that that might happen, but at the same time if the university is censoring debate that exists in the real world and it's impossible to extricate that from the backlash some individuals might face, the information still has to be released.The same with the Brett Winstein scandal, releasing the email he sent regardless of the consequences to his life (and there were consequences) had to be weighed against the newsworthiness of the content.Arguing that the recording shouldn't have been released because some people might get backlash is a disingenuous complaint, and I doubt you would care if someone you disagreed with was the focus on the animus.
Try Kevin Spacey. His House of Cards performance is likely his true persona. Psychopaths are tricky fucks, but I don't think Spacey was acting; he was slightly adjusting his native personality.
Man, it's a shame to see such a force for good torn down to nothing with literally nothing other than the word of two people and a photo where he is making an offensive groping gesture. All anyone will have to do from now on is simply accuse someone on the left of sexual harassment. And poof, the left will eat them.The most important thing is the impact of harassment, deliberate, accidental, malicious, or initernalized, on the people targeted. But that doesn't mean you ignore everything else. I voted for Al Franken. I would gladly vote for Al Franken again if there were an election tomorrow, because I think he is one of the greatest forces for good in this country, and I firmly do believe, or want to believe, in my heart that he would never intentionally physically violate another human being, and would never excuse his behavior if it did. I haven't seen anything to suggest otherwise.I am a man, so no, I don't understand what it's like for women. I can't understand what it's like for women. What I'm most afraid of is that I, and others, have internalized harassing behavior to the point that we do it without thinking about it, and women have internalized it to the point that they will just put on a smile while it happens and speak out about it in retrospect, that no one will ever be called on to reflect on what they're doing as they're doing it, and nothing will change. I'm fucking begging you, out of pessimism for the level of misogyny that is accepted as the norm in our culture, speak up if you feel a hand on your ass. Speak out if you're uncomfortable with a kissing scene and you're in theater. I don't... how can I be expected to disown what I perceive to be one of the greatest forces for good in politics right now, a man who I deeply respect, when there's so little to go off of that damns his character? When dozens of people who worked under him come out and say "This is not consistent who Al Franken is," and when he condemns himself for his own misconduct, calls for introspection and investigations and shining a spotlight on himself and others, and his apology is immediately accepted?This isn't even getting into the muddying of the waters - I'm well aware of the weaponization of this scandal by russian bots on social media. I'm aware of Roger Stone being in the know of these things before they were revealed publicly. It smells dirty to me, but I'm trying to keep that fact isolated from the reality of the pain perceived by those who have been victimized, deliberately, maliciously, unknowingly, or accidentally, by not just Al Franken, but our cultural norms that treat women with less dignity and respect that they deserve, and to take into account the responses and corroborating accounts of those accused and connected to either the accused or the accusers.And I'm sure there is some portion in the above paragraphs that will be quoted, bolded, and ranted against as proof that I am a monster. How can we make progress like this if our own imperfections are weaponized by those who seek to prevent progress? How can we better ourselves if it takes this long for us to be called out by each other? How can any person be expected to interact in any capacity with the public while avoiding contact that could be interpreted as inappropriate? Yes, I've been touched inappropriately. Accidentally, and deliberately. I think we all have, man or woman. But fuck, is that really the end all, be all? Does nothing matter other than whether one person ever felt wronged by another? What's the fucking recourse for any of this when someone just throws out a false accusation, like the NYPost did on behalf of Arianna Huffington, in the case where it's Arianna Huffington herself saying so? This is insane. Even if Al Franken is an ass grabbing misogynist.
I agree with your post. So far, I have believed the various allegations by accusers over the past few months, supported by well sourced reporting.But this Franken situation... I'm sure some aspects of the accusers' stories are true, yet it strongly reeks of people like Stone and Bannon turning the momentum of the "believe women" movement against political opponents. It's truly gross and helps delegitimise the stories of other victims, but it's not above them and it's not above a very very small (!) number of women willing to go along with it.
Quote from: LimeQuote from: TranshumanYou know, that might happen, and it's horrible that that might happen, but at the same time if the university is censoring debate that exists in the real world and it's impossible to extricate that from the backlash some individuals might face, the information still has to be released.The same with the Brett Winstein scandal, releasing the email he sent regardless of the consequences to his life (and there were consequences) had to be weighed against the newsworthiness of the content.Arguing that the recording shouldn't have been released because some people might get backlash is a disingenuous complaint, and I doubt you would care if someone you disagreed with was the focus on the animus.You are falling into the trap set up by the far right thinking that this is a question of freedom of speech and that we somehow have to 'tolerate' and actively invite and encourage the inclusion of far-right opinions and arguments in order to 'defeat them'. Freedom of speech has nothing to do with a university course and how to teach.University courses have curricula. They have hiring practices. They have regulations stating that what topics and areas to teach. All the time teachers and professors decide on what literature and authors to include and exclude when teaching. All the time they decide what to say and how to balance teaching, course requirements, hand-ins, exams, etc. When they choose not to include everything, would you call this censorship as well? Obviously not. We constantly make value judgments on what fits best with the limited time in a course and not having the time to pick up on some far-right academic's views on gender pronouns and his ties to nazis is not a case of censorship - it's just saying that it's not worth the time of day.Freedom of speech is just the societal equivalent to "ethics in games journalism". It's just a smokescreen to entice unaffected and unknowing people to listen to and recognize bigoted arguments as legitimate political positions. It has nothing to do with this specific case of university teaching. Yeah who is this Transhuman poster, and why is he such a piece of shit? Also his username might be bigoted, there's a 50/50 chance.
that's the worst joke you've ever told
the smaller version of the image looks like it says verafled
We’re recruiting new moderators. If you’re a member in good standing and would like to help guide discussions here on NeoGAF, please send a private message to this account.The NeoGAF moderation team had typically operated silently behind the scenes or via shared modbot usage out of necessity in recent years. To address the problems arising from those trends both internally and for the community at large, new moderators will each be equipped with a separate account for moderation duties. That way, mods will be able to safely maintain a visible presence even in the most heated threads, and the community will have far better overall transparency about moderation actions than before. ain’t nobody going to mod a gaming forum anonymously breh gl tho
I’m sure I’m killing any chance by saying this here where ShowerLore watches, but if you pedo/ephebo/himus can even mildly convince me to do so, I will log into my GAF account and try to sell Evilore on modding me, and offer revival suggestions.
Quote from: TVC 15 on November 22, 2017, 05:14:15 AMI’m sure I’m killing any chance by saying this here where ShowerLore watches, but if you pedo/ephebo/himus can even mildly convince me to do so, I will log into my GAF account and try to sell Evilore on modding me, and offer revival suggestions.If you posted leaks of modchat in here I bet Evilore would be even more freaked out than Cerium was and you could personally be responsible for kicking NeoGAF while it's down and ending it forever.
Also I hope the readers of this thread appreciate just how many pages of father-son incest comics I had to trawl through to find a panel that fully encapsulated the nature off the work without being eye-searingly pornographic. It’s a real balancing act.
What’s the best kind?
Novid save usAssimilate post some garbagesomebody complain about social studies warriors
had a big crush on the sister and Goo was such a shit lol
ashep said: ↑Or you know, maybe do because it's an extremely efficient example of how seemingly minor differences in grammar can have a devastating impact.
If you wanna do that then avoid bringing in transphobic viewpointsAnd if you absolutely have to bring in transphobic viewpoints.... probably shouldn't claim to be neutral.And if you're gonna do all this as a TA... maybe get permission.
what does Gears of War have to do with any of this
The user was warned for this post. Please, let's refrain from comparing game publishers to literal diseases. It's in terrible taste.
If you don't care about politics, why do you bother with the news? News is inherently political ?
Quote from: Premium Lager on November 22, 2017, 02:58:45 AMbest comedy show now is New Girlshame it got canned because people suckIt got seven seasons on a broadcast network.On FOX of all networks.
best comedy show now is New Girlshame it got canned because people suck
Quoteashep said: ↑Or you know, maybe do because it's an extremely efficient example of how seemingly minor differences in grammar can have a devastating impact.Quote from: excelsiorlef, post: 1265316, member: 330If you wanna do that then avoid bringing in transphobic viewpointsAnd if you absolutely have to bring in transphobic viewpoints.... probably shouldn't claim to be neutral.And if you're gonna do all this as a TA... maybe get permission.Excelsiorlef is something else. This maniac has to be getting close to being homeless. Who the hell would want to deal with this day to day? Someone like this makes the plight of the trans community almost impossible. I can only imagine what the backlash will be like.