http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2015/08/regarding-trans-and-transgenderism.html?m=1
You'll get a kick out of the second link Benji. It is by one of the most radical trans women in America (plz read Whipping Girl).
The discussion about redefining terms in the comments of that post are interesting, two years hence, as I clicked onto her main page to see the newest content which included Marcuse Revisited:
https://medium.com/@juliaserano/refusing-to-tolerate-intolerance-f24c1bff513fThroughout the piece and the connecting ones she uses the term "free speech absolutist" as a negative, and joins much of the last days of NeoGAF.com in the opinion that such positions "cannot be taken seriously." All while conflating those who confuse "free speech" for "speaking without any reputation or social consequences to ones self" and those who consider "free speech" as "lack of state/legal suppression" in a way that often leaves her walking past criticizing the impossible former, for advocating against the latter and in favor of state suppression of speech/press/assembly/etc.
For example, the middle piece in the series which actually seems more in line with Marcuse's assertion that ideas themselves are forms of violence and should be suppressed by the state like any violence while quoting from a recently "discovered" newly popular segment of Popper's
Open Society let alone merely criticizing "speaking without any self consequences":
The second camp includes those of us who have witnessed the unrelenting rise of white nationalism (or the “alt-right,” as it is sometimes euphemistically called) online over the last several years — their recruitment of hordes of young white men, their campaigns of hate speech and harassment (e.g., Gamergate, attacks on Leslie Jones, and others) designed to intimidate and silence women and minorities. Now, we are watching the architects of that movement being treated as celebrities and playing lead roles in the Trump administration, and we cannot help but feel that there is something far more substantial and grave going on here.
...
more severe suppression may ultimately be necessary to stop it.
If you've entered the realm of ideas being literal acts of violence and as such needing to be suppressed by the Trump Administration then you aren't taking a stand against "free speech absolutists" you're taking a stand against concepts of liberty and democracy that predate the text of the First Amendment by hundreds of years.
It's not a slippery slope argument (which she complains about) to point out
your entire argument is based on the premise that ideas should be illegal. You're ruling out not "absolutism" but the very possibility of the free exchange of ideas.
Another thing we can thank Jack Kirby for. The New Gods are living ideas who create weapons out of the power of ideas. Warner Bros and DC have been planning all this for years to setup Snyder's glorious Darkseid debut. Bless up.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
How's that Momo? A better starting point than Novid's pitch?