Author Topic: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible  (Read 5278964 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4500 on: March 21, 2019, 09:55:20 PM »
It doesn’t really matter. Do you think Disney makes as much money from someone streaming Black Panther as they would if someone bought the DVD or BR off Amazon? No. But they still put that movie on Netflix pretty damn quick because that is where people watch movies.
Disney doesn't continue paying the costs of distributing the film after it's finished. Netflix, Amazon, whoever are paying the costs of serving that to subscribers. Disney and the other media conglomerates can easily afford a large chunk of these costs because it's relatively small AND consistent which is why they're hopping into it.

Even Google can't afford this with Games, let alone any of the major Gaming corporations such as Activision, EA, etc.

ResetBanBot

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4501 on: March 21, 2019, 09:56:16 PM »
Every other form of media streaming can be buffered, video game streams cannot be buffered. 60fps requires a 16.6ms round trip time, this is not realistic even under the most ideal circumstances. Any dropped packets will be immediately noticeable (lol wifi) and cannot be compensated for with buffering. Compression will be required, which is the norm in other forms of offline media, but not the norm for video games and compression artifacts could potentially ruin the UIs of certain video games.

If your game does not require visual details, or responsive controls then it'll work fine (ie. walking simulators). But what do I know, it's not like anyone has ever tried this exact same thing before, and we all know how much faster ISPs have gotten over the past several years.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4502 on: March 21, 2019, 09:59:28 PM »
WTF are you talking about benji?

That's an entirely different streaming concept... are you high?  lol
You don't think that's the way they're going to do it with A level games? Not the stream you video and interact with it OnLive path, they know that won't work. Plus they're probably going to find they want local files knowledge. It'll be easier to "stream" you chunks of the game onto local storage then delete it.

The current consoles already can do this they just don't delete without your permission because you expect the whole game once you get it. But I'm not sure why you need to reinvent the wheel if players don't expect that.

If they can get enough players to also host the content to others that's gravy.

Clockwork5

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4503 on: March 21, 2019, 10:02:40 PM »
Because every media has proven that it is. It’s only a matter of time.

Movies and CDs can be buffered;  your experience is not ruined by brief latency spikes, or even having terrible latency at your connection at all, other than the time to start the video or audio stream up. 

Video games are an entirely different beast and your experience can be completely hosed by even a breif latency spike.. and having even moderate latency can make the entire experience unusable to people...And latency is not a completely solvable issue.  It literally is controlled by physics.  It can get better but it will NEVER be as good as playing locally from a control perspective.  And... controlling a video game.. kinda important.

Admittedly I have not been thrilled with PlayStation now in terms of input lag. However, Project Stream was butter. I do have a 1gig ISP so yeah, I’m ahead of the curve, but I honestly could not detect any more latency than I could on my old 2003 LCD display that I had until a couple years ago.

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4504 on: March 21, 2019, 10:03:27 PM »
I wonder if riotious knows about Google play games that don't need to be installed.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4505 on: March 21, 2019, 10:04:27 PM »
What does Stadia have to do with any of this?

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4506 on: March 21, 2019, 10:04:41 PM »
Oh God I'm in this conversation again.

:rage

Clockwork5

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4507 on: March 21, 2019, 10:06:14 PM »
My bad. I’ll drop it.

Clockwork5

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4508 on: March 21, 2019, 10:07:13 PM »
What a dumb name

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4509 on: March 21, 2019, 10:07:48 PM »
Microsoft had every incentive to make the "cloud" work this generation as they were hinting. And they haven't really. It's still mostly extrapolated from where we've been with it. Cloud saves. Background downloading content. So many games that are "ready" early in the install still cut off 80+% of the content and they certainly don't let you go online with them.

Are you sure? I heard Crackdown 3 used the cloud for 10000x more power than a single console alone, and it changed the way I played video games forever.
©@©™

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4510 on: March 21, 2019, 10:10:37 PM »
What does Stadia have to do with any of this?

OK so trolling.

Nice to see you so quickly adopt ResetERA.com methods of discussion.

So you think Google is going to be the lone company streaming games and not the current companies who have spent decades invested in video gaming? There's a better chance Google drops this the instance it starts blatantly cutting into their other businesses via costs than there is that Stadia establishes a significant market share of gaming streaming services.

Clockwork5

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4511 on: March 21, 2019, 10:15:59 PM »
I like how you are both on the same side of the argument yet are somehow fighting about nonsense at this point.

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4512 on: March 21, 2019, 10:16:25 PM »
Because every media has proven that it is. It’s only a matter of time.

Movies and CDs can be buffered;  your experience is not ruined by brief latency spikes, or even having terrible latency at your connection at all, other than the time to start the video or audio stream up. 

Video games are an entirely different beast and your experience can be completely hosed by even a breif latency spike.. and having even moderate latency can make the entire experience unusable to people...And latency is not a completely solvable issue.  It literally is controlled by physics.  It can get better but it will NEVER be as good as playing locally from a control perspective.  And... controlling a video game.. kinda important.

Admittedly I have not been thrilled with PlayStation now in terms of input lag. However, Project Stream was butter. I do have a 1gig ISP so yeah, I’m ahead of the curve, but I honestly could not detect any more latency than I could on my old 2003 LCD display that I had until a couple years ago.

Did you play any fighting games on Project Stream? You would probably notice a difference there when trying to pull off complicated moves.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4513 on: March 21, 2019, 10:18:43 PM »
Clockwork never said "Stadia" he said streaming. I have no reason to believe OnLive/Stadia streaming will ever go anywhere in capital G gaming. It doesn't even make sense for casual g gaming. Why expend the costs involved in streaming when players will always host the content themselves? And the entire development model assumes this? Films and especially music aren't in an arms race for resources, especially space.

Sony and Microsoft are "playing" with select parts of their catalog, they aren't going to dive in and foot the bill. It'd be insane.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4514 on: March 21, 2019, 10:20:19 PM »
Did you play any fighting games on Project Stream? You would probably notice a difference there when trying to pull off complicated moves.
fighting games just won't exist in the all streaming future. problem solved.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4515 on: March 21, 2019, 10:22:00 PM »
the very next sentence he goes on to talk about streaming in general. you aren't very good at the gotchas.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4516 on: March 21, 2019, 10:26:54 PM »
Ironically, if Microsoft pushes out that S without a disc drive and with Nintendo level storage space, I might believe they're serious about streaming solely interactive video to players.

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4517 on: March 21, 2019, 10:27:01 PM »
Did you play any fighting games on Project Stream? You would probably notice a difference there when trying to pull off complicated moves.
fighting games just won't exist in the all streaming future. problem solved.

lol

I mean, if you're someone who just mashes the buttons I suppose there would be some fun to be had there. However, some moves are difficult to pull off at the best of times, and the key bit of that is, may require timing.

Bore Expert

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4518 on: March 21, 2019, 10:27:48 PM »
at least Bobby still has besada at his side to comfort him in these dark days and fight to protect his good name



nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4519 on: March 21, 2019, 10:28:44 PM »
streaming will have a future in games anyway. it won't be dominant for decades but it'll be there as another way to play games. if nothing else, the temptation to be able to charge people a monthly subscription to own a license to a game will be too tempting for the corps to give up so they'll push for it pretty hard.

Ironically, if Microsoft pushes out that S without a disc drive and with Nintendo level storage space, I might believe they're serious about streaming solely interactive video to players.
isn't the plan for one of their Xbox Two consoles to be an all streaming device? i remember seeing that at some point in the rumor mill.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2019, 10:32:47 PM by nachobro »

Clockwork5

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4520 on: March 21, 2019, 10:30:07 PM »
Because every media has proven that it is. It’s only a matter of time.

Movies and CDs can be buffered;  your experience is not ruined by brief latency spikes, or even having terrible latency at your connection at all, other than the time to start the video or audio stream up. 

Video games are an entirely different beast and your experience can be completely hosed by even a breif latency spike.. and having even moderate latency can make the entire experience unusable to people...And latency is not a completely solvable issue.  It literally is controlled by physics.  It can get better but it will NEVER be as good as playing locally from a control perspective.  And... controlling a video game.. kinda important.

Admittedly I have not been thrilled with PlayStation now in terms of input lag. However, Project Stream was butter. I do have a 1gig ISP so yeah, I’m ahead of the curve, but I honestly could not detect any more latency than I could on my old 2003 LCD display that I had until a couple years ago.

Did you play any fighting games on Project Stream? You would probably notice a difference there when trying to pull off complicated moves.

No I did not, Assassins Creed was the only game and yeah, on PlayStation now it was “alright” checking out something like Red Dead Redemption but driving games were unplayable. I get it, there are barriers to the latency issue. But I’m not arrogant enough to think I understand this better than the engineers at Alphabet Inc who gave the green light on this. Also, ID software sounded pretty confident playing Doom on stadia is going to be an enjoyable experience. That was surprisingly effective in my eyes. ID is a bit protective of that IP since it is on such a high note right now.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4521 on: March 21, 2019, 10:31:57 PM »
stadia is some linux shit and id will take any opportunity to pimp vulkan :doge

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4522 on: March 21, 2019, 10:35:20 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/can-you-name-a-single-character-from-the-movie-avatar.106856/post-19092769

Quote from: El Bombastico, post: 19092769, member: 2235
Very long story short:

Got permabanned for being an asshole.

Was accused of sexually harassing at least 2 or 3 different women

Nuked all his social media accounts/sites

The game of telephone being played over the BRob saga is pretty amazing.  Wasn't it one serious accusation, relayed second hand and then later on the chick who claimed her friend was raped by him recanted?

There's a blog post trying to sum it up but I found it more confusing than anything.

https://disneystarwarsisdumb.wordpress.com/2019/02/20/did-jason-ward-lie/

Star Wars fandom : not even once :hhh
« Last Edit: March 21, 2019, 10:45:05 PM by VomKriege »
ὕβρις

Clockwork5

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4523 on: March 21, 2019, 10:35:33 PM »
stadia is some linux shit and id will take any opportunity to pimp vulkan :doge

Lol fair enough

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4524 on: March 21, 2019, 10:36:27 PM »
Quote
Cameron gave nerds a scifi with an alien moon where 9ft tall cat people can psionically link to dragons, before flying them through floating mountains to fight gunships and mechs. The nerds - along with the rest of mainstream audiences, all went to see it multiple times.

Then it became the highest grossing film of all time and a symbol of mainstream culture, and nerds no longer wanted to be associated with it. Titanic, having been dethroned, then was welcomed with newfound appreciation after 12 years of being shat on by nerds for the same reason.

Internet dudes don't want to be lumped in with mainstream audiences.
 
https://www.resetera.com/threads/can-you-name-a-single-character-from-the-movie-avatar.106856/post-19093930

what a take :lol good to know sculli is still going full retardo

Eh he's an asshole about it but he is right.

I remember getting my VHS copy of titanic at midnight. NO SHAME



benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4525 on: March 21, 2019, 10:36:46 PM »
I don't think Microsoft nor Sony is going to crater third party support without consulting the third parties. There's too many costs involved for the gaming companies. Google, like Epic, isn't going to be swallowing the costs to get stuff on Stadia forever. I can't imagine Microsoft and Sony will even be willing to do it for half as long, none of the third parties are in position to truly afford it they rely on so many outside hardware costs being just handled.

The current development model is entrenched to such a level that the next step has to resemble it, not completely shift to turning into video streaming services and content providers built to supply them. The existing streaming services are piggybacking on other industries and their entrenched models. And even then they haven't at all upset the apple cart on the development side like it seems.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4526 on: March 21, 2019, 10:38:30 PM »
for now streaming a game at 4K/60 is just a pipe dream for basically everyone but it's probably a lot easier to stream 720p/30 to people and that's good enough for a large segment of the population and will be a good start.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4527 on: March 21, 2019, 10:39:18 PM »
scullibundo can suck a fat, blue alien dick

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4528 on: March 21, 2019, 10:40:48 PM »
But then you have the other company, let's say Sony, going look at our fucking version of these games. Simply because they didn't shift out the guaranteed hardware platform. And all the developers looking at that too.

Just like they did over five years ago by handing a game to another dude. :doge

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4529 on: March 21, 2019, 10:42:06 PM »
the kids are out here watching nazi youtubers on cracked screen android tablets and playing fortnite on their phones while smoking spice and downing kratom. you think these people give a fuck about a little input lag?

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4530 on: March 21, 2019, 10:43:23 PM »
Not lag, visible content differences. Entire chunks of the game not existing on the all-streaming platform.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4531 on: March 21, 2019, 10:44:36 PM »
But why would you talk about "Stadia style" streaming when it's so obvious it won't take? Might as well talk about the moon rock threat.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4532 on: March 21, 2019, 10:45:39 PM »
But then you have the other company, let's say Sony, going look at our fucking version of these games. Simply because they didn't shift out the guaranteed hardware platform. And all the developers looking at that too.

Just like they did over five years ago by handing a game to another dude. :doge
MS' possible solution seems the best way to go if they do one streaming box and one big dick local hardware box

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4533 on: March 21, 2019, 10:47:34 PM »
scullibundo can suck a fat, blue alien dick

I hope n'avi cock works like their hair

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4534 on: March 21, 2019, 10:48:16 PM »
You are a fucking prick dude.  Very ResetEra if you to just ignore me pointing out you’ve been off base this entire conversation.
Fine, you've convinced me. Stadia style streaming is the future and definitely will be how the majority of gaming is done in 2022.

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4535 on: March 21, 2019, 10:49:36 PM »
Can a mod please separate and archive these last few pages so we can revisit the convo when stadia inevitably fails

tuna_love

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4536 on: March 21, 2019, 10:51:20 PM »
 :lol

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4537 on: March 21, 2019, 10:51:29 PM »
Please leper riotass

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4538 on: March 21, 2019, 10:51:55 PM »
But then you have the other company, let's say Sony, going look at our fucking version of these games. Simply because they didn't shift out the guaranteed hardware platform. And all the developers looking at that too.

Just like they did over five years ago by handing a game to another dude. :doge
MS' possible solution seems the best way to go if they do one streaming box and one big dick local hardware box

big dick hardware energy

 :lawd

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4539 on: March 21, 2019, 10:52:09 PM »
You are a dumb cunt riotous.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4540 on: March 21, 2019, 10:53:18 PM »
Reread the convo you fucking loser dickhead.  I like how you’ll devote an entire day to spamming posts from a Resetera thread here but can’t bother to read a convo in which you decided to insult me.
:rofl

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4541 on: March 21, 2019, 10:53:32 PM »
Stadia is srs business brehs

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4542 on: March 21, 2019, 10:55:45 PM »
YOU'VE INSULTED HIM. FORGIVENESS IS OFF THE TABLE

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4543 on: March 21, 2019, 10:56:53 PM »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4544 on: March 21, 2019, 10:58:07 PM »
Hint:  I literally think game streaming is going to fail miserably by the end of next gen.
Well, I disagree.

when.. we were talking about ... Stadia.
Well, I disagree.

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4545 on: March 21, 2019, 10:58:20 PM »

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4546 on: March 21, 2019, 11:00:01 PM »
mods delete the last couple of pages and ban Stadia-related discussion from The Bire. As a matter of fact, word filter Stadia.


#free.creme

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4547 on: March 21, 2019, 11:00:09 PM »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4548 on: March 21, 2019, 11:01:13 PM »
EPIC GAMES IS THE FUTURE, NOT STADIA:


tho when you click "skip sign in" they won't let you access your games, just drop you out to the log in page

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4549 on: March 21, 2019, 11:02:29 PM »
bloodlines 2 is going to be announced tonight as a joint epic/stadia exclusive and you nerds are just gonna sit there and insult each other :wag have some goddamn respect

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4550 on: March 21, 2019, 11:03:48 PM »
discussing actual video games :donot

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4551 on: March 21, 2019, 11:04:56 PM »
if we're lucky it'll actually be an epic exclusive and that will give everyone some excellent meltdowns

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4552 on: March 21, 2019, 11:05:21 PM »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4553 on: March 21, 2019, 11:05:49 PM »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4554 on: March 21, 2019, 11:06:20 PM »

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4555 on: March 21, 2019, 11:10:27 PM »
BENJI IS A CONVICTED RAPIST

wow, that's a hefty accusation to level against the SalesEra expert.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4556 on: March 21, 2019, 11:12:09 PM »
i didn't want to have to explain the mask

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4557 on: March 21, 2019, 11:23:34 PM »
I think one thing you guys are ignoring about the success of netflix - and the potential success of stadia - is that its not just the carrot of netflix being one sub, a wide variety of content within that sub without any hidden extras, and that sub works on any of the devices you already own and you can access it in any way you feel like entirely at your own conveinence.

Its also the stick of cable companies being stupid greedy assholes, and that netflix sub letting you get away from all of their bullshit.

Sony and MS are stupid greedy assholes, and they have utterly fucked up huge aspects of the value proposition of owning a console in the first place in their chase to be more like a cable company.
Don't get me wrong, Nintendo are stupid greedy assholes too, but they're working in an entirely different asshole space.

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4558 on: March 21, 2019, 11:24:21 PM »
Quote from: GraveRobberX, post: 19089110, member: 5237
Ah fuck ‘em



He will die an old hateful man



This isn’t some woke commentary, just cause you make pretty cartoons is not the be all to tell the world, that everything is wrong and to forget about the past atrocities your own people committed, fuck outta here



There’s a reason those Bombs were dropped on your country, it wasn’t just for fun’s and giggles

https://www.resetera.com/threads/hayao-miyazaki-not-fond-of-american-movies.106816/page-3#post-19089110

BikeJesus

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #4559 on: March 21, 2019, 11:27:58 PM »
Console plebs might use Stevia, but PC mustard race won't.