Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 10
1
Career-wise... maybe in a tech project management position. I've even been slightly entertaining the thought of leaving commercial industry, getting a 2nd masters (for Education) and becoming a CS teacher (teachers make REAL GOOD money where I live).

I also hope to have at least one indie game or mobile game or RPGMaker game released to my name, possibly on Steam Greenlight.

Finally, I hope to be married, possibly with a kid. (I'm 34 now)

So, let's see...

1. I switched companies soon after the initial post. I don't have a management title, but I do lead quite a few projects in my division (for some household-name clients) and have had a title bump to "Senior Software Engineer". Did not leave the commercial tech industry. Making 6 figs now and my 401k has continued to blossom... between that and my equity (and other assets) I'm a "401k millionaire".

2. No indie developed game out yet :( Just some much smaller scale stuff with ZZT (Tim Sweeney's first game engine which uses textmode graphics). ONE OF THESE DAYS, I swear. A close friend of mine, who has tons of graphic design but barely any coding knowledge, took some Unity courses and is single-handedly making a pretty impressive Metroidvania: https://nixiegame.com/. This is inspiring me to take up the mantle.

3. I've been engaged for 4 years now, the pandemic + fiancee's grad school has put the wedding on hold. But early next June, we're all set to elope in Iceland, with a small-scale reception at a local fancy restaurant later in the month. No kid yet, though we're still both debating if we will want children.
2
I was watching the Joe Rogan Trump interview. I came to a conclusion. The Democratic party is the party with all of the nerds who did well in college.

If you and the rest of the Bore don't mind, I'm gonna springboard off your post, Himu, and dump my thoughts about the election.

Since the mid 2010s, the Dem party is less the "nerd" party (I mean, the Repubs now have the first millennial awkward techbro nerd in the White House) and more the "HR Karen" party, imo.
However, that is in no where near the primary reason she lost.

Kamala I think wasn't a strong candidate, but IMO she did pretty damn good for herself even with being handed a terrible deck. The economy/inflation is by far the biggest issue, and although the US handled inflation the best out of all the industrialized countries, and I'm privileged enough to say my 401k has boomed during the era, the fact of the matter is - a lot of the working class people are suffering, the cost of living has absolutely EXPLODED post-covid. While salaries have been catching up slightly, it's still not enough. And a grocery bill increasing by 50% is gonna hurt to those people who were living day-by-day even before the pandemic. I do think Biden and the FED have done their best to mitigate this, but unfortunately it was a shit "unprecedented" (most overused word the past few years) situation causing every single incumbent party to lose.

All the other reasons why people are saying she failed, are much smaller but they did skim the margins of her vote little by little. Gaza, not appealing to the youth, their oblivious celebrity endorsements, being perceived as being too invested in identity politics. I think Kamala did a good job of not getting bogged down in identity politics, however you had a period from the mid 2010s onward where leftist academists and others would be using terms like "toxic masculinity", "white supremacy", etc. These things obviously exist and white people as a whole could stand to be more mindful of others' situations, but when they get harped on by the "HR Karens", you start seeing even your typical college white lib get tired of being perceived as "the enemy" for stuff they probably have at most a tiny hand in perpetuating. Especially the "ethnic whites" i.e. those Ellis Island descendants who still may have slight ties to the old world were a big Dem constituency in the new deal era, but now go pretty hard for Trump. He made some big inroads in the Northeast and outright won the Rust Belt in 2016 and 2024 (where you have a large portion of Ellis Island descendants). Many of these people, whose families have been in this country way after slavery ended, way after the wars against the Native Americans, and who have faced tons of discrimination before being adopted into the "white" umbrella, question why they're getting the blame for atrocities perpetuated while their descendants were still in the old world mining coal in Poland, farming in Sicily, trying not to starve during the Irish famine.

We're having a realignment here - it's no longer a multicultural/multiracial "big blanket" party vs. a neoliberal wealthy white party with large evangelical and military support. It's shifted to a working class (with their uber rich overlords) vs. the "professional managerial class"/"laptop class" or what have you, with some remnants of the neoliberal/military divisions. And the Dem leadership however still thinks we're in the mid 2000s and fighting those same battles, which is a fools errand, since the coalitions within the Obama-era party have fragmented and are now increasingly at odds with one another. The Dems have let the working class slip away as they double-down on the failed neoliberal policies present in American politics since the Reagan era.

So where do the Dems go from here? Well, I think 2028 will be much more favorable to them so they probably can continue to stagnate doing what they're doing. If the tariffs Trump is pushing actually go through, it'll do further economic damage and stifle the tenuous recovery we're in, and then the field would be advantageous to them. Especially so if some of the Project 2025 horror comes to pass. But I'm hoping that Dems go through their own realignment and re-embrace their new deal/leftist roots. Many leftist/large government policies are extremely popular (Medicare for All, lower medicine costs, make the billionaires pay their fair share), while others are absolute poison to the electorate (defund the police, identity politics). But I also think the leftists are terrible at picking-and-choosing, along with messaging (the Right's most iconic and accurate meme is by far "the left can't meme"). The one person on the left who has a clear and concise message is, of course, Bernie. And happens to be the political figure with the highest likeability ranking. Sadly his successor pool is looking pretty thin (AOC is great but pushes some of the unlikable leftist policies and already has the GOP building up a smear campaign against her).

And finally, the DNC absolutely needs an enema.
3
The Superdeep Borehole / Re: USA Politics Thread |OT| Cleaning up the town
« Last post by Himu on Today at 12:36:18 AM »
No I’m not afraid of homeless people. I’ve volunteered with numerous orgs like Food Not Bombs to give homeless people food. I regularly bought food for my homeless neighbors that I know by name  in Brooklyn and gave them money. I’ve advocated for the homeless so much so one time I was at my cousins graduation at Morehouse and we were in line to get food at a Chicken and Waffles joint. A homeless woman walked up and asked for change and my family begged me not to because of drugs and I still gave the homeless person change, as my family looked at me disapprovingly.

So no, I’m not afraid of the homeless.

I have and will continue to advocate for them.

But we should not coddle them. The homeless situation in NY is different than it is other cities due to the density. You have people living on top of each other. This includes homeless people. Most people use the train to travel so you’re almost always on foot so you can’t avoid them in a car. One of the main NY maxims is “don't look them in the eye”. I have had a person run up to me, ask me to go with them to a Chinese restaurant so he can get food and when I declined he took his dick out and peed in my direction. In the trains you’ll have some maniac screaming and screeching and making a mentally ill tantrum screaming at passengers and sometimes harassing passengers. “Don’t look at them” is the rule. All this and yet New Yorkers pay 4-5 billion in homeless care for an issue that doesn’t seem to be solved. Just throw money at the issue: the Progressive Credo.

Homeless deserve care but many of them refuse to go to the shelter citing violence and threats of theft of personal belongings, preferring to sleep in the street. Homeless people are people but we should not tolerate homeless encampments in the park where people mingle and children play shooting up heroin or turning an entire train car into their personal house.





Homeless man literally pushes homeless advocate off the train platform, killing her



Multiple offenses with a warrant and not in jail because the left mind virus prioritizes being nice over a healthy society. Having lived I have irrefutable evidence that progressivism does not work and will not work and the government just wants to tax us as they get fat and live it large as no issues get solved.

I was almost directly in a mass shooting held by a homeless man. Literally the next train. He shot up a subway and had multiple offenses but the woke DA didn’t keep the fuck in jail. Thankfully no one died.

Put them in the shelters. Don’t allow them to not live in our trains. But if you say you’re a fascist. Progressivism is brain AIDS. Throwing money at issues and hoping it sticks.
4
Video Game Bored / Re: Arma 4 announced for 2027
« Last post by Samson Manhug on November 09, 2024, 10:55:31 PM »
I haven't heard of either of these and they both look great. Thanks!
5
The Superdeep Borehole / Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Last post by team filler on November 09, 2024, 09:58:07 PM »
I didn't have to read a book to see all that.

6
Video Game Bored / Re: Arma 4 announced for 2027
« Last post by Svejk on November 09, 2024, 08:58:33 PM »
What else are the Czechs up to?
The big one is Kingdom Come Deliverance II, but also good indies, like HROT, which came out last year actually.
7
The Superdeep Borehole / Re: USA Politics Thread |OT| Cleaning up the town
« Last post by Samson Manhug on November 09, 2024, 03:15:16 PM »
It sounds like you are frustrated about financial strain and public policy priorities that seemingly don't benefit you and you have little control over. It seems like you might also be afraid of homeless people.

Homeless people are likely also frustrated about financial strain and public policy priorities that don't benefit them and they have little control over. Is it possible that you are also afraid of becoming homeless?
8
The Superdeep Borehole / Re: USA Politics Thread |OT| Cleaning up the town
« Last post by Himu on November 09, 2024, 02:54:36 PM »
Homeless people are regular people. They just don't have stable housing.

Sure, but should they be allowed to congregate in parks and subway trains shooting up heroin, and yelling “GET OUT OF MY HOUSE!” when you step inside a subway car occupied by one? When you’re in New York and you step inside a train and there’s a homeless person and he’s the only person in that car everyone knows the modus operandi and that’s to get into the next car for survival. You never know who that person is and if they will have a mental breakdown and start screaming or assaulting you. While it’s true homeless people are regular people saying that doesn’t actually fix the issue. Meanwhile the government is taxing my ass off and sticking it in me raw without the luxury or lube or spit, as they fund 4-5 billions in homeless care and you’re worried about being stabbed on the train that children ride by themselves at 7 am on their way to school.
9
The Superdeep Borehole / Re: USA Politics Thread |OT| Cleaning up the town
« Last post by Samson Manhug on November 09, 2024, 02:48:14 PM »
Homeless people are regular people. They just don't have stable housing.
10
The Superdeep Borehole / Re: What book(s) are you reading?
« Last post by Samson Manhug on November 09, 2024, 02:43:58 PM »


I can't even talk about Ukraine with anyone because the propaganda surrounding it has been so heavy and effective, so it was great to read a carefully researched, well-cited book that lays out the facts: Ukraine's US-backed government is infiltrated with ultra-nationalists and neo-Nazis and they are supported by the center-right which holds power. The center-right that holds power has passed many actually far-right laws like outlawing far-left parties, destroying labor laws, banning speach criticizing the war, de-listing Russian as an official language, and they openly dehumanize Eastern Ukrainians by calling them bugs. Maidan was coup from the far-right that killed protestors in false flag operations. There was genocide happening by the Ukrainian military in the east before Russia invaded, etc. The US supported all these things and continues to do so, and the war-hungry Ukrainian regime could not exist without US support.

I recommend this book to anyone who feels like they are taking crazy pills when everyone and their brother is parroting Russophobic, Western media talking points to them any time Ukraine is brought up. It's hard to recommend to anyone else, though, because it could have used another round or two of editing to tighten the structure and find some of those numerous typos. Unfortunately, I feel like anyone who is skeptical of the facts in this book might use those to dismiss the content.

Despite those weaknesses, I'd love to read another book from the author covering the same topic from 2017 through today. It is a truly valuable analysis of the Ukrainian conflict from a left perspective, all collected in one place for you with a great bibliography.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 10