Author Topic: What are you playing?  (Read 4682325 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

iconoclast

  • レーダーマン
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8400 on: December 21, 2010, 03:26:04 AM »
Just started season 6 in Forza 3, up to level 45. Finally on the home stretch to 50. Once my driver level is maxed out, I'm gonna hire an AI driver to get gold medals for every race I haven't played, and while that's running, I'm gonna play through 999 and maybe some Disgaea 3.

1000'd Marvel Infinity Gauntlet too. Not a bad game, but still not as good as the lego games. At least Marvel has voice acting.
BiSH

Corporal

  • Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8401 on: December 21, 2010, 03:39:55 AM »
Just resolved that annoying cheeseburger storyline in Yakuza 3.

Finally, no more running from ambushes set by a lovestruck muscular guy in a red china dress.

Chases you around the whole damn town, that guy. Er, girl. Whatever.
!list

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8402 on: December 21, 2010, 04:00:12 PM »
Playing the campaign of Bad Company 2, it's fucking amazing. Also started Cladun and it's SO GOOD. Never played a Nippon Ichi game before and I feel this is a pretty good introduction.

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8403 on: December 21, 2010, 04:27:57 PM »
I've been playing a lot of Civ V since the latest patch. It feels like a much better game now.
©ZH

tiesto

  • ルカルカ★ナイトフィーバー
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8404 on: December 21, 2010, 04:55:28 PM »
Time for some endgame grinding in Ys 7, then to fight the final boss.
^_^

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8405 on: December 21, 2010, 05:17:44 PM »
Playing the campaign of Bad Company 2, it's fucking amazing.

Nice.  I ended up buying that for $6 at the last minute last night.

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8406 on: December 21, 2010, 05:30:15 PM »
Playing the campaign of Bad Company 2, it's fucking amazing.

Nice.  I ended up buying that for $6 at the last minute last night.

It's really fun. Beats the campaign of every CoD I've played by a country mile. The pacing is excellent.

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8407 on: December 21, 2010, 06:31:30 PM »
:lol If u enjoy falling asleep
fat

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8408 on: December 21, 2010, 06:32:32 PM »
:lol If u enjoy falling asleep

Sorry you didn't like it :(

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8409 on: December 21, 2010, 11:45:13 PM »
I finished the single player side of Blur.  Good god that was an awesome racer.  The last few race sets when you're doing A-class races at 150-200mph down Mount Haruna...zomg, Initial D ain't got shit on this.  Also makes GRID's Haruna stage look like a joke.

Some great tracks, amazing core racing engine, fantastic combat, lots of cool Bizarre-tm challenges to keep things exciting....great stuff.

The only things I disliked were:
-single player is really really easy.  Even on the final races I was lapping all the cars.  In the first 20 seconds you break away from the pack and never see them again.  It's pretty much the easiest racing game I've ever played 1p.  I mean I'm glad I wasn't getting frustrated like all these other bs ai racers, but the lack of opponents made it feel kind of empty after the first 20 seconds.  Online is much better where it's always close.
-The requirements for unlocking the boss races are stupid and grindy.
-Graphics could have a been a little better.  Doesn't look as good as PGR.  Photo mode in this sucks compared to PGR.
-Could have been a few more event types.  Race/Checkpoint/Destruction are all good, but the single player does feel kind of repetitive by the end.

Still, 3rd best arcade racer this gen behind Burnout Paradise and PGR4 imo.  Now that I'm done with this it's time for Hot Pursuit.  Bizarre & Criterion are the best arcade race game developers.

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8410 on: December 22, 2010, 12:28:56 AM »
Finishing up the remaining achievements for Just Cause 2.  Does anybody know an easy way to find the Leisureliner?  It's supposed to be the rarest car in the game.  Also about how long does it take to replay the game on the higher difficulty and how much harder is it?

Playing the campaign of Bad Company 2, it's fucking amazing.

Nice.  I ended up buying that for $6 at the last minute last night.

It's really fun. Beats the campaign of every CoD I've played by a country mile. The pacing is excellent.
It was all right, nothing amazing about the gameplay but the explosions and destructible environments were very awesome.  COD has the better scripted moments and Halo has the better AI basically.

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8411 on: December 22, 2010, 12:32:28 AM »
Playing the campaign of Bad Company 2, it's fucking amazing.

Nice.  I ended up buying that for $6 at the last minute last night.

It's really fun. Beats the campaign of every CoD I've played by a country mile. The pacing is excellent.
It was all right, nothing amazing about the gameplay but the explosions and destructible environments were very awesome.  COD has the better scripted moments and Halo has the better AI basically.

True but neither game series has a game that amounts to more than the sum of their parts. I really enjoyed Reach, and I love Black Ops and MW1's campaign, but I'm having a lot of fun in BC2. And this is coming from someone who hates DICE.

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8412 on: December 22, 2010, 12:36:46 AM »
It was a good campaign but after playing it twice (normal and hard) I never really got an itch to go back to any particular level.  Of course the multiplayer was awesome so that kind of takes priority every time you boot up the game.

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8413 on: December 22, 2010, 12:55:57 AM »
Yeah I just hopped into the multiplayer and really enjoyed it. Seems like it'll be a long time before I get my choice of weapons, but oh well.

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8414 on: December 22, 2010, 01:00:25 AM »
Finished White Knight Chronicles. In typical LEvel 5 fashion, the story goes completely fucking apeshit at the end :lol

Now I want to play the 2nd just to know where this goes next
fat

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8415 on: December 22, 2010, 01:29:45 AM »
Finished White Knight Chronicles. In typical LEvel 5 fashion, the story goes completely fucking apeshit at the end :lol

Now I want to play the 2nd just to know where this goes next

So you're saying the game is not terrible?

hmmmmmmmmm, WKS2 is getting cheaper these days...

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8416 on: December 22, 2010, 08:08:45 AM »
um yeah it is terrible. but they said they "refined" the gameplay in WKS2 so it might be more playable, and that version of WKS has the WKS2 battle system I think?
fat

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8417 on: December 22, 2010, 11:12:25 AM »
If it's terrible why did you play it all the way through??

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8418 on: December 22, 2010, 11:24:20 AM »
That's for me to know
fat

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8419 on: December 22, 2010, 11:29:18 AM »
>Playing Baldur's Gate 2
>Having a blast
>Gets to the Underdark
>Crashes at a specific point every single time.

PC gaming.  :rofl

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8420 on: December 22, 2010, 01:12:39 PM »
« Last Edit: December 22, 2010, 01:16:11 PM by Great Rumbler »
dog

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8421 on: December 22, 2010, 02:35:37 PM »
Yeah, I just reinstalled the whole thing.  I think one of my mods screwed up and wouldn't allow Drow characters to render without crashing.  So I'm playing vanilla for now.

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8422 on: December 22, 2010, 05:05:38 PM »
Finished Kane & Lynch 2.  Took me about 3.5 hours, so an hour shorter than the first game.

I thought it was good and would have been great 2p if you aren't price/length conscious.  For what it is, it's an exciting pure cover shooter with some great setpieces to fight through, an amazing visual style (easily some of the best visuals I've seen at times; looked so real and stylish), and the gunplay is actually kind of unique in that it's bad and inaccurate but then it feels realistic because of that and it makes it more intense when you're spooked and just spraying bullets everywhere.  Story was ok, length was fine but plot was kind of typical.  Because it stayed as a straight up "take cover, shoot guys, run forward" game from start to finish it never really fell apart like the first one.  I thought it was fairly consistent and enjoyable from the first stage to the last one.  Extra points for the insane nudity stage.

My only complaints are in 1p the AI doesn't do shit.  They stay alive but that's about it.  In split path flanking opportunities you need to let them be the decoy and go ahead and flank since they won't do anything useful on their own.  And in the few time sensitive situations it's annoying not to have another real shooter helping you out.  My other complaint is that the AI is too smart which makes it less fun to fight.  They hide because EVERYTHING and only pop out when you're not aiming at them.  Then you pop out to aim at them and they immediately retreat back behind cover before you can aim and shoot them.  I did a lot of diversion fire where I'd run at the cover shooting so they wouldn't pop out and then just walk up to the guy and pop him.  Much harder when a ton of guys though >_< 

Still for $5 it was a nice ride.  I think Kane & Lynch is a great franchise for SE as it's a solid pure gears cover shooter with an interesting real world spin on the setting/characters/story.  The thing is, they need to figure out how to sell it because it just can't work at $40-60 entries.  The games are short because they feel like you're playing a hollywood movie which is COOL and a good thing and I don't want them to be longer than 3-5 hour campaigns, but at the same time you can't sell a 3-5 campaign at full or even budget price.  I think the smartest thing to do with the series would be to make the future entries XBLA/PSN games for $10-15.  Shorten the campaigns further and do 2 hour "movies" with challenges and achievements and stuff for replayability like how Lara Croft handles it.  That way if you can split the budget cost of a full K&L retail title into a 3 game trilogy and sell them at $15 each you're making $45 and you're probably going to sell a lot more copies of K&L at $15 than you will at $40/50/60 retail game, so it should come out financially beneficial.  Everyone just waits until a K&L game is $5-10 bucks before buying, so why not sell them at those prices from the start.

Oh and best chopper section ever; at least visually.  Really really cool sequence.
 

For me it was under 3 hours.  I thought it was pretty bad compared to the first part of the first game.

Kane and Lynch 1 had a variety of cool areas you'd have shoot outs in, and they'd have you doing more than just bog standard cover shooting.  It had light tactical elements and cool sequences where you'd repel down buildings and break into a vault.  Kane and Lynch 2 is just 3 hours of non-stop shooting through mostly the same environments.  It does look cool with the visual effects going on (though I had to turn on steady cam) it's just Hong Kong.  There are some interesting sequences, like the naked part, but it's mostly the same thing.

The shooting is way too basic.  I'm sure it will be better in co-op, but in single player it is not even as complex as time crisis.  Since you don't have grenades, squad commands, get dropped in a second if you go out of cover, carry too little ammo for guns that aren't accurate, and are fighting against huge numbers of enemies behind strong cover, shoots outs end up being about timing.  You time when you pop up to catch the other guy popping up, repeat for 2 hours, cool-ish rail shooting sequence, repeat for another 45 minutes.  If you use your limited ammo to take out cover, the enemy doesn't even wait half a second before dashing to the next cover.  This are problems without considering how clunky the cover system is.  And ffs, you kill so many people in this game it's ridiculous.  You enter a room and a dozen people run in, move five feet, and another two dozen people run in.  It's you against numbers and it isn't fun.

The story and characters are so minimal that I lost track of why I was doing anything.  I get what they were going for, they just didn't execute it well enough.  Even for $5 I was pretty disappointed with it.  Enjoyed the first game more, though, at least it was better than the final parts of that game.  I wouldn't mind seeing more Kane and Lynch games but they need to work out what works in these games, which is the style, atmosphere, and things like that.

The Sceneman

  • Did my wife send you?
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8423 on: December 22, 2010, 07:13:01 PM »
Finishing up the remaining achievements for Just Cause 2.  Does anybody know an easy way to find the Leisureliner?  It's supposed to be the rarest car in the game.  Also about how long does it take to replay the game on the higher difficulty and how much harder is it?


tut tut, should have started on hard, no idea how long it will take you. You playing on the 360? It should be patched and you can find the leisureliner now. I found one by the ski resort. Its a big 2 storey modern coach bus. Don't forget the free vehicle DLC, as these guys count towards the 104 unique vehicles needed for the achievement
#1

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8424 on: December 22, 2010, 08:10:46 PM »
I only got up to like 27% completion by the time I finished all the agency missions so getting up to 75% while playing on hard seemed like the long way to get all the achievements.  I've only got about 10% to go until I get up to 75% then I'll do the second playthrough.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2010, 08:12:53 PM by am nintenho »

naff

  • someday you feed on a tree frog
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8425 on: December 22, 2010, 10:39:08 PM »
◕‿◕

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8426 on: December 22, 2010, 10:41:41 PM »
Bayonetta - like so far, but the hour I've played seems to feel like like 90% cutscenes
Nier - great start
Zelda 2 - this game sucks
dead space - should beat before dead space 2
IYKYK

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8427 on: December 23, 2010, 12:02:48 AM »
Playing the heck out of Gundam Musou 3 and loving it.  If they didn't screw up the storymode (there's barely any story, almost no cutscenes, everybody does the story together like GM2 instead of every pilot having a unique campaign like GM1 [I guess once the roster got HUGE they didn't want to spend the effort to make a campaign for every pilot]), if the pre-mission 2 min still talks were actually VOICED and if the camera was a little better (pulled out further), I'd declare GM3 as the musou game to end musou games and give it 9/10.  As is it's still ridiculously fun and addicting with great loot/xp leveling, tons of character/mechs/missions, awesome cell-shaded graphics, 4p online coop that is fun and you can grind there for your offline save, and basically 100-200 hours worth of single player gameplay.  Good stuff. 

Still playing Ni no kuni but hardly touching it.  I started reading Dante's Equation by Jane Jensen and now when I'm doing portable stuff I just read that cause it's better than an L5 rpg.  Still planning on seeing the game through to the end in the next month or so.  Don't like playing multiple rpgs at once and The Last Story comes out on Jan 27th.

Played a good chunk of Back to the Future Ep1.  It's...ok, like most Telltale games.  They never pull off a GREAT adventure game (well maybe a few eps have come close; sam & max S1 ep5 to name one), but they're never bad adventure games.  It's like every month there is a new 3/5 quality  5-6 hour adventure game by Telltale.  I think fans of BttF will like it more since they'll get all the references everywhere.  I like BttF but I haven't seen the movies in decades so I'm sure I'm missing a lot.  Will probably finish it in another day or two.

And that's about all I'm playing currently.  I start full time classes again for Bar exam prep on monday so probably won't be playing a ton of games at a time.  Might play through Prince of Persia Forgotten Sands because it's pretty and I like PoP and might play through Splinter Cell because it's sorta of good looking at times on the PC and I liked Splinter Cell in the past.

If it's terrible why did you play it all the way through??

http://www.destructoid.com/white-knight-chronicles-2-requires-clear-file-from-wkc1-175552.phtml

:rofl

Yeah, but if you're starting from scratch it's better to wait and play WKC2 and go through WKC1 with WKC2 gameplay refinements.  If I ever play WKC this is the way I'll do it, but considering I hate L5 rpgs I don't think this will happen.

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8428 on: December 23, 2010, 12:05:34 AM »
Bayonetta has way too many cutscenes, especially at the beginning and end.  the story is total trash tho so skipping scenes is highly encouraged.

and i know zelda 2 is bad, but why is it taking you this long to finish it?
pcp

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8429 on: December 23, 2010, 12:11:18 AM »
For me it was under 3 hours.  I thought it was pretty bad compared to the first part of the first game.

Kane and Lynch 1 had a variety of cool areas you'd have shoot outs in, and they'd have you doing more than just bog standard cover shooting.  It had light tactical elements and cool sequences where you'd repel down buildings and break into a vault.  Kane and Lynch 2 is just 3 hours of non-stop shooting through mostly the same environments.  It does look cool with the visual effects going on (though I had to turn on steady cam) it's just Hong Kong.  There are some interesting sequences, like the naked part, but it's mostly the same thing.

The shooting is way too basic.  I'm sure it will be better in co-op, but in single player it is not even as complex as time crisis.  Since you don't have grenades, squad commands, get dropped in a second if you go out of cover, carry too little ammo for guns that aren't accurate, and are fighting against huge numbers of enemies behind strong cover, shoots outs end up being about timing.  You time when you pop up to catch the other guy popping up, repeat for 2 hours, cool-ish rail shooting sequence, repeat for another 45 minutes.  If you use your limited ammo to take out cover, the enemy doesn't even wait half a second before dashing to the next cover.  This are problems without considering how clunky the cover system is.  And ffs, you kill so many people in this game it's ridiculous.  You enter a room and a dozen people run in, move five feet, and another two dozen people run in.  It's you against numbers and it isn't fun.

The story and characters are so minimal that I lost track of why I was doing anything.  I get what they were going for, they just didn't execute it well enough.  Even for $5 I was pretty disappointed with it.  Enjoyed the first game more, though, at least it was better than the final parts of that game.  I wouldn't mind seeing more Kane and Lynch games but they need to work out what works in these games, which is the style, atmosphere, and things like that.

I read this but I really have no reply other than I'm sorry you didn't enjoy it :(  I really had a lot of fun.  I never felt the waves were ridiculously long like the last half of the first game or CoD.  They definitely weren't short and you do kill a billion guys but I felt the pacing was pretty strong and you kept moving every few guys.  I was pretty offensive about my attack style because I played on easy.  Although it still took me 30 mins longer than you, but that might've been from all the retries at the start of chapter 2 on normal where I kept dying and got pissed off and switched to easy.

I agree the first half of K&L1 is much better because it has a lot of atmosphere, builds the characters more, and is just more interesting.  Breaking into that prison and breaking out with the prisoners is awesome.  The bank robbery and escaping on the streets is awesome.  There's a lot to love about the first half of K&L1.  K&L2 is just shoot shoot shoot while running through nice looking detailed Shanghai.  But because it stays consistent in being a solid shoot shoot shoot game from start to finish without any real drastic changes I enjoyed it.  The story was weak, but I find the main two characters interesting and hearing their chats all throughout built the character.  And I really really loved the visual style.  I must be the only person who never turned shakey cam off.  I found the amount of detail in the environments + the glitching + the camera @ 60fps to just be a stunningly unique visual style that kept me wanting to see what the next room looked like.  There's a room in the tower near the end where you go in and all the windows are open and the curtains are blowing and there's debris flying through the air everywhere and it looked like the pre-rendered stuff straight out of REmake.

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8430 on: December 23, 2010, 12:12:16 AM »
Bayonetta has way too many cutscenes, especially at the beginning and end.  the story is total trash tho so skipping scenes is highly encouraged.

Yes.  Bayonetta & Vanquish are both 5x better on their 2nd runs when you're skipping every cutscene.  Platinum is waaaaaay too cutscene crazy.  Bayonetta is still annoying though because you can't skip the cutscenes with QTEs in them :(

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8431 on: December 23, 2010, 12:18:21 AM »
Been wasting time in Geometry Wars 2 while kicking around ideas for things to either play (like FFXIII) or replay (like Ninja Gaiden or NG2).

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8432 on: December 23, 2010, 12:57:32 AM »
Bayonetta has way too many cutscenes, especially at the beginning and end.  the story is total trash tho so skipping scenes is highly encouraged.

and i know zelda 2 is bad, but why is it taking you this long to finish it?

i played zelda 1 instead, beat it, went back to zelda 2. every time i play i want to play something else.

And yeah, bayo's intro is god awful. any action game i play needs to put me in the action 10 seconds into the game for the love of god. dmc3's opening is like one minute and then you're kicking ass. dmc1, the intro is just some cutscene about devils and stuff and trish enters Devil May Cry shop and then from there you're in the outskirts of the castle. Ninja Gaiden 1 starts with Ryu Hayabusa BUM RUSHING ninjas out of fucking nowhere. NG2 starts with the same shit.

In Bayonetta, you go through this long ass boring tutorial, and then watch all these stupid long ass cutscenes with cheesy dialogue, and they just won't shut the fuck up! First it's Enzo's car, and then you're doing all this crap on a flying jet, and no one is ever willing to shut up.

A cutscene in a game like this should be fast, sweet, and to the point.

but i can't skip them because I'm ocd and I have to see every single part of my game's dammit!
IYKYK

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8433 on: December 23, 2010, 01:25:26 AM »
For me it was under 3 hours.  I thought it was pretty bad compared to the first part of the first game.

Kane and Lynch 1 had a variety of cool areas you'd have shoot outs in, and they'd have you doing more than just bog standard cover shooting.  It had light tactical elements and cool sequences where you'd repel down buildings and break into a vault.  Kane and Lynch 2 is just 3 hours of non-stop shooting through mostly the same environments.  It does look cool with the visual effects going on (though I had to turn on steady cam) it's just Hong Kong.  There are some interesting sequences, like the naked part, but it's mostly the same thing.

The shooting is way too basic.  I'm sure it will be better in co-op, but in single player it is not even as complex as time crisis.  Since you don't have grenades, squad commands, get dropped in a second if you go out of cover, carry too little ammo for guns that aren't accurate, and are fighting against huge numbers of enemies behind strong cover, shoots outs end up being about timing.  You time when you pop up to catch the other guy popping up, repeat for 2 hours, cool-ish rail shooting sequence, repeat for another 45 minutes.  If you use your limited ammo to take out cover, the enemy doesn't even wait half a second before dashing to the next cover.  This are problems without considering how clunky the cover system is.  And ffs, you kill so many people in this game it's ridiculous.  You enter a room and a dozen people run in, move five feet, and another two dozen people run in.  It's you against numbers and it isn't fun.

The story and characters are so minimal that I lost track of why I was doing anything.  I get what they were going for, they just didn't execute it well enough.  Even for $5 I was pretty disappointed with it.  Enjoyed the first game more, though, at least it was better than the final parts of that game.  I wouldn't mind seeing more Kane and Lynch games but they need to work out what works in these games, which is the style, atmosphere, and things like that.

I read this but I really have no reply other than I'm sorry you didn't enjoy it :(  I really had a lot of fun.  I never felt the waves were ridiculously long like the last half of the first game or CoD.  They definitely weren't short and you do kill a billion guys but I felt the pacing was pretty strong and you kept moving every few guys.  I was pretty offensive about my attack style because I played on easy.  Although it still took me 30 mins longer than you, but that might've been from all the retries at the start of chapter 2 on normal where I kept dying and got pissed off and switched to easy.

I agree the first half of K&L1 is much better because it has a lot of atmosphere, builds the characters more, and is just more interesting.  Breaking into that prison and breaking out with the prisoners is awesome.  The bank robbery and escaping on the streets is awesome.  There's a lot to love about the first half of K&L1.  K&L2 is just shoot shoot shoot while running through nice looking detailed Shanghai.  But because it stays consistent in being a solid shoot shoot shoot game from start to finish without any real drastic changes I enjoyed it.  The story was weak, but I find the main two characters interesting and hearing their chats all throughout built the character.  And I really really loved the visual style.  I must be the only person who never turned shakey cam off.  I found the amount of detail in the environments + the glitching + the camera @ 60fps to just be a stunningly unique visual style that kept me wanting to see what the next room looked like.  There's a room in the tower near the end where you go in and all the windows are open and the curtains are blowing and there's debris flying through the air everywhere and it looked like the pre-rendered stuff straight out of REmake.

yeah, maybe it would have been more enjoyable in easy.  I remember people claiming the same about Resistance 2 since you wouldn't just be hiding for most of the game.  Even on normal, I'd get dropped if I tried to go for it with a shotgun; hell, I didn't find out there was no melee move until that final section past the helicopter (not counting the human shield, which I used twice in the entire game).  Really, my biggest problem with the game is that I've played similar games that are better.  I don't think it is necessarily bad either.  It's just a standard cover based shooter and I'm not fond of that type of shooter anymore.  Kane and Lynch 1 was less of a straight forward shooter, I thought.

Don't get me wrong though, I really dug the visual style.  The shaky camera wasn't so much a problem as was the low fov.  It was a bit too tight on the character and that mixed with the shakey camera lost me.   And About the characters, I agree that Kane and Lynch are handled well through their little talked; I liked how slowly they'd reveal Kane's motivation and all that.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2010, 01:27:06 AM by Linkzg »

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8434 on: December 23, 2010, 02:22:35 AM »
Installing Bayo makes the graphics better, the load times are MUCH better. Xbots owned
IYKYK

Beezy

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8435 on: December 23, 2010, 02:27:01 AM »
Installing Bayo makes the graphics better, the load times are MUCH better. Xbots owned
:lol

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8436 on: December 23, 2010, 02:29:11 AM »
Errrr, I'm glad you are enjoying it Himuro.  But Xbots will never, ever, eveeer be owned on Bayonetta.  

Hint: Don't check out the texture comparisons until after you're done with the game.


I get tempted everytime I see Bayo for $10 or less to buy a copy for my PS3-only non-gamer brother.  But the quality of the port keeps me from biting.  Plus even though I think the game is not hardcore at all on normal and the fighting is easy to get into since you just dodge and counter, I think it might be too hardcore for him.  I let him borrow DMC3 once and he played it for like 10 mins and gave it back.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8437 on: December 23, 2010, 03:18:48 AM »
Awww, I was busting balls. It's a fun game game that has tremendous variety so far. I go from a boss fight to wall running in like 5 seconds. Chapter before that had DMC1 like adventure portions and a nice balance between exploration and combat. Great game but seems too easy to me, at least on normal. I guess witch time balances things out though. I was wondering how I could get good damage on a boss that mostly used far away projectiles and ended up witch timing an attack on accident that let me get some good hits in. Not hard but fun to experiment with.
IYKYK

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8438 on: December 23, 2010, 03:20:49 AM »
Apply patch and install. No problem with gameplay at all.
IYKYK

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8439 on: December 23, 2010, 04:09:28 AM »
Awww, I was busting balls. It's a fun game game that has tremendous variety so far. I go from a boss fight to wall running in like 5 seconds. Chapter before that had DMC1 like adventure portions and a nice balance between exploration and combat. Great game but seems too easy to me, at least on normal. I guess witch time balances things out though. I was wondering how I could get good damage on a boss that mostly used far away projectiles and ended up witch timing an attack on accident that let me get some good hits in. Not hard but fun to experiment with.

Normal is really easy if you play DMC/NG.  Same problem as normal on DMC4.  They try to make the games appeal to a wider audience so first run is mainstream friendly.

When play your 2nd run on hard, keeping all your stuff and skipping all the cutscenes you should have an even better time.  For me the first run was like a B+ game, 2nd run was a solid A.

iconoclast

  • レーダーマン
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8440 on: December 23, 2010, 05:56:17 AM »
Bayonetta as a whole is pretty easy. You gotta go for pure platinums on every verse to make it nice and hard. 8)


Almost done with Strike Witches now. 1cc'd normal, 1cc'd hard, and no-miss'd the game. Just gotta do the achievement for 1cc'ing Very Hard now, which seems nearly identical to hard mode. There's some cheap bullshit in this game that can screw you majorly on a 1cc run though. There's a few sections where boxes will come flying through the screen, so you either dodge them, or shoot them, and if you shoot them they explode into a ton of bullets. But anyway, these boxes come from both sides of the screen, alongside enemies, and if you accidentally fly into one that's spawning behind you, it takes away half your damn health! Bullets only do 25% damage, wtf! They could solve that problem by adding 'enemy incoming' warnings like Death Smiles, but whatever. The stage 5 boss is cheap as hell too, since in his 4th phase, he has a few different attacks he can do, and he seems to choose them randomly. The problem with this is one of his attacks is an instant laser directly on your position. You can't dodge it on reaction, it just hits you, so you have to be moving preemptively. And on hard/very hard, lasers do 50% damage. I died on that more than the last boss + true last boss combined. Bullshit.

Anyway, it's still a good game, but it's got problems.

« Last Edit: December 23, 2010, 09:41:40 AM by iconoclast »
BiSH

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8441 on: December 23, 2010, 02:18:57 PM »
Installing Bayo makes the graphics better, the load times are MUCH better. Xbots owned
Graphics were never Bayonetta problems,not sure why people are mentioning graphics,who cares about some pixels

The PS3 Bayonetta problem is that it runs sometimes(lots of times) even like 40fps lower than 360 version...that is huuge for any game
cat

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8442 on: December 23, 2010, 02:37:02 PM »
Really? I was noticing some slow down during the jet fight but I was chalking it up to like,"this has to be deliberate, since everything else outside the battle is slow right now"

Honestly, I can't tell and I count frames as a profession. 60 is nice, though.
IYKYK

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8443 on: December 23, 2010, 03:12:45 PM »
Yeah it is,for that reason don't watch 360 version.I guess you just have to adapt*

*played tons of low framerate games,especially on PC
cat

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8444 on: December 23, 2010, 03:30:53 PM »
The main issue with Bayo ps3 I've seen so far is the resolution. Eesh.
IYKYK

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8445 on: December 23, 2010, 04:26:55 PM »
It runs at 1280x720,both versions

cat

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8446 on: December 23, 2010, 05:08:34 PM »
really? Hmmm.
IYKYK

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8447 on: December 23, 2010, 05:27:54 PM »
It's not the resolution, but the texture quality.  A lot of the textures that are high-res sharp on X360 are blurry low-res on PS3 due to the ram and lazy port.  Lazy devs don't bother using the split ram and just treat the PS3 like a 256ram machine and drop the texture quality to get it working within that ram parameter.

And yeah PS3 runs at 30fps, X360 runs at 60fps which is a pretty big deal in an action game.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8448 on: December 23, 2010, 06:06:31 PM »
It can't run at 30 fps at all times. I know during some moments it feels like 60 and I certainly can't tell the difference between it and DMC1, for example.
IYKYK

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8449 on: December 23, 2010, 07:41:25 PM »
Hmmm. I like Nier but Bayo's got me addicted. I'm replaying chapters over and over just to get a better score.

This is the real DMC4.  8)
IYKYK

Beezy

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8450 on: December 23, 2010, 08:03:15 PM »
Hmmm. I like Nier but Bayo's got me addicted. I'm replaying chapters over and over just to get a better score.

This is the real DMC4.  8)
:rock

iconoclast

  • レーダーマン
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8451 on: December 23, 2010, 09:56:42 PM »
Yay, just 1cc'd Very Hard in Strike Witches. :D

All four skill-based achievements are out of the way now, just gotta clean up the rest of the story mode ones or whatever. That 1cc was pretty tough though, on the last stage I got hit three times by random bullets, so I had to do the entire latter half of the stage + the last boss + the true last boss with no health left. Didn't think I'd be able to pull it off.
BiSH

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8452 on: December 23, 2010, 11:04:09 PM »
Finally got out of the Underdark in BG2.  Definitely my least favorite part of the game.  Way to many instant kills for my liking.

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8453 on: December 23, 2010, 11:13:26 PM »
Hmmm. I like Nier but Bayo's got me addicted. I'm replaying chapters over and over just to get a better score.

This is the real DMC4.  8)

You're only a year late!

BTW, Bayonetta PS3 gets trashed because Platinum Games didn't develop it.  They made the 360 version and some internal team at Sega ported it over.  It suffers from frame rate problems and has shittier textures/graphics overall in comparison.  IIRC someone said if you drop the PS3 resolution down to 480P (:lol) the game runs a lot smoother. 

And in your case, let ignorance be bliss...don't go see what you're missing.
ど助平

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8454 on: December 23, 2010, 11:28:01 PM »
FFS, Amnesia: The Dark Descent is one of the most oppressive games I've ever played.
nat

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8455 on: December 23, 2010, 11:40:16 PM »
Hmmm. I like Nier but Bayo's got me addicted. I'm replaying chapters over and over just to get a better score.

This is the real DMC4.  8)

You're only a year late!

BTW, Bayonetta PS3 gets trashed because Platinum Games didn't develop it.  They made the 360 version and some internal team at Sega ported it over.  It suffers from frame rate problems and has shittier textures/graphics overall in comparison.  IIRC someone said if you drop the PS3 resolution down to 480P (:lol) the game runs a lot smoother. 

And in your case, let ignorance be bliss...don't go see what you're missing.

Is that team Angel whatever in the opening credits?
IYKYK

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8456 on: December 23, 2010, 11:41:49 PM »
Nope

Also, I'm pretty sure Himu is trollin yall. Hes not that stupid... for a black guy
fat

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8457 on: December 23, 2010, 11:43:32 PM »
shush.
IYKYK

Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8458 on: December 23, 2010, 11:53:34 PM »
Grindin' like a mother fucker in Gundam Musou 3. I need to get 20 characters up to a Relation Level of 4 or higher to advance the big crazy storyline... I've got 11 at 4 or higher, time to grind.
野球

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: What are you playing?
« Reply #8459 on: December 24, 2010, 04:03:20 PM »
bayonetta  :wtf


edit: so far it's pretty good but not amazing.
« Last Edit: December 24, 2010, 04:57:14 PM by fistfulofmetal »
nat