That's not true. I think most of it is garbage (which it is), but there are some things I like. You have already flip-flopped in this thread, starting it out all hyped up for the WWE, then calling it mediocre, and now you have a hard-on for it again for whatever reason.
I can't remember- did you watch wrasslin' back in the 80s/90s? If not, maybe that's why you don't hate what's on there now. It's total crap. I think it HAS improved in some ways, but it is still grade A wrestlecrap all the way.
Naw, I didn't flip flop, it's just...inconsistent, but they're clearly trying and I get a lot of enjoyment at least once a week from their programming, just not on Raw. Some weeks are good, some are really middling. Sometimes the writing and booking drives me batshit, but I still find it entertaining. I'm open-minded about the future, especially because of NXT, the handling of The Shield, the handling of Ryback in recent months, and Cesaro. Their use of talent from the indies and developmentals has been spot on. Talent wise, I don't think there has ever been a point in the company's history where they have had as much pure workers assembled as they do now. 2013 could be a fantastic year if utilized well.
As for your second question, I started watching wrestling in the 80's/early 90's but didn't become a huge fan until 1997. I watched WWF Attitude Era and WCW every week, went to local independent shows;etc. and I think people put the 90's, particularly the late 90's on a ridiculously stupid pedestal. You constantly complain in this very thread that the titles mean nothing currently, but in the late 90's, titles changed every two weeks.
Here's some real talk: Internet wrestling community warriors who parade the Attitude Era as perfection are nothing more than nostalgia addled idiots.
1999 WWF was fucking awful. 1999 WCW was fucking awful. The fuckery was high. Storylines rarely had endings, NWO certainly didn't have a good ending and it was one of the biggest stables in the history of wrestling. Fucking Wolf Pac? Really? Latino World Order? NWO 2000 with Jeff fucking JARRETT?
- The Union stable. Haha. Remember this? You probably don't. Mick Foley, Big Show, Ken Shamrock...Test? Haha. That fizzled out fast!
Shit.
- Owen Hart comes back as the Blue Blazer? What the FUCK.
SHIT- Interferences or run ins EVERY SINGLE MATCH IS A DQ. Why? Who the fuck cares why?
SHIT- Let's make the belts mean jack shit by having them change hands every two weeks! Kofi Kingston having the IC belt has more prestige. Fuck outta here with that notalgia shit.
SHIT- Storylines were routinely dropped at the flip of a hat (aforementioned Union).
SHIT- THIS is what you thought was good:
<--
SHIT!There's your Attitude Era.
But naw, late 90's pro wrestling was just perfect, mayne.
Fucking nostalgia tards. And you talk about how bad WWE is now? Maybe it's just that you're older, or maybe it's the fact that deep down you just really can't hack the pro wrestling WWE style anymore.
My overall point is that current WWE is not as bad as you think it is, and more than that, it's certainly on an upswing. But no, you have to go on about how terrible it is, week in, week out. Even I, with the acknowledgement that it can be average at times, see the potential and keep watching because I'm entertained. Please exit this thread until you can actually contribute instead of being a nostalgia 90's fellatio tard. The real kicker is the pretense that you are right because
wrestling used to be so much better! when it also used to be so much worse.
I remember WWF being so bad in 2000/2001 that I just stopped watching it. It's okay breh, if you think it's terrible do what normal human beings do. Masochism ain't healthy.